2004 Moskowitz Prize - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

2004 Moskowitz Prize

Description:

2004 Moskowitz Prize. Lloyd Kurtz. Nelson Capital Management. SRI in the Rockies ... Orlitzky, Marc, Frank L. Schmidt, and Sara L. Rynes. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: HBSS
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2004 Moskowitz Prize


1
2004 Moskowitz Prize
  • Lloyd Kurtz
  • Nelson Capital Management
  • SRI in the Rockies
  • Keystone, Colorado
  • October 9, 2004

2
2004 Winning Studies
  • Moskowitz Prize Winner
  • Orlitzky, Marc, Frank L. Schmidt, and Sara L.
    Rynes. "Corporate social and financial
    performance A meta-analysis." Organization
    Studies, 24, 2003.
  • Honorable Mention
  • Bollen, Nicolas P.B. and Mark A. Cohen. "Mutual
    Fund Attributes and Investor Behavior." Working
    Paper, May 24, 2004.

3
Orlitzkys Meta-Analysis
  • Summary of Key Findings
  • Orlitzkys Hypotheses
  • The Literature
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Detailed Results

4
Summary of Key Findings
  • The corporate social responsibility (CSR)
    literature is more meaningful and coherent than
    most researchers realize.
  • Statistically significant relationship between
    CSR and corporate financial performance (CFP).
  • These relationships are very unlikely to be
    spurious or caused by publication effects.

5
Orlitzkys Hypotheses
  • There will be a statistically significant
    relationship between CSR and CFP.
  • The two factors will mutually reinforce one
    another.
  • The correlation will be shown to be due to
  • Improved managerial competency
  • Improved corporate reputation
  • Much of the variance in studies will be due to
  • Sampling or measurement error
  • Different data sources

6
The LiteratureNumbers in parentheses show of
Moskowitz Prizes and Honorable Mentions.
7
What is Meta-Analysis?
  • Complex statistical technique.
  • Goal Make sense out of nonsense.
  • Aggregates many studies.
  • Widely used in medical research.
  • Use in management/financial research is new.
  • Such after-the-fact, or retrospective, analysis
    falls pretty low on the scale of scientific
    reliability. But sometimes it provides good clues
    about where problem areas may lie.
  • - Time magazine, 9/3/01

8
Meta Analysis and Vioxx
9
Confirmed Serious CV Thrombotic Events Observed
in VIGOR
Source FDA Advisory Committee Presentation,
2/8/01 www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3677
s2_05_li.PPT
50 mg
10
Meta-Analysis of COX-2s in 2001
  • The annualized myocardial infarction rates for
    COX-2 inhibitors in both VIGOR and CLASS were
    significantly higher than that in the placebo
    group of a recent meta-analysis of 23,407
    patients in primary prevention trials (0.52)
    0.74 with rofecoxib (P .04 compared with the
    placebo group of the meta-analysis) and 0.80
    with celecoxib (P .02 compared with the placebo
    group of the meta-analysis). The available data
    raise a cautionary flag about the risk of
    cardiovascular events with COX-2 inhibitors.
  • Source Journal of the American Medical
    Association. 286(8)954-9, 2001 Aug 22-29.
  • (Mercks own meta-analysis did not show this
    effect.)

11
Final Warning
  • In an FDA-funded study by Kaiser Permanente
    heart attack rates tripled for patients taking
    Vioxx in doses higher than 25 milligrams per day,
    according to the study. Lower doses of the drug
    also increased the risk of a heart attack, but
    not significantly so, the study indicated. Merck
    defended the safety of its 2.5-billion-a-year
    drug and questioned the study."
  • Source Reuters, 8/27/04

12
The End
  • Merck . Co., Inc. today announced a voluntary
    worldwide withdrawal of VIOXX (rofecoxib), its
    arthritis and acute pain medication.  The
    company's decision, which is effective
    immediately, is based on new, three-year data
    from a prospective, randomized,
    placebo-controlled clinical trial...
  • Source Company press release, 9/30/04

13
Bringing Meta Analysis to CSR
  • Large body of quantitative work
  • Controversy over
  • Definitions of key variables
  • Methodology
  • McWilliams and Siegel Misuse of event studies
  • Interpretation of results
  • Griffin and Mahon 25 years of incomparable
    research
  • Margolis and Walsh Research is generally weak,
    but see positive relationship
  • Despite the intensity of study directed at it,
    the relationship between CSP and corporate
    financial performance (CFP) remains in dispute.
    Barnett and Salomon, 2003

14
The Results Hypothesis 1
  • Hypothesis 1 There will be a statistically
    significant relationship between CSR and CFP.
  • Supported
  • CSR explains 24 of the variance in CFP.
  • File Drawer Analysis 1,037

15
The Results Hypothesis 2
  • Hypothesis 2 The two factors will mutually
    reinforce one another.
  • Supported
  • By using time lags, Orlitzky finds that CFP is a
    predictor of future CSR.
  • But CSR also predicts CFP.
  • Taken together, these findings suggest a
    virtuous cycle with quick cycle times or
    concurrent bidirectionality.

16
The Results Hypothesis 3
  • Hypothesis 3 The correlation will be shown to
    be due to
  • Improved managerial competency
  • Improved corporate reputation
  • Supported
  • Both internal (competency) and external
    (reputation) measures of CSR predicted CFP.
  • Of the two, the reputation effect was stronger.

17
The Results Hypothesis 4
  • Hypothesis 4 Much of the variance in studies
    will be due to
  • Sampling or measurement error
  • Different data sources
  • Supported
  • Sampling and measurement issues accounted for 24
    of the variance across studies.
  • Reputational measures were better predictors of
    CPF than social audits (e.g., KLD ratings).
  • Impact of CSR on CFP was stronger with accounting
    measures than market measures.

18
Contacting the Authors
  • Moskowitz Prize Winner
  • Dr. Mark Orlitzky
  • Sr. Lecturer
  • The University of Auckland Business School
  • Commerce C Building
  • 18, Symonds Street
  • Auckland, New Zealand
  • m.orlitzky_at_auckland.ac.nz
  • Honorable Mention
  • Nicholas Bollen
  • Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management
  • 401 21st Avenue South
  • Nashville, TN 37203
  • nick.bollen_at_owen.vanderbilt.edu

19
Further Information
  • http//www.sristudies.org

20
Citations
  • Barnett, Michael, and Robert Salomon. Throwing
    a Curve at Socially Responsible Investing
    Research A New Pitch at an Old Debate.
    Organization Environment, September 2003.
  • Bollen, Nicolas P.B. and Mark A. Cohen. "Mutual
    Fund Attributes and Investor Behavior." Working
    Paper, May 24, 2004.
  • Griffin and Mahon. "The Corporate Social
    Performance and Corporate Financial Performance
    Debate Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable
    Research." Business Society, March 1997.
  • Margolis, Joshua, and James Walsh. People and
    Profits? The Search for a Link Between a
    Company's Social and Financial Performance. Lea
    Publishing, 2001
  • McWilliams, Abagail, and Donald Siegel. "Event
    Studies in Management Research Theoretical and
    Empirical Issues." Academy of Management Journal,
    1999.
  • Orlitzky, Marc, Frank L. Schmidt, and Sara L.
    Rynes. "Corporate social and financial
    performance A meta-analysis." Organization
    Studies, 24, 2003.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com