Residential mobility and social segregation in Amsterdam 18901940 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Residential mobility and social segregation in Amsterdam 18901940

Description:

What do residential mobility and segregation tell us about ... Reformed dutch. Catholic. Jewish. Other religion. No religion. Zone_end_new. Model. 1. B. Std. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: hen89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Residential mobility and social segregation in Amsterdam 18901940


1
Residential mobility and social segregation in
Amsterdam 1890-1940
  • Henk Laloli
  • NIWI-KNAW
  • Amsterdam

2
Aim of the study
  • Relate individual residential mobility patterns
    to changes in social segregation

Questions
  • Do we see a residential mobility pattern of
    moving out of the centre in the sample?
  • Did these moves contribute to social
    segregation?
  • What do residential mobility and segregation
    tell us about urban development?

3
Sources and subjects
  • City and neighbourhood level tax and housing rent
    data
  • Sample of dockworkers or casual workers from the
    population register
  • Who?
  • The poorest people in the city with on and off
    jobs, high fertility, very low incomes

4
Amsterdam development
5
(No Transcript)
6
Residential mobility
7
  • Dockworkers distribution differs from city
    population
  • Change does not keep pace with city population

8
Residential mobility
  • Two cohorts addresses starting round 1900 and
    after 1909 to 1930s
  • Dockworkers move to new areas
  • They keep living near the harbour
  • Their distribution is very different from the
    general population overrepresented in old city
    and working-class districts

9
How could they move to the new areas?
  • The new areas generally have higher rents

10
Regression analysis on low rent housing of
workers last adresses in 1930s
  • New zones few low rents
  • Working class areas high on
  • low rents

11
(No Transcript)
12
  • Dockworkers live around the harbour in the old
    city
  • Not in elite or middle class districts

13
  • Elite spreads from old centre to the south
  • Dockworkers remain around harbour

14
  • Dockworkers live in low rent areas
  • Concentrated in the old centre

15
  • They move to low rent areas, also in new areas

16
Income segregation
17
(No Transcript)
18
Impact of the crisis of the 1930s
19
(No Transcript)
20
General conclusions
  • Dockworkers live in the areas with low rent
    housing and lowest income segregated
  • They continue to do so when they move
  • They dont keep pace with general population in
    terms of distribution over new areas
  • Work place and housing rent influence residential
    choice
  • Dockworkers are able to move to low rent housing
    in new areas
  • Municipality builts low rent housing in new areas
  • They live in housing built by municipality?

21
City development
  • Social segregation
  • Social classes are spatially segregated but
    economic development softens this until 1930
  • Crisis of the 1930s increases segregation again
    (rents weigh higher on budget)
  • Old city degradation?
  • Loss of population elite, middle class diminish
  • Still a mixed area inner core tends to CBD, part
    of elite remains
  • After 1930 working-class districts decline
  • Social differences between zones of development?
  • Housing quality (rents) and health differ between
    old and new
  • Income differences are spread inside the zones
  • Working-class areas in old and new zones grow
    nearer in income level
  • Spatial social segration
  • Takes the form of an opposition between the south
    and rest
  • Residential mobility pattern of working-class
  • outward movement into newly built areas like
    other classes (but more restricted)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com