Compliance The hidden cause of treatment failure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

Compliance The hidden cause of treatment failure

Description:

'The best medication in the world is completely useless unless people take it' ... Eastwood, 1997. Pereira, 1997. Hoencamp, 1995 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: leoni9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Compliance The hidden cause of treatment failure


1
Compliance The hidden cause of treatment failure
  • Dr Leonie Rynn

2
The best medication in the world is completely
useless unless people take it
3
The need to develop strategies to improve
adherence is an essential element in reducing
the global burden of disease WHO 2003
4
Consistent Pill Taking
  • We try hard
  • But were not very good at it!

5
Non-Compliance
  • Not an accusation.
  • Its human nature

6
Compliance Asthma
  • 266 Randomly selected adolescents 13 17yrs of
    age
  • Compliance assessed by written questionnaire

Kyngas HA Nurse Health Sci. 1999 1195-202
7
Compliance Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
  • 556 pts with RA followed for 3 years
  • Compliance assessed annually by interview

Viller F et al. J Rheumatol. 1999262114-2122.
8
Compliance Hypertension
Mallion et al, J Hypertension, 1998
9
Compliance Diabetes
  • Adherence rate for two drugs for diabetes
  • 54 refill rate
  • Long-term compliance
  • 72.5 by pill count
  • 50.7 by electronic cap

Melikan et al, Clin. Ther., 2002. Paes et al,
Pharm. World Sci, 1998
10
The problem of poor compliance
Patients not adhering by disease area ()
Whitney HAK et al. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 1993.
11
Compliance
  • Full compliance
  • Taking all medication as prescribed
  • Partial compliance
  • Occasionally missing or questioning the need for
    medication
  • Non- compliance
  • Complete cessation of medication

12
Schizophrenia
  • Taking medication over an extended period of time
    is hard for any condition
  • Schizophrenia is no exception

13
With Schizophrenia
  • Single largest amount of outcome variance is
    accounted for by medication response
  • Current treatment philosophy emphasizes the
    concept of using the lowest effective dose of
    medication

14
Partial Compliance
  • Problems with compliance have an immediate impact
  • Becomes an issue when the threshold of lowest
    effective dose is not reached

15
Compliance
  • Problems with compliance affects
  • some patients all of the time?
  • all patients some of the time?
  • Great uncertainty in identifying which ones at
    which times

16

17
Evidence to date
  • 50 will stop medication within 1 year
  • 75 will stop medication within 2 years
  • Prescription refill rates show less than 10 are
    filled fully
  • Average no of days that a patient with
    schizophrenia is without medication because of
    failure to refill prescription is 110 125 days

Gray et al (2002)
18
How can it be identified?
  • Ask the patient
  • Different inquirers get different answers
  • Patients may truly believe they are compliant
  • Veligan Study - 60 stated they took every dose
  • 8 actually did
  • Ask the clinician
  • Overly optimistic when predicting medication
    compliance
  • Prediction 95
  • Actual was 38

19
How can it be identified?
  • Rx refills
  • Refill is only part of the pill taking process
  • Microchips
  • Opening the bottle is one step closer
  • Serum level
  • A gold standard? or recent activity?

20
Impact
  • Partial compliance or interruptions in
    medication are ultimately damaging and costly to
    the patient
  • Lack of full recovery
  • Reappearance of symptoms
  • Relapse
  • Rehospitalisation

21
Poor Compliance Affects Rehospitalisation Rates
Percent
Medication Possession Ratio
Valenstein M, et al. Medical Care.
200240630-639.
22
Impact
Gilmer et al. Am J Psych 2004
23
Impact
  • A 10 day gap in medication doubles the odds of
    being hospitalised
  • A 30 day gap in medication (after 3 months of
    medication) quadruples the suicide attempt rate

Keith S. Unpublished data. 2003, R.M.C.
Herings, and J.A. Erkens, Submitted to BMJ
24
Impact
  • We cannot simply reverse the onset of clinical
    deterioration in patients not on medication with
    vigorous pharmacological interventions
  • Relapse rate doubles compared to those maintained
    on continuous medication

25
Impact of Partial Adherence Asthma
Impact on Illness
Impact on Patient
Weeks
Days
Months
Hours
Missed Doses
Courtesy of Robert Lasser and Sam Keith
26
Impact of Partial Compliance Schizophrenia
Impact on Patient
Impact on Illness
Duration of Missed Doses
Courtesy of Samuel Keith
27
Psychotic RelapseWhat is the impact on the
person?
28
Psychotic RelapseWhat is the impact on the
person?
  • Is it biological degeneration?
  • Is it treatment resistance?
  • Is it demoralization?

29
Multiple Relapses May Lead to Continuing
Neurodegeneration
  • Deterioration in schizophrenia is probably the
    result of neurodegeneration
  • Many patients who stop treatment and then relapse
    fail to regain prior level of function
  • Early intervention is key
  • Antipsychotics may improve long-term outcome by
    counteracting neurodegeneration

Lieberman JA, et al. J Clin Psychiatry
199657(suppl 9) 5-9. Sheitman BA, et al.
Psychiatric Res. 199832143-150.
30
Impact of Multiple Relapses
Average time to remission in three successive
episodes (N10)
Adapted from Lieberman J et al., J Clin
Psychiatry 1996.
31
Is continuous therapy the answer?
32
Long-term Studies of Continuous vs Targeted
Maintenance
  • 5 studies with at least 1 year of follow-up
  • Compared continuous antipsychotic treatment with
    targeted treatment given only when patients
    showed early signs of clinical worsening

33
Continuous vs Targeted Maintenance
Rates of Relapse After 1 Year
Kane JM. N Engl J Med. 199633434-41.
34
Clinical Solutions
35
Psychosocial Solutions
  • Education of physicians, families and persons
    suffering from schizophrenia
  • Need long-term model of schizophrenia
  • Must recognize increasing penalty of each relapse
  • Families, friends and patients should not have to
    be pill police
  • Development of effective compliance therapies

36
Long-Acting Medication

37
Advantages
  • Confidence in medication availability
  • Predictable and stable plasma levels
  • No first pass metabolism - Lower dose possible
  • A missed injection does not lead to abrupt
    withdrawal
  • A missed injection (non-compliance) is
    immediately known
  • Advantages for patients
  • Freedom from daily pill taking
  • Consistent contact with treatment team

Kane JM et al. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol
1998855-66.
38
Potential to Improve Relapse Rates With Depot vs
Oral Antipsychotics
Relapsed ()
27
48
2
-16
24
9


Mantel-Haenszel P lt 0.0002. Davis JM et al.
Drugs. 199447741-773.
39
These Were All Conventional DepotsWould the
Same Be True of atypicals?
  • One year, open label study
  • Stable patients
  • Switched from
  • Oral Atypical to long-acting atypical (same drug)

40
1-year Trial Prior Antipsychotic (AP)
Medication
None
HAL oral
OLZ
Other oral
Other-D
HAL
FLP
PER
RIS 4 mg/d or less
Typical Depots n 188 (25.9)
n 208 (28.7)
FLX
RIS over 4 mg/d
n 128 (17.7)
ZUC
Multiple antipsychotics
n 120 (16.6)
Fleischhacker et al. J Clin Psych. Oct 2003
41
Conventional Depot to Long-acting Atypical
measure of efficacy
Mean PANSS Total Score
P lt 0.001 vs prior AP





12 24 36 50
EP (weeks)
Fleischhacker et al. J Clin Psych. Oct 2003
42
Oral Atypical to Long-acting Atypical (same
drug) A measure of compliance
Mean PANSS Total Score
P lt 0.05 P lt 0.001 vs prior AP










12 24 36 50
EP
Fleischhacker et al. J Clin Psych. Oct 2003
43
Efficacy AnalysisOral Atypical to Long-acting
Atypical Categorical Improvement
(n78) (n118)
Patients
40
60
20
Improvement in PANSS from Baseline to Endpoint
44
Why not use a long-acting injectable?Beliefs vs
Reality
45
Patients Often Prefer Long-acting Antipsychotics
Wistedt, 1997
Jacobsson, 1980
Eastwood, 1997
Pereira, 1997
Hoencamp, 1995
Desai, 1999
50
0
100
Percentage
Compared oral atypical with conventional
long-acting. Walburn J et al. Br J Psychiatry.
2001179300-307.
46
Compliance
  • Clinical Decision-Making

47
The Decisions Facing EVERY Clinician
48
Why clinically consider a long-acting atypical
antipsychotic for early episode?
  • They have the most to lose
  • 80 will have a second episode and with each
    episode recovery is less complete
  • Adherence problems
  • Greater after first episode because model of
    chronic illness not established
  • 75 off medication by 2 years

Robinson DG, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry
1999562417 Lieberman J, et al. J Clin
Psychiatry 199657(Suppl. 9)6871 Weiden PJ,
Zygmunt A. J Pract Psychiatry Behav Health
199710610
49
Why clinically consider a long-acting atypical
antipsychotic for early episode?
  • Remission
  • 5 times longer with medication than without
  • A cognitive impairment that affects
  • attention, persistence, attitude

Robinson DG, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry
1999562417 Lieberman J, et al. J Clin
Psychiatry 199657(Suppl. 9)6871 Weiden PJ,
Zygmunt A. J Pract Psychiatry Behav Health
199710610
50
Non-Compliance
  • Not reasonable to expect in schizophrenia
  • All data point to this
  • The illness itself makes it difficult
  • A critically important aspect of recovery

51
Compliance
  • If we really believe that medication works
  • We need to be sure that it is delivered
  • Not necessarily to those who refuse
    medicationpeople have the right to decline
  • To those who really want to take it, but because
    of the illness they have, they are unable to do
    so.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com