Annotating Molecular Interactions in MINT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Annotating Molecular Interactions in MINT

Description:

... coming out from both the body text and the figure legends ... Biocreative annotation flaws: examples. FALSE POSITIVES. Phosphorylation. FALSE NEGATIVES ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: toto59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Annotating Molecular Interactions in MINT


1
Annotating Molecular Interactions in MINT
http//mint.bio.uniroma2.it/mint/Welcome.do
2
ANNOTATING PROTEIN INTERACTIONS STANDARDS AND
BASIC ASPECTS
3
What is archived in MINT?
  • MINT collects P-P interactions experimentally
    verified
  • The interaction representation is according to
    PSI-MIs ontology and nomenclature
  • The interaction types collected in MINT are
  • Colocalizations
  • Physical interactions
  • Direct interactions (enzymatic reactions)

4
Curation standards
The PSI Molecular Interaction work group develops
a common data standard that allows user to
retrieve all relevant data from different sites
and perform comparative analysis of different
datasets
5
(No Transcript)
6
Interaction type
7
What is critical in the annotation process?
  • Organism identification
  • Proper Uniprot_ID detection
  • Experimental features annotations
  • Participant features annotations

8
http//www.nature.com/nbt/consult/index.html
9
Papers selection
  • Title
  • Abstract
  • Materials and methods
  • Quick look at the figures

10
(No Transcript)
11
THE SECOND BIOCREATIVE CHALLENGE DATASETS
PREPARATION
12
MINT curation projects
  • Journals curation (FEBS letters, EMBO Journal,
    EMBO Reports)
  • Thematic curation (Domains, VirHostome)

13
  • DELIVERED DATASETS
  • TRAINING SET
  • (128 pmids 1182 interactions)
  • TEST SET
  • (221 pmids 1489 interactions)

14
Biocreative training-set
  • The MINT/BioCreative positive test set is
    composed of papers extracted from volumes of FEBS
    letters, EMBO Journal and EMBO Reports published
    from january to july 2006
  • All the papers not curated from the above
    mentioned volumes are considered belonging to the
    negative test set
  • For each interaction is reported the best
    interaction description sentence coming out from
    both the body text and the figure legends

15
ANNOTATION AND PREDICTION USE CASES
16
Biocreative annotation flaws examples
  • FALSE POSITIVES
  • Phosphorylation
  • FALSE NEGATIVES
  • Positive controls
  • MISINFORMATION
  • Complexes

17
Use cases
  1. Pol I is a complex
  2. No sentences are available for the illustrated
    colocalizations

In situ colocalization of NM1 and Pol
I Immunostaining of isolated nucleoli showed that
actin and NM1 were enriched in nucleoli and their
distribution correlated with upstream binding
factor (UBF) and fibrillarin (Fig 1A).
NMI colocalized with Pol I and green fluorescent
proteinRPA53, a protein that decorates the
active subpopulation of Pol I (Fig 1B). The
colocalization between Pol I and NM1 was
further corroborated by immunogold electron
microscopy using intact HeLa cells (supplementary
Fig 1 online). NM1 was distributed throughout the
nucleoplasm but was largely excluded from
the nucleoli, except the fibrillar centres. These
nucleolar subcompartments are known to contain
Pol I and Pol I-specific transcription factors
(Scheer Benavente, 1990 Dundr et al, 2002).
In addition, both a novel autoimmune serum
against Pol I (S57299 see supplementary Figs 2,3
online) and a peptide-specific affinitypurified an
tibody against NM1 blocked Pol I transcription in
vitro (Fig 1C,D). These data support previous
studies demonstrating a key role for NM1 in Pol I
transcription (Fomproix Percipalle, 2004
Philimonenko et al, 2004).
18
Use cases
This experiment describes a genetic interaction
19
Use cases
Post-translational modification or PPI?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com