Title: Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement
1Engine Nacelle Halon Replacement
2PRESENTATION CONTENTS
- OVERVIEW OF THE EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY
- EXAMPLE OF MASS EQUIVALENCE
- EXAMPLE OF GAS CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE
- RESULTS TO DATE, TABULAR
- RESULTS TO DATE, PARTIAL GRAPHICAL
- CONCLUSORY STATEMENTS
3EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY - OVERVIEW
- EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY
- OVERVIEW
4EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY - OVERVIEW
- TESTING OCCURS IN A FIXTURE CONTAINING SALIENT
FEATURES OF THE ENGINE NACELLE ENVIRONMENT - THE EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY IS TWO-PART
- ESTABLISH A MASS EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN AGENTS BASED
ON FIRE EXTINCTION PERFORMANCE - A H1301 BENCHMARK IS ESTABLISHED
- THE REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE QUANTITY IS CHANGED
UNTIL THE H1301 BENCHMARK IS MET OR EXCEEDED - ESTABLISH A CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE BASED ON
AGENT DISTRIBUTION BEHAVIOR OF THE MASS
EQUIVALENT - GAS ANALYSIS IS USED TO CAPTURE PERFORMANCE
- TIES BACK TO FIRE EXTINCTION PERFORMANCE
- PROCESS IS REPEATED IN 4 EQUIVALENCE ITERATIONS
TO FIND THE LARGEST EQUIVALENT CONCENTRATION (2
ventilation conditions x 2 fire threats)
5IMAGERY - TEST FIXTURE
6EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt I, MASS
- EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY, PART I
- MASS EQUIVALENCE
7EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt I, MASS
- TEST FIXTURE VENTILATION IS SET TO 1 OF 2 POINTS
- THE OBJECT IS TO BRACKET SYSTEM BEHAVIOR
- HIGH VENTILATION (HiVent) 2.2 LBM/S _at_ 100F
- LOW VENTILATION (LoVent) 1.0 LBM/S _at_ 260F
- H1301 CERTIFICATION IS KNOWN FOR BOTH CASES
- AGENT IS STORED AT 100F
- AGENT DISCHARGE IS 1 SECOND
- H1301 BENCHMARK (FIRE TESTING) IS ACCOMPLISHED
WITH THE APPLICABLE CERTIFICATION PROFILE - H1301 DISTRIBUTION IS REASONABLY SYMMETRIC
- DISCHARGE IS NOT DIRECTED AT THE FIRE THREAT
- MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 5 FT SEPARATES AGENT
INJECTION AND THE FLAME FRONTS
8IMAGERY SAMPLING PROBE LOCATIONS, SPRAY
9IMAGERY TYPICAL H1301 CERTIFICATION GRAPH,
HiVent
10IMAGERY TYPICAL H1301 CERTIFICATION GRAPH,
LoVent
11IMAGERY SAMPLING PROBE LOCATIONS, POOL
12EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt I, MASS
- DEFINING THE H1301 BENCHMARK
- DETERMINED FOR EACH EQUIVALENCE ITERATION
- EQUIVALENCE ITERATION VENTILATION FIRE
THREAT - POOL FIRE THREAT JP8
- ? 150F _at_ 220 IN2 x 0.5IN DEEP
- ELECTRICAL ARC REMAINS ON DURING AGENT INJECTION
- SPRAY FIRE THREAT JP8, LUBRICANT OR HYDRAULIC
FLUID - ? 150F _at_ 0.25 GPM
- FUEL SPRAY ELECTRICAL ARC REMAIN ON DURING
AGENT INJECTION - FUEL SPRAY STRIKES HOT SURFACE DURING AGENT
INJECTION - RESULT FROM 1 FIRE TEST REIGNITION TIME DELAY
(RTD) - RTD time (FIRE EXTINCTION) time (FIRE
REIGNITION) - RTD IS ASSESSED FROM VIDEO RECORD OF EACH FIRE
TEST - H1301 BENCHMARK AVERAGED RTDs FROM 5 REPEATED
FIRE TESTS RTD_ave (H1301)
13IMAGERY - SPRAY FIRE ZONE
14IMAGERY - POOL FIRE ZONE
15EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt I, MASS
- PROCESS
- SELECT CONDITIONS FROM 1 OF 4 EQUIVALENCE
ITERATIONS - HiVent, JP8 SPRAY OR POOL FIRE THREAT
- LoVent, LUBRICANT SPRAY OR JP8 POOL FIRE THREAT
- ESTABLISH H1301 BENCHMARK WITH 5 REPEATED FIRE
TESTS - FIND EQUIVALENT MASS OF THE REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE
- COMPARISION BASIS AVERAGE RTD OF 5 REPEATED
TESTS - EQUIVALENCE DEFINED AS
- RTD_ave (H1301) ? RTD_ave (EQUIVALENT MASS)
- IF A SPRAY FIRE THREAT, USE EQUIVALENT MASS AND
VERIFY SUCCESS AGAINST OTHER FUELS - HiVent VERIFICATION LUBRICANT HYDRAULIC FLUID
- LoVent VERIFICATION JP8
- REPEAT 3 TESTS FOR EACH FUEL
- SUCCESS DEFINED AS
- RTD_ave (EQUIVALENT MASS) ? RTD_ave (VERIFICATION)
16EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt II, CONCENTRATION
- EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY, PART II
- CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE
17EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt II, CONCENTRATION
- TREATING THE VOLUMETRIC GAS CONCENTRATION AS THE
PAREMETER FOR EQUIVALENCE (NOT CITING ANY MASS
EQUIVALENCE!!) - REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE IS DELIVERED THROUGH
NON-OPTIMIZED PLUMBING - SOME NON-OPTIMIZED QUANTITY OF THE REPLACEMENT
CANDIDATE WILL STILL ACHIEVE PARITY WITH H1301
BENCHMARK - CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENCE EVALUATED AT THE FLAME
FRONT ONLY (2 CHANNELS PER TEST)!! - EQUIVALENT GAS CONCENTRATION IS BASED ON
- CAPTURED GAS ANALYSIS DATA
- FIRE EXTINCTION BEHAVIOR
18EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt II, CONCENTRATION
- PROCESS
- CAPTURE GAS DISTRIBUTION OF THE EQUIVALENT MASS
WITH 3 REPEATED TESTS - COLLECT THE 2 FLAME FRONT CURVES FOR EACH TEST
- TRANSFORM FLAME FRONT, GAS CONCENTRATION CURVES
- CURVES ARE TYPICALLY CAPTURED TO ILLUSTRATE
EXPONENTIAL GROWTH/DECAY (i.e. CERTIFICATION
TEST) - TRANSFORM EACH CURVE TO CONCENTRATION vs.
DURATION_at_CONCENTRATION - CREATE A SINGLE DATA POOL OF ALL POINTS FROM THE
TRANSFORMED CURVES - MODEL THE DATA POOL WITH HIGHEST-ORDER
POLYNOMIAL, BEST-FIT FUNCTION - RECALL AVERAGE RTD FROM REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE
- USE AVERAGE RTD OF THE EQUIVALENT MASS IN THE
BEST-FIT FUNCTION TO CALCULATE EQUIVALENT
CONCENTRATION
19EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY EXAMPLE
- EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY
- EXAMPLE
20EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt I, EXAMPLE
- MASS EQUIVALENCE EXAMPLE (actual data)
- EQUIVALENCE ITERATION HiVent JP8 SPRAY FIRE
- H1301 BENCHMARK RTD_ave (H1301) 1.39 SECONDS
- REPLACEMENT CANDIDATE WORK WITH HFC-125
- EQUIVALENT MASS 8.0 LBF HFC-125
21EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt II, EXAMPLE
- EQUIVALENT CONCENTRATION EXAMPLE
- THIS EXAMPLE IS BASED UPON DATA FOR THE
DISTRIBUTION OF 8.0 LBF HFC-125 - RESTRICT DATA REVIEW TO THE 2 ANALYZER CHANNELS
LOCATED AT THE SPRAY FLAME FRONT - CALCULATION FOLLOWS IN GRAPHICAL FORMAT
- FOR SIMPLICITY IN THIS EXAMPLE
- ONE PAIR OF ANALYZER TRACES ARE SHOWN (SINGLE
TEST) - DUE TO THE REDUCED SIZE OF THE DATA POOL, THE
CALCULATION FOR THIS EXAMPLE IS NOT THE REPORTED
EQUIVALENT CONCENTRATION - PROTOCOL REQUIRES REPEATING 3 GAS DISTRIBUTION
TESTS TO PRODUCE THE DATA POOL TO MAKE THIS
CALCULATION
22EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt II, EXAMPLE
23EQUIVALENCE METHODOLOGY Pt II, EXAMPLE
ILLUSTRATION ONLY EQUIVALENCE NOT VALID
24RESULTS TO DATE
25RESULTS TO DATE - TABULAR
26RESULTS TO DATE TRANSFORMED DATA, HiVent
EQUIVALENTS
27CONCLUSORY STATEMENTS
28CONCLUSORY STATEMENTS
- CURRENTLY WORKING HFC-125 IN THE LoVent JP8 POOL
- REMAINING CF3I EQUIVALENCE ITERATIONS WILL FOLLOW
- UPON COMPLETING HFC-125/CF3I ITERATIONS, PROJECT
CONCLUDES