Intrathecal Narcotics for Postoperative Analgesia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Intrathecal Narcotics for Postoperative Analgesia

Description:

Likely no more clinically relevant than for IV narcotics ... No significant difference in side effects from IV narcotic. Conclusions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: informat778
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intrathecal Narcotics for Postoperative Analgesia


1
Intrathecal Narcotics for Post-operative Analgesia
  • Kristopher R Davignon, MD
  • Dept of Anessthesia Grand Rounds
  • March 2007

2
Intrathecal Narcotics
  • Opioids were know to the ancient Sumerians as of
    4000 B.C.
  • 1971 Opioid receptor discovered
  • 1973 Receptors found in the brain
  • 1976 Receptors found in the spinal cord
  • 1979 Early reports of intrathecal opioids
    producing analgesia

3
Intrathecal Narcotics
  • Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Procedures
  • Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty
  • 350,000 Procedures per year in the US
  • 5 min to consent
  • 15 min for procedure

4
Overview and Goals
  • Anatomy, Physiology Pharmacology
  • Complications
  • Evidence Based Practice
  • Dose-Response
  • Future Directions

5
Anatomy, Physiology Pharmacology
6
Anatomy, Physiology Pharmacology
  • Drug disposition depends primarily on lipid
    solubility
  • Any drug rapidly redistributes
  • opioid is detectable in the cisterna magna within
    30 min of lumbar intrathecal administration

7
Anatomy, Physiology Pharmacology
  • Opiods
  • Morphine
  • Meperidine
  • Hydromorphone
  • Sufentanil Fentanyl
  • Methadone
  • Non Opiods
  • Clonidine
  • Neostigmine
  • Adenosine
  • Epinephrine
  • Ketorolac
  • Midazolam

Preservative
8
Anatomy, Physiology Pharmacology
  • Lipophilic opioids
  • Rapidly traverse the dura sequestered in
    epidural fat (and enter systemic circulation)
  • Rapidly penetrate the spinal cord and bind
    receptors and nonspecific sites

9
Anatomy, Physiology Pharmacology
  • Hydrophilic opiods
  • Limited binding to epidural fat and nonspecific
    receptors
  • Slower transfer to systemic circulation
  • Higher CSF concentrations accounting for rostral
    spread

10
Anatomy, Physiology Pharmacology
11
Complications
  • Pruritus
  • Mechanism unclear likely opiod receptor
    mediated (not histamine)
  • Incidence 30-100
  • Rx Antihistamines, 5-HT3 antagonist, opiod
    antagonists (or agonist-antagonists), propofol

12
Complications
  • Urinary Retention
  • Not dose dependent
  • Can last 14-16 hours
  • Most frequent with Morphine
  • 35 incidence
  • Mechanism related to sacral parasympathetic
    outflow inhibition
  • Allows increase in maximal bladder capacity

13
Complications
  • Nausea and Vomiting
  • Incidence 30
  • Most profound with Morphine
  • Likely due to cephalad migration of drug to area
    postrema

14
Complications
  • Respiratory Depression
  • Incidence is dose dependent
  • Very Rare 0.09 to 0.4
  • Likely no more clinically relevant than for IV
    narcotics
  • Monitoring for 18-24 hours when using lipophilic
    opiods

15
Complications
  • PDPH
  • Age, Gender, History of PDPH, Obesity
  • Multiple dural puncture, Needle size, Needle
    design

16
(No Transcript)
17
Complications
  • PDPH
  • Rx
  • hydration
  • Caffeine
  • Sumatriptan
  • ACTH
  • EBP

18
Complications
  • Neuropraxia/Paralysis
  • Epidural hematoma
  • Epidural abcess

19
Evidence Based Practice
  • What types of surgery is amenable to intrathecal
    narcotics?
  • What doses should we use?
  • What outcomes can we affect?

20
Types of Surgery
  • Thoracic
  • Including Cardiac
  • Intra-abdominal
  • Including C/S, AAA, Open Cholecystectomy
  • Lower Extremity
  • Including THA TKA

21
  • Narcotic Only (worst)
  • Narcotic LA (best)
  • LA Only

22
(No Transcript)
23
the Dose
  • 1) Optimal dose depends on the surgical procedure
  • 2) Incidence of side effects increases in
    proportion to dose (especially with doses gt 300
    ug)

24
the Dose
25
Dosing for THA
  • Use lowest dose possible!
  • Studies have used doses as low as 0.025 mg
  • Older studies used doses as high as 0.5mg
  • Ideal dose seems to be 0.1 mg
  • Lower doses dont provide good analgesia
  • Higher doses plagued with pruritis

26
Dosing for THA
27
Dosing for THA
28
Affecting Outcomes
29
Do Improved Pain Scores Matter?
30
(No Transcript)
31
Future Directions
  • Anticoagulants
  • Use of stents and anti-platelet agents
  • Aggressive DVT prophlaxis
  • Absence of laboratory evidence of these agents
  • Sustained release neuraxial narcotic
  • Depodur

32
Future Directions
  • Depodur (morphine sulfate extended release
    liposome injection)

33
Future Directions
34
Future Directions
  • Better Pain Scores for 48 hours
  • Studied in Hip Arthroplasty, Cesarean Section,
    Lower Abdominal Surgery
  • No significant difference in side effects from IV
    narcotic

35
Conclusions
  • Pain management in the in-patient setting is
    becoming a priority for adminstrative
    organizations
  • A majority of in-patient pain management is
    post-operative
  • Neuraxial narcotics consistently reduce patients
    VAS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com