IES 371 Engineering Management Chapter 10: Location - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

IES 371 Engineering Management Chapter 10: Location

Description:

Identify the factors affecting location choices ... Ethel & Earl Griese narrowed their choice for a new oil refinery to 3 locations. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: sirint
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IES 371 Engineering Management Chapter 10: Location


1
IES 371 Engineering ManagementChapter 10
Location
  • Week 11
  • August 17, 2005
  • Objectives
  • Identify the factors affecting location choices
  • Explain how to apply the various methods to
    location decisions

2
Facility Location Competitive Advantages
  • The need to produce close to the customer due to
    time-based competition, trade agreements, and
    shipping costs.
  • The need to locate near the appropriate labor
    pool to take advantage of low wage costs and/or
    high technical skills.

3
Issues in facility location
  • Proximity to Customers
  • Business Climate
  • Total Costs
  • Infrastructure
  • Quality of Labor
  • Suppliers
  • Other Facilities
  • Free Trade Zones
  • Political Risk
  • Government Barriers
  • Trading Zones
  • Environmental Regulation
  • Host Community

4
Plant Location MethodologyLocation Factor Rating
2
3
1
  • Procedures
  • Identify factors that are important in the
    location decision
  • Prioritize the factor by its importance. Each
    factor is weighted from 0 to 1.00
  • Subjective score (0 to 100) is assigned to each
    site for each factor
  • Sum up the weighted score.
  • The site with highest score is the most
    attractive

4
5
See also Example S5.1
5
Plant Location MethodologyCenter-of-Gravity
Technique
  • Used for locating single facility that considers
    existing facilities, the distances between them,
    and the volumes of goods to be shipped between
    them.
  • Involves formulas used to compute the coordinates
    of the two-dimensional point that meets the
    distance and volume criteria stated above.
  • The coordinates for the location of the new
    facility are computed as follows

x, y Coordinates of the new facility at
center of gravity xi, yi coordinate of
existing facility I Wi Annual weight
shipped from facility i
See also Example S5.2
6
Ex 1 Center-of-Gravity Technique
  • Several automobile showrooms are located
    according to the following grid which represents
    coordinate locations for each showroom.

Question What is the best location for a new
Z-Mobile warehouse/temporary storage facility
considering only distances and quantities sold
per month?
7
Plant Location MethodologyLoad-Distance
Technique
  • Various locations are evaluated using a
    load-distance value.
  • For a single potential location, a load-distance
    value (ld) is computed as follows
  • Select the location with lowest ld value

x, y coordinates of the new facility xi, yi
coordinate of existing facility LD the
load-distance value li the load expressed
as weight, number of trips, or unit di the
distance between the new and existing facility
Ex 2 From ex 1, evaluate two possible different
sites of warehouse to supply to showroom A, D,
and Q. Given that Warehouse site 1 x 420 and y
450 Warehouse site 2 x 250 and y 980
8
Plant Location MethodologyBreak-even analysis
  • Also refer to Supplement A Decision Making
  • Basic steps for break-even analysis in facility
    location decisions
  • Determine variable costs and fixed costs
  • Plot the total cost lines (sum of fixed costs and
    variable costs) for all alternatives in a single
    graph
  • Identify the approximate ranges for sites with
    lowest total cost
  • Solve algebraically for the break-even points
    over the relevant ranges

9
Ex 3 Break-even analysis
  • Ethel Earl Griese narrowed their choice for a
    new oil refinery to 3 locations. Fixed and
    variable costs are as follows.
  • Describe the appropriate decision plan for this
    company.

10
Plant Location MethodologyTransportation Method
  • A quantitative approach based on linear
    programming
  • To determine the allocation pattern that
    minimizes the cost of shipping products from 2 or
    more plants (source of supply) to 2 or more
    warehouses (destinations)
  • This method is find the best shipping pattern
    between plants and warehouses for a particular
    set of plant locations with given capacities

11
Transportation Tableau
12
Ex 3 Transportation Method
  • Fire Brand makes sauce in EL Paso and New York
    City. Distribution centers are located in
    Atlanta, Omaha, and Seattle. The shipment costs
    per case are as shown in the table.
  • The demand for Atlanta, Omaha, and Seattle are
    8,000, 10,000, and 4,000 cases per month
    respectively. The plant in El Paso has production
    capacity of 12,000 cases / month, while the plant
    in New York City has production capacity of
    10,000 per month.

Determine the shipping pattern that will minimize
transportation costs. What are the estimated
transportation costs associated with this optimal
allocation pattern?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com