Title: EEE381B Aerospace Systems
1EEE381BAerospace Systems Avionics
- Radar
- Part 2 The radar range equation
- Ref Moir Seabridge 2006, Chapter 3,4
2Outline
- Basic radar range equation
- Developing the radar range equation
- Design impacts
- Receiver sensitivity
- Radar cross-section
- Low observability
- Exercises
31. Basic radar range equation
- There are many different versions of the radar
range equation. - We will use, and fully derive, the one presented
below. -
41.1 Components of the equation
- Rmax the maximum range of the radar
- Pt average power of the transmitter
- G gain of the transmit/receive antenna
- ? wavelength of the operating frequency
- ? radar cross-section of the target
- Smin minimum detectable signal power
51.2 Units of the equation
62. Developing radar range equation
72.1 Transmitted power
- Recall from the previous lecture that the average
transmitted power is a function of peak pulse
power and the pulse duration
82.2 Power density at target 4
- Recall that power density decreases as a function
of distance traveled -
92.3 Reflected power
- The amount of power reflected back from a target
is a function of the power density at the target
and the targets radar cross-section, ?
102.4 Power density of echo at antenna
- The power density of the returned signal, echo,
again spreads as it travels back towards the
radar receive antenna.
112.5 Power of echo at receiver
- The antenna captures only a portion of the echoed
power density as a function of the receive
antennas effective aperture
In this equation the receiver is assumed to be
all radar receive chain components except the
antenna.
122.5.1 Relative power received ? range
132.6 Minimum detectable signal power
- Therefore a radar system is capable of detecting
targets as long as the received echo power is
greater than or equal to the minimum detectable
signal power of the receive chain
143. Radar design impacts
- A careful study of the radar range equation
provides further insight as to the effect of
several radar design decisions. - In general the equation tells us that for a
radar to have a long range, the transmitter must
be high power, the antenna must be large and have
high gain, and the receiver must be very
sensitive.
153.1 Power, Pt
- Increases in transmitter power yield a
surprisingly small increase in radar range, since
range increases by the inverse fourth power. - For example, a doubling of transmitter peak power
results increases radar range by only 19,
163.2 Time-on-target, ?/Tp
- The average power transmitted can also be
increased by increasing the pulse duty cycle,
sometimes referred to as the time-on-target. - A combined doubling of the pulse width and
doubling of the transmitter peak power will give
a fourfold increase in average transmitted power,
and 41 increase in radar range.
173.3 Gain, G
- Antenna gain is a major consideration in the
design of the radar system. - For a parabolic dish, doubling the antenna size
(diameter) will yield a fourfold increase in gain
and a doubling of radar range.
183.4 Receiver sensitivity, Smin
- Similar to that of transmitter power, increases
in receiver sensitivity yield relatively small
increases in radar range. - Only 19 range increase for a halving of
sensitivity, and at the expense of false alarms. - Receiver design is a complex subject beyond the
scope of this course, see 3.5.3. - Simplistically, the smaller the radar pulse
width, the larger the required receiver bandwidth
and the larger the receiver noise floor.
193.4.1 Receiver bandwidth
203.4.2 Signal-to-noise
213.4.3 Receiver threshold
224. Radar cross-section, ?
- The radar cross-section of a target is a measure
of its size as seen by a radar, expressed as an
area, m2. - It is a complex function of the geometric
cross-section of the target at the incident angle
of the radar signal, as well as the directivity
and reflectivity of the target. - The RCS is a characteristic of the target, not
the radar.
234.1.1 RCS of a metal plate
- Large RCS, but decreases rapidly as the incident
angle deviates from the normal.
244.1.2 RCS of a metal sphere
- Small RCS, but is independent of incident angle.
254.1.3 RCS of a metal cylinder
- RCS can be quite small or fairly large depending
on orientation.
264.1.4 RCS of a trihedral corner reflector
- The RCS of a trihedral (corner) is both large and
relatively independent of incident angle.
275. Low Observability
- From the previous discussion on the radar
cross-section of targets, it should be obvious
that determining the radar cross-section of an
airplane is a complicated task. - The art of designing an aircraft to specifically
have a low RCS is known as low observability, or
more commonly known as stealth. - Stealth is a relatively new technology,
- even full RCS prediction is only 2 decades old.
285.1 History of stealth aircraft 1
295.2 Aircraft high RCS areas 1
305.3 Low observability design areas 1
315.3.1 Low observability design example1
325.3.2 Low observability design example1
335.4 Comparative RCS 1
346. In-class exercises
356.1 Quick response exercise 1
- Think carefully about the derivation of the radar
range equation just presented. Is there a
potentially significant loss component missing? - Hint recall the simple link equation from your
very early lectures.
366.2 Quick response exercise 2
- Why have designers of stealth aircraft sought to
blend the physical transitions / features of the
aircraft? - Will reduction in your aircraft RCS alone make
you invisible to the enemy? - How else might they find you?
376.3 Radar range equation calculation
386.3 Radar range equation calculation
- The US Navy AN/SPS-48 Air Search Radar is a
medium-range, three-dimensional (height, range,
and bearing) air search radar. - Published technical specifications include
- Operating frequency 2900-3100 MHz
- Transmitter peak power 60-2200 kW
- PRF 161-1366 Hz, and pulse widths of 9 / 3 µsec
- Phased array antenna with a gain of 38.5 dB
- For its published maximum range of 250 miles for
a nominal target such as the F-18, what is the
receiver chain sensitivity in bBm?
39References
- Moir Seabridge, Military Avionics Systems,
American Institute of Aeronautics Astronautics,
2006. Sections 2.6 2.7 - David Adamy, EW101 - A First Course in Electronic
Warfare, Artech House, 2000. Chapters 3,4 6 - George W. Stimson, Introduction to Airborne
Radar, Second Edition, SciTch Publishing, 1998. - Principles of Radar Systems, student laboratory
manual, 38542-00, Lab-Volt (Quebec) Ltd, 2006. - John C. Vaquer, US Navy Surface Officer Warfare
School Documents, Combat Systems Engineering
Radar, http//www.fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/docs/sw
os/cmd/fun12/12-1/sld001.htm - Mark A. Hicks, "Clip art licensed from the Clip
Art Gallery on DiscoverySchool.com"