Title: Mix Design of Bitumen Stabilised Materials
1Mix Design of Bitumen Stabilised Materials
- Kim Jenkins
- TG (2) Update
- Phase 2 Research Phase
- RPF May 2008
tellenbosch
2TG(X)
3Project Scope
Task Description
1 2 Triaxial (Protocol New Standard)
3 4 Stiffness (Correlation Existing New)
5 6 Adv Classification (Existing New)
7 8 Curing (Lab Procedure Validation)
9,1011 Durability (Moisture Binder)
12 Compaction
4Task 2 Simple Tri-axial
- Specimen geometry 150 mm Ø x 300 mm
- Monotonic tests (only)
- s3 0 , 50, 100, 200 kPa
- Loading rate 2 e/min
- SIMPLE (no membrane)
tellenbosch
5Lab Survey
6Conceptualisation
7Find your own solutions (innovate)
8Trials with latex membrane as confining tube
(Mulusa)
9 Final design
10Task 7 Curing (lab protocol)
Emulsion Foam
No active Active filler filler
No active Active filler filler
11TASK 8 CURING VALIDATION
PSPA
tellenbosch
12Lab cure moisture versus temperature
13Mr (lab) versus Moisture Content
14Field moisture versus curing time
15Mr (field) versus cure time
16TASK 9 Durability Improved Tests- Untreated
Material Properties - Moisture sensitivity tests
(Twagira)
Moisture Induction Sensitivity Test MIST
17MIST saturation time
Degree of saturation ()
50mm layer
Pulsing time (sec)
18Sr versus Mr
Resilient Modulus, Mr (MPa)
Degree of Saturation ()
Resilient Modulus (MPa)
Specimen type
19Task 12 Compaction
- Vertical impact
- Kneading effect
- Create a triaxial specimen
(Kelfkens)
20Mounting The Vibratory Hammer
21Compaction Experiment
- Individual Layers for samples - weighed off
22Foam vs Emulsion Compaction Time per Layer
35s
70s
0s
0s
FOAM
EMULSION
23CT Scans
24Temperature Influences Foamed Mix
25Materials Classification BSMs- Similar to
granular
BSM1
BSM2
BSM3
BSM1
BSM2
BSM3
26Summary
- Appropriate testing is needed i.e. shear
parameters for BSMs - Stiffness is a key mix property
- Curing protocol being refined
- Classification system should be robust
- Aiming for mid 2008 for completion
27Get the mix right and laying will be the easy
part
28But be careful
29Questions?