Title: Professor dr' juris Ola Mestad
1- Professor dr. juris Ola Mestad
- Centre for European Law and Scandinavian
Institute of Maritime Law - International Economic Law Course Spring 2009
2Todays Items
- Education and national treatment Article XVII
- Disciplining regulatory behaviour Article VI
- Maritime Services negotiations
- Services and investment
3I. What Is Special With Education?
- Only 46 WTO members have made education
commitments - What about your own country?
- Education is a key feature of national identity
building - It has a strong cultural component
- Investment in education is probably the single
most important investment that a country can
undertake - This makes it different from other public
services like health and welfare, that are based
on a distributive justice rationale
4The Case of Jamaicas Higher Education Commitments
- Jamaica has bound higher education in its
schedule without qualifications - September 2003 Request for like allocation of
public funding to institutions boasting
franchised degrees from a number of foreign
universities - It was evident that many Caribbean governments
lacked the capacity for formulating effective
policy responses (The University of the West
Indies)
5Public Funding and Article XVII National Treatment
- 1. In the sectors inscribed in its Schedule, and
subject to any conditions and qualifications set
out therein, each Member shall accord to services
and service suppliers of any other Member, in
respect of all measures affecting the supply of
services, treatment no less favourable than that
it accords to its own like services and service
suppliers. - 2. A Member may meet the requirement of paragraph
1 by according to services and service suppliers
of any other Member, either formally identical
treatment or formally different treatment to that
it accords to its own like services and service
suppliers. - 3. Formally identical or formally different
treatment shall be considered to be less
favourable if it modifies the conditions of
competition in favour of services or service
suppliers of the Member compared to like services
or service suppliers of any other Member.
6National Treatment and Public Funding
- Is public funding covered by the National
Treatment obligation? - all measures affecting the supply (Art. XVII.1)
- The relevant test is the effect on the
conditions of competition (Art. XVII.3) - Likeness test in respect of education
- Leading to same exams or similar levels?
- Public funding to other subjects is covered
7What About Direct Government Supply of Education
- Does national treatment with respect to public
funding also cover direct government supply of
education? - Interpretation of whether government supply is a
measure - In my opinion, it is not
- A measure is a kind of intervention
- Examples from the definition in Art. XXVIII a
law, regulation, rule, procedure, decision,
administrative action, or any other form - As long as the government is only funding its own
activities, national treatment does not require
funding of international education suppliers - If the government is also funding national
individual suppliers, the national treatment
obligation applies
8The Concept of Government Supply of Education
- Government supply also covers sub-levels of
government like provinces, counties,
municipalities - Should it also cover supra-levels of government
like The University of the West Indies? - This is delegated governmental activites, but
delegated to a supranational or intergovernmental
institution - Is that really different from delegation of
activities to sub-levels? - Compare the definition of measures by Members
in Art. I.3(a) - Would a denial of analogy be a dicrimination of
poorer small contries, that really should be
encouraged to co-operate between themselves?
9II. Regulatory Behaviour
- Quantitative restrictions Article XVI Market
Access - Covered last time
- Qualitative restrictions Article VI Domestic
Regulation - Hotly debated issue why?
- Mainly still to be negotiated
10Article VI Domestic Regulation
- 1. In sectors where specific commitments are
undertaken, each Member shall ensure that all
measures of general application affecting trade
in services are administered in a reasonable,
objective and impartial manner. - 2. (a) Each Member shall maintain or institute as
soon as practicable judicial, arbitral or
administrative tribunals or procedures which
provide, at the request of an affected service
supplier, for the prompt review of, and where
justified, appropriate remedies for,
administrative decisions affecting trade in
services. Where such procedures are not
independent of the agency entrusted with the
administrative decision concerned, the Member
shall ensure that the procedures in fact provide
for an objective and impartial review. - (b) The provisions of subparagraph (a) shall not
be construed to require a Member to institute
such tribunals or procedures where this would be
inconsistent with its constitutional structure or
the nature of its legal system.
11Article VI Domestic Regulation cont
- 3. Where authorization is required for the supply
of a service on which a specific commitment has
been made, the competent authorities of a Member
shall, within a reasonable period of time after
the submission of an application considered
complete under domestic laws and regulations,
inform the applicant of the decision concerning
the application. At the request of the applicant,
the competent authorities of the Member shall
provide, without undue delay, information
concerning the status of the application.
12Article VI Domestic Regulation cont
- 4. With a view to ensuring that measures relating
to qualification requirements and procedures,
technical standards and licensing requirements do
not constitute unnecessary barriers to trade in
services, the Council for Trade in Services
shall, through appropriate bodies it may
establish, develop any necessary disciplines.
Such disciplines shall aim to ensure that such
requirements are, inter alia - (a) based on objective and transparent criteria,
such as competence and the ability to supply the
service - (b) not more burdensome than necessary to ensure
the quality of the service - (c) in the case of licensing procedures, not in
themselves a restriction on the supply of the
service.
13Article VI Domestic Regulation cont
- 5. (a) In sectors in which a Member has
undertaken specific commitments, pending the
entry into force of disciplines developed in
these sectors pursuant to paragraph 4, the Member
shall not apply licensing and qualification
requirements and technical standards that nullify
or impair such specific commitments in a manner
which - (i) does not comply with the criteria outlined in
subparagraphs 4(a), (b) or (c) and - (ii) could not reasonably have been expected of
that Member at the time the specific commitments
in those sectors were made. - (b) In determining whether a Member is in
conformity with the obligation under
paragraph 5(a), account shall be taken of
international standards of relevant international
organizations applied by that Member. - 6. In sectors where specific commitments
regarding professional services are undertaken,
each Member shall provide for adequate procedures
to verify the competence of professionals of any
other Member.
14III. Two Paradoxes of Liberalization of Maritime
Services
- Maritime transport is one of the globally most
liberalized service sectors, but it seems nearly
impossible to reach a binding liberalization
agreement in the WTO - Most of the total volume of goods covered by WTO
GATT is transported by ship but there seems to be
no connection between binding liberalization of
trade in goods and performance of or trade in
maritime services
15Typical Maritime Sector Restrictions
- Cargo sharing agreements
- Bilateral
- Liner conferences
- National preferences
- Restricted access to government and strategic
cargoes - Cabotage
- Cargo reservations
- Limitations on local presence and investment
- Other
- Tax treatment
16Annex on Negotiations on Maritime Transport
Services
- 1. Article II and the Annex on Article II
Exemptions shall enter into force for
international shipping, auxiliary services and
access to and use of port facilities only on - (a) the implementation date to be determined
under paragraph 4 of the Ministerial Decision on
Negotiations on Maritime Transport Services or, - (b) should the negotiations not succeed, the date
of the final report of the Negotiating Group on
Maritime Transport Services provided for in that
Decision. - 2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to any specific
commitment which is inscribed in a Members
Schedule. - 3. From the conclusion of the negotiations
referred to in paragraph 1, and before the
implementation date, a Member may improve, modify
or withdraw all or part of its specific
commitments in this sector .
17The Involved Interests
- EU, Japan, Norway and other shipping countries
want liberalization - EU and Norway are aligned
- Joint initiatives
- Previously there has been some tactical
disagreement, also within the EU - The difficult, and most important player, the US,
is reluctant - Changed emphasis over the years?
- Cabotage
- Mulitimodal transport
- Developing countries
- Some transformation of interests over the last
years?
18Doha Round Status March 2009
- All negotiations have broken down (July 2008)
- Maritime services still not generally covered
under GATS MFN obligations - Countries with scheduled commitments in the
relevant sector are bound by their commitments as
well as by the MFN obligation (Art. II) - The sector negotiations apparently even more
difficult (but not so generally important) than
agriculture and the special safeguard measure to
protect developing countries against import
surges in food which finally made the
negotiations brake down in July
19IV. Services and Investment
- Mode 3 commercial presence is in reality
including investment Article I.2 c) - The failed request for a broader agenda for the
Doha round to include trade and investment - See Van den Bossche 90-91, Dolzer Schreuer
26-27 - European Communities Developing countries
20Performance Requirements under TRIMs (under GATT)
- Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures
- Members,
- Desiring to promote the expansion and
progressive liberalisation of world trade and to
facilitate investment across international
frontiers so as to increase the economic growth
of all trading partners, particularly developing
country Members, while ensuring free competition - Recognizing that certain investment
measures can cause trade-restrictive and
distorting effects
21TRIMs cont
- Article 2 National Treatment and Quantitative
Restrictions - 1. Without prejudice to other rights and
obligations under GATT 1994, no Member shall
apply any TRIM that is inconsistent with the
provisions of Article III or Article XI of GATT
1994. - 2. An illustrative list of TRIMs that are
inconsistent with the obligation of national
treatment provided for in paragraph 4 of
Article III of GATT 1994 and the obligation of
general elimination of quantitative restrictions
provided for in paragraph 1 of Article XI of GATT
1994 is contained in the Annex to this Agreement.
22TRIMs Annex Illustrative List
- 1. TRIMs that are inconsistent with the
obligation of national treatment provided for in
paragraph 4 of Article III of GATT 1994 include
those which are mandatory or enforceable under
domestic law or under administrative rulings, or
compliance with which is necessary to obtain an
advantage, and which require - (a) the purchase or use by an enterprise of
products of domestic origin or from any domestic
source, whether specified in terms of particular
products, in terms of volume or value of
products, or in terms of a proportion of volume
or value of its local production or - (b) that an enterprises purchases or use of
imported products be limited to an amount related
to the volume or value of local products that it
exports.