Frutsttningar fr kraftvrme i Sverige och ngra av grannlnderna

1
The experimental phase is over Emissions trading
is here to stay
2
Power prices vs. Allowance prices
Power prices w1 w17
3
Sweden is a net importer
4
Swedish power balance 2004/2005 Peak demand in a
ten years winter
Margin 200 MW
29000
MW
28800
Import 1300 MW
Reserves 1700 MW
Combustion plants 2800 MW
Nuclear 9500 MW
Hydro 13700 MW
Demand Supply
Source Svensk Energi
5
The Nordic power production system
Gas turbines
Cost
Oil
/MWh
Allowance prices
Coal Condensing plants
20 /ton
10 /ton
5 /ton
CHP
Nuclear
Hydro
TWh/year Capacity
300
200
1
00
0
400
Demand
6
The Emissions trading directive, Article 1

• This Directive establishes a scheme for
  greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within
  the Community in order to promote reductions of
  greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective and
  economically efficient manner.

7
Different treatment of new CHP in
differentmember states
Sweden Carbon tax - 50 MSEK Allocation - 35
MSEK (60)
Finland Carbon tax - 22 MSEK Allocation 18
MSEK (121)
Germany Carbon tax 0 MSEK Allocation 21 MSEK
(124)
Denmark System under reconstruction
Carbon tax and allocation for a CHP plant
equivalent to Rya KVV EAU price 150 SEK/ton
8
Benchmarking may be a step in the right direction

• If properly developed, it could provide for
• Longer term stability
• Environmental integrety
• A solid foundation for a simpler, harmonised
  system

9
however, some issues have to be resolved

• The carbon tax must be abolished for the
  benchmarked sector
• The imbalance between renewables included in the
  directive (biomass gt20 MW) and those that are not
  (wind, waste heat etc.) must be adressed.
• It must be clarified what striving for
  international harmonisation actually means.

10
Dont let the patient die!