Pixel R - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Pixel R

Description:

Development of MCM-D technology to mostly eliminate kapton hybrids has been ... Covers only US part of electronics design and prototype costs for silicon strip ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 5
Provided by: Gilch
Category:
Tags: electronics | mcm | pixel

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pixel R


1
Pixel RD
  • The useful lifetime of the innermost pixel layer
    is expected to be limited to a few years at
    design luminosity.
  • However, there are substantial uncertainties in
    the actual radiation levels and realistic
    operating voltages gt plan on replacing at least
    this layer(possibly more) early, since pixels are
    essential for tracking and required for all
    b-tagging, which is critical for high Pt physics.
  • On a somewhat longer timescale, luminosities
    beyond 1034 will require major upgrades to the
    tracking system eg. replacement of gas detectors
    by silicon(or something else), replacement of
    silicon strip detectors by pixels and increased
    radiation hardness(beyond the current 25MRad) for
    pixel detectors.
  • RD for gt1034 is very challenging(its taken us
    about 20 years to be comfortable with 1034).

2
Pixel RD Areas
  • Electronics
  • Increase/understand radiation hardness gt 100
    MRad. This looks promising but much more study
    needed.
  • Follow the technology from 0.25? to smaller
    feature sizes. Work on 0.17 ? or 0.13? can begin
    very soon.
  • Reduce pixel size below 50x400?. There is already
    significant confusion in at least innermost pixel
    layer.
  • Sensors
  • A follow on to the successful ROSE collaboration
    is starting to address the 1035 challenge.
  • Hybridization
  • Reduce the pitch of bump bonding to allow smaller
    pixels, or use redistribution in electronics.
  • Development of MCM-D technology to mostly
    eliminate kapton hybrids has been ongoing for
    some time and needs further development.
  • Mechanics and systems issues
  • Reduce material and complexity of the
    mechanics/cooling. Material reduction directly
    improves electron and photon energy resolution
    and tracking performance.
  • Complexity of current cabling/cooling is
    formidable. Reliability will be problem.
  • Radioactivation of pixel elements is already
    significant at 1034. There are as yet no good
    ideas about how to handle this for higher
    luminosities.

3
Replacement Funding Profile
4
Replacement Costs
  • Silicon RD in past years received substantial
    non-project support, which will be largely absent
    for replacement.
  • Pixel Replacement RD(2.5M)
  • For comparison, past project costs for pixel RD
    were about 2.5M(AY). Costs including other
    support were 2-3 times this value.
  • Pixel Replacement Costs(5M)
  • For comparison, current project baseline project
    costs(TPC) are 6.7M. Including non-project
    support would raise this to about 11M.
  • SCT Replacement RD Costs(0.9M)
  • Covers only US part of electronics design and
    prototype costs for silicon strip IC replacement.
  • ReadOut Driver RD and Replacement Costs(2.3M)
  • Covers RD related to replacement of pixel RODs
    to match pixel replacement. Current ROD
    TPC(including pixel RODs in management
    contingency) is about 3.5M.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com