TAP2002 Ships - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

TAP2002 Ships

Description:

the emissions for steam generation that can be different for different fuel used: ... boilers, gas turbines and stationary engines; fuel consumption have to be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: carlot2
Category:
Tags: engines | ships | steam | tap2002

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TAP2002 Ships


1
AGENDA
  • Summary of activities in 2007
  • Italy contribution on BREF Analysis
  • Open Problems
  • Methodology for domestic combustion
  • Processes vs Combustion emissions
  • Fugitive and diffuse PM emissions
  • SNAP definition
  • Address draft chapters
  • Agree to the 2008 workplan

2
EP Update priorities and connected work as fixed
at Expert Panel on Combustion and Industry
Report to plenary 7 TFEIP EIONET meeting on
Emission Inventory ProjectionThessaloniki,
Greece, 31 october and 1-2 November 2006
3
Plans for 2006/2007, Expert Panel on Combustion
and Industry
4
Plans for 2006/2007, Expert Panel on Combustion
and Industry
5
Summary of activities in 2007
  • Define the main inputs of the Expert Panel to
    project team of editing authors (consultant) to
    restructuring the Guidebok
  • Provide the project team of editing authors with
    all information and all relevant underlying
    material (methods/emission factors) useful to
    update the guidebook
  • Support the project team in meeting the industry
    boards
  • Analysis of all industrial BREF (ITALY Delegation)

6
2007 Meeting
  • Expert Panel meeting, Rome, 16 April 2007
  • Expert Panel meeting, Dessau, 23-24 may 2007
  • Expert Workshop on Industrial Processes Utrecht,
    11 September 2007
  • Informal Meeting of EP with Consultant for GB
    update and Industry, London, 11 October

7
Preparation of Rome meeting (industry
partecipation to GB update)
  • The meeting was prepared
  • Sending an invitation to all the people in
    Thessaloniki meeting
  • Individuating a list of industry reference people
    (the list was extracted from IPPC BREF
    documentation)
  • Sending a specific invitation to industry
    representative from the TFEIP chair
  • Inviting the Acting Head of the European IPPC
    Bureau in JRC

8
Rome meeting Invited industry organizations
  • CONCAWE (the oil companies' European organisation
    for environment, health and safety)
  • European Aluminium Association
  • CEPI- Confederation of European Paper Industries
  • EUROFER - European Confederation of Iron and
    Steel Industries
  • CEMBUREAU - representative organisation of the
    cement industry in Europe
  • Eurometaux
  • CPIV - Comite Permanent des Industries du Verre
    Européenne Avenue Louise 89
  • COTANCE - Confederation of National Associations
    of Tanners and Dressers
  • CERAME-UNIE Liaison Office of the Europ. Ceramic
    Industry
  • CIAA - Confederation of Food and Drink Industries
    of the EEC

9
List of partecipant in Rome meeting
  • Carlo Trozzi co-leader of the Expert Panel on
    Combustion and Industry
  • Riccardo De Lauretis co-leader of the Expert
    Panel on Transport
  • Tinus Pulles TNO Built Environment and
    Geosciences
  • Jeroen Kuenen TNO Built Environment and
    Gceosciences
  • Nadine Allemand Expert Group on Techno-Economic
    Issues UNECE
  • Lourens Post CONCAWE (oil companies' Eur. org.
    for env. healt safe.)
  • Brian Smithers CONCAWE
  • Ole Restad CEMBUREAU (organisation of the cement
    industry in Europe)
  • Eirik Nordheim European Aluminium Association
  • Fabrice Rivet CPIV (European Glass Industries)
  • Rémi Bussac EURELECTRIC (Union of the Electricity
    Industry)
  • Javier Pérez Rodríguez Universidad Politécnica de
    Madrid
  • Antonio Ferreiro Análisis Estadístico de Datos

10
Conclusions of Rome meeting
  • Industry clearly expressed its interest in
    co-operating with the Guidebook project
  • The Guidebook project team is eager to intensify
    the co-operation with industry
  • the industries will have involved in revise the
    chapters of new Guidebook, also if the
    responsibility of the revision of the Guidebook
    will be on Commission supported by the Advisor
    Editorial Group
  • the Guidebook project team is ready to retrieve
    all the relevant information on the new
    technologies available in the Expert Group on
    techno-economic documentation

11
Dessau meeting
  • Report from previous meetings
  • Main discussion about sector specific tests

12
Dessau meeting conclusions about sector specific
tests ()
() Not all the people agree with the inter
pollutants test at all
13
Dessau Projections expert panel (PEP)
meeting25th May 2007Identification of areas
where the CIEP and PEP can reciprocally
help(Conclusion/Suggestion of EP leader
presentation)
  • Shared Emission factors definition
  • Shared SNAP rubric definition
  • Shared Activities rate evaluation methodologies
  • Shared penetration factors

14
Uthrect London workshops
  • Workshops aim at discussing GB zero order drafts
    with relevant industry experts looking at
    remaining problems and data gaps
  • Discussion about the Tier concept
  • Discussion about splitting process and combustion
    emissions
  • Industry is not very happy with the reporting
    format (NFR), because of the split between
    combustion and process emissions
  • Discussion about fuel or product based EFs for
    process with combustion (ex. cement, glass,...)

15
Uthrect meeting partecipants
  • Carlo Trozzi (leader Expert Panel for Combustion
    Industry)
  • Bart van Konijnenburg (Royal VNP, on behalf of
    CEPI)
  • Ton Schrijvers (CORUS, on behalf of Eurofer)
  • Claude Lorea (Cembureau)
  • Jose M. Adzet (AIICA, on behalf of Cotance)
  • Fabrice Rivet (VGI-FIV)
  • Ruud Beerkens (TNO, also representing the Glass
    Industry)
  • Guy Teckels (CPIV)
  • Nicola Brophy (AEA, project team member)
  • Tinus Pulles (TNO, project team member)
  • Wilfred Appelman (TNO, project team member)
  • Jeroen Kuenen (TNO, project team member)

16
London meeting partecipants
  • Tom Massey RWENpower/Eurelectric
  • John Stockdale Britglass
  • Neil Haines Corus Grp/Eurofer
  • Brian Smithers CONCAWE
  • Nadine Allemand CITEPA
  • Mike Woodfield AEA, Chair
  • Justin Goodwin AEA
  • Nicola Brophy AEA

17
Italy contribution on BREF Analysis
  • APAT (Italy Environmental Protection Agency)
    financial support the work and supervise it
  • The work was realized in the spring/summer 2007
    by Techne Consulting
  • A report was produced that incorporate also the
    sectors already analysed in the last years and
    included in previous revision on Guidebook
  • The work has regarded the only individuation and
    extraction of relevant emissions factors from the
    BREF documentation and presentation in Tables
  • A report will be send to the TFEIP segretariat
    and to the consultant in the next weeks

18
List of industrial BREF (all included in the work)
19
Heavy metals and EXPREME Project
The task of EP finalized to The Use output of
ESPREME and other projects to update EFs and
recommendations on HM in the Guidebook was
resolved with the contribute to German
delegation, see the relation to plenary
Improvements of HM information in the Guidebook
Jochen Teloke (Germany)
20
Open Problems
  • Methodology for domestic combustion
  • Processes vs Combustion emissions
  • Fugitive and diffuse emissions
  • SNAP definition

21
Small Combustion methodology update
  • From Thessaloniki meeting
  • New GB must indicated the possible sources of
    data and possible surrogate methodology
    particularly regarding technologies penetration
    (very important for small combustion
    installations) referring to different Tiers
  • Domestic Combustion needs Tier 3 (emissions
    estimate model) methodologies to be developed EP
    collect information from member states in order
    to recommend an unified user methodology in input
    GB project EP recommend that this activity will
    be funded in the frame of GB project

22
Processes vs Combustion emissions 1
  • where we have boilers or heaters in which the
    combustion is not affected by the process we are
    in sector 0301 Combustion in boilers, gas
    turbines and stationary engines fuel consumption
    have to be allocated to 0301
  • if the fuel is in contact with the products
    (steel, cement, ...) we have combustion processes
    with contact (0303 Processes with contact) the
    emissions factors must be preferably expressed in
    function of output of the process (g/Mg steel,
    g/Mg cement, ...) and can be different for
    different fuel used emissions factor in function
    of fuels burned can be included in the chapter
    but only as references fuel consumption do not
    have to be allocated to 0301

23
Processes vs Combustion emissions 2
  • if the steam are in contact with the products
    (for examples sometimes processes of drying
    paper) we have
  • the emissions for steam generation that can be
    different for different fuel used we are in
    sector 0301 Combustion in boilers, gas turbines
    and stationary engines fuel consumption have to
    be allocated to 0301
  • combustion process (combustion with contact) in
    the activities 030321 Paper-mill industry (drying
    processes) the emissions factors must be
    preferably expressed in function of output of
    process (g/Mg paper, ...) and allocate to SNAP
    04 no fuel consumption

24
Processes vs Combustion emissions 3
  • if the exhaust gases of boilers and heaters are
    in contact with the products (for examples sludge
    drying, ...) we have combustion processes with
    contact (0303 Processes with contact) the
    emissions factors must be preferably expressed in
    function of output of the process (g/Mg sludge,
    ...) and can be different for different fuel
    used emissions factor in function of fuels used
    can be included in the chapter but only as
    references fuel consumption do not have to be
    allocated to 0301

25
Fugitive and diffuse emissions
The EP recommend to the consultant to take into
consideration all the relevant process actually
not included in the GB (see also, but not only,
the new SNAP proposal)
26
SNAP nomenclature
  • Coordination of activities for updating SNAP
    versions keeping them in line with methodological
    advances and new reporting requirements
  • Maintenance of SNAP correspondence with other
    nomenclatures CRF, NFR, RAINS/GAINS, NACE,
    PRODCOM,
  • Repository and clearing-house centre for
    (SNAP/NFR) emissions inventories/projections
    oriented to facilitate inter-countries control
    checks of the their (SNAP/NFR) emissions
    inventories
  • Projections scenarios nomenclature Harmonization
    of names and contents

27
Revision Process
  • Consultant send to EP leader the list of relevant
    chapters for review
  • EP leader circulate the list and ask to EP member
    cooperation in review project
  • EP leader prepare a program for review the GB
    chapters included time and people
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com