eParticipation through rating the Portal sites - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

eParticipation through rating the Portal sites

Description:

Homepage Matsuke (Watchdog). Residents. Mayor. Assembly. Better. Community. Participation ... 10 Criteria of Watchdog. 1. Top Page design. 2. Ease of using ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ven65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: eParticipation through rating the Portal sites


1
eParticipation through rating the Portal sites
  • Miwako Ichinose
  • Kazuya Saito
  • Hiroshi Mizuta
  • VE Center

2
Almost all local governments in Japan are trying
to implement the New Public Management (NPM)
for citizen-centered service. NPM bases on
Participation of Residents to their Local
government. VE center has developed the
promotion tool of Participation with rating the
local government Portal site, 24 hours a day, 7
days a week. This is the eParticipation tool
named Homepage Matsuke
(Watchdog).
3
Challenge eParticipation
Mayor
Assembly
Better Community
Residents
Participation
Collaboration
4
10 Criteria of Watchdog
  • 1. Top Page design
  • 2. Ease of using
  • 3. Business related Information services
  • 4. Administration services
  • 5. Government head message
  • 6. Local assembly activities message
  • 7. Information for community living
  • 8. Government money flow
  • 9. Resident participation opportunities
  • 10. Information security

5
Verification
VE Center Experts 7 persons average
High School Students 17 persons average
1. Top Page design
10. Information security
2. Ease of using
3. Business related Information services
9. Resident participation opportunities
4. Administration services
8. Government money flow
5. Government head message
7. Information for community living
6. Local assembly activities message
6
Total Points of 23 wards in Tokyo7 VE Center
experts results
1
2
3
21
22
23
7
Nakano Ward1(70)
1.Residents imvolvement
10
1.MayorS Leadership
8
Adachi Ward3(61)
2. Residents imvolvement
13
2. Assemblys leadership
9
Itabasi Ward5(59)
9
11
2.Mayors Leadership
10
Sumida Ward13(45)
22
22
19.Mayors Leadershiploss
11
Edogawa Ward19(40)
16
22.Mayors Leadershiploss
18
12
Kita Ward21(38)
22
16
23.Mayors Leadershiploss
13
Chiyoda Ward23(30)
17
21.Mayors Leadershiploss
23
14
Conclusions
  • High School students said
  • 1.I can get the knowledge of the place where I
    live.
  • 2.I am interested in my local government
  • administration.
  • 3.The contents of our mayors message is
  • low.

This HP Metsuke is free to every one and VE
center is promoting eParticipation throughhe
rating with HP Metsuke.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com