Professor dr' juris Ola Mestad - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Professor dr' juris Ola Mestad

Description:

for formulating effective policy responses' (The University of the West Indies) ... it also cover supra-levels of government like The University of the West Indies? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: ola62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Professor dr' juris Ola Mestad


1
  • Professor dr. juris Ola Mestad
  • Centre for European Law and Scandinavian
    Institute of Maritime Law
  • International Economic Law Course Spring 2009

2
Todays Items
  • Education and national treatment Article XVII
  • Disciplining regulatory behaviour Article VI
  • Maritime Services negotiations
  • Services and investment

3
I. What Is Special With Education?
  • Only 46 WTO members have made education
    commitments
  • What about your own country?
  • Education is a key feature of national identity
    building
  • It has a strong cultural component
  • Investment in education is probably the single
    most important investment that a country can
    undertake
  • This makes it different from other public
    services like health and welfare, that are based
    on a distributive justice rationale

4
The Case of Jamaicas Higher Education Commitments
  • Jamaica has bound higher education in its
    schedule without qualifications
  • September 2003 Request for like allocation of
    public funding to institutions boasting
    franchised degrees from a number of foreign
    universities
  • It was evident that many Caribbean governments
    lacked the capacity for formulating effective
    policy responses (The University of the West
    Indies)

5
Public Funding and Article XVII National Treatment
  • 1. In the sectors inscribed in its Schedule, and
    subject to any conditions and qualifications set
    out therein, each Member shall accord to services
    and service suppliers of any other Member, in
    respect of all measures affecting the supply of
    services, treatment no less favourable than that
    it accords to its own like services and service
    suppliers.
  • 2. A Member may meet the requirement of paragraph
    1 by according to services and service suppliers
    of any other Member, either formally identical
    treatment or formally different treatment to that
    it accords to its own like services and service
    suppliers.
  • 3. Formally identical or formally different
    treatment shall be considered to be less
    favourable if it modifies the conditions of
    competition in favour of services or service
    suppliers of the Member compared to like services
    or service suppliers of any other Member.

6
National Treatment and Public Funding
  • Is public funding covered by the National
    Treatment obligation?
  • all measures affecting the supply (Art. XVII.1)
  • The relevant test is the effect on the
    conditions of competition (Art. XVII.3)
  • Likeness test in respect of education
  • Leading to same exams or similar levels?
  • Public funding to other subjects is covered

7
What About Direct Government Supply of Education
  • Does national treatment with respect to public
    funding also cover direct government supply of
    education?
  • Interpretation of whether government supply is a
    measure
  • In my opinion, it is not
  • A measure is a kind of intervention
  • Examples from the definition in Art. XXVIII a
    law, regulation, rule, procedure, decision,
    administrative action, or any other form
  • As long as the government is only funding its own
    activities, national treatment does not require
    funding of international education suppliers
  • If the government is also funding national
    individual suppliers, the national treatment
    obligation applies

8
The Concept of Government Supply of Education
  • Government supply also covers sub-levels of
    government like provinces, counties,
    municipalities
  • Should it also cover supra-levels of government
    like The University of the West Indies?
  • This is delegated governmental activites, but
    delegated to a supranational or intergovernmental
    institution
  • Is that really different from delegation of
    activities to sub-levels?
  • Compare the definition of measures by Members
    in Art. I.3(a)
  • Would a denial of analogy be a dicrimination of
    poorer small contries, that really should be
    encouraged to co-operate between themselves?

9
II. Regulatory Behaviour
  • Quantitative restrictions Article XVI Market
    Access
  • Covered last time
  • Qualitative restrictions Article VI Domestic
    Regulation
  • Hotly debated issue why?
  • Mainly still to be negotiated

10
Article VI Domestic Regulation
  • 1. In sectors where specific commitments are
    undertaken, each Member shall ensure that all
    measures of general application affecting trade
    in services are administered in a reasonable,
    objective and impartial manner.
  • 2. (a) Each Member shall maintain or institute as
    soon as practicable judicial, arbitral or
    administrative tribunals or procedures which
    provide, at the request of an affected service
    supplier, for the prompt review of, and where
    justified, appropriate remedies for,
    administrative decisions affecting trade in
    services. Where such procedures are not
    independent of the agency entrusted with the
    administrative decision concerned, the Member
    shall ensure that the procedures in fact provide
    for an objective and impartial review.
  • (b) The provisions of subparagraph (a) shall not
    be construed to require a Member to institute
    such tribunals or procedures where this would be
    inconsistent with its constitutional structure or
    the nature of its legal system.

11
Article VI Domestic Regulation cont
  • 3. Where authorization is required for the supply
    of a service on which a specific commitment has
    been made, the competent authorities of a Member
    shall, within a reasonable period of time after
    the submission of an application considered
    complete under domestic laws and regulations,
    inform the applicant of the decision concerning
    the application. At the request of the applicant,
    the competent authorities of the Member shall
    provide, without undue delay, information
    concerning the status of the application.

12
Article VI Domestic Regulation cont
  • 4. With a view to ensuring that measures relating
    to qualification requirements and procedures,
    technical standards and licensing requirements do
    not constitute unnecessary barriers to trade in
    services, the Council for Trade in Services
    shall, through appropriate bodies it may
    establish, develop any necessary disciplines.
    Such disciplines shall aim to ensure that such
    requirements are, inter alia
  • (a) based on objective and transparent criteria,
    such as competence and the ability to supply the
    service
  • (b) not more burdensome than necessary to ensure
    the quality of the service
  • (c) in the case of licensing procedures, not in
    themselves a restriction on the supply of the
    service.

13
Article VI Domestic Regulation cont
  • 5. (a) In sectors in which a Member has
    undertaken specific commitments, pending the
    entry into force of disciplines developed in
    these sectors pursuant to paragraph 4, the Member
    shall not apply licensing and qualification
    requirements and technical standards that nullify
    or impair such specific commitments in a manner
    which
  • (i) does not comply with the criteria outlined in
    subparagraphs 4(a), (b) or (c) and
  • (ii) could not reasonably have been expected of
    that Member at the time the specific commitments
    in those sectors were made.
  • (b) In determining whether a Member is in
    conformity with the obligation under
    paragraph 5(a), account shall be taken of
    international standards of relevant international
    organizations applied by that Member.
  • 6. In sectors where specific commitments
    regarding professional services are undertaken,
    each Member shall provide for adequate procedures
    to verify the competence of professionals of any
    other Member.

14
III. Two Paradoxes of Liberalization of Maritime
Services
  • Maritime transport is one of the globally most
    liberalized service sectors, but it seems nearly
    impossible to reach a binding liberalization
    agreement in the WTO
  • Most of the total volume of goods covered by WTO
    GATT is transported by ship but there seems to be
    no connection between binding liberalization of
    trade in goods and performance of or trade in
    maritime services

15
Typical Maritime Sector Restrictions
  • Cargo sharing agreements
  • Bilateral
  • Liner conferences
  • National preferences
  • Restricted access to government and strategic
    cargoes
  • Cabotage
  • Cargo reservations
  • Limitations on local presence and investment
  • Other
  • Tax treatment

16
Annex on Negotiations on Maritime Transport
Services
  • 1.  Article II and the Annex on Article II
    Exemptions shall enter into force for
    international shipping, auxiliary services and
    access to and use of port facilities only on
  • (a) the implementation date to be determined
    under paragraph 4 of the Ministerial Decision on
    Negotiations on Maritime Transport Services or,
  • (b) should the negotiations not succeed, the date
    of the final report of the Negotiating Group on
    Maritime Transport Services provided for in that
    Decision.
  • 2.  Paragraph 1 shall not apply to any specific
    commitment which is inscribed in a Members
    Schedule.
  • 3.  From the conclusion of the negotiations
    referred to in paragraph 1, and before the
    implementation date, a Member may improve, modify
    or withdraw all or part of its specific
    commitments in this sector .

17
The Involved Interests
  • EU, Japan, Norway and other shipping countries
    want liberalization
  • EU and Norway are aligned
  • Joint initiatives
  • Previously there has been some tactical
    disagreement, also within the EU
  • The difficult, and most important player, the US,
    is reluctant
  • Changed emphasis over the years?
  • Cabotage
  • Mulitimodal transport
  • Developing countries
  • Some transformation of interests over the last
    years?

18
Doha Round Status March 2009
  • All negotiations have broken down (July 2008)
  • Maritime services still not generally covered
    under GATS MFN obligations
  • Countries with scheduled commitments in the
    relevant sector are bound by their commitments as
    well as by the MFN obligation (Art. II)
  • The sector negotiations apparently even more
    difficult (but not so generally important) than
    agriculture and the special safeguard measure to
    protect developing countries against import
    surges in food which finally made the
    negotiations brake down in July

19
IV. Services and Investment
  • Mode 3 commercial presence is in reality
    including investment Article I.2 c)
  • The failed request for a broader agenda for the
    Doha round to include trade and investment
  • See Van den Bossche 90-91, Dolzer Schreuer
    26-27
  • European Communities Developing countries

20
Performance Requirements under TRIMs (under GATT)
  • Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures
  • Members, 
  • Desiring to promote the expansion and
    progressive liberalisation of world trade and to
    facilitate investment across international
    frontiers so as to increase the economic growth
    of all trading partners, particularly developing
    country Members, while ensuring free competition
  •             Recognizing that certain investment
    measures can cause trade-restrictive and
    distorting effects

21
TRIMs cont
  • Article 2 National Treatment and Quantitative
    Restrictions
  • 1. Without prejudice to other rights and
    obligations under GATT 1994, no Member shall
    apply any TRIM that is inconsistent with the
    provisions of Article III or Article XI of GATT
    1994.
  • 2. An illustrative list of TRIMs that are
    inconsistent with the obligation of national
    treatment provided for in paragraph 4 of
    Article III of GATT 1994 and the obligation of
    general elimination of quantitative restrictions
    provided for in paragraph 1 of Article XI of GATT
    1994 is contained in the Annex to this Agreement.

22
TRIMs Annex Illustrative List
  • 1. TRIMs that are inconsistent with the
    obligation of national treatment provided for in
    paragraph 4 of Article III of GATT 1994 include
    those which are mandatory or enforceable under
    domestic law or under administrative rulings, or
    compliance with which is necessary to obtain an
    advantage, and which require 
  • (a) the purchase or use by an enterprise of
    products of domestic origin or from any domestic
    source, whether specified in terms of particular
    products, in terms of volume or value of
    products, or in terms of a proportion of volume
    or value of its local production  or
  • (b) that an enterprises purchases or use of
    imported products be limited to an amount related
    to the volume or value of local products that it
    exports.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com