Intermountain Lumber Company V. Commissioner - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Intermountain Lumber Company V. Commissioner

Description:

Issue: Court determination of 'control' as is requisite in applying Section 351. ... Shook relinquished the legal right to retain stock. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: sarahb152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intermountain Lumber Company V. Commissioner


1
Intermountain Lumber Company V. Commissioner
  • Sarah K. Bragg
  • June 18, 2007

2
Transfer of Property for Stock
  • Judge Wilson
  • United States Tax Court, 1976
  • Examines Section 351
  • Issue Court determination of control as is
    requisite in applying Section 351.

3
S W Sawmill, Inc. (1 of 3)
  • Shook and Wilson partnered to build a saw mill.
  • Wilson co-guaranteed a 200,000 loan to provide
    financing.
  • Shook and Wilson created S W Sawmill, Inc. and
    created a contract with the following
    stipulations regarding ownership of stock

4
S W Sawmill, Inc. (2 of 3)
  • 1. Dee Shook is to sell to Milo E. Wilson 182
    shares of stock in S W for the agreed price of
    500 per share.
  • 2. Wilson is to pay Shook for said stock,
    interest only until 1969 at which time principal
    payments of 15,000 per year are to commence.

5
S W Sawmill, Inc. (3 of 3)
  • 3. As each principal payment is made the
    proportionate number of shares of stock are to be
    transferred on the corporate records and
    delivered to Wilson.
  • Shook also executed an irrevocable proxy allowing
    Wilson voting rights in all the stock.

6
Intermountain Lumber Co.
  • On July 1, 1967 Intermountain Lumber Co. bought
    all outstanding shares of S W stock.
  • An agreement was made to pay Shook 91,000 more
    than Wilson.

7
The Problems Arise
  • Shook my transferred assets into S W were
    non-taxable under Section 351.
  • Intermountain the transfers were taxable
    because of the lack of pertinent control
  • Intermountain wished to use the higher FMV basis
    for depreciation purposes.

8
The Courts Decision
  • Shook and Wilson intended to consummate the sale
    of the said stock.
  • Shook relinquished the legal right to retain
    stock.
  • Therefore he did not have the requisite control
    of company to take advantage of Section 351.

9
Conclusion
  • Section 351 No Gain or Loss to be recognized if
    property is transferred for stock and that person
    is then in control.
  • Simply a transfer of form.
  • Shooks transaction was a Sale and not simply a
    transfer of form.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com