Title: Tim C' Meaney
1PPP Project Financing
The Role of Direct Agreements in a PPP Project
30th September 2005
- Tim C. Meaney
- DZ BANK AG
- Hong Kong Project Finance
2 Agenda
The Role of Direct Agreements in a PPP Project
- What is a Direct Agreement?
- Structural Presentation of a Direct Agreement
- Purposes of Direct Agreements
- Benefits of Direct Agreements
- Who Provides Direct Agreements
- Issues with Direct Agreements
- Conclusions
- Contact Information
3 1) What is a Direct Agreement?
- An agreement between individual Project Parties
each of which is a contracting party with the PPP
Concession Company (the SPV) and the Senior
Lenders to the SPV. - The objective of the Direct Agreements is to
establish certain legal rights which apply when
the relevant contract is threatened with
termination - typically by the action or inaction
of the SPV. - The Direct Agreement does not transfer
obligations to Lenders unless Lenders exercise
their rights.
4 2) Structural Presentation of a Direct Agreement
- PPP Project - Typical Transaction Structure
(simple form)
Government Authority
Provision of Services
Service Fee Payment
Fixed Time / Fixed Price DC Contract
Sub-contractors
DC Contractor
PPP Project Company (special purpose vehicle or
SPV)
Insurers
Construction Costs
Operation Fee
Services Provider
Sub-contractors
PPP Services
5 - 10
90 -95
Equity
Debt
Investors
LENDERS
5 2) Structural Presentation of a Direct Agreement
(cont.)
- PPP Project - Typical Transaction Structure
(simple form) - Location of Primary Direct Agreements
Government Authority
Sub-contractors
DC Contractor
PPP Project Company (SPV)
Insurers
Services Provider
Sub-contractors
Equity
Debt
Investors
LENDERS
63) Purposes of Direct Agreements
- The purpose of a Direct Agreement is to provide
rights to Lenders which may permit the prevention
of termination of key project contracts executed
between the SPV and other Project Parties without
Senior Lenders having the opportunity to consider
whether to preserve the contracts by stepping
in and curing the underlying termination event
where the SPV has failed or elected not to do so. - The rationale for Lenders having such rights goes
back to a fundamental principle in limited
recourse or project financing
73) Purposes of Direct Agreements (cont.)
- The Lenders primary source of repayment within a
limited recourse project financing are funds
generated by the Project itself and directed
through the SPV. - To the extent that the SPV has insufficient funds
to repay the banks, then these banks may enforce
and exercise their security interest over the SPV
assets. The key assets of the SPV are not the
physical assets but the contractual agreements
which form the basis of the PPP Project
arrangements. Hence the need for Direct
Agreements.
8 4) Benefits of Direct Agreements
- The key benefit of a Direct Agreement is in
providing Lenders with an opportunity to revive
the Project after a default caused by the SPV
under the relevant Project Contract which remains
uncured. - How is this achieved?
- The Direct Agreement grants Lenders Step In
Rights i.e. the ability to step in to the shoes
of the SPV to - i) Cure the underlying Event of Default
- ii) Manage the Project for the Duration of the
Step In Period
9 4) Benefits of Direct Agreements (cont.)
- Step In is undertaken by a Receiver or a
Designated Party. - Step In involves the assumption of joint and
several liability with the SPV during the Step In
Period. - Lenders seek to cap i.e. limit this liability
10 5) Who Provides Direct Agreements?
- Direct Agreements can be established with a range
of contracted Project Parties. For the purposes
of this Presentation the key parties for Lenders
with whom the impact of the Direct Agreement will
be discussed are - 1) The EPC / DC Contractor
- 2) The OM Contractor
- 3) The Concession Granting Authority (the
Authority)
11 5) Who Provides Direct Agreements? (cont.)
- 1) The EPC / DC Contractor
- The Direct Agreements executed with a EPC or DC
Contractor is designed to provide Senior Lenders
with the opportunity to preserve the contract
with the Contractor following a default /
termination event occuring under the Contract
caused by the SPV. - Lenders will be required to cure the relevant
event. - The preservation of the underlying construction
arrangements is a critical factor for Lenders
since the SPV has no source of revenue until the
PPP assets are completed and the service
provision commenced.
12 5) Who Provides Direct Agreements? (cont.)
- A complexity can arise when the Contractor is
also the (or a) key shareholders of the SPV.
There may be a hostile relationship following a
default by the SPV and the Lenders may be forced
to allow the Contract to be terminated i.e. to
elect not to exercise rights under the Direct
Agreement. - Practically very difficult to replace Contractor
since the PPP Concession commonly provides a
Completion Date default provision which may
prevent the Lenders with limited time to cure the
underlying default event.
13 5) Who Provides Direct Agreements? (cont.)
- For certain PPP Projects there may also be a
desire to establish Direct Agreements with key
EPC / DC Sub-Contractors. Primary focus here
would be key equipment suppliers. This may also
be slightly more critical where the SPV
shareholder and the EPC Contractor are related
parties.
14 5) Who Provides Direct Agreements? (cont.)
- 2) The OM Contractor
- The OM Contract Direct Agreement provides
Lenders with a right (but not an obligation) to
cure an Event of Default. - OM is critical in the context of PPP since PPP
at its heart involves the provision of
services. - OM Contractor should provide notice of
termination to Lenders. Otherwise ineffective.
The same applies to the EPC / DC Direct
Agreement. - The OM Direct Agreement will permit the Lenders
to Step In to the Contract between the SPV and
the OM Contractor.
15 5) Who Provides Direct Agreements? (cont.)
- 3) The Concession Granting Authority (the
Authority) - Commonly a Direct Agreement or Tripartite
Agreement. Tripartite Agreement to the extent
that the SPV also is a counterparty to the
Agreement. - The Authority Direct Agreement is the key Direct
Agreement in the contract of a PPP Project. The
SPV has no source of revenue other than that
receivable under the Concession Agreement. As
such the need for preservation of the Contract is
critical. - The importance of the Authority Direct Agreement
is influenced by the consequences of the
underlying SPV Default Termination regime within
the Concession
16 5) Who Provides Direct Agreements? (cont.)
- If termination of the Concession by the Authority
for SPV Default results in transfer of the assets
to the Authority and a termination sum being
payable to ensure repayment of debt, then Lenders
are in a position of some comfort. - If termination of the Concession by the
Authority results in no transfer of the assets to
the Authority and no payment of a termination sum
to the Lenders, then the impact and importance of
this Direct Agreement is substantially heightened.
17 5) Who Provides Direct Agreements? (cont.)
- In the latter case, Lenders will wish to ensure
that the Authority Direct Agreement provides a
sufficient basis for a preservation or revival of
the PPP Project. This may involve - Foreclosure on the Project Assets
- Appointment of a Receiver
- Termination of the Construction Contract and
appointment of a replacement contractor - Termination of the OM Contract and appointment
of a replacement contractor - Rescheduling of the Project Debt
- The exercise of the above remedies should not
provide additional termination rights to the
Authority
18 5) Who Provides Direct Agreements? (cont.)
- Target of the Lenders under a Direct Agreement is
to minimize the interference and disruption to
the Project and to consider the steps which are
to be taken to preserve the Project and the
underlying Concession.
19 6) Issues with Direct Agreements
- Importance of achieveing a balanced Direct
Agreement - Imbalanced Direct Agreement will limit the
effectiveness of the Step In arrangements and
limit the ability to preserve the Project. - The following comments focus on the Authority
Direct Agreement / Tripartite Agreement. - Identified issues
- Tripartite Agreement should not be the only
remedy for Lenders - Election Periods and Cure Periods should be
reasonable
20 6) Issues with Direct Agreements (cont.)
- Transfer of liability should be defined and
reasonable e.g. Lenders representative should
only be liable for identified defaults causing
the termination event and Step In plus
obligations during Step In Period. - Unreasonable Step In Criteria should be avoided.
- Direct Agreements should not in themselves create
Lender obligations unless the election to Step In
is taken.
217) Conclusions
- In considering the formulation of Authority
Direct Agreement (which an appear as a bid
document) it is vital for the Authority to
receive appropriately experienced advice. This
is a general comment regarding the proposed bid
documentation. - Inexperienced advice leads to unbalanced
documentation which could render the underlying
transaction unbankable in its current form. - Poor bid documents unnecessarily delay the
closing process may add cost and create an
unhelpful atmosphere during negotiations.
227) Conclusions (cont.)
- The Authority Direct Agreement is not the only
source of remedy for Lenders. The financing
agreements must also be acknowledged. - The Direct Agreement will remain an essential
ingredient to the PPP (and other) infrastructure
financing arrangements and as such should be
given due consideration.
23 Contact Information
For further information please contact
Mr. Tim C. Meaney Head of Project Finance DZ
BANK AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank Hong
Kong Branch 9th Floor, Tower II, Admiralty
Centre 18 Harcourt Road, Hong Kong Direct Tel.
852 2864-3990 Direct Fax 852 2864-3174 Email
tim.meaney_at_dzbank.de Website www.hongkong.dzbank.
de