OACP presentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

OACP presentation

Description:

Robyn Robertson, M.C.A. President and CEO. Traffic Injury Research Foundation ... Many claims; fewer solid facts. Near hysteria can surround the issue ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: herb158
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OACP presentation


1
(No Transcript)
2
Drugs and Driving What the research tells us.
Robyn Robertson, M.C.A President and CEO Traffic
Injury Research Foundation Countermeasures
XVII Toronto, ON, November 3, 2008
3
Drugs and driving
  • Drugged driving is an emerging traffic safety
    issue.
  • Highly controversial and often confusing.
  • Many claims fewer solid facts.
  • Near hysteria can surround the issue societal
    ambivalence alcohol (OK) drugs (not OK).
  • Moral overtones illegal (bad) versus legal
    (good) drugs.

4
Complex issue
  • Drugs and driving is a much more complex issue
    than drinking and driving.
  • We know and understand much more about alcohol
    its properties are consistent.
  • Complexities of drugs account for shortcomings in
    knowledge and different interpretations of
    evidence.

5
Research challenges
  • Large sample sizes.
  • More intrusive tests.
  • Refusal rates are high.
  • Collection, storage, analysis issues.
  • Correlation between drug level in blood and
    impairment is low or unreliable for many drugs.
  • Elimination rates timing of testing.
  • Wide range of analyses are expensive.

6
Why it is so complicated?
  • Many different drugs highly complex chemicals.
  • Different populations of users some are
    difficult to identify.
  • Different usage patterns according to
    prescription in combination.
  • Effects (pharmacodynamics) differ by drug and
    user (tolerance over time).
  • Testing for presence vastly more complex than
    testing for alcohol.

7
Key questions
  • Do drugs impair skills/abilities needed for safe
    driving?
  • Do people actually use these drugs while they are
    driving?
  • Are drivers who use them involved in collisions?
  • Is there evidence that the presence of the drug
    caused the crash?
  • How have jurisdictions responded to the issue?

8
Do drugs impair driving skills
  • Yes. Experimental studies show a wide range of
    drugs impair critical skills and abilities (e.g.,
    response times, concentration).
  • Some have a potent impact particularly those
    with a sedative/hypnotic effect. Some have a
    moderate effect (cannabis) some are less likely
    to cause impairment (stimulants).

9
Do drugs impair driving skills
  • Experimental studies have a number of
    limitations.
  • They take place in a controlled environment.
  • Measures of performance, not judgment.
  • Only low doses of drugs are tested for ethical
    reasons.
  • Impact on real-world experience not known.

10
Do drugs impair driving skills
  • Epidemiological (real world) studies are weak and
    vague.
  • Two types (case control and crash
    responsibility/culpability analysis), both of
    which have weaknesses.
  • The evidence that marijuana is related to crash
    risk is mixed. Some studies report that the crash
    risk is actually lower than the average driver,
    others report crash risk is 1.5-2.5 times
    greater one study said 6.4.
  • Studies of benzos show the crash risk is 1.6-5
    times greater.

11
Do people use them and drive?
  • Yes, but... Data on frequency and quantity of
    drug use in the driving population are sketchy.
  • Best estimate is that about 10 of drivers are
    using impairing drugs.
  • Marijuana is the most commonly reported/detected
    and most common among young males.

12
Do people use them and drive?
  • TIRF public opinion poll revealed 15 of driving
    population had taken prescription or over the
    counter medication within two hours of driving.
  • Marijuana use increased from 1.2 to 2.4 in
    past few years. (An estimated 500,000 people).

13
Do people use them and drive?
  • NHTSA 2007 roadside survey tested for drugs.
  • Victoria, Australia used random saliva testing
    and found 1 in 100 drivers were positive for
    alcohol 1 in 50 drivers were positive for drugs.
  • Officers on west coast in North America report a
    sharp increase in drugged impaired driving.

14
Do people use them and drive?
  • No profile of a drugged driver.
  • Marijuana is the most commonly reported/detected
    and most common among young males.
  • Some suggest that young people are substituting
    drugs for alcohol.
  • Prescription medications much more common among
    older populations.
  • Women tend to be over-prescribed by doctors.

15
Are drugged drivers involved in crashes?
  • Yes. Overall incidence of drug detections among
    drivers killed or injured in road crashes is in
    the 14-17 range.
  • Most commonly detected substance is cannabis
    (about 10-11 of cases) next are benzodiazepines
    (class of drugs with hypnotic, anticonvulsant,
    and properties) found in about 5-9 of cases.

16
How many crashes are caused by drug impairment?
  • Unknown, because the evidence of the contribution
    of drugs to crashes is inconsistent and
    inconclusive.
  • Testing of fatally injured drivers is low.
  • Drugs frequently detected in blood in combination
    with alcohol (up to 75).
  • Challenge to distinguish between the effects of
    the drugs and the characteristics of the users
    (e.g., risk taking among some users reduced
    skills in general among elderly).

17
Responses to drugged driving?
  • Per se (zero tolerance) and impairment-based
    laws
  • Impairment Austria, Denmark, Netherlands,
    Norway, Portugal, Ireland, UK.
  • Per se France, Switzerland, Sweden
  • Both Belgium, Germany, Spain Finland.
  • Random testing Belgium, Denmark, Germany,
    Spain, Italy, Portugal, Finland, Norway.
  • Suspicion France, Ireland, Austria,
    Netherlands, Sweden, UK.

18
Responses to drugged driving?
  • Per se (zero tolerance) and impairment-based
    laws.
  • Effectiveness of laws is unknown.
  • Some police, courts have no protocols in place
    to handle cases.
  • No research to guide policies.
  • Few cases go to court always take alcohol over
    drug case.
  • Focus on drugged driving or drug users?

19
Challenges in Canada?
  • Training for Crown and judiciary.
  • DRE process needs to be upheld in Court.
  • DRE evidence is open to challenge not yet
    accepted by the Courts.
  • Officers cannot interpret DRE evidence in Court
    need for expert.

20
Challenges in Canada?
  • Lab processing time and resources.
  • More evidence for Crowns to lead.
  • Length of trials.
  • Not a lot of case law to rely upon.

21
Summary
  • Many drugs impair skills and abilities deemed
    important for the safe operation of a vehicle.
  • Many of these drugs are used by people when they
    drive.
  • Many of these drugs are found in drivers involved
    in collisions.
  • The risks (contributory effects) are not well
    established.
  • On balance the evidence shows that the problem is
    by no means trivial even though still not well
    understood.

22
Staying informed
  • www.tirf.ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com