PRESENTATION TO THE

1

PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON
HOUSING (NATIONAL ASSEMBLY)
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON
HOUSING (NATIONAL ASSEMBLY)
2ND APRIL 2003
2nd APRIL 2003
KEVIN DUNCAN VICTOR MATLOU
Kevin Duncan
Victor Matlou
2

AGENDA
AGENDA

• BACKGROUND
• THE REINVENTION OF THUBELISHA
• HOMES
• THE NEW FUTURES
• 3 YEAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
• CONSTRAINTS TO DELIVERY
• QUO VADIS
• QUESTIONS ANSWERS

• 1. BACKGROUND
• THE REINVENTION OF THUBELISHA
• HOMES
• 3. THE NEW FUTURES
• 4. 3 YEAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
• 5 CONSTRAINTS TO DELIVERY
• 6. QUO VADIS?
• 7. QUESTIONS ANSWERS
• - 2 -

3

• BACKGROUND
• 1.1 ORIGINAL PURPOSE
• To make a substantial contribution on a national
  basis to normalisation of the low cost housing
  market through the provision of appropriate
  rightsizing houses for qualifying
  beneficiaries.
• 1.2 PERFORMANCE TO DATE ( 4443 units )
• Houses constructed per Province
• - 3 -

• BACKGROUND
• 1.1 ORIGINAL PURPOSE
• To make a substantial contribution on a national
  basis to normalisation of the low cost housing
  market through the provision of appropriate
  rightsizing houses for qualifying
  beneficiaries.
• 1.2 PERFORMANCE TO DATE (4443 units)
• (Houses constructed per Province)

4
-4 -

• 1.3 PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED
• R2479 own contribution
• Ineffective evictions
• In-situ rightsizing
• Illegal occupations

• 1.3 PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED
• R2479 own contribution
• Ineffective evictions
• In-situ rightsizing
• Illegal occupations

5

2. THE REINVENTION OF THUBELISHA
HOMES WHY REINVENTION AND NOT INCREMENTAL
IMPROVEMENT? 2.1 THE FUTURE IS NOT WHAT IT USED
TO BE! - Rightsizing potential reduced from
17000 to 11000 2.2 DOING THE SAME
THING BETTER WOULD NOT GUARANTEE SUCCESS -
External factors override good planning 2.3 THE
NEED TO OFFER THE DEPARTMENT A BETTER
RETURN - Assist with implementation of National
Priorities. - 5 -
2. THE REINVENTION OF THUBELISHA HOMES
WHY REINVENTION AND NOT INCREMENTAL
IMPROVEMENT? 2.1 THE FUTURE IS NOT WHAT IT USED
TO BE! - Rightsizing potential reduced from
17000 to 11000 2.2 DOING THE SAME
THING BETTER WOULD NOT GUARANTEE SUCCESS -
External factors override good planning 2.3 THE
NEED TO OFFER THE DOG A BETTER RETURN - assist
with implementation of National
Priorities.
6
- 6 -
3. THE NEW FUTURES WE ARE THE FUTURE OF THE
CREATION OF OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH
HOUSING DISTINCTIVE PROGRAMMES 3.1
RIGHTSIZING - Servcon clients - Aged disabled
vs waiting list 3.2 PEOPLES HOUSING PROCESS
(PHP) - Secondary/primary support
organisation - Capacitate and implement for
Local Authorities 3.3 EMERGING CONTRACTOR
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME - Requested by Department
to spearhead - In conjunction with NHBRC
NURCHA - Women in Construction

• THE NEW FUTURES
• WE ARE THE FUTURE OF THE CREATION OF
  OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH HOUSING
• 3.1 RIGHTSIZING
• - Servcon clients
• - Aged disabled vs waiting list
• 3.2 PEOPLES HOUSING PROCESS (PHP)
• - Secondary/primary support
  organisation
• - Capacitate and implement for Local
• Authorities
• 3.3 EMERGING CONTRACTOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
• - Requested by Department to spearhead
• - In conjunction with NHBRC --- Women in
  Construction

7
- 7 -

• 3 YEAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

• 3 YEAR FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

8
(No Transcript)
9
- 9 -
10
- 10 -

• CONSTRAINTS TO DELIVERY
• 5.1 LAND
• - Availability
• - Cost
• 5.2 LEGAL
• - Environmental Impact Assessment
• - Deeds Office
• - Surveyor Generals Office
• - Illegal Occupants
• - Support by SAPS for evictions
• 5.3 LOCAL AUTHORITIES
• - Service Level Agreements
• - Councillors involvement
• 5.4 POLICY
• - R2479 own contribution
• - Differing Interpretation

• CONTRAINTS TO DELIVERY
• 5.1 LAND
• Availability
• - Cost
• 5.2 LEGAL
• - Environmental Impact Assessment
• (EIA)
• - Deeds Office
• - Surveyor Generals Office
• - Illegal Occupants
• - Support by SAPS for evictions
• 5.3 LOCAL AUTHORITIES
• - Service Level Agreements
• - Councillors involvement in subsidy
• applications
• 5.4 POLICY
• - R2479 own contribution
• - Interpretation (particularly
• PHP)

11
- 11 -

• QUO VADIS?
• TO BECOME THE ORGANISATION OF CHOICE
• FOR MUTUALLY AGREEABLE GOVERNMENT
• LINKED HOUSING AUTHORITIES/AGENCIES
• BY PROVIDING THEM WITH IMPLEMENTATION
• SOLUTIONS FOR PROJECTS IN PURSUANCE
• OF THE NATIONAL PRIORITIES

• QUO VADIS?
• TO BECOME THE ORGANISATION OF CHOICE
• FOR MUTUALLY AGREEABLE GOVERNMENT
• LINKED HOUSING AUTHORITIES/AGENCIES
• BY PROVIDING THEM WITH IMPLEMENTATION
• SOLUTIONS FOR PROJECTS IN PURSUANCE
• OF THE NATIONAL PRIORITIES

12
- 12 -
7. QUESTIONS ANSWERS
7. QUESTIONS ANSWERS