The MicroArcsecond ScintillationInduced Variability MASIV Survey - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

The MicroArcsecond ScintillationInduced Variability MASIV Survey

Description:

The MicroArcsecond ScintillationInduced Variability MASIV Survey – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: jlov7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The MicroArcsecond ScintillationInduced Variability MASIV Survey


1
MASIV The Micro-Arcsecond Scintillation-Induced
Variability survey
Jim Lovell1, Dave Jauncey1, Hayley Bignall2,
Lucyna Kedziora-Chudczer3, J-P Macquart4,
Barney Rickett5, Tasso Tzioumis1 1 ATNF 2
JIVE 3 Sydney Uni 4 Kapteyn Institute,
Netherlands 5 Uni California San Diego
2
Aims of MASIV
  • Obtain a statistically significant sample of
    Intra-Day Variables (IDVs), 100
  • 2/3 extreme IDVs were discovered serendipitously
  • How common are they?
  • So far surveys have been small and limited to
    bright sources. What is the IDV population
    amongst weaker sources?
  • What makes these objects different? Correlations
    with z, b, VLBI TB, ?, X-ray, ?-ray etc
  • Structure of the ISM
  • AGN structure at ?as resolution

3
VLA Observations
  • Four 72 hr epochs Jan, May and Sep 2002 (96h),
    Jan 2003
  • 5 sub-arrays of 5 or 6 antennas each.
  • 710 compact, flat-spectrum sources at 5 GHz
  • 60 sec on-source per scan
  • 6 scans per source per day (10,000 scans per
    epoch)
  • After first epoch, moved to core sample of 550
    sources with 4 subarrays and used subarray 5 for
    more intensive monitoring.

4
Current Status
  • Observations complete
  • First results published
  • 85 of 710 variable
  • TB lt 1012K
  • Top 29 sources listed Lovell et al. 2003,
    AJ 126, 1699
  • All 4 epochs now reduced
  • Analysis underway
  • Polarisation still to do

5
Variability Detection RMS/mean vs Mean
  • Uncertainties made up of two components
  • S Jy due to noise and confusion
  • P due to pointing errors
  • S 1.5 mJy, P 1
  • First cut select sources with

6
  • Extreme variables are rare
  • More high modulation index sources in the weaker
    sample. Difference in mas-scale structure? See
    Roopeshs talk.

7
Variability Statistics
  • After removing sources with structure 525 in
    sample common to all epochs.
  • 146 (28) showed variations
  • 74 varied in 1 epoch only
  • 33 varied in 2 epochs
  • 21 varied in 3 epochs
  • 18 varied in all epochs
  • Single epoch variables from Jan 2002 and Jan 2003
    may be stopping/starting so the 74 is an
    overestimate. In epochs 2 and 3, 25 of each were
    single-epoch variables

8
Variability Statistics cont
  • Variability by epoch
  • Jan 2002 63
  • May 2002 71
  • Sep 2002 81
  • Jan 2003 60
  • On any epoch, 11 to 15 variable
  • Sep 2002 has most number of variables despite
    being in the nominal slowdown period for LSR
    screens.

9
Lifetime of Variables
  • Jan 2002 and Jan 2003 useful as annual cycle
    effects removed. Gives a good idea of lifetime on
    1 year timescale.
  • 92 variables in total
  • Jan 2002 63 variables
  • Jan 2003 60 variables
  • 31 in common
  • So (in January at least) expect 12 of sources to
    be variable but only half of them to be there a
    year later.

10
Variability Timescales
  • Full range of timescales from hours to days but
    most are 0.5 d or longer
  • Generally not enough scints to get a good
    measurement of Tchar
  • Some with multiple timescales

11
A few lightcurves..
12
J18193845 J09495819
13
J08294018 B115629517 modulation
high RMS
14
Changes in timescale
  • Difficult to determine with this dataset due to
    few scintles per epoch, but
  • Look at 27 bright, large RMS variability sources
    in epoch 1 with 4-epoch coverage

15
JVAS J07204737
Screen moving with LSR
Tchar 2.5 d
Tchar 0.3 d
Tchar 0.4 d
16
JVAS J05021338
Change in structure? Screen not moving with LSR?
Tchar 1.2 d
Tchar 3.0 d
Tchar 1.6 d
17
J09160242
Tchar 2 d
Tchar 1.3 d
Tchar gt1.8 d
Not an annual cycle. Tchar increasing.
Tchar gt3 d
18
Timescale variations
  • Of 27 bright, large RMS variability sources in
    epoch 1 with 4-epoch coverage
  • 13 show evidence of annual cycles
  • 4 tied to the LSR
  • 9 non-LSR
  • 8 show changes in Tchar not consistent with
    annual cycles
  • Intrinsic and/or ISM changes?
  • 4 varied only in epoch 1
  • 2 unclassified

19
Sky distribution
  • Isotropic or not?

20
Galactic distribution (nH)
21
Galactic Distribution
Latitude distribution
Longitude distribution
N
N
Fraction
Fraction
Longitude
Latitude
22
Galactic Distribution (nH)
23
Sky distribution
  • Anisotropic
  • No obvious correlations with HI, H-alpha etc.

24
Summary
  • 28 of compact flat spectrum sources vary on at
    least one epoch
  • Extreme variables are rare
  • Timescales typically hours to days, not many
    short-period variables. Monitoring may require
    dedicated telescopes.
  • Annual cycles seem common among persistent
    variables. Many non-LSR screens
  • Large fraction of variables are one-off episodic.
  • Non-isotropic sky distribution but no obvious
    correlation with HI, electron density dist etc.

25
The End
MASIV 2, May 2002
http//www.atnf.csiro.au/jlovell/masiv
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com