Title: Complications Where do we go from here
1ComplicationsWhere do we go from here
- Sharon Nachman
- Chair, Complications Committee
- IMPAACT
2Recent/Past Endeavors
- OI prevention
- 254, 1008
- Vaccines
- 292, 1024, 1008, 1061s, 1057, others
- Metabolic
- 1045
- Psychiatric
- 1055
3Next steps
- New sites
- Domestic
- 13 NIAID, ?NICHD
- International
- 22 NIAID, ?NICHD
- New ideas
- Not so new diseases
- New pathogens to target
- New toxicities
4From the RFA
- TB
- PKs, treatment
- Diarrhea
- Rotavirus
- Malaria
- HPV
- Hypercholesterolemia and other metabolic issues
- Bacterial prophylaxis
- Psychiatric diagnoses and therapies
5Long term follow up
- What are the scientific questions?
- Focus on new therapies
- Do we focus on ARTs or include others?
- Enroll from clinical care and PT protocols
- Stand alone study
- Not duplicate SMART or AMP
- How to develop international studies for new
adverse events?
6CCG
- Follow up into adulthood
- Delayed complications
- Effects of long term treatments
- How adolescents cope emotionally and physically
- Mental health
- Learning disabilities, neurocognitive issues,
behavioral issues - Treatment and prevention of malnutrition
- Enhancing response to TB, malaria medications
7CCG other issues
- Bone
- Cardiac
- Lipoatrophy and lipodystrophy
- Comparison of long term effects between domestic
and international cohorts
8What is open or opening soon?
- 1041
- INH prophylaxis
- International
- 1047 CLOSED!!
- HPV IN HIV youth
- Domestic
- 1065
- Menactra vaccine in HIV youth
- Domestic
- 1063
- Atorvastatin
- Domestic
- 1055
- Psychiatric disorders
- Domestic
9New ideas
- 10 capsules submitted
- TB
- Treatment (2)
- Observational trial
- TB diagnosis
- Psychosis (treatment)
- Growth hormone for truncal adiposity (treatment)
- Bone remineralization (treatment)
- Cardiac risk diagnosis
- HIV nephropathy (prevalence, pathogenesis)
- Rotavirus vaccine
10Moving up from capsule
- CS 4060 Safety and immunogenicity of a live,
attenuated, rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeqTM) in
children born to HIV-infected mothers - CAP 182C Impact of Oral Alendronate Therapy on
Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Children and
Adolescents - CAP 187C Open labeled study examining the safety
and 36 week clinical and virological outcome of
HIV infected children with pulmonary tuberculosis
(PTB) treated with TB drug regimen including
rifampicin and who are also managed with an
anti-retroviral regimen (ARV) including either
lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) added ritonavir
(RTV) or efavirenz (EFV) or nevirapine (NVP). - CAP 192C Use of an interferon gamma based
immunoassay for the diagnosis of latent
tuberculosis in HIV infected children
11(No Transcript)
12Use of an Interferon Gamma Based Immunoassay for
the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis (LTBI) in
HIV Infected Children.
- Marc Foca, MD, Philip LaRussa, MD,
- Anne Gershon, MD
- Columbia University Medical Center
13Background
- The WHOs Stop TB strategy calls for isoniazid
(INH) prophylaxis in HIV infected patients in
whom active TB has been excluded in order to
reduce the burden of active disease and spread in
these patients. - Pediatric burden of worldwide TB cases is
estimated at 15 - Prevalence of LTBI in the pediatric population is
unknown - PPD impractical in many areas
- Refrigeration
- Patient must return in 48-72 hours for reading
- New assays based on gamma interferon production
from TB specific lymphocytes could alleviate
these difficulties without overburdening
infrastructure
14Hypothesis
- An interferon gamma based immunoassay will have
improved sensitivity and specificity compared to
PPD placement for the diagnosis of latent
tuberculosis (LTBI) in an HIV infected population
of children1. - Minimal laboratory infrastructure centrifuge,
incubator, hemocytometer. Assay takes less than
24 hours to perform with a short training period. - 1. Liebeschuetz et al The Lancet 2004
3642196-2203
15Outcomes
- Groups I (PPD/CXR-) and III (PPD/CXR) would
allow an estimate of the sensitivity and
specificity of the IFN assay compared to PPD - Group II (PPD-/CXR-) would provide interesting
data on development of disease if PPD and CXR
negative subjects with a positive IFN assay go on
to develop active disease. - Group IV (PPD-/CXR) would be treated initially
for an alternative diagnosis, but follow-up would
indicate how many went on to a diagnosis of TB
16Endpoints
- Primary
- To compare the sensitivity, specificity, and
positive/negative predictive value of an
interferon gamma based assay to standard PPD
placement for the diagnosis of LTBI. - Secondary
- To provide data on the prevalence of LTBI in this
patient population - To inform prophylaxis recommendations
- Prevalence high enough to recommend blanket
prophylaxis - Prevalence low enough to offer targeted
prophylaxis
17(No Transcript)
18CAP 182C Phase I/II Trial of Oral Alendronate
for HIV Infected Youth with Low Bone Mineral
Density (BMD)
- George K Siberry, MD, MPH
- Bret J Rudy,MD
19Background Rationale
- Low BMD associated with fractures
- Low BMD in childhood -gt adult osteoporosis
- Most lifetime bone mass laid down in adolescence
- Bisphosponates (alendronate) effective in
reducing BMD loss in adults with osteoporosis - Higher rates of low BMD in HIV adults and
children (Amorosa review 2006 Obrien2001
P1045) - Additional factors TDF, PI, Depoprovera,
Nutritional status, steroids, anticonvulsants
20Background Rationale
- Alendronate (ALEN) in HIV adults with low BMD
safe and improved spine BMD (Mondy 2005) - Limited data for safety and BMD improvement in
non-HIV children with osteoporosis treated with
ALEN (Unal 2006) - No ARV interactions expected with ALEN
- Increase jaw osteonecrosis with (intravenous)
bisphosphonates (Capsoni 2006 Woo 2006) - DEXA established norms for children
- Quantitative ultrasound no radiation but very
limited data Rosso 2005
21Primary Objectives
- Compare BMD in the lumbar spine at 6, 12 and 24
months to baseline. - Estimate rates of adverse effects at 6, 12 and 24
months of alendronate use. - Compare performance of radiation-free
quantitative ultrasound to gold-standard DEXA for
measurement of BMD
22Population Study Design
- Phase I/II, 2-year trial
- Population 12-24 year old HIV
- Inclusion HIV acquired in infancy/childhood
Spinal BMD Z-score lt-2.0 - Exclusion Systemic steroids anticonvulsants
GH deficiency, 1 hyperparathyroidism, renal
failure Cushing syndrome. Active dental
infection. Significant dental/periodontal
disease. - N30 (N15 to detect 3 change in BMD)
23Study Outline
- Visits screening, entry, 6, 12, 24 months
- Treatment
- Calcium dose 1000 mg daily
- Vit D Dose 400 I.U. po daily
- Alendronate
- gt30kg 10mg daily
- 30kg 5mg daily
- Assessments (0, 6, 12, 24 months)
- DEXA Quantitative ultrasound
- Dental exams (safety)
- Blood and urine markers of bone formation and
absorption and of vitamin D status
24(No Transcript)
25Clinical and virological outcome of HIV infected
children with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB)
treated with a rifampicin-containing TB drug
regimen and anti-retroviral regimens (ARV)
including either lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r)
added ritonavir (RTV), or efavirenz (EFV) or
nevirapine (NVP)
- Shabir A Madhi
- Mark Cotton
26Background and Rationale
- Rifampicin, key anti-TB bactericidal drug, shares
drug-interactions with PIs (except ritonavir)
and NNRTIs through induction of cytochrome p-450. - Treatment of HIV infected children on ARV for TB
frequently requires the substitution of PIs and
NNRTIs - HIV infected children with TB not treated with
ARV 3.5 fold higher mortality than children on
dual TB-ARV treatment (i.e. started on ARV within
2-8 weeks of starting TB treatment) - Current 1st line ARV regimen in South Africa
- lt 3 years d4T, 3TC lopinavir/r
- 3 years d4T, 3TC, Efavirenz
- TB regimen H/R/Z x 2 months H/R x 4 (?7
months)
27Hypothesis
- Potential ARV (PI and NNRTI)-TB (rifampicin) drug
interactions may be dealt with through dose
modification of the relevant ARVs without
adversely affecting the safety, clinical
response, virological (HIV viral load) and/or
immunological outcomes (CD4 count) of dually
(TB-HIV) treated HIV infected children.
28Study groups (N50 in each)
Notes 1ARV will be initiated in all children lt
12 months of age and based on presence of
severe/advanced immunosupression using 2006 WHO
recommended CD4 threshold levels in children 12
months of age and/or based on clinical
discretion of attending physician. 2Dose
adjustment at time of initiating TB
treatment 3Inclusion of children on a NVP regimen
or switching these children to LPV/rRTV would
require additional guidance from pharmacist
29Objectives of study
- Primary objectives
- Determine the 36 week virological and
immunological outcome in HIV infected children
with PTB dually treated - To determine the safety of an ARV regimen with 2
NRTIs and either LPV/r RTV, EFV (125 dosage)
or NVP (130 dosage) in HIV infected children
dually treated with a rifampicin-containing TB
drug regimen. - Secondary objectives
- To determine the 48 week virological and
immunological outcome in HIV infected children - Describe the pharmacokinetic profile of ARVs
(LPV, RTV or EFV, or NVP) and rifampicin in HIV
infected children during the dual treatment phase
for TB-HIV. - immune-reconstitution syndrome and outcome
30Study population..
- Multi-centered study involving any site using
study ARV and TB regimen - Children aged 6-14 months with clinical or
microbiological diagnosis of PTB (exclude EPTB) - Children been stable on ARV for at least three
months or in whom ARV initiation is planned
within 2-8 weeks of initiating TB treatment - Study sample N50 per arm
- Timelines enrollment complete in 12-18 months.
31(No Transcript)
32CS4060Safety and immnunogenicity of a
live,attenuated rotavirus vaccine in
HIV-infected and uninfected children born to
HIV-infected mothersMyron Levin
33Background
- Rotaviral diarrhea is a significant health burden
in all countries, but is often especially
threatening in resource poor settings - This will be a significant problem at
international sites and will complicate the care
of children with neonatal HIV infection - Licensed rotavirus vaccines are safe and
efficacious in HIV-uninfected children - Rotavirus vaccine should be made available to
protect HIV-infected children
34Objectives
- Primary safety within 42 days after any dose in
HIV-infected and uninfected infants - Secondary
- Immunogenicity after the third dose (serum
IgA-ELISA and neutralization assays) - Shedding of vaccine strain virus
- Relationship of responses to CD4, HIV RNA, and
ART
35Design
- Contact mothers -90 to 30 days of birth
- International sites
- Test at week 8-12 for CD4 and HIV RNA (VL)
- 3-doses of 5-valent vaccine or placebo
- OPV as per standard of care
- Blood sample pre-dose and after Dose 3 repeat
CD4 and HIV RNA - Stool samples after each dose
- Weekly clinic or home visits
36Design
- Monitoring
- Enroll 20 HIV-infected with 15 CD4 and assess
before proceeding - Then continue enrolling this stratum and observe
the first 20 HIV-infected with lt 15 CD4 before
proceeding - Sample 240 each vaccine/placebo
- 80 in each group with HIV 160 uninfected
- Equal numbers with low and high CD4
37Issues
- Detects Grade 3 SAE of lt3.7 in HIV-infected
lt1.9 in uninfected at 95 C - Compare in the two groups
- SAEs - Detect 15-20 difference between vaccine
and placebo recipients - Antibody titers look for 3-folds rise in titer
- Shedding (measure of efficacy?) - exploratory
- Relate to immune status and viral load
exploratory - Accrual rate see P1041
- Design will detect infection acquired post-partum
- Copra-antibodies? (measure of mucosal immunity)
38(No Transcript)