Title: John Locke 16321704
1John Locke(1632-1704)
- The Second Treatise of Civil Government
- 1690
"...he that will not give just occasion to think
that all government in the world is the product
only of force and violence, and that men live
together by no other rules but that of beasts,
where the strongest carries it...must of
necessity find another rise of government,
another original of political power..." ---from
The Second Treatise of Civil Government
2Chapter VII, 77 - 89
- Man is born with a perfect title to
- Perfect Freedom
- Uncontrolled enjoyment of his rights under the
law of nature - His Rights under the law of Nature include all
his property, i.e - Life
- Liberty
- Estate
- Included therein is his right to adjudge and
punish breaches of his rights - These rights are equal and co-existing with every
other person - Society is formed when people give up their
natural rights by giving them into the hands of
the community - This is the origin of civil or political
societies.
3Chapter VII, 90 - 94
- An absolute Monarch, having all legislative and
executive power, there is no earthly judge
available to decide between the Monarch and the
subject - A True Government has no other end but the
preservation of Property (Life, Liberty, Estate) - Since
- no person in a true civil society can be exempted
from its laws - the only reason for civil society is to protect
all from the despoiliation of their property by
others, and - Between the ruler and the subject, there is no
judge but the ruler, then - Absolute Monarchy means that as between the ruler
and the subject the state of nature remains
intact. - Thus, Absolute Monarchy is inconsistent with the
true concept of civil society
4Chapter VIII, 95 - 99
- Man leaves his naturally free, equal, and
independent state of nature only by his free
agreement to join and unite with others into a
civil society - When a civil society is formed, the majority
govern - Every person joining that society consents to
submit to the will of the majority - By uniting, and consenting to majority
government, people give up all the power
necessary to the ends for which they unite, and
retain the rest
5Chapter VIII, 100 - 122
- He Responds to two objections to his theory
- First, There are no instances to be found where
free and equal men, independent of each other,
met and formed a civil society in this manner - He uses what little knowledge he had of Indians
to show that men could actually live together
freely without a coercive government over them - Even where history shows that the government was
in one hand, yet that person received their
governmental authority from the consent of all
the people which proves the point that the
people are the ultimate authority - Second, All men are born under a government, they
have never been free and at liberty to unite
together and form a new one or erect another
lawful government - If this be true, then which government is the
lawful one? Let us bow down and worship the
rightful ruler and abandon all others. Just show
who is the one lawful prince! - If men may move between countries, and proclaim
their allegience to a new sovereign, then they
are free to form a new civil society - No man can bind his children or others
- Only by his own consent can a man be subjected to
a government - Query How then does a government obtain
jurisdiction over a territory?
6Chapter IX, 123 - 131
- The Chief End of men uniting into civil society
is the preservation of their Property - The Only powers of a man in the state of nature
are to - Preserve Himself and others within the law of
nature, and - Punish, as best he can, crimes against the
natural law as he understands it - The State of Nature lacks many things necessary
for the protection of individual property - Common Consent to a standard of right and wrong
- Known and indifferent judges to determine
differences between people according to
established law - The power to execute a sentence when it is right
- The object of society then is to secure/promote
the common good by securing to everyone their
Property and provide against the three defects of
the state of nature mentioned above - Query Which comes first, society or property?
7Chapter IX, X, XI, 131 - 142
- The majority have the authority to govern in a
civil society - Though they establish a Legislature, it is bound
- and must abide by - the natural law authority
delegated to them, viz - Internal Powers
- To govern by promulgated laws applicable equally
to all, - Laws must be designed only for the good of all
the people, - No taxes may be levied on the people but with
their consent - Property may not be confiscated without
compensation - The Legislature may not transfer its power to
another - External Powers
- To protect the society from outside sources of
harm (war and peace) - A legislature which exceeds these powers exceeds
the authority given by the people, and the people
have the right to abolish or change it if this
occurs
8Chapter XIII, 149 - 158
- The People retain the supreme right to alter the
legislature when the legislature acts contrary to
the trust reposed in them - When executive power operates outside the law,
society owes no obedience, however, when the
executive enforces laws rightfully made then the
members of society ought to obey - If the Executive power hinders the legilsature
wrongfully, the true remedy is use of force to
oppose such force, as in this case the executive
has made war on the people
9Chapter XIV, 159 - 168
- The prerogative (discretion or privilege) of the
Executive is given to - Exercise discretion in the enforcement of the law
for the common good - Act in instances where the legislature has
provided no rule until the legislature can
determine a proper rule - The end of government being the preservation of
Property, the executive should be able to pardon,
since even the guilty should be spared when
possible without prejudice to the innocent - The people retain the right to rein in the
prerogative of the executive for the public good - Ultimately, the only judge of the power of the
prerogative of the executive in power is an
appeal to heaven - Query Does he mean by this the right of
rebellion?
10Chapter XIX, 211 - 232
- There is a difference in dissolving society
dissolving a government. Society can remain
though the government chances, but not
vice-versa\ - Government can be dissolved by force from without
- Government can be dissolved from within when
- The legislature is altered. People have the
right to use force to resist laws made by
unlawful means or an unlawful legislature - When a person(s) sets up his/their arbitrary will
in place of the law - When the legislature is hindered from meeting or
acting freely to accomplish the tasks given it by
the people - When the elections or means of election are
altered without the consent of the people - When the people are delivered into the hands of a
foreign power - When the Executive power no longer enforces the
law - When the Legislative or Executive powers act
contrary to their trust - By invading the property of the subject, or
- Making themselves or others arbitrary masters of
the lives, liberties, or fortunes of the people
11To conclude
- An individual in a state of nature grants part of
his powers to the society for the preservation of
his Property (life, liberty, estate) - The society creates a government (Legislative
Executive), and transfers those powers to it for
the protection of the subject - These powers can never be taken back by the
subject so long (and no longer) as the trust is
properly exercised - The powers of government are forfeited by
violation of the trust, and the people retain the
authority to change the government in such cases - (Note that in Lockes day, the Judicial was
thought of as a part of the Executive powers
the King in Parliament was the ultimate court in
the English system, and all judges were officers
of the King)
12Interesting Issues from Locke
- Why does the majority (and not 2/3 or 3/4 or
consensus) obtain the right to govern? - How does a society obtain jurisdiction over
territory? If it does so only because that
territory is the pre-existing property of a
subject, why does the government not loose that
territory if the subject sells it to a subject of
a different society? - If the society does not obtain jurisdiction over
territory because it is the pre-existing property
of the subject, then how does it obtain such
jurisdiction? - If society is formed by common consent, what
happens when a person fails to consent after
coming of age. - Does a person remain subject to a society even if
he withdraws and joins a different existing
society? - Which comes first? Individual property or the
laws of a civil society which describe, define,
and protect rights in that property?