Title: BroadWay
1IST BroadWay A 5/60GHz hybrid system concept
2Strategy for migrating towards higher frequencies
- The vision
- extend and complement 5GHz broadband wireless LAN
systems in the 60GHz range for providing a new
solution to very dense urban deployments and hot
spot coverage without sacrificing the user
throughput expectations - guarantee nomadic terminal mobility in
combination with higher throughput - The key objectives
- bridge the 5GHz band and 59-65GHz bands by
conceiving a dual frequency hybrid WLAN - granting smooth evolution from existing 5GHz OFDM
to 60GHz - allowing backward compatibility to 5GHz systems
- providing total system throughput gt350Mbps
through bandwidth expansion - philosophy restrict proliferation of
heterogeneous technologies, 60GHz HIPERSPOT based
on extensions of current 5GHz OFDM hardware - Leverage existing 5GHz products for a low cost
60GHz product - The BroadWay composite system is based on
- HIPERLAN/2 TDD/TDMA OFDM high spectrum efficiency
technology _at_5GHz - HIPERSPOT an innovative ad-hoc extension _at_60GHz
- HIPERLAN/2 and HIPERSPOT is the Way to Broadband
communications BroadWay!
3BroadWay project architecture and partners
- WP breakdown
- WP1 Application scenario and overall system
specification - WP2 Link layer, convergence layer architecture
and implementation - WP3 Advanced baseband architecture and key
solutions - WP4 Low cost integrated RF front-end and key
solutions - WP5 Industrial dissemination
- Partners major role
- Motorola (MOT)
- new baseband solution, provider of InP QMMIC
technology, RF module design, ad-hoc - Technische Universitaet Dresden (TUD)
- advanced baseband architecture (design,
performance, prototyping) - Farran (FAR)
- dual mode RF architectures antenna design joint
antenna/RF-FE integration, system packaging - TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory (TNO)
- MAC extension for ad-hoc, 5/60GHz RF modules
design and characterization - Institut fuer Mobil und Satellitenfunktechnik GmH
(IMST) - antennas design at 5/60GHz
- Intracom (ICOM)
- Ad-hoc, routing preserving QoS, vertical hadoffs
4Overall planning
5- Ad-Hoc Networking issues
- in BROADWAY
6BroadWay Networking Summary
- A Centralized Architecture is considered
- the AP is responsible for all decisions
- Routing, Clustering, Neighborhood Discovery (ND)
initiation - information is collected at 5 GHz and is sent to
the AP - Clusters are created depending on
- geographical information (constructed by the ND
phase) - MTs that are close is possible to communicate
- the resource needs of the MTs
- MTs that need to exchange data are possible to
communicate - An enhanced protocol stack is defined to support
the networking proposal in BroadWay
7The Cluster
- A Cluster
- operates at a specific channel at 60 GHz
- has a Cluster Head (CH) responsible for all
communications - consists of a number of MTs operating at the same
channel at 60 GHz - each MT can communicate with the CH
- is allowed to be active for a number of frames
before switching to 5 GHz - is possible to contain Forwarding Nodes (FN) to
enable inter-cluster communication
Cluster Head
60 GHz Range
60 GHz Data Flow
Mobile Terminal
Intra-cluster Communication
Cluster Head
60 GHz Range
Forwarding Node
60 GHz Data Flow
Mobile Terminal
Inter-cluster Communication
8APs Supervision
- 5 GHz
- has the standard role of the AP
- is responsible to initiate a Neighborhood
Discovery (ND) phase - collects information
- neighborhood and resource requirements
- based on the collected information it decides
- on the clusters
- CHs, frequency channels, set of MTs, number of
frames that a cluster is allowed to operate - on feasible routes
- FNs are determined whenever it is feasible
- provides each CH, FN or MT at 60 GHz with
- routing and clustering information
- 60 GHz
- participates in ND phases
- is always a CH
- MTs close to the AP at 60 GHz always belong to
its cluster
9Different Roles of a MT
- 5 GHz
- operates as standard MT
- receives messages from the AP
- to start a ND phase
- to become part of a cluster
- 60 GHz
- participates in ND phases
- CH receives corresponding message from the AP
including - clustering and routing information including
- FN receives corresponding message from the AP
including - clustering and routing information
- frequency channels of the adjacent cluster for
the switching in between - MT receives corresponding message from the AP
- similar role to that of the standard MT at 60 GHz
(CH has the role of the AP at 60 GHZ)
10Finite State Machine for the different roles of a
MT
11Snapshot of BroadWay Network Architecture (BWNA)
AP
CH
Access Point
5 GHz Range
AP
Cluster Head
60 GHz Range
Forwarding Node
5 GHz Data Flow
Mobile Terminal
60 GHz Data Flow
12DLCCL Architecture for BWNA Support
Access Point
NCE Node Communication Entity
NCE
Cluster
prtpr
Specific
messages
MH
Ethernet
Information
CH_R_table
CH_C_table
BWSSCS
BWSSCS BroadWay Service Specific Convergence
Sublayer
MAC_ID_table
FN_table
NDI
BWR
Next ND
C_table
Phase
MTi
_table
MFL
BWRR_table
ND_table
NDP
RN
FL_table
BWDLC BroadWay Data Link Control
BWDLC
AP_table
ND
ND
messages
Control Plane
User Plane
Note MTs architecture is a simplified version
of the APs
13Modules, Tables and Information Flow
- BWDLC
- Neighborhood Discovery (ND) Discovers the
connectivity between nodes at 60 GHz - output AP_table (MTi_table for each of the MTs)
- BWSSCS
- Monitor Flows (MFL) Monitoring of the resources
for a data session - input MAC_ID_table, output FL_table
- Resource Needs (RN) Estimation of the resources
for a data session - input FL_table, output BWRR_table
- Neighborhood Discovery Processing (NDP) merging
of ND information - input AP_table plus MTi_tables, output ND_table
- Neighborhood Discovery Initiator (NDI) Decides
on the next ND phase - input ND_table, output Next ND Phase
- BroadWay Routing (BWR) Cluster and routing
information - input ND_table and BWRR_table, output C_table,
FN_table - NCE
- Message Handler (MH) responsible to send/receive
information to the MTs - input C_table and FN_table, output CH_C_table,
CH_R_table, Cluster Specific information, prtpr
messages
14BroadWay Routing (BWR)
- BWR is responsible for two major
algorithms/decisions - Clustering
- set of MTs that will form a cluster
- CH
- number of frames that a cluster is active
- Routing
- set of FNs
- Each of the above is subject to a particular
trade-off
15BWR Trade-Off (1)
- Set of MTs present in a cluster
- MTs that are close and have data to exchange is
not mandatory to belong to the same cluster - other data connections might be open requiring
data exchanges - CH
- connectivity with all nodes in the network is
required - Increased number of frames that a cluster is
active - increased throughput
- - small amount of data needed to exchanged with
MTs outside the cluster are delayed - problem changes to topology (e.g. mobility)
cause link failures - if this is the case no increased throughput is
achieved
16BWR Trade-Off (2)
- Set of FNs
- Switching between different channels at 60 GHz is
required - expensive
- Tight synchronization requirements
- each CH needs to be aware when a FN is present at
its cluster - Data traffic between clusters is forwarded
through FNs - they become the bottleneck link
- Ideas
- More than one FNs if possible
- Prioritization of their traffic
17Current BWR Algorithm
- So far a simple one
- step 1 check connectivity between two MTs
- step 2 check resource demands these two MTs
- step 3 if no other resource demand exists that
step 1 is not satisfied then put those MTs in the
same cluster - step 4 elect as CH the MT that is connected with
all MTs in the cluster - Allow number of frames that are less than the
next ND phase - Extensive simulations will provide information
for the fine tuning of BWR - scheduled for the last 6 months of the project
(6/04 until 12/04)