Title: WHAT IS THE ALABAMA READING INITIATIVE
1WHAT IS THE ALABAMA READING INITIATIVE?
2- A statewide movement
- Anchored by reading research
- Aimed at ultimately achieving
- grade-level reading for all of
- Alabamas public school students
2
3HOW IS IT ACHIEVING ITS GOAL?
- Through intensive teacher development efforts
that are the heart and soul of the initiative.
3
4HOW ARE READING INITIATIVE SCHOOLS SELECTED?
- It is voluntary
- Schools are selected from a pool of applicants
who make 7 commitments
4
5SEVEN COMMITMENTS OF ARI SCHOOLS
- 1. Set 100 literacy as a goal.
- 2. Achieve commitment of at least 85 percent of
faculty. - 3. Attend the 10-day training program.
- 4. Be led by the principal.
5
6SEVEN COMMITMENTS OF ARI SCHOOLS
- 5. Adjust their reading instruction accordingly.
- 6. Model research-based reading instruction for
other schools. - 7. Be evaluated by an outside evaluator.
6
7GROWTH IN THE NUMBER OF ARI SCHOOLS
- 16 schools in 1998-1999
- 81 schools in 1999-2000
- 267 schools in 2000-2001
- 423 schools in 2001-2002
- 449 schools in 2002-2003
7
8BUILDING CAPACITY
- Trained 17,000 teachers
- Trained 300 reading coaches
- Certified 500 trainers
- Provided technical assistance
- through 15 regional coaches
8
9EARLY SUCCESSES
- 1,500,000 in contributions from businesses,
professional organizations, and government
supported the first two training efforts. - 17,000 teachers in the 449 schools gave rave
reviews to the first training institutes. -
9
10EARLY SUCCESSES
- The Alabama legislature has
- appropriated funds for 4 years
6,000,000, 10,000,000, 11,300,000, and
12,500,000. - Three outside evaluators report that students in
ARI schools score better than students in
comparison schools.
10
11NATIONAL ATTENTION
- Wrote Alabamas story in the Winter 1999 journal
published by the National Education Association. - Received the State innovation award from the
Education Commission of the States in August
2002, for exemplary policy related to literacy.
11
12NATIONAL ATTENTION
- Were awarded one of first three Reading
- First grants in July, 2002 (102,000,000
- over six years).
- Spotlighted at White House Reading
- Summit in September, 2002.
- Were featured in U.S. Department of
- Education publication, The Achiever in
- November, 2002.
12
13HOW ALABAMA READING INITIATIVE (ARI) AND
SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES (SES) COOPERATED
EARLY 1996-2000
13
14COMMON GOAL All students learn to read well.
All Students Read Well
SES
ARI
14
15RELATIONSHIP
All Students Read Well
- SBRR
- Intervention (3-12)
- Prevention (K-2)
- Professional Development
- Voluntary Approach
SES
ARI
15
16WAYS WE ASSISTED EACH OTHER EARLY
- Taking SBRR to High Schools
- Securing National Resources
- Seeking the best and brightest to serve
- on committees and as trainers
- Participating in each others training
- sessions
- Advocating for early assessment (K-2)
- of reading progress
16
17WHY IS THIS CONTEXT IMPORTANT?
- Had Already Established A Goal of ALL
- Students Reading on Grade Level
- Had Already Set the Expectation of Having A
Research-based Program - Had Already Established A Climate of
- Voluntary Competition
- Had Already Developed Professional Development
Modules on Five Essential Components and a Cadre
of Certified Professional Development Providers
17
18FINDINGS FROM THE ALABAMA READING INITIATIVE
EVALUATIONS
18
1919
2020
21ARI Schools Stanford 9 Reading Scores
Cumulative Reading Comprehension Gains
Chart 1
1.8
1.8
Data is based on gains
1.6
Cohort 1
of individual students
relative to their scores
1.4
Cohort 2
one year earlier
Cohort 3
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.1
NCE Point Gain Relative to non-ARI Schools
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.0
Cohort 1 16 Schools Cohort 2 65 Schools Cohort
3 186 Schools TOTAL 267 Schools
21
22ARI Schools Stanford 9 Reading Scores
Average Reading Comprehension Gains, by Grade
Level
Chart 3
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
NCE Points Relative to Non-ARI Schools
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Elementary
Middle
High
22
23OTHER HIGHLIGHTS FROM SPECIFIC EVALUATIONS
- Year 2 - Population of struggling readers
decreased by 10 - Year 2 - Discipline referrals decreased
- - 67 after two years
- - 23 in first year
- Year 2 - Special Education referrals decreased
- - by 28 over two years
- - by 14 in one year
-
23
24HIGHLIGHTS FROM SPECIFIC EVALUATIONS
- Year 4 - Cohorts 1, 2, and 3 are still faring
well. Gains are not yet visible in Cohort
4. - Year 4 - In higher-achieving schools
- Systematic phonics programs are used more
frequently school-wide - Code emphasis reading programs are used more
frequently with struggling readers
24
25TAKING VARIABLE PERFORMANCE SERIOUSLY
25
26FACT
- The Year 3 Evaluation of the ARI and the Year 1
Evaluation of Reading Excellence Act (REA)
identified 78 out of 267 schools where gains were
less than the gains made by non-participating
schools.
26
27WHAT WE CHANGED IMMEDIATELY
- Halted the rapid expansion of ARI and
- put more emphasis on ongoing
- professional development
- Recertified Cohort 1 schools
- Retooled the 78 schools not making
- sufficient progress
27
28WHAT WE CHANGED IMMEDIATELY
- Used Put Reading First as training text
- Devoted 50 of professional
- development time to
- - modeling with students
- - having teachers practice with students
- Offered DIBELS assessment to 323 ARI
- schools
28
29TRANSITION TO READING FIRST (ARFI)
29
30IN TARGARETED READING FIRST SCHOOLS
- Required the purchase of a scientifically based
- comprehensive reading program from a short
list of - programs approved by the SDE.
- Required each ARFI school to hire a full time
reading - coach.
- Are preparing ARFI principals, reading coaches,
and - district reading coordinators to assume
their instructional - leadership roles.
- Will hold two monthly professional development
meetings - for the ARFI reading coaches to build SBRR
expertise in - every ARFI school.
30
31FOR STATEWIDE IMPACT
- Will administer DIBELS
- statewide in 2003-2004.
- Will provide professional
- development to all K, 1, 2, and 3
- teachers beginning in 2003,
- utilizing Teacher Reading
- Academies.
31
32PROVIDING LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT
- Hired nine additional reading
- coaches to work only with the
- ARFI-eligible LEAs in 2002 and
- the selected ARFI schools in 2003.
- Dedicated the equivalent of two full-
- time senior ARI staff to ARFI.
32
33TOWARD COORDINATEDSTATEWIDE READINGACTIVITY
33
34Four Sections Within the SEA are Currently
Involved in Literacy-related Activities
- Alabama Reading Initiative (ARFI)
- Special Education Services (BRM,
- Language!, Direct Instruction)
- Federal Programs (NCLB)
- Classroom Improvement (Standards,
- Assessment, Textbooks, Assistance to
- Failing Schools)
34
35- Standards Revised reading standard
- Assessment Replaced state-developed K-2
- assessments with DIBELS.
- Accountability Four sections have worked
- together extensively.
- Professional Development Agreed to use
- Teacher Reading Academies to train both
- K, 1, 2, and 3 teachers over next four years,
- currently working on a joint principal
- professional development effort.
35
36- Instructional Materials Federal Programs is
- promoting programs approved for ARFI
- schools, and we could impact the textbook
- review process.
- Monitoring Regional coaches provide constant
- feedback to state staff regarding
implementation - Federal Programs will provide outside
- monitoring.
- Management Department Management Team
- holds meetings periodically. All four
sections - participate on State Reading Leadership Team.
36
37LEADERSHIP
37
38- Any worthwhile endeavor
- necessarily involves obstacles.
- The more worthwhile the
- endeavor, the more the obstacles.
- Leaders must inspire others to
- overcome obstacles.
38
39- Knowing how to do a job is the
- accomplishment of labor.
- Showing others how to do a job is the
- accomplishment of teaching.
- Making sure that the work is done is
- the accomplishment of management.
- Inspiring others to do better work is
- the accomplishment of leadership.
39
40CONTACT INFORMATION
- Website www.alsde.edu
- Click Sections
- Click Alabama Reading Initiative
- Click Alabama Reading First
Initiative - Contact Katherine Mitchell
- kmitchll_at_alsde.edu
- 334-353-1570
40