Title: Partnerships,
1Business Organizations2009-2010 Lectures
- Partnerships,
- Corporations
- And the variants
- PROF. BRUCE MCCANN
- LECTURE 14
- REVIEW
2What are we talking about?
- Two Umbrella Types of Entities
- Limited personal liability for owners
- Limited partnership
- Limited Liability Company
- Corporation
- No protection from personal liability
- General partnership
- Sole proprietorship
3Some Basic Terms
- Partnership
- Two or more persons (and by person we also mean
other entities) - Share power
- Share profits
- Share losses
- Partnership reports its profits and losses to the
partners who each take their percentage on their
own tax return (pass through) - Partnership itself is not taxed
- Each partner personally liable
- Dissolves on death of partner or other
- No formal registration required with State
4Corporation
- One or more owners
- No personal liability (assuming formalities met)
- Registered with Secretary of State
- Managed by its Board of Directors who are elected
by the owners - Board names officers who run day-to-day
operations - Separate existence from its owners (perpetual
life) - Pays taxes
- Distributes profits via dividends to owners
5AGENCY
6AGENCY
- Elements of relationship
- 1. Principal manifests assent that agent act for
principal and be subject to principals control - 2. Agent manifests consent or otherwise consents
to act.
7Scope of Authority of Agent Derived From
- Actual authority that authority which principal
has expressly granted to the agent or which agent
reasonably believes was granted. - Apparent authority that authority which
principal has informed third party has been
vested in agent - Implied authority that authority reasonably
required to accomplish the objectives of the
agency
8Corp Code 313
- Subject to the provisions of subdivision (a) of
Section 208, any note, mortgage, evidence of
indebtedness, contract, share certificate,
initial transaction statement or written
statement, conveyance, or other instrument in
writing, and any assignment or endorsement
thereof, executed or entered into between any
corporation and any other person, when signed by
the chairman of the board, the president or any
vice president and the secretary, any assistant
secretary, the chief financial officer or any
assistant treasurer of such corporation, is not
invalidated as to the corporation by any lack of
authority of the signing officers in the absence
of actual knowledge on the part of the other
person that the signing officers had no authority
to execute the same.
9Importance of Disclosure of Agency
- Example of Disclosed Principal
- Alpha Corporation, Inc.
-
- By ____________________
- George Smith, Pres.
- Other party aware of agency and principal.
- Principal alone is liable to third party.
10FYI California and Agent Liability
- California courts generally do not employ the
Restatement analysis, but appear to hold the
agent liable, regardless of his or her disclosure
of the fact of agency, unless the name of the
principal is disclosed so as to make it appear on
the face of the instrument that the parties
intended to bind the principal and not the agent.
(See Patterson v. John P. Mills Organization
(1928) 203 C. 419, 421, Gambord Meat Co. v.
Corbari (1952) 109 C.A.2d 161, 162, 240 P.2d 342
agent liable on personal check sent in payment
of principal's obligation - And a disclosure only of the principal's trade
name is not a sufficient disclosure of identity
to relieve the agent of personal liability. (W.W.
Leasing Unlimited v. Commercial Standard Title
Ins. Co. (1983) 149 C.A.3d 792, 796.) -
11Partially Disclosed Agency
- Aka unidentified principal in Restate. 3rd
Agency - Real estate agent represents anonymous purchaser.
- Why? To keep secret identity of purchaser
because of publicity or in order to maintain
negotiation advantage. - Other party is aware of agency but not identity
of principal. - Both agent and principal liable to third party.
12Undisclosed Agency
- Real estate agent represents that she is
purchasing the property for herself. - Why? Take advantage of personal relationship
with seller to get better price. - Other party unaware of agency or existence of
principal. - Both principal and agent liable.
13Principals Liability for Torts of Agent
- Liable if agent has actual or apparent
authority. - Liable if principal ratifies the agents acts.
- Liable if negligent in selecting or
supervising the agent - Liable if agent negligent in performance of act
- Liable if agent is employee acting in course and
scope.
14Agent Is a Fiduciary
- A fiduciary duty is the highest standard of care
at either equity or law. A fiduciary is expected
to be extremely loyal to the person to whom he
owes the duty (the "principal") he must not put
his personal interests before the duty, and must
not profit from his position as a fiduciary,
unless the principal consents. The word itself
comes originally from the Latin fides, meaning
faith, and fiducia, trust.
15PARTNERSHIP
16Aggregation vs Entity Theories
- Commonlaw (Aggregation)
- Partners held undivided but separate interests in
property - Partnership was not an entity distinct from its
partners - Withdrawing partner entitled to piece of each
asset as is her estate - Unanimous consent to admit new partner
- Partnership meant one exact constellation of
partners. Any change resulted in dissolution.
17Aggregation or Entity Theories
- Under Uniform Partnership Act, 1997
- Partnership is an entity distinct from the
partners - Withdrawing partner has no interest in
partnership assets but only right to receive pro
rata share of the value of assets - Entity may continue on despite withdrawal or
death of partner
18Under Entity Theory
- CAL. CORP. CODE 16502 California Code -
Section 16502 - The only transferable interest of a partner in
the partnership is the partner's share of the
profits and losses of the partnership and the
partner's right to receive distributions. The
interest is personal property.
19Under UPA, Modern P/S a Hybrid
- Still an aggregation of partners in sense that
- Each partner individually (jointly and severally)
liable for debts - Pass through entity, invisible to taxing
authorities each partner pays on her own income
from the partnership
20Formation
- CAL. CORP. CODE 16202
- (a)Except as otherwise provided in subdivision
(b), the association of two or more persons to
carry on as coowners a business for profit forms
a partnership, whether or not the persons intend
to form a partnership. (Emphasis added.) -
21Establishing a Partnership
- Majority Intent is key, as evidenced by conduct
and circumstances. - Minority Requires finding all of the following
- 1. A community of interest in the venture
- 2. An agreement to share profits
- 3. An agreement to share losses
- 4. A mutual right of control or management
22RECAP OF PARTNER LIABILITY
- Restatement of Agency
- A Principal is liable for torts of employee if
they are committed within the course and scope of
employment - Course and scope requires that there be some
intent in the mind of the agent to serve the
purposes of the principal - Uniform Partnership Act
- Partnership is liable if partner is carrying on
in the usual way the business of the partnership
and has actual or apparent authority - NO REQUIREMENT that the partner is motivated to
benefit the partnership
23The Usual Way
- American Rule partner must be acting
consistently with the way that particular
partnership operates. - English Rule partner must be acting as do others
in that type of business, whether or not usual
for that particular partnership. - UPA follows English Rule interpretation
24California Corporations Code Section 16404
Excerpt
- The fiduciary duties a partner owes to the
partnership and the other partners are the duty
of loyalty and the duty of care set forth below - A partner's duty of loyalty to the partnership
and the other partners includes all of the
following (3) To refrain from competing with
the partnership in the conduct of the partnership
business before the dissolution of the
partnership. - A partner shall discharge the duties to the
partnership and the other partners under this
chapter or under the partnership agreement and
exercise any rights consistently with the
obligation of good faith and fair dealing. - A partner does not violate a duty or obligation
under this chapter or under the partnership
agreement merely because the partner' s conduct
furthers the partner's own interest
25The End Game of a Partnership
- Dissolution (or Dissociation)
- An event triggers the end of the partnership
- Winding Up
- The affairs of the partnership are concluded
- Assets liquidated or earmarked for distribution
- Taxes paid
- Creditors paid
- Partners are paid
- Termination
- All affairs are wound up
26Dissociating Partner
- Within Rights Under Agreement
- Share as per agreement or per UPA
- Price if all assets sold as of date of
dissociation at greater of liquidation value or
going concern value, with interest - In Violation of Agreement or Wrongful
- Same less
- Value of Goodwill (discretionary)
- Offsets for damage caused by wrongful
dissociation - Any other amounts owed by departing partner
27LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
- Form allows limited liability to limited partners
provided they do not manage - 1976 ULPA provided safe harbor if acts of
limited confined to such things as - Consulting with general partner re partnership
affairs - Requesting or attending meeting of partners
- Voting on matter relating to business affairs if
subject of vote is one allowing approval or
disapproval of limiteds - Serving as agent or employee of LP
28LLC
- liMITED Liability Companies
29California Corporations Code Section 17153
The fiduciary duties a manager owes to the
limited liability company and to its members are
those of a partner to a partnership and to the
partners of the partnership.
30California Corporations Code Section 17001
- (z) "Membership interest" means a member's rights
in the limited liability company, collectively,
including the member's economic interest, any
right to vote or participate in management, and
any right to information concerning the business
and affairs of the limited liability company
provided by this title.
31California Corporations Code Section 17001
- (n) "Economic interest" means a person's right to
share in the income, gains, losses, deductions,
credit, or similar items of, and to receive
distributions from, the limited liability
company, but does not include any other rights of
a member, including, without limitation, the
right to vote or to participate in management,
or, except as provided in Section 17106, any
right to information concerning the business and
affairs of the limited liability company.
32LLC Re-Cap
- Creature of Contract
- Variation between states as to what the operating
agreement can do with respect to - Eliminating fiduciary duties, namely
- Duty of Care
- Duty of Loyalty
- California, for example,
- Cannot entirely eliminate duty of loyalty in
operating agreement - But can specify certain acts which will not
constitute breach if not manifestly
unreasonable.
33Duty of Loyalty
- Duty to account for property or profit or benefit
derived by the member from LLC property. - Duty not to appropriate an LLC opportunity
- Duty to avoid conflicts of interest
- Duty to refrain from competing
- Acts in violation require consent of the members.
34Duty of Care
- Duty to refrain from grossly negligent or
reckless conduct, intentional misconduct, or a
knowing violation of law. - Agreement cannot unreasonably reduce this duty of
care.
35CORPORATIONS
36Promoters and Pre-incorporation Liability
- Liability that of promoters until corporation
adopts pre-incorporation agreements and other
party agrees to novation, replacing promoter with
corporation - Contract language indicating promoter not to be
personally liable may exonerate promoter
37Overview of Corporate Structure
38Incorporation Process Review
39Incorporation Process Review
- Articles filed
- By laws prepared
- First meeting held of shareholders
- Elect Directors
- Make subchapter S election
- Directors meeting
- Adopt pre-existing agreements
- Appoint officers
- Authorize issuance of stock
- Authorize banking relationships
40The Debt-Equity Relationship
41Why Capitalize with Debt?
- You can keep (i.e., leverage) the cash you have.
- You retain ownership (control) of the business
- Interest payments are tax-deductible
- Generally easier to sell debt because you dont
have to convince someone that the company will
grow, only have to convince them that theyll get
paid back (and they get paid first). - Lender is first in line to get paid if must
liquidate assets - Have a good return on investment (ROI)
42Advantages of Selling Equity
- Motivate buyer to pull for the success of the
company - Doesnt use precious cash
- No obligation to re-pay
- Can print more when needed
43Disadvantages of Selling Equity
- Usually requires giving up at least some control
- Allows camels nose under the tent
- Dividends are not deductible from corporate tax
44Types of Equity
- Common Stock
- Preferred Stock
- Convertible preferred stock
- Warrants
45Status of Shares
- Validly Issued
- Board has authorized and Dept of Corporations has
issued authorization - Fully Paid
- All consideration has been received
- Non-assessable
- The holder of the shares has no obligation to
honor any assessments against the shares
46Common Stock
- Required to be issued
- Usually carries voting power
- May or may not have par value
- First in line in terms of control, last in line
in terms of getting paid on liquidation
47Preferred Stock
- Preference given as to
- Dividends
- Liquidation of the companys assets
- May also allow certain rights if the dividends
are not paid (such as electing a number of
directors)
48Convertible Preferred Stock
- Preferred stock that carries with it right to
convert to common stock
49Warrants
- Are issued by the corporation
- Give the owner the right to acquire common stock
in the future for a specified price - Usually added as an enticement to lenders but may
be sold independently
50Capital Contribution Issues
- Watered Stock
- Shareholder liable to creditors to extent stock
has not been paid for - Measured by difference between shares value and
what was (was not) paid - Comes up where
- Did not pay par for the stock or
- Value of the consideration given was overstated
51Concept of Par
- Originally a tool to control maximum and minimum
capitalization of the corporation - Evolved into baseline reserve to protect
creditors - Today largely meaningless
52THE PLAYERS, REVISITED
- SHAREHOLDERS
- Elect directors
- Usually must ratify certain acts of directors
- Resolution to dissolve
- Resolution to merge with another entity
- Resolution to sell principal assets
- Resolution to change corporate purpose
- Resolution to amend by-laws or charter
53VOTING
- Statutory (or Regular) Voting
- One vote per share, each directorship voted on
independently - i.e., Jim has 500 shares, there are 3
directorships up for election. Jim can vote his
500 shares for each of the 3, but cannot
accumulate his 1500 votes and put all on one
directorship. - Cumulative Voting
- One vote per share multiplied by the number of
directorships up for election. Total number of
votes can be allocated as shareholder wishes - i.e., Jim can cast all 1500 votes for one
director.
54THE PLAYERS, REVISITED
- DIRECTORS
- Charged with day-to-day operations of entity
- Hire and Fire Officers
- Bear ultimate responsibility for conduct and
misconduct of the corporation
55The Corporations Foundational Documents
- Articles (Charter)
- By Laws
- Shareholder Agreements Between Themselves
- Buy-sell Agreements
- Aka Cross-purchase Agreements
- Survivor Purchase Agreement
- Corporations Agreements To Repurchase Stock
- Stock purchase Agreement
- Aka Redemption Agreement
56Closely Held vs Statutory Close Corporation
- Any corporation can be held by a small number of
shareholders. One shareholder is not uncommon. - A closely held corporation is a term with no
particular legal significance other than to mean - Few shareholders
- Most of whom participate in management
- No general market for the stock (because of
limitations on control and liquidity) and - Some limitations on transfer of the stock
- Courts now widely allow shareholders to control
management via controlling directors powers.
57Statutory Close Corporation
- Specifically so-identified in Articles
- Limited as to number of shareholders possible,
usually 30 or 35. - Stock certificates must bear legend detailing
that there are restrictions on transfer - Prohibited from making a public offering
- If adhere to rules, statutes allow exemption from
claims regarding improper limits on directors
powers - Delaware allows shareholders to manage directly
without a board of directors.
58When You Need Shareholder Agreements
- To maintain exemption from securities
registration requirements - i.e., a restriction that shareholder cannot
transfer to a citizen of another state
(triggering interstate sales issue) - To maintain subchapter S status
- i.e., a restriction that you cannot sell to a
partnership or corporation which would exceed
limit of 75 shareholders - To maintain professional corporation status
- i.e., cannot sell to unlicensed person
59When You Need Shareholder Agreements
- To Maintain Effectiveness of a Pooling Agreement
- i.e., if parties pool shares under agreement to
keep X off the board, important no one conveys
their shares to X.
60Restrictions
- May be absolute
- Prohibits transfer altogether (usually
unenforceable) - May require others consent
- Typically requires director or shareholder
approval - May limit class of possible transferees
- Must be family members
- Must be CPA
- Must be non-competitor
61Examples of Restrictions
- Buy-Out Agreements
- Whereby anyone desiring to sell must offer to
designated others on same terms, so-called right
of first refusal. - Whereby someone who may lose control of stock in
a divorce is obliged to sell to other
shareholders or to the corporation - Whereby the estate of a deceased shareholder must
sell to the others
62Pricing the Shares
- Three usual approaches
- Book Value
- What do the accounts show the shares are worth if
you divide the number of outstanding shares into
the number you get when you subtract the
liabilities from the assets? - Liquidation Value
- What would you get if you closed the doors, sold
all the assets, paid all the debts, and divided
the money up? - Cash Flow or Earnings
- What would an investor be willing to pay today to
own a company that generates the profits your
company generates?
63Recording the Corporate History
- All States Require Minutes be Maintained
- Calif Corps Code 314
- The original or a copy in writing or in any other
form capable of being converted into clearly
legible tangible form of the bylaws or of the
minutes of any incorporators', shareholders',
directors', committee or other meeting or of any
resolution adopted by the board or a committee
thereof, or shareholders, certified to be a true
copy by a person purporting to be the secretary
or an assistant secretary of the corporation, is
prima facie evidence of the adoption of such
bylaws or resolution or of the due holding of
such meeting and of the matters stated therein.
64By Laws
- Must conform to the Articles
- Must conform to the law
- e.g., by-law prohibiting any transfer of interest
would be unenforceable
65California Corps Code 204
- The articles of incorporation may set forth (a)
Any or all of the following provisions, which
shall not be effective unless expressly provided
in the articles -
- (5) A provision requiring, for any or all
corporate actions the vote of a larger
proportion or of all of the shares of any class
or series, or the vote or quorum for taking
action of a larger proportion or of all of the
directors, than is otherwise required by this
division.
66Calif. Corporations Code Section 603(d)
- (d) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), directors
may not be elected by written consent except by
unanimous written consent of all shares entitled
to vote for the election of directors provided
that the shareholders may elect a director to
fill a vacancy, other than a vacancy created by
removal, by the written consent of a majority of
the outstanding shares entitled to vote.
67Postscript on Consents
- Model Act now allows electronic or other consents
without unanimity and without notice to all
shareholders if - Articles of Incorporation provide for passage by
majority vote, and - The action is approved by consents signed, even
electronically, by a majority of eligible voters - By default, Directors are to be elected by
plurality (rather than cumulative vote or
majority vote) - True both under Model Act and Delaware law
- BUT, bylaws may provide for majority or other
constraint
68Pillsbury v Honeywell
- Shareholders Rights
- Right to review corporate records is not
unlimited - Must be for a proper purpose germane to his
interest as a stockholder Del. Code, Title 8,
220. - Proper purpose means a concern relating to
investment return - BUT investment return can include shareholder
motivated by desire to take control of the
corporation
69Who Has the Power to Act for Shareholder?
- Shareholder of record
- Proxy
- Assignee (Pledgee) if assignment or pledge so
allows
70The Powers and Duties of the Board
- It is a Board, not a gathering of Generals
- No director has any power acting alone
- Their only power derives from decisions they make
acting as a Board and which are recorded in the
minutes of the corporation - Power of directors is original and undelegated.
Their powers are not granted by others but
originate with their election to the Board. - Directors power comes from the state, if
anywhere. - The relation of directors to shareholders is that
of trustee to beneficiaries.
71The Powers and Duties of the Board
- May Delegate Some of Its Duties
- Where large board, usual to allow for
subcommittees to operate with relative autonomy - Executive Committee is common device, organized
to handle decisions or required resolutions (such
as approval of significant contract) when full
board cannot be readily convened. - In Public Corporations, Usually See Inside and
Outside Directors - Inside are also officers of corporation
- Outside are recruited from other corporations,
public service, etc.
72The Powers and Duties of the Board
- Key Functions
- Provide advice and counsel
- Instill discipline in the decision-making of the
corporation - Oversee crises
- Monitor the conduct of Management
73REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS
- Tension between treatment of shareholders who are
also directors - They want security against removal
- And treatment of directors who are not
shareholders - Shareholders do not want to have any impediment
to voting such directors out. - RULE Under Model Act statutes, cannot deny
shareholders right to remove with or without
cause. - May require supermajority to remove
shareholder-director without cause, however.
74Tools for Dealing with Deadlock or Misconduct
- Judicial Dissolution
- Buyout of dissenting shareholder
- Appointment of custodial director or manager
- Arbitration provision in bylaws or other contract
75VOTING TRUSTS
- Under Model Act, requires
- Writing
- Setting out provisions
- 10 yr limit (can be extended by some or all)
- Delivery to corporations principal office
76POOLING AGREEMENTS
- Widely used to pool smaller stock holdings into
a unit having power to influence Board or
corporate actions - Generally provide for process to pre-vote an
issue put to the shareholders, then cast all
shares in pool for winner of the internal vote. - Agreements are contracts and enforced as such
- Equitable relief now available via statute
- Previously courts could only remedy breach by
damages
77Shareholder Agreements
- Liberally construed in closely held corporations
- BUT, under Model Act,
- Must be included in writing filed with the
corporation - Must be unanimously approved by all shareholders
at time of creation - Must be included in articles or bylaws or in a
separate writing - BUT
- Cannot eliminate fiduciary duties of officers and
directors, - Are not binding on creditors or third parties
- Are not binding on shareholders without knowledge
78GALLER V GALLER
- Held Shareholder agreement not violative of
public policy unless - Violates an express statement of policy or
- Is manifestly injurious to public welfare and
- Where corrupt or dangerous tendency clearly
appears on face of agreement or is part of a
corrupt scheme and disguised to conceal true
nature of the transaction
79Sea-Land Rule
- Corporate entity will be disregarded and veil of
limited liability pierced if - There is a unity of interest and ownership such
that the separateness of the personalities of the
entity and the individual (or other entity) no
longer exists - Circumstances must be such that adherence to the
fiction of separateness would - SANCTION A FRAUD
- PROMOTE INJUSTICE
-
80Sea-Land Rule Promote Injustice?
- Means more than that a creditor will go unpaid.
- There must be a wrong beyond creditors inability
to correct, e.g., - Unjust enrichment to person or entity who looted
corporation - Scheme to move assets to one entity and
liabilities to another - Must be sufficient to merit the evocation of
the courts equitable powers. -
81Piercing Based on Agency Analysis
- Where person uses a corporation as a shield to
pursue the persons interests and activities,
effectively same conduct as if used any other
agent - Therefore, liability imposed on principal via
respondeat superior - No matter if agents wrongdoing arises in
contract or tort
82Declaring Dividends
- Highlights the tension between creditors and
shareholders - CREDITORS do not want money taken out of the
corporation until they have been paid - SHAREHOLDERS like dividends because
- (a) represents a return on investment that is no
longer subject to market forces - (b) declaring a dividend signals optimism about
the future and often drives the share price
higher.
83Basic Policy Objective Protect the Creditor
- Limit so that dividends can only be paid from
surplus after sufficient capital held in
reserve to pay debts.
84Solely Within Authority of Directors
- Holders of common shares have no vested right to
a dividend - Some preferred shares carry right to a dividend
and enforcement power (such as right to name
directors) if required dividend is not paid to
preferred shareholders - Courts will not interfere with directors
decision to declare or withhold dividend absent
showing of fraud, bad faith or abuse of
discretion by directors - BUT once a dividend is declared, shareholders may
enforce in court
85TYPES OF SURPLUS
- Capital surplus
- Excess portion of price received by corporation
for its stock after subtracting the par value - Plus any amount directors deem necessary
(sometimes required by creditors) - Earned surplus
- Earning of the company from operations after
subtracting liabilities and net of capital
accounts - Reduction surplus
- The amount directors vote to take out of Stated
Capital (e.g., by reducing par or because
augmented from capital surplus and now unwinding - Revaluation surplus
- The amount of previously unrealized appreciation
directors choose to recognize (and which moves
into earned surplus)
86Stock Dividends
- Issue additional shares in lieu of cash.
- Reasons
- Dont want to spend the cash but want to appease
shareholders - Want to increase voting rights of pro-board
shareholders in case of takeover bid - Need to issue more shares to make an offering
work and must issue stock dividends to keep
voting rights intact - Drives down stock price somewhat (because more
shares over which ratios operate, such as
earnings per share)
87Directors Duty of Care
- Francis v United Jersey Bank
- Director is fiduciary of the corporation and its
shareholders - And in the context of the business of the
corporation, may be a fiduciary to its creditors - Where there is constructive or actual trust
- Director must discharge duties in good faith and
with that degree of diligence, care and skill
which ordinarily prudent men would exercise under
similar circumstances in like positions
88Francis v United Jersey Bank
- Where director breaches duty, personally liable
if negligence was a proximate cause of a loss to
the creditor or shareholder or corporation - Plaintiff has burden of showing loss would have
been avoided if defendant had performed her
duties - Analysis includes determination of reasonable
steps director should have taken - BUT causation will be inferred where reasonable
to conclude particular result from a failure to
act and that result has occurred.
89Caremark
- Director liability can be grounded on several
theories - Liability following poor decision by board
because decision was negligent and ill advised - Liability based on failure to act where due
diligence would prevent the loss - BUT, absent cause for suspicion there is no
dutyto install and operate a system of corporate
espionage to ferret out wrongdoing that they have
no reason to suspect exists.
90Caremark contd
- There must be a system in place adequate to
assure the board that appropriate information
will come to its attention in a timely manner - Failure to insist upon and maintain such a system
may render a director liable
91Caremark contd
- Plaintiffs must show
- Director knew or
- Should have known were violations of law
- Took no steps to prevent or remedy
- Failure proximately caused the loss
92The Business Judgment Rule
- Applies when what is at issue is a business
decision made by the directors - Does not come into play where directors are
accused of failing to monitor or similar
derelictions of the duty of care, only when
making a business decision
93The Rule
- Absent fraud, illegality or conflict of interest,
a director who acts in good faith is not
personally liable for mere errors of judgment
short of CLEAR AND GROSS NEGLIGENCE - Shlensky v Wrigley 237 N.E. 2d 776 (Ill. 1968)
- Unless director(s) had an interest in the subject
of the decision or - Unless decision constitutes illegal conduct
(e.g., decision to pay a bribe)
94ALI Version
- No liability for a business judgment reached in
good faith provided - 1. Director or officer was disinterested
- 2. Director or officer was informed as to the
subject of the decision to a degree the director
or officer reasonably believes appropriate and - 3. Rationally believes decision is in the best
interests of the corporation
95SMITH V VAN GORKOM
- "Informed" within meaning of "due care" means
board reviewed all material information
reasonably available - Liability under Business Judgment Rule arises
only where there is a showing of gross
negligence, meaning something more careless than
ordinary negligence. - E.g., failure to even read a report which was
itself deficient
96Delaware Gen Corp Law Sec. 141
(e) A member of the board of directors, or a
member of any committee designated by the board
of directors, shall, in the performance of such
member's duties, be fully protected in relying in
good faith upon the records of the corporation
and upon such information, opinions, reports or
statements presented to the corporation by any of
the corporation's officers or employees, or
committees of the board of directors, or by any
other person as to matters the member reasonably
believes are within such other person's
professional or expert competence and who has
been selected with reasonable care by or on
behalf of the corporation.
97Shareholder Ratification
- Shareholders may ratify acts of even interested
directors PROVIDED shareholders are fully
informed - Burden is on directors to establish shareholders
were fully informed
98Model Act
- SECTION 8.30. GENERAL STANDARDS FOR DIRECTORS
- (a) A director shall discharge his (sic) duties
as a director, including his (sic) duties as a
member of a committee - (1) in good faith(2) with the care an
ordinarily prudent person in a like position
would exercise under similar circumstances
and(3) in a manner he (sic) reasonably believes
to be in the best interests of the corporation. - (b) In discharging his (sic) duties a director is
entitled to rely on information, opinions,
reports, or statements, including financial
statements and other financial data, if prepared
or presented by - (1) one or more officers or employees of the
corporation whom the director reasonably believes
to be reliable and competent in the matters
presented(2) legal counsel, public accountants,
or other persons as to matters the director
reasonably believes are within the person's
professional or expert competence or(3) a
committee of the board of directors of which he
(sic) is not a member if the director reasonably
believes the committee merits confidence. - (c) A director is not acting in good faith if he
(sic) has knowledge concerning the matter in
question that makes reliance otherwise permitted
by subsection (b) unwarranted. - (d) A director is not liable for any action taken
as a director, or any failure to take any action,
if he (sic) performed the duties of his (sic)
office in compliance with this section.
99Calif. Corp Code Sec. 309
- (a) A director shall perform the duties of a
director, including duties as a member of any
committee of the board upon which the director
may serve, in good faith, in a manner such
director believes to be in the best interests of
the corporation and its shareholders and with
such care, including reasonable inquiry, as an
ordinarily prudent person in a like position
would use under similar circumstances. - (b) In performing the duties of a director, a
director shall be entitled to rely on
information, opinions, reports or statements,
including financial statements and other
financial data, in each case prepared or
presented by officers, consultants, etc. - (c) A person who performs the duties of a
director in accordance with subdivisions (a) and
(b) shall have no liability based upon any
alleged failure to discharge the person's
obligations as a director. In addition, the
liability of a director for monetary damages may
be eliminated or limited in a corporation's
articles to the extent provided in paragraph (10)
of subdivision (a) of Section 204.