Defining - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Defining

Description:

Co-Chair WRAP Mobile Source Forum. WRAP Board Meeting. July 24, 2002. 2 ' ... Smallest Cumulative Impact in 2018: 0.28 DV at Mesa Verde NP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: johnfko
Category:
Tags: board | defining | mesa

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Defining


1
Defining Significant Impact from Mobile Sources
and Road Dust
  • By John F. Kowalczyk
  • Co-Chair WRAP Mobile Source Forum
  • WRAP Board Meeting
  • July 24, 2002

2
Significant Impact Requirements in Section 309
  • Determine if Mobile Source Emissions or Road Dust
    Contribute Significantly to Visibility
    Impairment in any of the 16 Class I areas on the
    Colorado Plateau based on Current and Projected
    Levels.

3
Definitions
  • Mobile Sources include On-Road and Non-Road
    Engine, Evaporative and Tire and Brake Wear
    Emissions
  • Road Dust includes Paved and Unpaved
  • Analyze Mobile Impacts from Major Urban Areas
  • Analyze Road Dust Impacts from State/Reservation

4
If Mobile Source are a Significant Contributor
  • Requires State to Restrict Emissions to Projected
    Lowest Levels
  • Implement Measures to Achieve Emissions Budget
    and Demonstrate Compliance
  • Establish Emission Tracking System
  • Separate from Conformity according to EPA

5
If Road Dust is a Significant Contributor
  • Must Implement Necessary and Appropriate
    Emission Management Strategies

6
Questions
  • Significant Not Defined
  • Areas of State Not Defined
  • What to do about Inaccuracies in Modeling Road
    Dust

7
Mobile Source Forum Preliminary Recommendations
  • Three Alternative Definitions of Significant
  • Evaluate Alternatives against Modeling Results
    for Realisticness and Reasonableness
  • Choose Alternative or Revise and make Final
    Recommendation (Expect by end of Summer)
  • Consensus on Other Issues

8
Alternative Significant Contribution Definitions
  • Cumulativelt 1 DV Significance 0.5 DV
    Cumulative gt1DV Significance 0.1 DV
  • Significance 1.0DV
  • Significance 0.1 DV

9
Alternative 1 Definition of Significant
  • Two Tier Significance Level Based on Cumulative
    Impact from all 9 States
  • Cumulative Approach based on some Consistency
    with PSD/NSR and FLAG Programs

10
Alternative 1 (cont.)
  • If Cumulative Impact (CI) lt 10 of Natural
    Conditions (NC) for Avg. of 20 Most Impaired
    Days then Area of State/Reservation Significant
    is gt 5 of NC
  • If CI gt 10 of NC Significant is 1 of NC
    (Exclude any Signif. Area if in lowest 20 of CI)

11
Alternative 2
  • Individual Area of State/Reservation Approach
    (Cumulative Impact not considered)
  • Based on Impact being Perceptible
  • Perceptible in range of 0.5 DV to 2.0 DV
  • Significant threshold 1 Deciview

12
Alternative 3
  • Individual Area of State/Reservation Approach
    (Cumulative Impact not considered)
  • Based on Rule Definition of Significant as
    Contributor to Visibility Impairment not a Sole
    or Perceptible Cause of Impairment
  • Significant Threshold 1 of Natural Background
    (about 10 of a Deciview)

13
Areas of State for Mobile Source Impact Analysis
  • Counties Encompassing Urban Areas in 9-State
    Transport Regions with Populations greater than
    250,000
  • 11 Areas
  • 2 in AZ, 3 in CO, 1 in ID, 1 in NM, 2 in OR, and
    2 in UT
  • California and Nevada analyzed separately since
    electing not to go 309

14
Mobile Source Significance Trigger
  • Significant in Base Year (2003) and Future Year
    (2018) then Budget/Tracking Applies
  • Significant in Base but not Future Year and any
    pollutant reaches minimum before 2018 then
    Budget/Tracking Applies (SO2)
  • Significant in Base but not Future Year and all
    pollutants continually decrease then Future SIP
    revision, if needed, to meet Reasonable Progress
    Provision of Rule

15
Road Dust Significance Trigger
  • If Road Dust Significant in Base and Future Year
    than Further Analysis after Expected Improvements
    to Estimated Dust Emissions/Modeling by EPA/WRAP
  • If still Significant than Reasonable and
    Appropriate Control Measures apply through
    SIP/TIP revision no later than 12/31/08

16
Prelim. Modeling Results - On Road Mobile
  • Smallest Cumulative Impact in 2018
    0.28 DV at
    Mesa Verde NP
  • Largest Cumulative in 2018
    0.78 DV at Zion NP
  • 2018 Nonroad Emission Inventory of Major
    Visibility Precursors is 2 X of On Road EI

17
Preliminary Modeling Results - Road Dust
  • Smallest Cumulative Impact in 2018
    0.08 DV at Weminuche Wilderness
  • Largest Cumulative Impact in 2018
    0.31 DV at Black Canyon of Gunnison NP

18
Conclusions
  • Need Complete Modeling Results (Nonroad Areas)
    for Accurate Determination
  • Cumulative Mobile likely gt 1.0DV
  • Unclear if any 309 area gt 0.1 DV
  • State Road Dust may be lt 0.1 DV
  • Concern that Future Nonroad Emissions Exceed On
    Road

19
Mobile Source Emission Trend- Tons/Day NOx,
SOx,, PM
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com