Case II: Testing Difference Between Means - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Case II: Testing Difference Between Means

Description:

If observed Z falls inside of the chosen Zcritical then do not reject the null hypothesis (H0) ... variable accounted for, explained by, independent variable ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: annpo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Case II: Testing Difference Between Means


1
Case II Testing Difference Between Means
  • Case II Do observations taken on two groups of
    subjects differ from one another? Do the two sets
    represent samples from identical or different
    populations?
  • Case IIa Known population standard deviation
  • Case IIb Population standard deviation not
    known

2
Case IIa Z test of Difference between Means
  • Do observations take on two groups of subjects
    differ from one another? Do the two sets
    represent samples from identical or different
    populations?
  • known population standard deviations

3
Teacher Expectancy Study
  • Sample 60 elementary children randomly selected
    and randomly assigned to experimental (bloomers)
    or control group.
  • Mean IQ of Bloomers 110.23
  • Mean IQ of control group109.57
  • Known population s.d.s (sigmas) experimental
    group 10 and control group 10
  • Is their a significant difference between
    post-test IQ between Bloomers and Controls?

4
Case IIa Design Requirements
  • One independent variable with two levels
  • Dependent variable is continuous (interval or
    ratio)
  • A subject appears in one group only
  • Population s.d. is known

5
Case IIa Assumptions
  • Scores in two groups are independent of one
    another
  • Scores in the respective populations are normally
    distributed
  • Variances of scores in two populations are equal
    (homogeneity of variance)

6
Teacher Expectancy Null and Alternative
Hypotheses
  • Assume the null hypothesis is true until proven
    guilty
  • State the Null Hypothesis
  • H0 ?Bloomers ? Control
  • H0 ? Bloomers- ? Control 0
  • State the Alternative (Research) Hypothesis
  • H1 ? Bloomers gt ? Control (directional,
    one-tailed)
  • H1 ? Bloomers- ? Control gt 0 (directional,
    one-tailed)
  • Or could have been
  • H1 ? Bloomers not ? Control
    (non-directional, two-tailed)
  • H1 ? Bloomers- ? Control not 0
    (non-directional, two-tailed)

7
Case II Same or Different Population
8
Sampling Distribution of Differences between Means

68
95
99
-1se
-2se
1se
2se
-3se
3se
0
Null Hypothesis
9
Sampling Distribution of Difference between Means
10
Teacher Expectancy Testing Hypothesis (cont)
  • Calculate the standard error of the difference of
    means 2.57
  • Calculate Zobserved by subtracting the sample
    difference of means from the known
    (hypothesized) population difference of means and
    dividing by the standard error of the difference
    of means
  • ((110.23-109.57)- (0)) /2.57
  • .66/2.57.26 standard error points
  • Evaluate against criteria (set level of
    significance)
  • Significance level .05 one-tailed 1.65
    (Zcritical)
  • Significance level .01 one-tailed 2.33
    (Zcritical)

11
Defining the Critical Area - Teacher Expectancy
Unlikely at .05
Unlikely at .01
1.65se
2.33se
0 population mean difference
12
Teacher Expectancy (cont)
  • Decision Rule
  • If Zobserved falls outside of the chosen
    Zcritical then reject the null hypothesis (H0)
  • If observed Z falls inside of the chosen
    Zcritical then do not reject the null hypothesis
    (H0)
  • Decision
  • Having picked a significance levelof .05 our
    Zobserved of .26 falls inside of the chosen
    Zcritical of 1.65 so we would not reject the null
    hypothesis
  • Conclusion

13
Making Decision -Teacher Expectancy
Z Distribution Normal Curve
One tailed test
H0 ?E - ?c 0
.26
?diff 0
2se
-2se
1se
-1se
Critical Values
1..65se
2.33se
.01
.05
p
14
Case IIb t-Test of Differences between
Independent Means
  • Do the two samples belong to an identical
    population or to a different population?
  • Population s.d. not known

15
Case IIb Design Requirements for Use of t Test
  • One independent variable with two levels
  • Dependent variable is continuous (interval or
    ratio)
  • A subject appears in one group only
  • Population s.d.s not known

16
Case IIb Assumptions
  • Scores in two groups are independent of one
    another
  • Scores in the respective populations are normally
    distributed
  • Variances of scores in two populations are equal
    (homogeneity of variance)

17
Example T-test Two Sample Independent Means
Teacher Expectancy
18
T-test for Two Sample (Independent Means) Designs
  • Set Null Hypothesis ?e - ? c 0
  • Set Alternative Hypothesis ? e - ? c gt 0
    (one-tailed)
  • Examine Assumptions of t-test
  • Independence and random sampling
  • Normality within each population
  • Homogeneity of variance (equal variance in two
    pops)
  • Decide Significance Level alpha .01
  • Compute standard error for difference between
    means 6.44

19
T-test for Two Sample (cont)
  • Locate tcritical with N-2 df tcritical (.01/1,8)
    2.896
  • Compute tobserved
  • ((116.4 -105.2)- 0)/6.44
  • 11.2/6.44 1.74
  • Decision Rule
  • Reject H0 if tobserved gt tcritical
  • Do Not Reject H0 if tobserved lt tcritical 1.74
    lt 2.896
  • Decision???
  • Conclude although difference was in expected
    direction, there is insufficient evidence to lead
    us to believe that the observed difference in our
    sample is due to anything other than chance

20
Teacher Expectancy E.g.
t Distribution Sample Sizes 5 each df8 Alpha
.01
One tailed test
H0 ?E - ?c 0
1.74
0
2se
-2se
1se
-1se
Critical Values
1.860e
2..89se
.01
.05
P
21
Teacher Expectancy 99 CI
  • (Xe-Xc) - tcritical(.01/2,8) (sxe-xc)
  • lt ue-uc lt
  • (Xe-Xc) tcritical(.01/2,8) (sxe-xc)
  • 11.2 - 2.306 (6.44) lt ue-uc lt 11.2 2.306
    (6.44)
  • 11.2 - 14.85 lt ue-uc lt 11.2 14.85
  • -3.65 lt ue-uc lt 26.05
  • 95 CI tells us that over all random samples of
    difference between means, the true value of ?e-
    ?c lies within this interval of IQ points with a
    probability of ..95

22
Assessing Practical Significance
  • Significant findings may not be practically
    significant
  • Three ways of assessing practical significance or
    strength of association
  • Strength of Association
  • Estimated Effect Size
  • Statistical Power

23
Practical Significance Strength of Association
  • After making decision to reject H0
  • The degree to which the sample data are found to
    be incompatible with the H0
  • Proportion of variance in dependent variable
    accounted for, explained by, independent variable
  • Ranges from 0-1.00

24
Practical Significance Effect Size (d)
  • .20 - weak effect
  • .33 - meaningful
  • .50 - medium effect
  • .80 - strong effect
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com