Title: OACP presentation
1(No Transcript)
2 Drugs and Driving What the research tells us.
Robyn Robertson, M.C.A President and CEO Traffic
Injury Research Foundation Countermeasures
XVII Toronto, ON, November 3, 2008
3Drugs and driving
- Drugged driving is an emerging traffic safety
issue. - Highly controversial and often confusing.
- Many claims fewer solid facts.
- Near hysteria can surround the issue societal
ambivalence alcohol (OK) drugs (not OK). - Moral overtones illegal (bad) versus legal
(good) drugs.
4Complex issue
- Drugs and driving is a much more complex issue
than drinking and driving. - We know and understand much more about alcohol
its properties are consistent. - Complexities of drugs account for shortcomings in
knowledge and different interpretations of
evidence.
5Research challenges
- Large sample sizes.
- More intrusive tests.
- Refusal rates are high.
- Collection, storage, analysis issues.
- Correlation between drug level in blood and
impairment is low or unreliable for many drugs. - Elimination rates timing of testing.
- Wide range of analyses are expensive.
6Why it is so complicated?
- Many different drugs highly complex chemicals.
- Different populations of users some are
difficult to identify. - Different usage patterns according to
prescription in combination. - Effects (pharmacodynamics) differ by drug and
user (tolerance over time). - Testing for presence vastly more complex than
testing for alcohol.
7Key questions
- Do drugs impair skills/abilities needed for safe
driving? - Do people actually use these drugs while they are
driving? - Are drivers who use them involved in collisions?
- Is there evidence that the presence of the drug
caused the crash? - How have jurisdictions responded to the issue?
8Do drugs impair driving skills
- Yes. Experimental studies show a wide range of
drugs impair critical skills and abilities (e.g.,
response times, concentration). - Some have a potent impact particularly those
with a sedative/hypnotic effect. Some have a
moderate effect (cannabis) some are less likely
to cause impairment (stimulants).
9Do drugs impair driving skills
- Experimental studies have a number of
limitations. - They take place in a controlled environment.
- Measures of performance, not judgment.
- Only low doses of drugs are tested for ethical
reasons. - Impact on real-world experience not known.
10Do drugs impair driving skills
- Epidemiological (real world) studies are weak and
vague. - Two types (case control and crash
responsibility/culpability analysis), both of
which have weaknesses. - The evidence that marijuana is related to crash
risk is mixed. Some studies report that the crash
risk is actually lower than the average driver,
others report crash risk is 1.5-2.5 times
greater one study said 6.4. - Studies of benzos show the crash risk is 1.6-5
times greater.
11Do people use them and drive?
- Yes, but... Data on frequency and quantity of
drug use in the driving population are sketchy. - Best estimate is that about 10 of drivers are
using impairing drugs. - Marijuana is the most commonly reported/detected
and most common among young males.
12Do people use them and drive?
- TIRF public opinion poll revealed 15 of driving
population had taken prescription or over the
counter medication within two hours of driving. - Marijuana use increased from 1.2 to 2.4 in
past few years. (An estimated 500,000 people).
13Do people use them and drive?
- NHTSA 2007 roadside survey tested for drugs.
- Victoria, Australia used random saliva testing
and found 1 in 100 drivers were positive for
alcohol 1 in 50 drivers were positive for drugs. - Officers on west coast in North America report a
sharp increase in drugged impaired driving.
14Do people use them and drive?
- No profile of a drugged driver.
- Marijuana is the most commonly reported/detected
and most common among young males. - Some suggest that young people are substituting
drugs for alcohol. - Prescription medications much more common among
older populations. - Women tend to be over-prescribed by doctors.
15Are drugged drivers involved in crashes?
- Yes. Overall incidence of drug detections among
drivers killed or injured in road crashes is in
the 14-17 range. - Most commonly detected substance is cannabis
(about 10-11 of cases) next are benzodiazepines
(class of drugs with hypnotic, anticonvulsant,
and properties) found in about 5-9 of cases.
16How many crashes are caused by drug impairment?
- Unknown, because the evidence of the contribution
of drugs to crashes is inconsistent and
inconclusive. - Testing of fatally injured drivers is low.
- Drugs frequently detected in blood in combination
with alcohol (up to 75). - Challenge to distinguish between the effects of
the drugs and the characteristics of the users
(e.g., risk taking among some users reduced
skills in general among elderly).
17Responses to drugged driving?
- Per se (zero tolerance) and impairment-based
laws - Impairment Austria, Denmark, Netherlands,
Norway, Portugal, Ireland, UK. - Per se France, Switzerland, Sweden
- Both Belgium, Germany, Spain Finland.
- Random testing Belgium, Denmark, Germany,
Spain, Italy, Portugal, Finland, Norway. - Suspicion France, Ireland, Austria,
Netherlands, Sweden, UK.
18Responses to drugged driving?
- Per se (zero tolerance) and impairment-based
laws. - Effectiveness of laws is unknown.
- Some police, courts have no protocols in place
to handle cases. - No research to guide policies.
- Few cases go to court always take alcohol over
drug case. - Focus on drugged driving or drug users?
19Challenges in Canada?
- Training for Crown and judiciary.
- DRE process needs to be upheld in Court.
- DRE evidence is open to challenge not yet
accepted by the Courts. - Officers cannot interpret DRE evidence in Court
need for expert.
20Challenges in Canada?
- Lab processing time and resources.
- More evidence for Crowns to lead.
- Length of trials.
- Not a lot of case law to rely upon.
21Summary
- Many drugs impair skills and abilities deemed
important for the safe operation of a vehicle. - Many of these drugs are used by people when they
drive. - Many of these drugs are found in drivers involved
in collisions. - The risks (contributory effects) are not well
established. - On balance the evidence shows that the problem is
by no means trivial even though still not well
understood.
22Staying informed