Methamphetamine Use Among Proposition 36 Clients - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Methamphetamine Use Among Proposition 36 Clients

Description:

Presentation for the Substance Abuse Research Consortium ... Marijuana/Hashish. 1.08. Heroin/Opiates. 1.03. Cocaine/Crack. 1.06. Alcohol. 1. Methamphetamine ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ahaw4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Methamphetamine Use Among Proposition 36 Clients


1
Methamphetamine Use among Proposition 36 Clients
August 8, 2006 Presentation for the Substance
Abuse Research Consortium By Angela Hawken,
Ph.D., Darren Urada, Ph.D., Douglas Longshore,
Ph.D.
2
Source CADDS
3
Source CADDS
4
Demographics Among SACPA Meth Users
  • 70 male, 30 female
  • Half are in treatment for the first time
  • 55 White, 34 Hispanic
  • Median age 35

Source CADDS 2004-2005
5
Source CADDS
6
(No Transcript)
7
Source CADDS
8
Source CADDS
9
SACPA meth users had more drug re-arrests than
users of most other drugs, but fewer than users
of cocaine.
Notes Values reported are incident rate ratios
from a negative-binomial regression model of
arrest. Regressions include controls for sex,
county, prior arrests, employment status, and
age/race interactions is significant at the
1 level. is significant at the 5 level.
10
SACPA meth users were similar to cocaine heroin
users on property arrests during the 30 month
follow-up.
Notes Values reported are incident rate ratios
from a negative-binomial regression model of
arrest. Regressions include controls for sex,
county, prior arrests, employment status, and
age/race interactions is significant at the
1 level. is significant at the 5 level.
11
SACPA meth users had FEWER arrests for sex crimes
(e.g. prostitution) during the 30 month follow-up
than cocaine or heroin users.
Notes Values reported are incident rate ratios
from a negative-binomial regression model of
arrest. Regressions include controls for sex,
county, prior arrests, employment status, and
age/race interactions is significant at the
1 level. is significant at the 5 level.
12
SACPA meth users were similar to cocaine
heroin users on violent arrest rates during the
30 month follow-up.
Notes Values reported are incident rate ratios
from a negative-binomial regression model of
arrest. Regressions include controls for sex,
county, prior arrests, employment status, and
age/race interactions is significant at the
1 level. is significant at the 5 level.
13
SACPA methamphetamine users do not spend more
time incarcerated. Days Incarcerated by Primary
Drug, 30 month follow-up
14
Conclusions
  • Most SACPA Clients Use Methamphetamines
  • SACPA Meth users are not less likely to complete
    treatment or spend less time in treatment
  • SACPA meth users are more likely to have a drug
    re-arrest than heroin, marijuana, and alcohol
    users, but less likely than cocaine/crack users.
  • SACPA meth users are generally not more likely to
    have re-arrests on property, sex, or violent
    charges, and do not spend more time incarcerated.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com