MultiResolution Land Characteristics MRLC Consortium - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

MultiResolution Land Characteristics MRLC Consortium

Description:

MultiResolution Land Characteristics MRLC Consortium – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Sra63
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MultiResolution Land Characteristics MRLC Consortium


1
Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC)
Consortium
  • Great Lakes Regional Data Exchange
  • Land Cover / Land Use
  • Chicago, IL
  • April 27, 2005
  • Steve Raber
  • NOAA Coastal Services Center

2
Outline
  • MRLC Overview
  • The National Land Cover Database (NLCD)
  • Partners and contributions
  • NOAA Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP)
  • Future plans

3
MRLC Consortium
History
  • Formed in 1993
  • Multi-agency (federal)
  • Original members USGS, EPA, NOAA, USFS
  • Administered by USGS EROS Data Center

Original objective To leverage resources toward
the purchase of Landsat 5 imagery for the
conterminous U.S. for use in the development
of land cover products.
4
MRLC Consortium
Background 1990s
  • National LC mapping programs of the 1990s
  • Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP) NOAA
    Coastal Services Center focus on critical
    coastal habitats
  • Gap Analysis Program (GAP) National Biological
    Survey (NBS), later USGS focused on maintaining
    bio-diversity
  • National Land Cover Data (NLCD) directed by USGS
    and EPA focused on comprehensive (wall-to-wall)
    mapping of the US
  • Minimal cross-agency collaboration except for
    purchase of imagery
  • NLCD 1992 mapping (aka MRLC 92) kicked-off
  • MRLC members added in mid-1990s NASA, BLM

5
MRLC Consortium
NLCD 1992
  • USGS / EPA focused
  • wall-to-wall land cover mapping of conterminous
    U.S.
  • Minimal participation by other agencies
  • Circa 1992 imagery best available (single
    scenes)
  • Mapping based on EPA regions
  • Traditional image processing methods
  • Significant subjectivity
  • Some contracts awarded
  • Work completed circa 2000

6
MRLC Consortium
NLCD 1992 Lessons Learned
  • Successful mapping effort
  • Proved wall-to-wall mapping could be accomplished
  • Image archive developed
  • Pre-processing refined
  • Partnerships with industry fostered
  • National awareness built
  • Broad-based user community fostered
  • Accuracy assessment conducted by EPA
  • Decent results at Anderson Level 1 (70
    accurate)
  • Mixed reviews from users
  • Consistency and repeatability issues and concerns
  • Need for better approach in future identified

7
NLCD 2001
True MRLC Collaboration
  • Circa 2001
  • C-CAP, GAP, and NLCD all utilizing similar
    classification schemes, yet doing their own thing
  • MRLC Consortium presents opportunities
  • Vision to bring mapping programs into alignment
  • Landsat costs at all-time low (unprecedented)
  • Promising new semi-automated techniques
  • Improve repeatability, consistency, and accuracy
  • USGS EROS Data Center (EDC)
  • Promotes vision for National Land Cover
    Database
  • Partnership model to accomplish all mapping
  • Other mapping programs contribute while maintain
    own identity

8
MRLC / NLCD 2001
New Purpose Win / Win
  • Leverage each agencys strengths
  • Slight modifications to each classification
    scheme (C-CAP, GAP, NLCD)
  • Work toward own objectives, while developing the
    NLCD
  • Improved quality
  • Adoption of new semi-automated techniques -
    maintains consistency / repeatability
  • Mapping zones based on eco-regions
  • Three-season imagery

9
NLCD 2001
Classification Scheme
  • Water
  • Open Water
  • Perennial Ice/Snow
  • Developed
  • Developed, Open Space
  • Low Intensity
  • Medium Intensity
  • High Intensity
  • Forests
  • Deciduous
  • Evergreen
  • Mixed
  • Barren(Rock/Sand/Clay)
  • Non-Vascular
  • Lichens
  • Moss
  • Shrubland
  • Dwarf Shrub
  • Shrub
  • Grasslands/Herbaceous
  • Herbaceous
  • Sedge Herbaceous
  • Agriculture
  • Pasture/Hay
  • Cultivated Crops
  • Wetlands
  • Woody Wetlands
  • Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands

10
MRLC Expanded
Partners Meeting, March 2005
  • US Geological Survey (USGS)
  • EDC Collin Homer, MRLC Chair
  • GAP
  • NAWQA
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    (NOAA)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • US Forest Service (USFS)
  • Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
  • National Park Service (NPS)
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFW)
  • National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
  • US Office of Surface Mining (OSM)

11
NLCD 2001 - Status
12
Capturing Coastal Changes
Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP)
  • Conceived in the late 1980s
  • Implemented as a NOAA program in the mid 1990s
    via grants and cooperative agreements
  • Project-based mapping until 2000

Original objective To improve scientific
understanding of the linkages between coastal
wetland habitats, adjacent uplands, and living
marine resources
13
C-CAP Re-tooling
Aligning with MRLC / NLCD
  • 1999 -- C-CAP review identified the need to
  • Leverage other national efforts
  • Focus on applications customer orientation
  • Standardize, create consistency, timely delivery
  • 2000 -- collaborative discussions with USGS and
    MRLC
  • Classification and techniques modified to
    accommodate NLCD

14
C-CAP Geography
15
C-CAP Classification Scheme
Focus on the Coast
  • Water
  • Open Water
  • Perennial Ice / Snow
  • Developed,
  • Open Space
  • Developed, Low Intensity
  • Developed, Medium Intensity
  • Developed, High Intensity
  • Forest
  • Deciduous
  • Evergreen
  • Mixed
  • Bare Land
  • Shrubland
  • Dwarf Shrub
  • Scrub / Shrub
  • Grassland
  • Wetlands
  • Palustrine Forested
  • Palustrine Scrub / Shrub
  • Palustrine Emergent
  • Estuarine Forested
  • Estuarine Scrub / Shrub
  • Estuarine Emergent
  • Unconsolidated Shore
  • Aquatic Bed
  • Estuarine Aquatic Bed
  • Palustrine Aquatic Bed
  • Agriculture
  • Cultivated land
  • Pasture / Hay
  • Alaska Only
  • Sedge / Herbaceous
  • Lichens
  • Moss

16
C-CAP Philosophy
Focus on the Coast
  • Focus on
  • Coastal habitats and resources
  • Change detection and analysis
  • Accuracy and quality
  • Minimize duplication of effort
  • Guided by user input and interactions
  • Target audience resource managers and
    decision-makers
  • Partnerships are critical
  • Work with private industry
  • Day-to-day technical mapping
  • Faster, better, and more consistent

17
C-CAP Status
Coastal NLCD
2004 Contracts
2005-2006 Contracts
NLCD Zones
18
Looking Forward
  • First priority
  • Complete national baseline of land cover and
    change data, in collaboration with MRLC
  • Focus on the user community / constituency
    outreach and coordination
  • Develop high-resolution solutions
  • Pursue regional updates every five years (with
    caveats )
  • Continue integrating into broader NOAA and
    National Map initiatives

19
For more information
Steve.Raber_at_noaa.gov Nate.Herold_at_noaa.gov Homer_at_us
gs.gov C-CAP www.csc.noaa.gov/landcover MRLC
www.mrlc.gov EPA (MRLC) www.epa.gov/mrlc/about
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com