Title: ACTIVE ASPHALT RESEARCH PROJECTS
1ACTIVE ASPHALT RESEARCH PROJECTS
- Bill Maupin
- Principal Research Scientist
2- Use of Waste Shingles
- High Binder / High Modulus Field Project
- Optimized Surface Mix Design
- Pooled Fund Studies
- Intelligent Compaction
- SM-4.75 Mix Design
3Using Waste Shingles
- Past study Manufacturing Waste
- Present study Tear-off Waste
- Green Highway Project
4BACKGROUND
- In the 1990s a recycling committee set up by the
state legislature developed a list of waste
materials that potentially might be used in
highway construction - One of the materials listed by the committee was
recycled roofing material - VDOT did a literature search and developed a
draft special provision to allow trial of waste
shingles upon request
5BACKGROUND (Contd)
- In 2006 the Hampton Roads District received a
request from Rose Brothers to try manufacturing
shingle waste on a plant mix schedule in
Southampton County - Arranged to place approximately 2000 tons each of
SM-9.5A with shingles and SM-9.5A without
shingles for comparison
6- PAST STUDY -Manufactured Shingle Waste
- Evaluated 2500 tons of SM-9.5A with 5 percent
shingle waste - Compared 2200 tons of SM-9.5A with 10 percent RAP
- Constructed by Rose Brothers in 2006
- Shingle waste from manufacturing facility in
North Carolina
7SHINGLE WASTE
8SHINGLE SHREDDER
9SHREDDED SHINGLES
10SHINGLE CONTENT
- 18 percent asphalt
- 34 percent filler
- 45 percent granules and sand
- 2 percent fiber glass
- 1 percent tape and water
11 EVALUATION
- Observe construction
- Test pavement
- Density
- Permeability
- Test hot mix samples
- Volumetrics, Fatigue, TSR, Rut, Abson Recovery
- Pavement performance
12RECOVERED BINDERVirgin Binder PG 64-22
13CONCLUSIONS
- Both mixes behaved similarly during placement and
compaction - Both mixes behaved similarly under laboratory
testing - Both recovered binders passed as PG 70-22
- Performance is good for both mixes
- A Special Provision is available
14-Present Study-Use of Tear-off Shingle Waste
- ARAC recommended that a study be done on the use
of tear-off shingles - Approval process is complete and research has
started
15Are Tear-offs Different?
- Binder in tear-off shingles has aged and may be
more brittle - Foreign materials such as wood and metal could be
present if not processed properly - Asbestos May require PLM testing
16RESEARCH STUDY
- Purpose Determine suitability of using tear-off
shingle waste in asphalt concrete - Laboratory study
- Properties of binder in shingles and shingle-mix
- Test mix containing shingles volumetric,
fatigue, rut, TSR - Field test Install short test section(s)
containing shingle mix and conventional mix - Gather information on availability of shingles
17POSSIBLE COST SAVINGS
- Asphalt cement binder selling for more than 765
per ton (38 per lb.) - The asphalt binder in shingles estimated to cost
less than 3 per lb. plus transportation - Estimated savings of several dollars per ton of
hot mix asphalt (HMA)
18Sources of Ground Tear-offs?
- Asphalt Roof Recycling Mt. Airy, MD Walt
Johnson, (301) 831-0888 - Tidewater Green Corp Chesapeake, VA by
January ? - Waterway Materials Corp Chesapeake, VA ?
19TEAR-OFF SHINGLESAsphalt Roof Recycling Center -
MD
20PICKING OUT NON-SHINGLE MATERIAL
21SHINGLES FARM ROADS
22Test Section?
- Would like to install a small section of pavement
containing 4 to 5 shingles - Get construction experience, samples for lab
testing, observe performance
23GREEN HIGHWAY PROJECT
- Possible construction project(s) being planned to
utilize waste materials for a Green Highway
Demonstration Project - Structural fill - slag, foundry sand, coal ash,
shredded tires, compost mulch - Asphalt pavement shingles
- Several possible future construction projects in
tidewater area
24HIGH BINDER HIGH MODULUSFIELD TEST
- Brian Diefenderfer
-
- Bill Maupin
25Progression of Study
- Idea - Use an asphalt-rich base mix to improve
durability and provide a perpetual pavement
structure - Lab study completed
- Field study in progress
26LABORATORY STUDY
PERM
TSR
FATIGUE
RUTTING
27LAB STUDY RESULTS
- Predicted field voids decreased 1.0 1.5 for
each 0.4 increase in AC - Decrease in voids reduced permeability and should
produce less chance of moisture damage - Increase in AC benefited fatigue life
- Lab rut tests were acceptable for at least 0.8
extra AC with PG 70-22
28PAVEMENT ANALYSIS
- Performed theoretical pavement analysis based on
I-81 traffic - Used MEPDG to determine effect of changing mix
properties - Types of binders (64-22, 70-22, 76-22)
- Asphalt content ( 0.6, 1.2)
- Air void content (- 2.0, 2.0)
- Ran 21 different combinations
29TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION
30PAVEMENT ANALYSIS FINDINGS
31Conclusions MEPDG Analysis
- Stiffer binder in IM mix offered improvement in
resistance to rutting - High binder low air void content base mix
showed potential for resistance to fatigue
cracking - Suggest development of a design following
perpetual concepts - fatigue resistant base mixes
32FIELD TEST SECTION
- ARAC recommended that a field test section with
high binder be installed - A construction project has been located in the
Fredericksburg District near Carmel Church,
relocation near intersection of Rtes 207, 652 and
I-95 - Section consists of 6 of BM-25.0D
- Goes to ad in December, 2008
33FIELD TEST SECTION (Contd)
- 3 sections to be built and evaluated
- Conventional BM-25.0D
- Conventional BM-25.0D 0.4 AC
- Conventional BM-25.0D 0.8 AC
- Tests to be performed by VDOT / VTRC in lab and
field for each section on various layers - Desire to instrument base layer with strain
gauges
34FIELD TEST SECTION (Contd)
- Construction will be observed
- Test results on various layers will indicate
in-place properties - Properties will be used to predict future
performance of pavement sections - Long term performance will be monitored
35OPTIMIZED SURFACE MIX DESIGN PROJECT
- Other states believe durability to be a problem
and have made mix design changes - We decreased our compaction level to 65 gyrations
to increase asphalt content - The general feeling is that still some of our
mixes are not durable
36Questions
- Has Superpave resulted in lesser amount of
designed asphalt content? - Pre-Superpave design mix temperature was the same
between mixes therefore did the equiviscous
Superpave requirement produce thinner films for D
and E mixes? - How much asphalt will mixes safely tolerate?
- Superpave gradation band is wide therefore,
where on the band are mixes being designed? - Are optimum gradations being used?
37RESEARCH PROJECT
- Develop a brief history of past VDOT design
requirements - Examine production QC/QA test results of
Superpave and pre-Superpave mixes - Use lab rut test procedure to determine if
asphalt contents are near the safe maximum amount - Determine how to make design changes if changes
are justified
38POOLED-FUND STUDIES
- Each state contributes an equal amount to conduct
a study - Current studies
- Intelligent Compaction
- SM-4.75 mix design
39INTELLIGENT COMPACTION
- Accelerated Implementation of IC Technology for
Soils, Base, and Asphalt Materials -
http//www.intelligentcompaction.com/ - Develop experience and identify needed
improvements - Possible benefits
- Improve density
- Improve efficiency
- Improve quality control information
40IC STUDY
- 12 DOTs are participating
- Managed by FHWA
- Research conducted by Transtec Group
- At least 1 field demonstration in each state
- IC roller requirements
- Stiffness measuring system
- Self adjusting feedback system
- GPS mapping system
41IC ROLLER CAPABILITIES
42NUMBER OF ROLLER PASSES
Shoulder
Longitudinal Joint
Courtesy Sakai America
43SM-4.75 MIX DESIGN STUDY
- Do we need thin mixes?
- Refine procedures and criteria for 4.75mm
Superpave mix design - National Center of Asphalt Technology
- 8 states are supporting the study
- Conducting field tests in several states
44SM-4.75 MIX DESIGN STUDY
- Delayed several times because of the lack of
field sections - New completion date of March 1, 2009
45NEW STUDY Catfish Slime Asphalt Release Agent
46THE END