Title: Dr' Larry Muszynski
1 SOILS AND CONCRETE
Dr. Larry Muszynski RNK 327
2- Structural integrity of a building depends on the
material that supports its foundations. - Type of soil
- Non problem soils
- Problem soils
- Subsurface investigation
- destructive
- non-destructive
3- Bearing capacity of the soil
- Soil compaction methods
- Effects of groundwater
- Dewatering methods
- Foundations
- Shallow
- Pile
4- Three Soils and Concrete Labs
- Concrete Mix Design
- Lab Demonstration
- Preliminary Information
- Mixing
- Plastic concrete testing
- Hardened concrete testing
- Soil Classification
- Sieve analysis
- Atterberg test
- Soil Compaction
- Proctor test
5- Soil composition
- large and small particles
- weathering of rocks and decay of vegetation
- Igneous rocks
- fine grained - slow cooling
- Basalt, rhyolite, andesite
- coarse grained - fast cooling
- Granite, diorite, gabbro
6- Sedimentary formed by accumulation of sediments
- Shale- clay or silt most abundant?
- Sandstone -quartz
- Limestone-Calcium carbonate (soft and hard
versions) - Tabby buildings
- Dolomites - limestone Mg.
- Metamorphic formed by heat and pressure
- granite gt gneiss
- basalt gt schist
- sandstone gt quartzite
- shale gt slate
- limestone gt marble
7(No Transcript)
8 - Weathering of rock
- mechanical
- temperature changes
- frost action
- rainfall, running water
- wind erosion
- chemical
- oxidation
- carbonation
- leaching
- hydrolysis
- solution
9Weathering Profile
10- Igneous rocks
- granite gt silty sands
- basalts gt clayey soils
- Sedimentary rocks
- shales gt clays and silts
- sandstones gt sandy soil
- limestone gt coarse or fine grained soils
- Metamorphic rocks
- gneiss gt silty sands
- slate gt clayey soils
- marble gt fine grained soils
- quartzite gt coarse grained soils
11SOIL EXPLORATION
12- Reconnaissance
- preliminary examination including
- geologic data-
- topographical information
- groundwater table information
- underground utilities
- Borings - drilling holes in the ground
- Sampling - removing soil from the hole
- Testing - characteristic properties of the soil
13- Auger - not good for soft clay or coarse sand
- Test pits -excavations into the earth to permit
visual inspection of soil strata - Advantages
- relatively fast
- inexpensive
- clear picture of soil strata
- gtDisadvantages
- -depth of observation (10- 15 ft.)
- -high groundwater table
14- Core borings - drill into soil and/or rock with a
core drill bit. - Core removed with soil or rock core intact,
- Soil or rock removed for further testing
- soil rock tested for compressive strength and
permeability.
15- Decisions
- boring spacing
- 50 - 100 ft. for multistory buildings
- 100 - 200 ft. for single story buildings
- 500 - 1000 ft. for highways.
- boring depths
- boring should go deeper than the depth of
unsuitable soil into suitable or compacted soil.
(Footing width) - for tall structures borings should go into bedrock
16- Removing samples from bored holes - every 5 ft.
in depth of the boring hole. - disturbed
- auger and wash borings
- core borings
- soil grain analysis, liquid limit, plastic limit,
specific gravity and compaction. - undisturbed
- test pit "carving"
- "Shelby tube" extraction
- strength, compressibility and permeability
17- Soil bearing capacity reduced when the water
table is near the the footing. - Reduction in foundation stability
- structures float out of ground (high ground water
table) - hazardous or toxic waste landfills -
contamination - Location of water table
- existing wells
- boring holes
- level to which groundwater rises in a boring hole
is the groundwater elevation in that area.
18- Standard Penetration test
- Cone Penetration test
19- Standard Penetration Test
- (SPT)
- Cohesionless soil- cohesive soil
- Split spoon sampler
- 2" o.d. x 1-3/8" i.d tube, 18 to 24 in long
- split longitudinally
- 140 lb hammer falling 30" to drive spoon 18" into
the soil - No. of blows required to penetrate each of the
three 6-inch increments is recorded separately. - Standard penetration resistance value (N-value)
is the number of blows required to penetrate the
last 12-inches, N in blows/ft) - Remove "disturbed" sample for further testing
20- SPT results affected by overburden pressure
- effective wt. of overlying soil.
- Correction factor, C(n)
- Three methods
- Cn 0.77(log (20/po)
- Ncorr N Cn
21Cohesionless Soil
- Relative Density N(corr)-value
- Very loose 0-4
- Loose 4-10
- Medium 10-30
- Dense 30-50
- Very Dense gt50
22Cohesive Soil
- Consistency N(corr) Value
- Very soft lt2
- Soft 2-4
- Medium 4-8
- Stiff 8-15
- Very stiff 15-30
- Hard gt30
23- Cone Pentration Test
- (CPT)
- Mechanical cone penetrometer
- 60 degree angle
- 1.41 in. base diameter
- 1.55 sq. in. base area
- Static cone test
- pushed by hydraulic jack
- Dynamic cone test
- pushed by blows of a drop hammer
- Penetration resistance measured and recorded as a
function of depth of soil penetrated
24- Depth increments of 8 inches
- Rate of penetration of 2-4 ft./min
- CPT data
- cone resistance
- friction resistance
- friction ratio
25- Seismic waves velocity - soil rock density
- sound waves
- explosive charge
- hammer/steel plate arrangement
- detectors - geophones
- time of arrival vs. distance
- velocity and depth -
- v 800 ft/s in loose sand
- v 20,000 ft/sec in granite
26- Wenner 4-probe electrode
- Soils rock of different densities
- different electrical resistivities
- resistivity affected by moisture content
- Resistivity vs. spacing
- initial straight line - constant soil resistivity
- second straight line resistivity of second
layer and intersection gives depth of the boundry
between the two layers.
27- Electrical resistivity
- depth of strata
- type of soil
- depth of groundwater
- locate masses of dry sands, gravel rock.
- Disadvantages of both techniques
- subjective nature of data and interpretation
- subsurface picture may not be accurate
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30- Example boring map -
- Boring log sheet -
- Geologic profile -
- RINKER HALL MAP AND LOG SHEETS
31SOIL CLASSIFICATION
32METHODOLOGY
- Soils categories type and size
- cohesionless
- gravel (2 mm)
- sand (0.1-2 mm)
- silt (0.005 - 0.1 mm)
- cohesive
- clay (less than 0.005mm)
- organic
- unacceptable (color and odor)
33 - Grain size categories
- coarse grained
- coarser than 0.075 mm or 200 sieve
- Granular (gravel and sand)
- fine grained
- finer than 0.075 mm or 200 sieve
- silts and clay
34Grain size analysis
- Sieve analysis (ASTM D422)
- Grain size distribution curve - graph
- Median size (D50)
- diameter of soil particles at which 50 passes
- average particle size
- Effective size (D10)
- diameter of soil particles at which 10 passes
- permeability related
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38Atterberg Limits - ASTM D4318
States of Consistency for cohesive soils
- water
39Soil Classification Systems
- AASHTO Soil Classification System
- ASTM (Unified Soil Classification System)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43(No Transcript)
44Unified Soil Classification System Coefficients
- Coefficient of Uniformity
- C(u) D60/D10
- Coefficient of Curvature
- C(c) (D30)2/ D60D10
- These coefficients are used to distinguish
between clean gravel and clean sands, having less
than 5 fines(passing 200 sieve) - Footnote c and d, and meaning of CL-ML
45(No Transcript)
46Liquid Limit 55 Plastic Limit 50
47(No Transcript)
48Soils Classification Review
49Lab 1
- Sieve analysis test
- Sieves 10, 20, 40, 60, 100 or 140, 200,
Pan - Approximately 500 - 1000g soil
- 10 minute shake time
- Data sheet
- Calculate Median size - D50, effective size -
D10, D60 and D30 for coefficient of uniformity
and coefficient of curvature determinations.
50 - Liquid Limit Test
- Drop device and grooving tool
- Approx. 150g dry soil passing 40
- Add water in 20 ml increments
- Record number of drops (2 drops per second)
required to close ½ wide groove - Less than 5 too wet start over
- Greater than 35- too dry add water
- 1 sample 25-35 drops and one between 15 and 25
and all three between 15 and 35 - Determine water content in percent based on o.d.
dry soil - Data sheets
51 Plastic Limit Test
52Review
- Lab Review and data
- Sieve test
- 140 0.106 mm
- Liquid limit
- Plastic limit
- Example problems
- Homework problems
53Soil Classification
Sieve No.
Passing
PI
14
27
19
542
4
6
No. 4
100
100
100
No. 10
92
100
100
No. 40
52
100
92
No. 100
41
No. 200
28
62
90
LL
29
72
38
PL
15
45
19
AASHTO A-2-6(0) A-7-5(18)
A-6(17) ASTM SC MH CL
Clayey sand Elastic silt Lean
clay
55(No Transcript)
56Components of Soil
- Solid, liquid and gas solids, water and air
- Block Diagram of Soil Components
- Figure 3-10 in book.
- V(t) V(v) V(s)
- V(v) V(a) V(w)
- Three new (Volume) parameters for soil
characterization - void ratio, e V(v)/V(s)
- porosity, n V(v)/V(t) 100 expressed as a
- degree of saturation, S V(w)/V(v)100
expressed as a
57 - Parameters based on (Weight)
- water content w W(w)/W(s)100 expressed as a
- Unit weight(wet) ? W(t)/V(t)
- W(t) W(s) W(w)
- V(t) V(s) V(w) V(a) V(s) V(v)
- Unit wt. (dry) ?(d) W(s)/V(t)
- Specific gravity of solids
- G(s) W(s)/V(s)?(w)
- ?(w) 62.4 pcf (Unit weight of water)
58Permeability, Capillarity Compressibility
- Permeability - movement of water through the soil
- Capillarity - rise of water in soil at the water
table - Compressibility - Settlement resulting in a
volume decrease of soil under load - immediate settlement - hours of a few days
- cohesionless or granular soils
- consolidation settlement - over a period of time
- primary consolidation - cohesive soils
59Compactness Relative Density
- Relative Density based on
- Voids ratios
- Loosest condition
- Densest condition
- In-place
- Unit weight
- Loosest condition
- Densest condition
- In-place
60SOIL COMPACTION STABILIZATION
61METHODOLOGY
- Compaction
- compression of soil by mechanical means expelling
air. - Rapid by heavy compaction rollers
- increases soil density and
- increases soil strength
- decreases soil permeability
- decreases amount of settlement
- inexpensive way of improving the overall
properties of the soil
62 - Compaction quantified by
- soils dry unit weight
- calculated from wet unit weight and moisture
content - Optimum moisture content
- Maximum dry unit weight
- Laboratory compaction test (Plastic Soils?????)
- Standard Proctor - ASTM D698
- Modified Proctor- ASTM D1557
63(No Transcript)
64(No Transcript)
65(No Transcript)
66(No Transcript)
67Relative Density Cohesionless Soils
- Relative Density based on
- -Voids ratios
- Loosest condition e(max)
- Densest condition e(min)
- In-place (e)
- -Unit weight
- Loosest condition ?(min)
- Densest condition - ?(max)
- In-place - ?
68(No Transcript)
69(No Transcript)
70(No Transcript)
71Lab Test
- Description of proctor compaction device
- Standard, 5.5 hammer weight
- 3 x 25 blows from 1-ft height 12,375
ft-lbs/cu.ft. - Modified, 10- hammer weight
- 5 x 25 blows from 1.5-ft height 56,250
ft-lbs/cu.ft. - Specifications for compaction testing equipment
- Test Designation
- Standard or Modified
- Method
- Soil Particle size
72 - Soil sample as received?
- Unified designation maximum dry unit weight
range - 5 samples - 5 different water contents?
- Each sample placed in compression mold with
collar - compacted in layers
- specified distance
- specified number of blows per layer
- remove collar and trim
- weigh and determine - wet unit weight
- remove soil and determine moisture content - oven
dry - calculate dry unit weight using formula
- Plot data dry unit weight versus moisture
content - Determine Max dry unit weight and Optimum
moisture content
73 Problems to Do
- Page 160-161
- No. 1, 5, and 6.
74Field Compaction
- Equipment
- Smooth wheel roller
- Sheepsfoot roller
- Pneumatic roller
- Vibratory roller
- Dynamic Compaction
75Field Compaction Test Methods
76In-Place Soil Unit Weight Test
- Density of soil in-place by drive cylinder method
- ASTM D2937 or AASHTO T 204
- Unit weight of soil in-place by the sand-cone
method - ASTM D 1556 or AASHTO T 191
- Unit weight of soil in-place by the
rubber-balloon method - ASTM 2167 or AASHTO T 205
- Unit weight of soil and soil-aggregate in-place
by nuclear methods - ASTM D 2922
77Field Control of Compaction
- Specify in-place dry unit wt.
- Test in-place compacted layer
- of Std. Proctor compaction (90-95 typically
acceptable) - in-place dry unit wt./max lab dry unit wt. X 100
- Contract document
- of required compaction
- min. number of field dry unit wt tests
- max thickness of layers to compaction
- methods to obtain max. dry unit wt.(proctor)
- methods to obtain in-place unit wt.(sand-cone,
nuclear density meter)
78Compaction Specifications
- Work-Type specification
- contractor what to do and how to do it
- Lowest bid
- Method A
- Performance based specification
- contractor must achieve a certain degree of
compaction based on lab data. - Most common
- Method B and C
79- Soil improvement
- Mechanical
- new soil added to and mixed with natural soil
- compacted
- Chemical
- adding a chemical to natural soil followed by
mixing compacting - portland cement (7-14)
- road bases
- lime- plastic soils like clays to control volume
expansion - GeoSynthetics
80- Fly ash - byproduct of coal combustion
- cementing value
- Geosynthletics
- geotextiles
- geogrids
- geonets
- geomembranes