Corpus linguistics an introduction

1
Corpus linguisticsan introduction
2
Czech National Corpus
Hellenic National Corpus
Croatian National Corpus
Hrvatski nacionalni korpus
http//pkukmweb.ukm.my/iha/skblcl.pdf
3
Hungarian National Corpus
Slovak National Corpus
National Corpus of Irish
Maltese National Corpus
The Reference Corpus of Polish
4
The Bank of English
London/Oslo- Bergen (LOB)
British National Corpus (BNC)
International Corpus of English (ICE)
5
What is a corpus?

• A collection of naturally occurring language
  text, chosen to characterise a state or variety
  of language (Sinclair)
• A collection of linguistic data, either written
  text or a transcription of recorded data, which
  can be used as starting-point of linguistic
  description or as a means of verifying hypotheses
  about a language (Dictionary of linguistics and
  phonetics)

6
What is a corpus? (II)

• Large body of evidence typically composed of
  attested language use (McEnery)
• Usually a corpus is in machine-readable format
  and is ideally viewable and analysable through (a
  single) software package
• The word corpus comes from Latin body and the
  plural is corpora

7
What is not a corpus

• Lists of words
• Lists of sentences produced with the purpose of
  creating a corpus
• Archive a repository of readable electronic
  texts not linked in any coordinated way
  (http//www.archive.org)The Internet Archive
  is building a digital library of Internet sites
  and other cultural artifacts in digital form.
  Like a paper library, we provide free access to
  researchers, historians, scholars, and the
  general public.

8
What can we do with a corpus?

• Corpus-based approaches hypotheses are checked
  against a corpus
• Corpus-driven approaches hypotheses are drawn
  from the corpus

9
What can we do with a corpus? (II)

• 'Alright,' said the computer Deep Thought. 'The
  Answer to the Great Question...'
• 'Yes...!'
• 'Of Life, the Universe and Everything ... ' said
  Deep Thought.
• 'Yes ... !'
• 'Is ...'
• 'Yes...!!!...?'
• 'Forty-two,' said Deep Thought, with infinite
  majesty and calm.
• It was a long time before anyone spoke.
• 'Forty-two!' yelled someone in the audience. 'Is
  that all you've got to show for seven and a half
  million years' work?'
• 'I checked it very thoroughly,' said the
  computer, 'and that quite definitely is the
  answer. I think the problem, to be quite honest
  with you, is that you've never actually known
  what the question is.'
• Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy by Douglas Adams

10
Fields where corpora are used

• Lexicography to design dictionaries
• Language studies (relations between languages,
  differences between genre, evolution of the
  language)
• Computational linguistics (training and testing
  methods)
• Language teaching (learners corpora)
• Cultural studies, psycholinguistics

11
The characteristics of analysis using corpora
(Biber, 1998)

• It is empirical, analysing the actual patterns
  of use from natural texts
• It utilises a large and principled collection of
  natural texts as the basis for analysis
• It makes extensive use of computers for
  analysis, using both automatic and interactive
  techniques
• It depends on both quantitative and qualitative
  analytical techniques

12
History

• We have to split the history in two periods
  before Chomsky and after Chomsky
• Before Chomsky, methods similar to the ones in
  corpus linguistics were used (empiricism)http/
  /www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/monkey/ihe/linguistics/corpu
  s1/1fra1.htm

13
Early corpus linguistics

• Before Chomsky
• Computers were not available so it was difficult
  to analyse large collections of text
• Studies of child language using diaries kept by
  parents
• Spelling conventions in a German corpus of 11
  million words
• Foreign language pedagogy

14
Early corpus linguistics (II)

• All the work of early corpus linguistics was
  underpinned by two fundamental, yet flawed
  assumptions
• The sentences of a natural language are finite.
• The sentences of a natural language can be
  collected and enumerated.
• Most linguists saw the corpus as the only source
  of linguistic evidence in the formation of
  linguistic theories

15
(No Transcript)
16
Chomsky

• Between 1957 and 1965 Chomsky changed the
  direction of linguistics from empiricism towards
  rationalism
• Any natural corpus will be skewed. Some
  sentences wont occur because they are obvious,
  other because they are false, still others
  because they are impolite. The corpus, if
  natural, will be so wildly skewed that the
  description would be no more than a mere list
  (Chomsky, 1962)
• Introspection started to be used instead

17
Problems with introspection

• Naturally occurring data is observable and
  verifiable by everyone.
• Introspective data is artificial.
• Human beings have only the vaguest notion of the
  frequency of a construct or a word.

18
The revival of corpus linguistics

• The research in corpus linguistics was continued
  in small centres
• The hardware still imposed some restrictions,
  the real development will start in the 80s
• Fields like computational linguistics were not
  interested to use corpora

19
The revival of corpus linguistics (II)

• 1960s Brown Corpus (at the Brown University
  American English)
• 1970s LOB corpus British English
• 1980s Bank of English in Birmingham
• 1990s (BNC, LDC, ICE corpus, ELRA, TRACTOR,
  ICAME)

20
Why bother with corpora?

• Even expert speakers have only a partial
  knowledge of a languageA corpus can be more
  comprehensive and balanced
• Even expert speakers tend to notice the unusual
  and think of what is possibleA corpus can show
  us what is common and typical
• Even expert speakers cannot quantify their
  knowledge of languageA corpus can give us
  accurate statistics

21
Why bother with corpora? (II)

• Even expert speakers cannot remember everything
  they knowA corpus can store and recall all the
  information that has been input
• Even experts speakers cannot make up natural
  examplesA corpus can provide us with a vast
  number of real examples
• Even expert speakers have prejudices and
  preferences and every language has cultural
  connotations and underlying ideologyA corpus can
  give you more objective evidence

22
Why bother with corpora? (III)

• Even expert speakers are not always available to
  be consultedA corpus can be made permanently
  accessible to all
• Even expert speakers cannot keep up with language
  changeA constantly updated corpus can reflect
  even recent changes in the language
• Even expert speakers lack authority they can be
  challenged by other expert speakersA corpus can
  encompass the actual language use of many expert
  speakers

23
Parameters of a corpus

• Language
• Monolingual
• Multilingual (comparable corpora)
• Parallel
• Type of source
• Written
• Spoken
• Mix

24
Parameters of a corpus (II)

• Size of the corpus is not all important and it
  depends very much on the type of texts used
• Annotated/not annotated (type of encoding used
  plain text, SGML/XML encoded)
• Static corpus static/monitor corpus
• Corpus/sub-corpus
• Number of words/types

25
Type/token ratio

• From Brown corpus 1m tokens (written only) -
  50,406 types
• From 1980s Birmingham/Cobuild corpora 1m tokens
  (spoken only) - 36,807 types - 17,459 occur only
  once
• NB - fewer types than Brown (written only)
  spoken language is more repetitive, smaller
  vocabulary is used
• 4m tokens (Times newspapers only) - 122,773 types
  - 54,144 occur only once
• 18m tokens (general corpus) - 228,323 types -
  131,299 occur only once

26
Type/token ratio

• 121m tokens (general corpus) - 475,633 types -
  213,684 occur only once
• 211m tokens (general corpus) - 638,901 types
• 323m tokens (general corpus) - 812,467 types
• 418m tokens (general corpus) - 938,914 types -
  438,647 occur only once

27
Ways to exploit a corpus

• Word (token) / types frequency lists
• N-grams
• Concordances
• Collocations/collegations
• Specially designed programs (especially when the
  corpus is annotated)

28
Frequency lists

• are lists which indicates the words which appear
  in a corpus and their frequency
• they provide a survey of the corpus
• a frequency list becomes more meaningful when
  compared with other lists
• they remove a word from its contexts

29
Concordances

• show words in the context they appear
• usually they are obtained using special programs
  which allow to manipulate the lists of
  concordances
• KWIC (Key Word In Context) is the most common
  format

30
Collocations

• collocation the occurrence of two or more
  words within a short space of each other in text
• the collocates are extracted using a window to
  the left and right of a specified word
• can be used to further analyse the context of a
  word

31
The word learning
32
Building corpora

• Ways to acquire corpora
• Direct conversion from electronic format
• Optical scanning
• Keyboarding
• Speech transcription

33
Building corpora (II)

• Criteria in corpus design
• Size (small corpora are for genre specific
  studies, whereas big corpora make robust, general
  statements about a language)
• Genre (domain, distribution, age, )
• The structure of the corpus can be decided
• A priori (Brown, LOB, )
• A posteriori
• Old material is replaced with new one (monitor
  corpus)

34
Building corpora (III)

• Selection, permission, acquisition
• Data conversion, optical scanning, keyboarding,
  speech transcription
• Cleaning, spell-checking, encoding (annotation),
  indexing
• Writing documentation
• Evaluation of corpora
• Distribution of corpora

35
Possible problems when building a corpus

• A sampling frame designed to allow the
  exploitation of a certain linguistics properties
• Balance and representativeness
• Information can be lost through cleaning
• Duplication
• When working with speech information can be lost
  through transcribing

36
Web as a corpus

• The Web can be very useful source of texts
• The Web is very helpful for languages other than
  English
• Quite often there is not control on the language
  which is investigated therefore filtering (if
  possible) is necessary

37
Web as a corpus
38
Web as a corpus
39
Web as a corpus
40
Corpus annotation

• Enrichment of a corpus with various types of
  information
• It can be done at every level
• Word part of speech, sense
• Sentence sentence boundaries, syntactic tree
• Discourse coreferential chains, discourse
  segments
• Certain expressions named entities

41
Annotation scheme

• A standard used to annotate certain
  characteristics
• Gives meaning to a tag
• Nowadays it is in XML
• Usually in addition to an annotation scheme, a
  set of guidelines is produces to assist the
  annotation

42
Examples (II)

• ltPgtltSgtltW POS"PRON" NUM"PL LEMMA"we"gtWelt/WgtltW
  POS"V" LEMMA"have"gthavelt/WgtltW POS"EN"
  LEMMA"develop"gtdevelopedlt/WgtltNPgtltW POS"DET"
  LEMMA"a"gtalt/WgtltW POS"A LEMMA"computational"gt
  computationallt/WgtltW POS"N" NUM"SG"
  LEMMA"paradigm"gt paradigmlt/WgtltW
  POS"PUNCT"gt,lt/Wgt ...lt/NPgt ... lt/Sgtlt/Pgt

43
What are the advantages of corpus annotation?

• Ease of exploitation
• Reusability
• Multi-functionality
• Explicit analyses
• Once a corpus is annotated it can be used in
  further research

44
Annotation of a corpus

• Can be done automatically, semi-automatically
  and manually
• Sometimes the method is automatic and then the
  results postprocessed
• Usually special tools are used to minimise the
  human error

45
Criticism to corpus annotation

• Corpus annotation produce impure corpora
• Sometimes annotation can hide certain features
• Consistency versus accuracy
• Measures to compute the reliability of an
  annotation
• Sometimes the annotation scheme can cover a
  phenomenon only partially.

46
Existing corpora

• Brown Corpus/LOB corpus
• Bank of English
• Wall Street Journal, Penn Tree Bank, BNC, ANC,
  ICE, WBE, Reuters Corpus
• Canadian Hansard parallel corpus English-French
• York-Helsinki Parsed corpus of Old Poetry
• Tiger corpus German
• CORII/CODIS - contemporary written Italian
• MULTEX 1984 and The Republic in many languages

47
Distributors of corpora

• LDC (Linguistic Data Consortium)
• ELRA (European Language Resources Association)
• TRACTOR (TELRI Research Archive of Computational
  Tools and Resources)
• ICAME (International Computer Archive of Modern
  and Medieval English)

48
References

• Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg (1991) English
  corpus linguistics, Longman
• Duglas Biber, Susan Cnrad and Randi Reppen (1998)
  Corpus linguistics, Cambridge University Press
• Graeme D. Kennedy (1998) An introduction to
  corpus linguistics, Longman
• Tony McEnery and Andrew Wilson (1996) Corpus
  linguistics, Edinburgh University Press

49
References (II)

• Geoff Barnbrook (1996) Language and Computers,
  Edinburgh University Press
• Tony McEnery (2003) Corpus linguistics. In
  Ruslan Mitkov (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of
  Computational Linguistics, Oxford University
  Press