ACTIVE ASPHALT RESEARCH PROJECTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

ACTIVE ASPHALT RESEARCH PROJECTS

Description:

ACTIVE ASPHALT RESEARCH PROJECTS – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: billm48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ACTIVE ASPHALT RESEARCH PROJECTS


1
ACTIVE ASPHALT RESEARCH PROJECTS
  • Bill Maupin
  • Principal Research Scientist

2
  • Use of Waste Shingles
  • High Binder / High Modulus Field Project
  • Optimized Surface Mix Design
  • Pooled Fund Studies
  • Intelligent Compaction
  • SM-4.75 Mix Design

3
Using Waste Shingles
  • Past study Manufacturing Waste
  • Present study Tear-off Waste
  • Green Highway Project

4
BACKGROUND
  • In the 1990s a recycling committee set up by the
    state legislature developed a list of waste
    materials that potentially might be used in
    highway construction
  • One of the materials listed by the committee was
    recycled roofing material
  • VDOT did a literature search and developed a
    draft special provision to allow trial of waste
    shingles upon request

5
BACKGROUND (Contd)
  • In 2006 the Hampton Roads District received a
    request from Rose Brothers to try manufacturing
    shingle waste on a plant mix schedule in
    Southampton County
  • Arranged to place approximately 2000 tons each of
    SM-9.5A with shingles and SM-9.5A without
    shingles for comparison

6
- PAST STUDY -Manufactured Shingle Waste
  • Evaluated 2500 tons of SM-9.5A with 5 percent
    shingle waste
  • Compared 2200 tons of SM-9.5A with 10 percent RAP
  • Constructed by Rose Brothers in 2006
  • Shingle waste from manufacturing facility in
    North Carolina

7
SHINGLE WASTE
8
SHINGLE SHREDDER
9
SHREDDED SHINGLES
10
SHINGLE CONTENT
  • 18 percent asphalt
  • 34 percent filler
  • 45 percent granules and sand
  • 2 percent fiber glass
  • 1 percent tape and water

11
EVALUATION
  • Observe construction
  • Test pavement
  • Density
  • Permeability
  • Test hot mix samples
  • Volumetrics, Fatigue, TSR, Rut, Abson Recovery
  • Pavement performance

12
RECOVERED BINDERVirgin Binder PG 64-22
13
CONCLUSIONS
  • Both mixes behaved similarly during placement and
    compaction
  • Both mixes behaved similarly under laboratory
    testing
  • Both recovered binders passed as PG 70-22
  • Performance is good for both mixes
  • A Special Provision is available

14
-Present Study-Use of Tear-off Shingle Waste
  • ARAC recommended that a study be done on the use
    of tear-off shingles
  • Approval process is complete and research has
    started

15
Are Tear-offs Different?
  • Binder in tear-off shingles has aged and may be
    more brittle
  • Foreign materials such as wood and metal could be
    present if not processed properly
  • Asbestos May require PLM testing

16
RESEARCH STUDY
  • Purpose Determine suitability of using tear-off
    shingle waste in asphalt concrete
  • Laboratory study
  • Properties of binder in shingles and shingle-mix
  • Test mix containing shingles volumetric,
    fatigue, rut, TSR
  • Field test Install short test section(s)
    containing shingle mix and conventional mix
  • Gather information on availability of shingles

17
POSSIBLE COST SAVINGS
  • Asphalt cement binder selling for more than 765
    per ton (38 per lb.)
  • The asphalt binder in shingles estimated to cost
    less than 3 per lb. plus transportation
  • Estimated savings of several dollars per ton of
    hot mix asphalt (HMA)

18
Sources of Ground Tear-offs?
  • Asphalt Roof Recycling Mt. Airy, MD Walt
    Johnson, (301) 831-0888
  • Tidewater Green Corp Chesapeake, VA by
    January ?
  • Waterway Materials Corp Chesapeake, VA ?

19
TEAR-OFF SHINGLESAsphalt Roof Recycling Center -
MD
20
PICKING OUT NON-SHINGLE MATERIAL
21
SHINGLES FARM ROADS
22
Test Section?
  • Would like to install a small section of pavement
    containing 4 to 5 shingles
  • Get construction experience, samples for lab
    testing, observe performance

23
GREEN HIGHWAY PROJECT
  • Possible construction project(s) being planned to
    utilize waste materials for a Green Highway
    Demonstration Project
  • Structural fill - slag, foundry sand, coal ash,
    shredded tires, compost mulch
  • Asphalt pavement shingles
  • Several possible future construction projects in
    tidewater area

24
HIGH BINDER HIGH MODULUSFIELD TEST
  • Brian Diefenderfer
  • Bill Maupin

25
Progression of Study
  • Idea - Use an asphalt-rich base mix to improve
    durability and provide a perpetual pavement
    structure
  • Lab study completed
  • Field study in progress

26
LABORATORY STUDY
PERM
TSR
FATIGUE
RUTTING
27
LAB STUDY RESULTS
  • Predicted field voids decreased 1.0 1.5 for
    each 0.4 increase in AC
  • Decrease in voids reduced permeability and should
    produce less chance of moisture damage
  • Increase in AC benefited fatigue life
  • Lab rut tests were acceptable for at least 0.8
    extra AC with PG 70-22

28
PAVEMENT ANALYSIS
  • Performed theoretical pavement analysis based on
    I-81 traffic
  • Used MEPDG to determine effect of changing mix
    properties
  • Types of binders (64-22, 70-22, 76-22)
  • Asphalt content ( 0.6, 1.2)
  • Air void content (- 2.0, 2.0)
  • Ran 21 different combinations

29
TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION
30
PAVEMENT ANALYSIS FINDINGS
31
Conclusions MEPDG Analysis
  • Stiffer binder in IM mix offered improvement in
    resistance to rutting
  • High binder low air void content base mix
    showed potential for resistance to fatigue
    cracking
  • Suggest development of a design following
    perpetual concepts
  • fatigue resistant base mixes

32
FIELD TEST SECTION
  • ARAC recommended that a field test section with
    high binder be installed
  • A construction project has been located in the
    Fredericksburg District near Carmel Church,
    relocation near intersection of Rtes 207, 652 and
    I-95
  • Section consists of 6 of BM-25.0D
  • Goes to ad in December, 2008

33
FIELD TEST SECTION (Contd)
  • 3 sections to be built and evaluated
  • Conventional BM-25.0D
  • Conventional BM-25.0D 0.4 AC
  • Conventional BM-25.0D 0.8 AC
  • Tests to be performed by VDOT / VTRC in lab and
    field for each section on various layers
  • Desire to instrument base layer with strain
    gauges

34
FIELD TEST SECTION (Contd)
  • Construction will be observed
  • Test results on various layers will indicate
    in-place properties
  • Properties will be used to predict future
    performance of pavement sections
  • Long term performance will be monitored

35
OPTIMIZED SURFACE MIX DESIGN PROJECT
  • Other states believe durability to be a problem
    and have made mix design changes
  • We decreased our compaction level to 65 gyrations
    to increase asphalt content
  • The general feeling is that still some of our
    mixes are not durable

36
Questions
  • Has Superpave resulted in lesser amount of
    designed asphalt content?
  • Pre-Superpave design mix temperature was the same
    between mixes therefore did the equiviscous
    Superpave requirement produce thinner films for D
    and E mixes?
  • How much asphalt will mixes safely tolerate?
  • Superpave gradation band is wide therefore,
    where on the band are mixes being designed?
  • Are optimum gradations being used?

37
RESEARCH PROJECT
  • Develop a brief history of past VDOT design
    requirements
  • Examine production QC/QA test results of
    Superpave and pre-Superpave mixes
  • Use lab rut test procedure to determine if
    asphalt contents are near the safe maximum amount
  • Determine how to make design changes if changes
    are justified

38
POOLED-FUND STUDIES
  • Each state contributes an equal amount to conduct
    a study
  • Current studies
  • Intelligent Compaction
  • SM-4.75 mix design

39
INTELLIGENT COMPACTION
  • Accelerated Implementation of IC Technology for
    Soils, Base, and Asphalt Materials -
    http//www.intelligentcompaction.com/
  • Develop experience and identify needed
    improvements
  • Possible benefits
  • Improve density
  • Improve efficiency
  • Improve quality control information

40
IC STUDY
  • 12 DOTs are participating
  • Managed by FHWA
  • Research conducted by Transtec Group
  • At least 1 field demonstration in each state
  • IC roller requirements
  • Stiffness measuring system
  • Self adjusting feedback system
  • GPS mapping system

41
IC ROLLER CAPABILITIES
42
NUMBER OF ROLLER PASSES
Shoulder
Longitudinal Joint
Courtesy Sakai America
43
SM-4.75 MIX DESIGN STUDY
  • Do we need thin mixes?
  • Refine procedures and criteria for 4.75mm
    Superpave mix design
  • National Center of Asphalt Technology
  • 8 states are supporting the study
  • Conducting field tests in several states

44
SM-4.75 MIX DESIGN STUDY
  • Delayed several times because of the lack of
    field sections
  • New completion date of March 1, 2009

45
NEW STUDY Catfish Slime Asphalt Release Agent
46
THE END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com