Title: The Magnificent Seven
1The Magnificent Seven
2(No Transcript)
3Sepsis
- 25 deaths per 100,000 in Scotland
- Hospital mortality
- 47 in adults (MOF)
- 10 in children
- 5 yr mortality 74
- Patients with severe sepsis account for 45 of
all ICU bed-days - Considerable short and long term morbidity
- High cost US 120,000 at 5yrs
4In other words sepsis is bad!
5Historical Management of Sepsis
- ABC
- Antibiotics / surgery
- Goal directed therapy
6 History of Goal directed therapy
- Shoemaker Arch. Surg. 1973
- Increased DO2, increased survival
- Vallet CCM 1993
- Dobutamine challenge test
- Ronco JAMA 1993
- Critical DO2 needed is less
- VO2 mirrors DO2
- Hayes NEJM 1994
- Goal directed approach leads to worse outcome in
sepsis - Hayes CCM, 1997
- Sub-group analysis
- Survivors can increase DO2 VO2 (reserve)
- Non-survivors reduced reserve, fail to increase
VO2 with resus, O2 extraction falls with
aggressive inotropes
7Why not that simple ?
- Not just about oxygen delivery
- Oxygen consumption also important
- Critically ill different from surgical patient
- Flogging the struggling patient does harm
8What goals work?
- High risk surgery
- Early intervention in Sepsis
9- High risk surgery or patients
- Three groups
- Control
- Invasive monitoring, fluids, adrenaline to
increase DO2 - Invasive monitoring, fluid, dopexamine to
increase DO2 - Improved outcome in treatment groups (15 reduced
hospital mortality NNT 7) - Less side effects with Dopexamine
- Most benefit from fluid
10But
- Poor control results
- Impractical?
11What do I do?
- Measure CO in theatre
- Give more fluid pre KNS
- Use dopexamine more
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Early intervention
- Six hours only in AE HDU (but its the first 6
hours) - More fluid (blood) earlier
- Less inotropes and ventilation later
- NNT 7
16But..
- Are you doing it?
- How easy is it?
- What does it cost?
17What do I do..
- Easy in ICU
- Use CV sats- more blood and dopexamine
- Measure CO less noradrenaline
- Difficult in HDU
- Difficult in AE
- Impossible on the wards?
18(No Transcript)
19- Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled
-
- Multicenter, international
-
- Strict patient selection patients with systemic
inflam. organ failure due to acute infection. -
- 96 hours of 24mcg/kg/hr activated protein C
-
- 28 day mortality used as primary endpoint
20Results
- All patients
- 28 day mortality Placebo 30.8 Treatme
nt 24.7 (p0.005) - Reduction in the relative risk of death of 19.4
- Absolute reduction in risk of death of 6.1
- NNT 16
- In MOF
- 28 day mortality
- Placebo 33.9
- Treatment 26.5
- NNT 13.5
21But..
- Is Lilly trying to take over the world?
- Is it worth the money?
- Do we need another trial first?
- How would randomize for another trial?
22Cost Effectiveness
- USA
- 48,800 per QALY overall
- 27,400 per QALY if APACHE II gt25
- UK
- 10,000 per QALY if same treatment effect as
PROWESS - ARR would have to drop to 2 to 3 before cost
exceeded 30,000 per QALY (Davies in press)
23Cost Comparison
- aPC 10,000 per QALY
- Infliximab 100,000 per QALY
- rTPA 19,400 per QALY
24Current Situation
- Poor efficacy in
- Single organ failure (especially surgical
patients) - Usage
- ICS/SICS aPC appropriate for severe sepsis with
2 or more organ failures - ? APACHE gt25
- Variable usage
- Trial in the pipeline
25What do I do?
- Give to
- Septic shock
- 2 or more organ failures despite resuscitation
- Earlier rather than later
26aPC
27- Control BM 10 - 11 mmol/l
- Experimental 4.4 - 6.1 mmol/l
28But..
- Majority of patients post cardiac surgery
- Most benefit however
- Septic
- ICU for more than 3 days
- Non cardiac patients
- Trials awaited in general ICUs
- Benefit due to glycaemic control rather than
insulin per se. (Van den Berghe, CCM, 2003)
29Intensive Insulin - Medical
Patients in ICU for 3 days
All patients
30What do I do?
- Currently
- Tight control as per Annane
- The future
- Not so sure!
- Await ANZICS study.
31Intensive Insulin Therapy
32Relative adrenal insufficiency
- Definition
- Difficult
- Admission cortisol lt25mcg/dl (690nml/l)
- Incidence
- 30 of all ICU patients
- 50-60 in sepsis
- Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Adrenal insufficiency in the
critically ill. Chest 2002 1221784-1796. - Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Adrenal insufficiency during
septic shock. Crit Care Med 2003 31141-145.
33Annane, JAMA, 2002
- 300 patients with septic shock
- Hydrocortisone 50mg q6h
- ACTH test (high dose)
- Improved outcome in non-responders
- NNT (hospital mortality) 6
- Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C, et al. Effect
of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and
fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with
septic shock. JAMA 2002 228862-871.
34Relative adrenal insufficiency
- Diagnosis
- Admission cortisol
- Cortisol if deterioration
- Management
- 50mg hydrocortisone q6h iv in septic shock
- Stop if result suggests cortisol level sufficient
(lt25mcg/dl (690nml/l))
35Cheap easy. But
- Who gets them?
- For how long?
- ACTH?
- Random level?
- Harm?
- Is one trial enough?
36CORTICUS
- 500 patients
- 2002-2005
- Less sick than Annane study
- Sepsis for longer
- Non mortality difference
- Steroid vs placebo
- Responders vs non-responders
37What do I do?
- Give to
- Septic shock
- Resuscitate first
- Higher dose noradrenaline
- Random level pre first dose
- Stop
- Watch for response or level back
- Stop abruptly
38Steroids
39- 838 critically ill patients with Hb lt 9 within 72
hrs of ICU admission - Hb controlled to 7-9g or 10-12g
- Results
- ARR of 5.8 - Hospital mortality
- NNT 17
- No change in 30 day mortality (except if APACHE
lt20, lt55 yrs restrictive better) - MI or unstable angina ?
40But.
- Is anaemia better or transfusion harmful?
- J-L Vincent, JAMA, 2002, Transfusion associated
with higher mortality. - Leuco-depleted blood?
- Long term effects?
- Do we do what we think we do?
- Ischaemic heart disease?
- Wu, NEJM, 2001, Transfusion improved outcome in
MI if admission Hct lt30.
41What do I do?
- Most patients
- Transfuse one unit when Hb lt7
- Exceptions
- Ischaemic
- MI
- Early intervention DO2 optimization.
- Future
- Long term QOL studies
42Restrictive Transfusion
43Restrictive Ventilation
- 861 patients, ALI/ARDS
- Control
- 12ml/kg TV, Pplat lt50cmH2O
- Mim TV 4ml/kg (Pp gt50 if pHlt7.15)
- Intervention
- 6ml/kg TV, Pplat lt30cmH2O
- Min TV 4ml/kg (Ppgt30 if pHlt7.15)
- Bicarbonate for severe acidosis
44Results
- Marked reduction in hospital mortality NNT 11
- With restrictive policy
- Lower TVs and Pp
- Higher FiO2 Peep (until day 7)
- Higher pCO2 (pO2 similar)
- Lower pH
- Increased ventilator-free days
- Decreased other organ failure
45But.
- Difficult to do?
- Pressure control ventilation?
- What do you do?
- Surely bigger is better?
46What do I do?
- Beat by head against the wall!!
- Use APRV
47Restrictive Ventilation
48- 128 ventilated patients, sedated by infusion
- Control
- Sedation stopped at discretion of clinicians
- Intervention
- Sedation stopped daily, until patient awake
- Both groups sub-divide into propofol / morphine
or midazolam / morphine
49Results
- Duration of ventilation reduced by 2.4 days
- ICU stay reduced by 3.5 days
- No difference in adverse events
- No difference between propofol and midazolam
50What do I do?
- Encourage daily sedation vacation
- Then.Switch off sedation myself
- Use less propofo and more MM
- Use less noradrenaline
- Use less steroids
- Need to reassure that not torturing patients
- Need to communicate and be on hand
51Daily interruption of Sedation
52SSC
- What about combined strategies?
53Resuscitation Bundle
- As soon as possible (but within 6 hours)
- Measure lactate
- BCs prior to antibiotics
- Broad spectrum Abs within 1-3 hours
- If hypotension and/or lactate gt4mmol/l
- 20ml/kg fluid challenge
- Norad. If no response to fluid (MAPgt65)
- If persistant hypotension and/or lactate
- CVP gt8mmHg
- CVsat gt70
54Management Bundle
- As soon as possible (but within 24hrs)
- Low-dose steroids as per unit policy
- aPC as per unit policy
- Glucose control
- Protective ventilation if appropriate
55- NNT 4 for 6 hr bundle
- But
- Bundles different
- Numbers small
56Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Hypothermia post out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
improves outcome
The hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Study Group
(2002). Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia To Improve
Neurologic Outcome After Cardiac Arrest. NEJM
3468549-56
Bernard SA, TW Gray, MD Buist, BM Jones, W
Silvester, G Gutteridge, K Smith. Treatment of
Comatose Survivors of out-of-hospital Cardiac
Arrest with Induced Hypothermia NEJM 2002
3468557-63
57..cooling
- Target 32-34C
- Aim to reach target within 4 hours
- Cool for 24 hrs (external)
- Passive rewarming over 8 hrs
- All patients sedated, paralysed, ventilated
58.. Results..
59also
- Fear of creating poor outcome survivors has not
materialized
60But.
- Select group of patients
- Small of Cardiac arrests
- Not necessarily a bad thing
- Aftercare varies hugely
61What do I do?
- If they come to ICU then they get cooled
62SSC
63SSC survivors?
Too hard?
Harm?
Too hard?
Harm?
64SSC survivors?
65The Fabulous 5?
66sicsebm.org.uk