Title: High Growth Counties: Opportunities for Pinal County
1High Growth Counties Opportunities for Pinal
County
- Pinal County Comprehensive Plan
Curt Dunham AICP Partners for Strategic Action,
Inc. Comprehensive Plan Update Consultant
2Peer Counties Qualifications
- Rapid growth over past 20 years
- Impacted by one or more rapidly growing metro
areas - Urban/agricultural/open space interface
- Preservation issues
- Bedroom community/commuting issues
3Peer Counties Identified
- Polk County, Florida
- Cobb County, Georgia
- Arapahoe County, Colorado
4Polk County, Florida
- County between Orlando and Tampa
- Long established agricultural area (citrus)
- Interstate 4 corridor (I-4)
- Population 550,000
- 2,010 square miles Floridas fourth largest
5Polk County, Florida
6Polk County, Florida
7Polk County Current Issues
- Addressing transportation travel patterns
- No dedicated funding source to address
transportation issues - Prevent becoming a bedroom community
- Create jobs near people
8Polk County Good Decisions
- Updated Comprehensive Plan to include sub-areas
- Economic development is tied to land uses
consultants used have economic development
expertise - Planning to create a better mix of land uses and
bring services and jobs near residential areas
9Polk County Preserving Agriculture
- Strong public desire
- Developed Polk County Land Stewardship Program
a consortium of different interests - Alliance built between agricultural interests and
environmental interests
10Polk County - Transportation
- Travel patterns Interstate, Disney World
- Just entered into an agreement with Orlando
transit to tie into and provide new
transportation services
11Polk County Economic Development
- County not able to do much and not asked to
- Include economic elements in land use planning
- Support private non-profit Central Florida
Development Council
12Polk County - Collaboration
- Coordinate with other agencies through regional
Municipal Planning Organization - Developed a county/city managers alliance that
meets monthly - Much stronger collaboration to preserve long-term
water supply
13Polk County In Hindsight
- Should have developed a dedicated funding source
for infrastructure and roads - Now working a lot more closely with other
governmental entitiesthis should have happened
sooner
14Cobb County, Georgia
- Suburban Atlanta area
- Bedroom communities
- Historic areas (created from Cherokee County,
originally part of Cherokee Indian Nation) - Interstate 75 Corridor (I-75)
- 600,000 of 670,000 residents are not within
municipalities (unincorporated county) - 340.2 square miles
15Cobb County, Georgia
16Cobb County, Georgia
17Cobb County Issues
- Regional transit and commuting
- Need to expand transit and make better regional
connections of the roadway system - Redirect growth
- Protect green space
18Cobb County Good Decisions
- Installed a sewer system for the entire county in
the 1980s except where growth would be
discouraged. Used infrastructure as a growth
management tool and to protect water resources - Use of Community Improvement Districts to fund
transportation projects - 4.1 million bond passed to begin to purchase
green space
19Cobb County Issues
- Small farms to residential
- Industrial areas along I-75 are starting to
change - Growing Latino population
- Attempting to develop employment centers to
balance growth (residential, employment,
commercial)
20Cobb County Economic Development
- Counties in Georgia have similar powers as
cities - Incentives
- Economic development department
- Very active in working with other entities and
organizations, such as chambers of commerce, in
attracting firms and jobs
21Cobb County - Collaboration
- House Bill 489 mandates intergovernmental
cooperation - Developed service delivery strategy to minimize
duplication and improve effectiveness
22Cobb County In Hindsight
- Voted down mass transit in 1970s still paying
for it! - High costs of doing it now
- Communities that did join have very high quality
development around stations - Lack of mass transit systems added to commuting
problems and congestion
23Arapahoe County, Colorado
- Denver Metro Area
- 35 urban,65 rural (urban population to the
West, rural population to the East) - Interstate 70 Corridor (I-70)
- Population 550,000
- 803 square miles
24Arapahoe County, Colorado
25Arapahoe County, Colorado
26Arapahoe County Issues
- State Land Department changing the rules
- Urban Growth Boundaries under constant attack
- Total dichotomy of attitudes between West and
East County
27Arapahoe County Good Decisions
- Worked to develop Urban Growth Boundary
- Developed and stuck with Land Development Code
- Use sub-area plans to plan for specific issues
and needs
28Arapahoe County Agricultural Preservation
- No dedicated funding
- Public desire to maintain
- No re-zoning of agricultural land
- Use special districts they have held up well
29Arapahoe County Economic Development
- Not much of a role and not much pressure to do so
- Support the South Metro Chamber of Commerce
- Streamlined review process
30Arapahoe County - Collaboration
- Use a referral process
- Proposal within 2 miles of any governmental
entity are referred for review
31Arapahoe County In Hindsight
- Should have completed Land Development Code
sooner - Should have drafted plans to deal better with the
changeover in leadership that will undoubtedly
occur - Need to work to unify urban interests in the west
with rural interests in the east
32Opportunities for Pinal County
- Stronger advocate for economic development
- Integrate land uses with economic development
concepts - Agricultural preservation
- Open space preservation
33Opportunities for Pinal County
- Regional transit
- Improved communication and collaboration
unifying communities - Creation of job centers to lessen commuting
- Creation of dedicated funding sources and
proactive fiscal policies
34Opportunities for Pinal County
- Develop plans that will withstand change
- Act now, hesitation is very costly
- Learn from others and make reasonable assumptions