805%20MHz%20Pillbox%20Cavity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

805%20MHz%20Pillbox%20Cavity

Description:

805 MHz Pillbox Cavity – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Deru8
Learn more at: http://agni.phys.iit.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 805%20MHz%20Pillbox%20Cavity


1
805 MHz Pillbox Cavity
(IIT, Chicago, IL, Feb. 7th, 2002)
  • Derun Li
  • Center for Beam Physics
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

2
Collaborators
  • J. Corlett, A. Ladran, R. MacGill, R. Rimmer,
  • J. Wallig, M. Zisman
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • Berkeley, CA 94720
  • D. Summers, M. Reep
  • University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS
  • A. Moretti, A. Rowe, Z.B. Qian, V. Wu
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  • Batavia, IL

3
Introduction Review
  • Development of the 805 MHz Pillbox cavity
  • High shunt impedance and high acceleration
    gradient at order of 30 MV/m
  • Allow for testing of Be windows with different
    thickness, coatings and as well as other windows
  • Study RF cavity operation issues under the
    influence of strong magnetic fields at both the
    solenoid and gradient modes
  • The cavity design and status
  • The 805 MHz pillbox cavity design should allow
    for testing of different windows ? demountable
    windows to cover the beam irises (we have five Be
    windows, four Cu windows ...)

4
Cavity Design status
Coupler
Waveguide window
Thermo-couples or view ports
Be (or Cu) windows
Three more view ports on the equator
Pillbox cavity
5
Cavity Design Parameters
  • Frequency 805 MHz
  • Shunt Impedance
  • 38 M?/m (Z0) 32 M?/m (ZT2) Z V0,T2/P
  • Quality factor Q0 18,800
  • Coupling Constant
  • ?c 1.0 at critical coupling ltEgt 30 MV/m
    requires 2 MW peak power, 350 watts average, 52
    watts on windows (Cu, 66 watts for Be) at duty
    factor of 1.8x10-4 (12 FNAL19 us pulse length
    and 15 Hz repetition rate).

6
Manufacturing of the cavity
  • The cavity was fabricated at University of
    Mississippi, brazed at Alpha Braze Comp.

7
Cavity and coupler tuning
  • The cavity was ready for final tuning for the
    frequency and coupling in June, 2001.
  • (June 24-27, 2001 in University of Mississippi)
  • Before tuning f 803.198 MHz, ?c 0.12
  • After tuning f 805.486 MHz, Qext 12,800
  • After final brazing
  • Measurements done in November 14, 2001 at LBNL
    before shipping to Lab G at Fermilab

f 804.946 MHz, ?c 1.3, Q0 15, 000
8
Cavity Tuning (continued)
Michael and Daniel assembling the cavity
Cavity halves, coupler and Cu windows
9
Cavity Tuning (Continued)
  • Frequency tuning (shortening the gap)
  • Coupler tuning (widening coupling slot and
    shortening the transition waveguide)

Coupling slot
10
Coupler Tuning (continued)
  • The couple slot angle
  • was widened from
  • 400 to 500 (two cuts)
  • in order to get close
  • to critical coupling.
  • Measurements of
  • the coupling agree
  • well with time domain
  • MAFIA simulations

11
Vacuum issues
  • After final brazing at Alpha-Braze Comp.
  • Vacuum leaking was detected at the coupler.
  • Cu coating on the big transition waveguide was
    stripped and re-coated at LBNL.

12
Modification to coupler
O-Ring Grove
13
Vacuum issues (continued)
  • Old flanges were removed, and welded with new
    ones
  • UHV cleaning, RGA scan
  • Test setup at LBNL

14
Vacuum issues (continued)
  • After many failures, an O-ring at the transition
    of the coupler guard vacuum were employed
  • Cold and hot N2 gas was used to flush and bake
    the system
  • Before shipping to Lab G at Fermilab
  • Leak tight with base pressure (after a few days
    baking) 3x10-8 Torr and a clean RGA scan
  • Shipped to Fermilab under pressured N2 gas.
  • Lesson learned

DONT MACHINE A BRAZED JOINT ? IT MAY LEAK !
15
Diagnostics
  • Three view ports on the equator of the cavity
  • Three RF probes (adjusted to about -52 dB gain
    from the standard waveguide port) available for
    E M field measurement
  • An optic bore-scope can be used to inspect the
    windows and inner surface of the cavity ( need
    lighting and TV/VCR for viewing and recording)
  • Maximum six thermo-couples can be attached to
    monitor temperature distribution on windows
  • Two compartments behind the cavity can be used to
    measure window deflection by frequency shift

16
Diagnostics (continued)
  • Equipment available
  • at Lab G
  • x-ray, dark current
  • spectrum, forward
  • reflected RF power
  • and arc detector
  • Lab G layout ?

17
Be windows
  • Pre-stress study of the Be windows
  • Received two more Be windows (10,20 mills)
  • Two new copper windows with coatings
  • Halogen lamp heating measurements on two failed
    Be windows
  • Accelerometer measurements
  • Acoustic measurements
  • FEA (ANSYS code) modeling
  • Magnetic and E M forces on windows

18
Be windows (continued)
Acoustic Measurement
Setup for accelerometer measurement
19
Current Status
  • Cavity with Cu windows is now at Lab G
  • Leak tight at pressure of 2x10-7 Torr (1/22/02)
  • Braces are being made at Fermilab
  • Leak checking is underway
  • Waiting for vacuum parts to be made for final
    assembling of the vacuum and waveguide system
  • LBNL personnel (with test plan) will be at Lab G
    in Fermilab before turning on the RF power

20
Test Plan
  • A complete microwave measurement
  • Resonant frequency
  • Coupling constant
  • Q factor
  • Verify calibration of the RF probes
  • Final assembling of the vacuum/waveguide systems
  • Bake with N2 flow at 100 oC for two days
    preferably with RGA scans

21
Test Plan (continued)
  • Continue baking at vacuum for two days
  • RF conditioning slowly starting at low power
  • Push for high gradient
  • 2.5 MW peak power ? 34 MV/m accelerating gradient
    and 500 watts at 1.8x10-4 duty factor
  • Turn on superconducting magnet in solenoid mode
    to repeat above studies
  • Replace two Cu windows with the ones with TiN
    coatings

22
Test Plan (continued)
  • Should we test Be windows? NO!
  • EHS issues need to be addressed first
  • may contaminate the vacuum system
  • Future test plan depends on the upcoming test
    results and inputs from MUCOOL collaboration.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com