Global Public Goods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 75
About This Presentation
Title:

Global Public Goods

Description:

If everybody cooperates, long term costs and crises can be avoided at the cost ... groups, individuals would achieve a better outcome if they cooperated on GPGs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: itserv5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Global Public Goods


1
Global Public Goods
2
3 week plan
  • 1. Global Public Goods Diane, today in week 2
  • 2. Application of GPG ideas to global warming
    Ben in week 3
  • 3. Student discussion in week 4

3
Structure of todays seminar
  • Rehearse public goods ideas
  • Rivalry and excludability
  • Scale up to the global level

4
What is a public good?
  • While a market may allow individuals with
    self-interest to create and allocate many goods
    optimally, there exists a class of goods that are
    not produced adequately in a market system
    because of its voluntary nature

5
Aristotle
  • "For that which is common to the greatest number
    has the least care bestowed upon it. Every one
    thinks chiefly of his own, hardly at all of the
    common interest and only when he is himself
    concerned as an individual.

6
Knowledge as a public good
  • He who receives an idea from me, receives
    instruction himself without lessening mine as he
    who lights his taper at mine, receives light
    without darkening me
  • Thomas Jefferson, 3rd US President

7
Paul Samuelson
  • Collective goods
  • ...goods which all enjoy in common in the sense
    that each individual's consumption of such a good
    leads to no subtractions from any other
    individual's consumption of that good...
  • Why the light house?

8
Why the lighthouse?
  • What is public about the service provided by the
    light house?
  • What other things are considered a public good at
    the national or local level?

9
Why are public goods insufficient in supply?
  • Markets fail
  • Under supplied due to the non-rival and non
    excludable character of their provision
  • Disagreement concerning who should provide and
    finance these public goods as well as through
    what kind of mechanisms

10
Exclusion
  • A pure public good is one that is
    non-excludable
  • No-one can be barred from its consumption.
  • Examples?

11
Rivalry
  • if the good can be consumed without it being
    depleted, then the public good is non-rival in
    its consumption
  • One persons consumptions has no effect on the
    amount available for others

12
Private Goods
  • Private goods are excludable and rivalrous
  • ownership transferred against prices
  • property rights attached

13
Theory and reality
  • Pure public goods exist in text books
  • Need to consider
  • Impurities
  • Club goods
  • Common pool resources
  • Externalities
  • Spill-overs

14
Impurities
  • Pure public goods may be distributed unevenly
  • Example
  • Impure public goods, like libraries or public
    pools, are provided at particular locations, and
    are more accessible to some than to others.

15
Club goods
  • Between a pure public and private good
  • Optimal size is a group who can share a good
    without diminishing another members consumption
  • Non-rivalrous in consumption, but excludable

16
Clubs
  • Associations that exclude on the basis of a fee,
    nomination or some other method

17
Country clubs
  • Regional associations
  • European Union
  • ASEAN

18
Common pool resource
  • A good which is rival but non-excludable is
    sometimes called a common pool resource
  • Tragedy of the commons

19

20
Tragedy of the Commons
  • Collective Action problem
  • A shared resource in which any given user reaps
    the full benefit of personal use, while losses
    are spread over all users
  • Garrett Hardin

21
Commons Tragedies
  • Classic example cows on a shared pasture
  • Tragedy of overgrazing
  • A collective social trap
  • therein is the tragedy. Each man is locked into
    a system that compels him to increase his herd
    without limit in a world that is limited. Ruin
    is the destination to which all men rush, each
    his own best interest in a society that believes
    freedom of the commons

22
  • Hardin used this metaphor of the commons to
    describe
  • any situation where the interests of the
    individual do not coincide with the interests of
    the community, and where no organization has the
    power to regulate individual behaviour.

23
Hardins solutions
  • Mutual coercion, mutually agreed upon
  • A regulation accepted by a majority and imposed
    upon all involved
  • Eg. Speed limits, income tax
  • He writes Who enjoys taxes. We all grumble
    about them. But we accept compulsory taxes as we
    recognize that voluntary taxes would favour the
    conscienceless

24
Global Commons
  • Concept extended to regional global level
  • Oceans
  • Atmosphere
  • Biological diversity

25
Accessing the commons
  • Many commons are contested Where is the
    boundary? Who has access? How much can a person
    or group harvest or take? How is the resource
    allocated?
  • Commons are connected to democracy Who is
    eligible to make the rules? What are the payoffs
    or punishments for following or defying the
    rules?
  • Indigenous peoples, in particular, must confront
    issues of the commons in areas without clear
    property rights.

26
More Definitions A
  • A local public good benefits all the members of a
    local community. Eg?
  • A national public good benefits all the citizens
    of a state. Eg?
  • A domestic public good benefits all members of a
    community situated in a single state. Eg?

27
More Definitions B
  • A regional public good benefits countries
    belonging to a geographic area
  • A global public good benefits all countries and
    all persons
  • An international public good benefits more than
    one country.

28
Levels of public good provision
  • Public goods provision often seen as a state
    responsibility inside the state
  • Public sector provision
  • Multi-level governance and supra-nationality
    under-developed provision of GPGs
  • Definitions A assume sovereignty
  • Definitions B bring complications

29
GPG Complications
  • Sovereignty
  • National concerns, and structure of international
    system, translated into IOs
  • its impossible to reconcile the World
    Banks country focus with the delivery of GPGs
    there were too many contradictions. Whose
    interests would take precedence?

30
Conceptual work
  • Inge Kaul
  • Ravi Kanbur
  • Tod Sandler
  • Joe Stiglitz
  • Sectorally specific analytic work

31
Global Public Goods
  • How do international organizations and non-state
    actors create public goods.
  • What kinds of collective action is required?

32
What makes a public good global?
  • spatial range
  • Extend its impact beyond a group of contiguous
    countries

33
UNDP Criteria
  • Quasi-universal in terms of covering more than
    one group of countries
  • Quasi universal in terms of people covering all
    population groups
  • Quasi universal in meeting the needs of current
    generations without foreclosing opportunity for
    later generations

34
Types of GPGs
  • Natural global commons
  • Human made global commons
  • Global conditions

35
Natural Global Commons
  • Ozone layer
  • Other examples?

36
Human made Global Commons
  • AIDS vaccine
  • Examples?

37
Global conditions
  • Global policy outcomes
  • Eg global trade agreement
  • Other examples

38
World Bank Definition
  • commodities, resources, services and also system
    of rules or policy regimes with substantial cross
    border externalities
  • that are important for development and poverty
    reduction, and that can be produced in sufficient
    supply only through co-operation and collective
    action by developed and developing countries

39
UN Advocacy
  • Global public goods are often ignored but
    enormously important aspect of multilateralism.
    Whether we are talking about preserving
    bio-diversity, preventing climate change,
    fighting the spread of communicable diseases,
    establishing rules for trade and aviation, or
    setting global standards of human rights, it is
    impossible for any single state to secure such
    goods on its own

40
Global Public Bads
Global Public Bads
  • Pollution
  • Pollution
  • War
  • Illiteracy
  • Internet crime and fraud
  • Global financial instability
  • Disease

41
Externalities and spill-overs
  • By-products of third party action
  • Positive externalities
  • Education can have health benefits
  • Negative externalities
  • civil conflict

42
Do we need to care about global public bads?
43
Other public health bads
  • Invasive species
  • Mad cow disease
  • Bio-terrorism
  • Obesity epidemic
  • Ocean fish stock collapse
  • Smoking and drug abuse
  • What is global about these bads?

44
(No Transcript)
45
Why do we produce bads?
  • Economic explanations of rationality and
    imperfect information dominate
  • Sovereignty
  • Differing preferences and priorities
  • The free rider problem
  • The weakest link problem
  • The summation problem
  • Prisoners dilemma

46
1. Sovereignty
  • Most peoples lives are grounded in local and
    national context...
  • Governments unwilling to constrain sovereign
    decision-making

47
International cooperation
  • States reluctant to accept biding rules or
    international monitoring of their compliance
  • Weakens cooperation by adding high levels of
    uncertainty to international agreements

48
IEG Annual Report, 2008
  • Shared Global Challenges
  • Banks experience fostering global public goods
    including climate protection and control of
    communicable diseases.
  • a big problem with the Bank getting involved
    in GPGs was its fundamental country focus, and
    all the incentives that went with that.

49
Responsible Sovereignty
  • A Global Responsibility Partnership aimed at
    equitable and fair access to global public goods.
  • A Global Responsibility Partnership that
    contributes to crisis prevention, conflict
    management and post-conflict reconstruction.
  • And a Global Responsibility Partnership that is
    more inclusive and fills regulatory and
    institutional gaps in the international system.
  • FRANK-WALTER STEINMEIER, Foreign Minister of
    Germany, July 15, 2008
  • Available athttp//www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo
    /en/Infoservice/Presse/Rede/2008/080715-Rede-BM-Gl
    obal-Insecurity.html

50
2. Preferences
  • Governments have different short term interests
  • Environment versus Health
  • Girls education versus clean water
  • Disputes over mechanisms and financing of GPGs
  • What is the good in public good?
  • How do we prioritize global public goods?

51
3. Free Riders
  • Individuals who take goods free of charge and
    off-load costs onto the community
  • rational to avoid cost
  • students can be free riders as they do not pay
    full economic cost

52
Global Free Riders
  • Why should a government or company pay for
    education or peace if other countries, companies
    take advantage without contributing to the cost?
  • Because of non-excludability it is rational to
    wait for other countries to take the initiative
  • Policy failure
  • Over-producing global public bads
  • Under producing or mis-utilising global public
    goods

53
  • Free rider explanation of government failure
  • Prisoners dilemma an explanation of market
    failure

54
4. Prisoners dilemma
  • 2 strategies cooperate or defect
  • Both players prefer the outcome of cooperating to
    defection
  • If one cooperates, the other gains from defecting
  • Individual rationality

55
Two prisoners are questioned separately about a
crime they committed. Each may give evidence
against the other or may say nothing. If both say
nothing, they get a minor reprimand and go free
because of lack of evidence. If one gives
evidence and the other says nothing, the first
goes free and the second is severely punished. If
both give evidence, both are severely punished.
The overall (globally) best strategy is for both
to say nothing. However not knowing (or trusting)
what the other will do, each prisoner's (locally)
best strategy is to give evidence, which is the
worst possible outcome.
56
Nations as prisoners
  • The calculation is simple any given country can
    either cooperate, which means implementing
    painful policies, or do nothing. If everybody
    cooperates, long term costs and crises can be
    avoided at the cost of those painful policies
    in each country. If a country cooperates while
    its peers do nothing, that's the worst-case
    scenario the crisis happens anyway, along with
    extra domestic pain.

57
(No Transcript)
58
5. Weakest link problem
  • GPGs can only be produced when every government
    fully complies with a common approach (eg.
    Containing an infectious disease)
  • Success can be eroded by a single act of
    non-compliance
  • Examples?

59
6. The summation problem
  • GPG production dependent on the sum of individual
    efforts
  • Eg. Mitigating climate change
  • Challenges of long term global initiatives
  • ensuring compliance
  • Sustaining momentum

60
The provision of global public goods is voluntary
61
Under supply of GPGs
  • Collective action problem more pronounced at
    global level
  • Problems of coordination
  • . and consensus
  • How do we effect collective action?
  • Who or what should coordinate?
  • Who should finance?

62
The Policy Problem
  • The big issue, as usual, was not Why but What and
    How
  • ODI Simon Maxwell
  • www.odi.org.uk

63
Financing GPGs
  • Cross-border spillovers can create a financing
    gap
  • To shore up GPG financing, part of Official
    Development Assistance (ODA) is committed to GPGs
  • In key areas, rich nations finance provision of
    GPGs
  • E.g. Global Fund to Fight Aids, TB,
  • Malaria and Global Environment Fund

64
Institutions delivering GPGs
  • Nation-states
  • The United Nations
  • Multilateral development agencies, including the
    World Bank
  • Regional Institutions
  • Networks and private regimes
  • Private actors

65
International cooperation
  • State-centric policy making and GPG deficit
    necessitate international cooperation
  • Cooperation can be in the form of international
    laws, agreements, and protocols
  • Cooperation can be difficult to obtain and its
    objectives even harder to implement.

66
Private delivery of GPGs
  • Global compact/corporate citizenship
  • should IOs aim to supply GPGs, or rather foster
    networks that provided GPGs?
  • global public-private partnerships.

67
UN Quote
  • Whether we are talking about (1) preserving
    bio-diversity, preventing climate change, (2)
    fighting the spread of communicable diseases, (3)
    establishing rules for trade and aviation, or (4)
    setting global standards of human rights, it is
    impossible for any single state to secure such
    goods on its own

68
Themes
  • preserving bio-diversity,
  • fighting the spread of communicable diseases,
  • establishing rules for trade and aviation,
  • setting global standards of human rights

69
Questions
  • What are the public bad dimensions associated
    with each issue?
  • How did they come about?
  • How do we effect collective action?
  • Who, or what, should coordinate?
  • Who should finance?
  • What institutions need to be created or reformed?
  • What priority should each issue have on the
    global governance agenda?

70
Next steps
  • Ben in week 3 with an application of GPG
    framework to climate warming
  • Week 4 discussions
  • Conclude today with a couple of points on
    cooperation

71
Global Cooperation
  • Countries, firms, groups, individuals would
    achieve a better outcome if they cooperated on
    GPGs
  • Achieving cooperation
  • Repetition
  • Rewards and penalties
  • Leadership
  • Multilateral initiatives
  • Public sector intervention to increase level of
    provision

72
Mechanisms
  • Encourage private action with targeted funds
  • Philanthropy in health
  • Mechanisms to change behaviour
  • Standards setting
  • Eg. Basle II
  • Aid to overcome constraint of those providing
    least effort
  • Subsidize animal disease control in poor
    countries

73
How do we get around open access prisoners
dilemma?
  • Define property rights for the resource
  • Create enforceable contracts
  • Informal institutional arrangements
  • Influence participants behaviour
  • Incentives and penalties
  • Facilitating repeated game situation
  • promote learning and trust
  • Reduce the size of the game through
    decentralization
  • Increasing transparency -- defections are made
    public

74
Design of institutions
  • Kaul et al. (1999, p. 450) conclude with these
    policy recommendations
  • creation of international laws which address the
    global nature of public goods
  • promotion of participation of civil society at
    the global level and
  • giving people and governments the necessary
    incentives to take action for the provision of
    global public goods.

75
Rational choice seminar
  • Social and Political Thought seminar series of
    Warwick's Social Theory Centre
  • Ed Tiryakian (Duke University).
  • The Coming Demise of Rational Choice Theory.
  • A new perspective for social agency, rethinking
    "altruism" in the context of globalization. 
  • Monday, 13 October 2008, 5.30 pm in R3.25.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com