IAS 36 Impairment of Assets

1 / 76
About This Presentation
Title:

IAS 36 Impairment of Assets

Description:

NIRC - Conference on Accounting Standards and IFRS. The Reporting Landscape ... In the USA: Independent board Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) since 1973. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1562
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 77
Provided by: laurenc61

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IAS 36 Impairment of Assets


1
Significance of International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS)
NIRC - Conference on Accounting Standards and IFRS
New Delhi 3 February, 2007
JITENDRA AGARWAL
2
The Reporting Landscape
3
The Reporting Landscape
  • Global Markets the Services Revolution
  • Accountability
  • Cross border Capital flows
  • Bases for business decisions
  • Corporate Reporting failures
  • Corporate Governance
  • Regulatory Framework
  • Changes in Technology and Products

4
Accountability
  • A business enterprise receives capital from
    outside investors, lenders, and other creditors.
  • It is accountable to them it has an obligation
    to keep them informed about performance,
    conditions, and prospects.
  • Also accountable to others who provide resources
    or environment in which to operate Employees,
    government, community at large.

5
Bases for business decisions
  • Capital Market transactions
  • Mergers Acquisitions
  • Employee Stock Options
  • Borrowing and Lending

6
Company failure director failure !!
January 31, 2002
October 16, 2001
June 20, 2002
March 28, 2002
Issue Off-Balance Sheet Accounting and
Financial Reporting Fraud Impact 3 billion in
undisclosed losses
Issue Financial Reporting Fraud Impact 9
billion in unreported expenses
Issue Financial Reporting Fraud and
embezzlement Impact 2.5 billion of hidden
debt
Issue Financial Reporting Fraud through
improper revenue recognition Impact 12.4
billion in overstated earnings
7
Corporate Governance Pillars
Corporate Governance
Primary characteristics
F A I R N E S S
A C C O U N T A B I L I T Y
T R A N S P A R E N C Y
D I S C I P L I N E
D I S C I P L I N E
I N D E P E N D E N C E
R E S P O N S B I L I T Y
S O C I A L R E S P. N
T R A N S P A R E N C Y
8
Regulatory Framework
  • Sarbanes Oxley
  • Reporting in the financial services sector
  • Quotas, obligations, etc.
  • Taxation
  • Eligibility for business transactions

9
Changes in Technology and Products
  • Intangible Assets Licenses, Rights, etc
  • Tangible Assets component accounting
  • Barter transactions
  • Options and Swaps
  • Futures
  • Complex arrangements BOOT, BOT, BOMT, Service
    concession agreements, etc

10
Accountability
  • This is what corporate accounting is all about.
  • Accounting standards help ensure the financial
    information is

Understandable
11
Evolution of Accounting Standards
12
Evolution of Accounting Standards
  • Historically accounting standards have evolved
    country by country.
  • Standards set by government, or accounting
    profession, or independent board.
  • In the USA Independent board Financial
    Accounting Standards Board (FASB) since 1973.
    Before that accounting profession.
  • In Hong Kong Accounting profession Hong Kong
    Society of Accountants.
  • In China Government Ministry of Finance.

13
Evolution of Accounting Standards
  • National standards made sense when companies
    raised money in, and investors looked for
    investment opportunities in, only their home
    country.
  • But that is no longer the case.

14
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
  • Big change in 4th quarter of 20th century
    Globalisation of capital markets.
  • Now, investors seek investment opportunities all
    over the world.
  • Companies seek capital at the lowest price
    anywhere.
  • Cross-border mergers.
  • Accounting differences can completely obscure
    comparisons.

15
Cross border Capital flows
16
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
World 51 stock exchanges, 2700 foreign (cross
border listings) out of 40,000 companies
17
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
18
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
19
Globalisation of Capital Markets
Capital inflows
Capital Outflows
Source IMF Workpaper
20
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
  • On many stock exchanges foreign listings are a
    large of total - USA October 2006
  • NASDAQ 10 (329 cos., 36 countries).
  • NYSE 20 (453 companies, 47 countries).
  • Foreign is 33 of market value.
  • US SEC total
  • 1981 173 foreign companies listed in US.
  • 1991 439 foreign companies listed in US.
  • 20021,400 foreign out of 16000 total
  • 2004 1,236 foreign companies from 53 countries
  • 2005 1240 foreign companies from 55 countries

21
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
  • Foreign companies that sell securities publicly
    in the US must either
  • Prepare their financial statements using US
    Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP),
  • or
  • Use their national GAAP and include a
    reconciliation of earnings and net assets to
    comparable US GAAP figures.
  • The 1,240 foreign companies registered with the
    SEC use about 55 GAAPs!

22
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
  • Even with the reconciliation, perhaps 95 of the
    financial figures in a foreign companys annual
    report are based on their national GAAP not
    comparable to US GAAP.
  • Pity the poor investor who has to compare foreign
    GAAP companies with US investment alternatives.
  • Pity the SEC staff reviewer, too.

23
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
  • Same problem all over the world.
  • And these exchanges do not even require a
    reconciliation to national GAAP.
  • London Stock Exchange (Jan 2006)
  • 17 of companies are non-UK.
  • 550 foreign companies, 65 countries.
  • 66 of market value is non-UK.
  • Euronext 25 foreign (345 / 1,392)
  • Switzerland 32 (132 / 419)
  • Germany 21 (182 / 866)

24
Examples of Reconciling items USGAAP vs. Other
GAAPs
25
Examples of Reconciling Items
26
Examples of Reconciling Items
27
Examples of Reconciling Items
28
Examples of Reconciling Items
29
Examples of Reconciling Items
30
Topics covered by IASs
31
Shortcomings of Old IASC
  • Weak relationships with national standard
    setters.
  • Lack of convergence of IAS and major national
    GAAPs.
  • Part-time Board, full-time work load.
  • Needed broader sponsorship than accounting
    profession.
  • Needed recognition by regulators.
  • Needed resources.
  • Structure review 1999-2000. Results . . .

32
Topics Covered by Existing IASs
33
Topics Covered by Existing IASs
34
Topics Covered by Existing IASs
35
Topics Covered by Existing IASs
  • IFRS 1 First time adoption of IFRS
  • IFRS 2 Share based Payment
  • IFRS 3 Business Combinations
  • IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts
  • IFRS 5 Non-current Assets held for Sale and
  • Discontinued Operations
  • IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of
  • Mineral Resources
  • IFRS 7 Financial Instruments Disclosures
  • (issued 18 August 2005)

36
IFRS 8 Operating Segments
  • Issued 30 November
  • Effective 1 January 2009
  • Earlier adoption permitted
  • Replaces IAS 14

37
IFRS 8
  • No significant changes from ED
  • Adopts FAS 131 approach to determining
    segmentsmanagement approach
  • Focus on the information presented to the chief
    operating decision maker
  • Vertically-integrated operations can have
    segments
  • Measurement
  • Based on measures reported to chief operating
    decision maker
  • No requirement for IFRS-based measurement

38
IFRS 8
  • Disclosure
  • Enhanced from those in IAS 14
  • Reconciliation to IFRS-based reporting required
  • IAS 34 disclosures amended

39
IFRIC developments
  • Group and Treasury Share Transactions IFRIC 11
  • Service Concession Arrangements IFRIC 12

40
IFRIC 11 Group share plans
  • Issues
  • Share-based payments involving own shares
  • Share-based payments involving shares of the
    parent
  • Intra-group transfers
  • Share-based payments involving own shares
  • Will always be equity-settled if equity-settled
    under IFRS 2

41
IFRIC 11 (ii)
  • Share-based payments involving parent shares
  • Parent offers its shares to employees of the
    subsidiary
  • Always equity-settled
  • Subsidiary offers its employees shares of the
    parent
  • Cash-settled in the individual accounts of the
    subsidiary
  • Intra-group transfersnon-market vesting
    conditions

42
IFRIC 12
  • IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements
  • Approved, to be issued 30 November
  • Effective date 1 January 2008
  • Public-to-private arrangements only
  • Grantor controls or regulates what services are
    provided to whom and the price
  • Grantor controls any significant residual
    interest in the infrastructure
  • Whole life assets are within the scope if the
    Grantor controls services, intended customers and
    price
  • Operators pre-existing PPE
  • Grantor accounting is not addressed

43
IFRIC 12 (ii)
  • Some significant issues
  • Arrangement consideration
  • Financial asset vs. intangible asset
  • Repairs, restoration and maintenance
  • Borrowing costs
  • Applicability of other IFRS
  • Amends IFRIC 4
  • Scope exclusion for concession arrangements
    subject to IFRIC 12

44
The IFRICs agendastatus
  • Draftcomment period closed
  • D19 - The Asset Ceiling Availability of Economic
  • Benefits and Minimum Funding
    Requirements
  • D20 - Customer Loyalty Programmes
  • In development
  • IAS 18 - Real estate sales
  • IAS 18 - Initial fees received by a fund manager
  • IAS 18 - Identifying agency arrangements
  • IAS 38 - Advertising and promotional costs
  • IAS 41 - Recognition and measurement of
    biological
  • assets

45
The IFRICs agenda (ii)
  • Early stages
  • IFRS 2 - Accounting for employee benefit trusts
  • IAS 11 - Allocation of profit in unsegmented
  • contracts
  • IAS 17 - Sales and leasebacks with repurchase
  • agreements
  • IAS 21 - Hedging a net investment
  • IAS 39 - various hedge accounting issues

46
Recent and Emerging Trends in International
Accounting Standards
  • Greater use of fair values in measuring
    transactions
  • Impairment recognition.
  • Prohibit poolings.
  • Non-monetary exchanges.
  • Fair values on balance sheet for both financial
    and non financial assets
  • Financial Instruments.
  • Agriculture.
  • Investment property.
  • Commodity inventories.

47
Recent and Emerging Trends in International
Accounting Standards
  • More unrealised components of income
  • Performance reporting becomes key.
  • No income smoothing, cost deferrals, general
    provisions
  • Remove corridor approach to pensions.
  • Balance sheet approach to deferred tax.
  • No accruals for future losses.
  • Rigorous hedge accounting rules.

48
Recent and Emerging Trends in International
Accounting Standards
  • Eliminate off-balance sheet items
  • Derivatives.
  • Special purpose entities.
  • Stock compensation.
  • More disclosure, especially judgements, plans,
    assumptions
  • Judgement in applying accounting policies.
  • Risk management policies.
  • Sensitivity analyses.
  • Eliminate accounting choices.
  • Convergence with US GAAP.

49
Endorsement of IFRS in Past Few Years
  • International Organization of Securities
    Commissions 100 securities regulators (including
    the US SEC).
  • Basel Committee Global bank regulators
    (including the US Federal Reserve)
  • The World Bank and IMF.
  • The G7 Finance Ministers.
  • And many others.
  • These are non-binding endorsements.

50
Use of IFRS around the world
51
Use of IFRS Around the World
52
Use of IFRS Around the World
53
Use of IFRS Around the World
54
Use of IFRS Around the World
55
Use of IFRS Around the World
56
Use of IFRS Around the World
  • Europe domestic listed companies
  • IFRS required in consolidated financial
    statements of all European listed companies
    starting 2005.
  • About 9,000 companies
  • in 28 countries (15 current EU 10 joining May
    2004 3 EEA).
  • Member states may require or permit IFRS for
    unlisted companies, for individual-company
    statements and/or for foreign companies listed on
    EU exchanges.

57
Use of IFRS Around the World
58
Use of IFRS Around the World
  • IFRS already required or permitted for some
    domestic companies
  • Antilles, Bangladesh, Bolivia, China
    (B-shares), Egypt, Hong Kong (if incorporated
    outside HK), Hungary, Kuwait, Russia, South
    Africa, Switzerland, Turkey.
  • IFRS is the fallback if national GAAP does not
    address a question
  • Mexico, Venezuela.
  • IFRS permitted for foreign registrants
  • Most European countries, USA, and many others.

59
Asia-Pacific Summary
  • Adoption of IFRS in place of national GAAP
  • Bangladesh.
  • National GAAP mostly word for word IFRS
  • Australia (new policy), Hong Kong, New Zealand
    (new policy), Philippines, Singapore. Also
    several recent standards in India.
  • IFRS looked to in setting national GAAP
  • Most other A-P countries. To varying degrees.
  • Some domestic listed companies use IFRS
  • China, Laos, Myanmar.
  • Foreign listed companies may use IFRS
  • Australia, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Pakistan,
    Singapore, Thailand. Several in Japan also.

60
Use of IFRS Around the World
  • Other developed countries
  • Canada Domestic companies not allowed to use
    IFRS. In Jan 2006 the Accounting Standards Board
    of Canada adopted a plan which includes a
    decision to move financial reporting for Canadian
    publicly accountable enterprises to IFRSs.
  • Canadian companies registered with US SEC may use
    US GAAP.
  • South Africa All listed companies must follow
    IFRS starting 2005.
  • Switzerland Most listed companies already use
    IFRS.
  • Russia IFRS required for listed holding
    companies and all banks starting 2004. Phased in
    for other large companies to 2007.

61
Use of IFRS Around the World
IFRS accepted in about 75 jurisdictions
  • In terms of largest companies included in Fortune
    500 list, 176 prepare their accounts under US
    GAAP , 200 under IFRS and 81 under Japanese GAAP

Out of worldwide market capitalisation of over 36
trillion dollars at end 2005 11 trillion
corresponds to markets where IFRS are required or
permitted and 17trillion where US GAAP is the
rule
62
Benefits Criticism of Global Accounting
Standards
63
Benefits of Global Accounting Standards
  • Positive Findings on IFRS
  • Overall increase in comparability and
    transparency
  • Enables level playing fields and strengthens
    market discipline
  • Provision of early warning signals on exposure or
    risks relevant for risk assessment
  • Use of a principles-based framework, which
    provides for adequate degree of flexibility in
    implementation
  • Source Report titled Assessment of Accounting
    Standards from a Financial Stability Perspective
    published by European Central Bank December,
    2006

64
Benefits of Global Accounting Standards
  • Easier access to foreign capital markets.
  • Credibility of domestic capital markets to
    foreign capital providers.
  • Lower cost of capital to companies.
  • Comparability of financial data across borders.
  • Understandability.
  • Companies keep one set of books.
  • Global education and training.

65
Convergence criticism
  • Meaningless without convergence in local
    practices and laws as national standards are
    drawn up having regard to local laws, customs,
    usages and business environment.
  • Convergence of local practices is a distant dream
  • Implementation may result in an economic
    disadvantage to the user considering that
    national statutes either do not accept the basis
    on which the standard has been formulated or
    accept a different basis that secures an economic
    benefit for the user

66
Convergence
Business Issues
67
Convergence process
In content and quality facilitate convergence
Guided by some vision of the desired outcome
Improving quality
National standards-identical
Convergence
Shared objectives
Eliminating numerous options
Participation
In developing international standards
Active participation of US
68
U.S. views
  • As regulators around the world continue the
    process of developing a set of international
    accounting standards, some would like the U.S. to
    embrace standards that would be of higher quality
    than those currently used in many countries but
    less rigorous than U.S. GAAP. That would be a
    mistake. - Arthur Levitt
  • ..the trend particularly in the U.S. to have a
    detailed accounting rule for everything, no
    matter how narrow or obscure the issue
    Accountants should encourage the new IASB to
    emphasize a principles-based approach. Further,
    as part of the commitment to convergence, it is
    time for the FASB and SEC to change their
    behaviour and become more like the rest of the
    world. - Dennis R. Beresford, former chairman
    FASB

69
U.S. views
  • I have always wondered if some of those
    advocating the use of international standards
    failed to recognize and give appropriate credit
    to the fact that we in the U.S. have the worlds
    largest, most liquid capital markets because we
    do in fact have the best of breed financial
    reporting today. This in turn has provided
    companies with capital at the lowest possible
    cost that has been used to generate jobs and an
    improved global economy. - Lynn Turner
    final speech as Chief Accountant of SEC

70
Convergence
  • The coherent consistent application of IFRS is
    an essential prerequisite to the elimination of
    the reconciliation requirement in the U.S. It
    will take us some time to assess how IFRS is
    being implemented and enforced, but I am
    optimistic that we will complete our assessment,
    well within the 2009 goal for reconciliation, and
    be able to determine that the reconciliation
    requirement is unnecessary. Our new Chief
    Accountant, Conrad Hewitt, is committed to
    working to achieve this objective as quickly as
    possible. Paul S. Atkins U.S. SEC Commissioner

71
Convergence concerns
  • Inadequate compliance with international
    standards
  • Global auditing standards
  • International standard oversight function

72
Conclusion
73
Conclusion
  • The accounting confusion that results from dozens
    of national GAAPs in a global financial market is
    a disservice to investors, creditors, and others
    who use corporate financial statements.
  • No one country not even the USA has a
    monopoly on the best financial reporting
    standards and practices.
  • The accounting scandals of the past few years
    have driven that point home in the United States.

74
Conclusion
  • Accounting is not a science. Truth is not
    discovered by scientific experiments in a
    laboratory. Truth is what the standard setters
    say it is!
  • Based on a Conceptual Framework.
  • Focused on users needs.
  • Without bias.
  • Users have pretty much the same needs all over
    the world.

75
Conclusion
  • Clear lesson from Enron, WorldCom, Parmalat, etc
    Accounting Does Matter!
  • A single set of accounting standards leading to
    high quality, transparent, and comparable
    financial statements makes a lot of common sense.
  • An opportunity for the Indian profession to rise
    to global standards and be amongst the premier
    and much sort after professionals of the world.

76
Thank you.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)