Oregon - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Oregon

Description:

Expanded credit for proficiency option for students ... New diploma incorporates best features of CIM/CAM into a single credential ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: theres73
Category:
Tags: best | credit | oregon

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Oregon


1
Oregons New Diploma II. Core Standards
StructureIII. Essential Skills
  • Presented by
  • Oregon Department of Education

2
Oregon Diploma
  • State Board Goal
  • Each student demonstrates the knowledge and
    skills necessary to transition successfully to
    his or her next steps - advanced learning, work,
    and citizenship.

3
Oregon Diploma
  • The foundation for all next steps after high
    school
  • Community College
  • 4-year College/University
  • Workforce
  • Career School
  • Apprenticeship
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Military

4
Changes to the Diploma
  • State Board discussed policy changes to the
    diploma and gathered stakeholder input March
    2006-December 2007
  • State Board adopted new graduation requirements
    January 2007
  • Increased credits in English, Mathematics,
    Science, and Second Language/Arts/Career
    Technical Education
  • Introduced core standards and essential skills
  • Expanded credit for proficiency option for
    students
  • Sunset of CIM and CAM (HB 2263) and CIM subject
    area endorsements July 1, 2008
  • 2007-08 is a transition year to determine
    assessments for the diploma
  • Work samples still required during this time
  • New diploma incorporates best features of CIM/CAM
    into a single credential

5
High School Transcript This schematic
illustrates the components of the Oregon Diploma
(2012)
  • CREDIT REQUIREMENTS
  • English - 4 credits Physical Ed. 1 credit
  • 1 Credit ? 1 Credit
  • 1 Credit
  • 1 Credit Health 1 credit
  • 1 Credit ? 1 Credit
  • Math 3 credits Arts, CTE, or Second
  • 1 Credit Language 3 credits
  • 1 Credit ? 1 Credit
  • 1 Credit ? 1 Credit
  • ? 1 Credit
  • Science 3 credits
  • 1 Credit Electives 6 credits
  • 1 Credit ? 1 Credit
  • 1 Credit ? 1 Credit
  • ? 1 Credit
  • Social Sciences 3 credits ? 1 Credit
  • 1 Credit ? 1 Credit
  • ESSENTIAL SKILLS
  • Read and interpret a variety of texts
  • Write for a variety of purposes
  • Speak and present publicly
  • Apply mathematics in a variety of settings
  • Use technology
  • Think critically and analytically
  • Demonstrate civic and community engagement
  • Demonstrate global literacy
  • Demonstrate Career Related Learning
  • PERSONALIZED LEARNING
  • Education Plan Profile
  • Extended Application
  • Career Related Learning Standards
  • Career-Related Learning Experiences

Aligned to content standards
Credit may be earned by demonstrating
proficiency
TOTAL 24 credits
Oregon Department of Education 10-16-07
6
Oregon Diploma
  • Content Standards
  • The diploma must be standards-based
  • Standards should be the foundation of credits,
    courses, and career-related learning experiences
  • Credit for proficiency must be based on standards
  • Core Standards will be developed in all content
    areas to help focus instruction

7
Oregon Diploma
  • Essential Skills
  • Skills that are deemed essential for success in
    college, work and life
  • Process skills that cross all disciplines, not
    content specific
  • Embedded in content standards and curriculum
  • Can be demonstrated in a variety of courses,
    subjects, and settings
  • Students must demonstrate proficiency in
    Essential Skills to graduate

8
Diploma Implementation Planning Coordination
Guiding Principles
Stakeholder Engagement - Task Forces
Policy and OARs
Guiding Principles
Guiding Principles
Project Coordination Management
Communications
Guiding Principles
9
Diploma Implementation Planning Coordination
  • Five Diploma Implementation Task Forces
  • Implementation Advisory Task Force
  • Essential Skills Task Force
  • Standards and Assessment Task Force
  • Credit for Proficiency Task Force
  • Cost/Capacity Task Force
  • Transition Advisory Committee of the State
    Advisory Council for Special Education
  • CTE/Perkins IV Task Forces

10
Task Force Timeline 2007-08 through
2008-09 Phase-in Requirements 2008-2014
11
Stakeholder Input
  • Stakeholder Outreach Efforts
  • Meet with stakeholder groups
  • Develop task force-stakeholder input process
  • Maintain Diploma Website
  • Post information on regular basis
  • Receive input
  • Update FAQs based on input

12
Communications
  • Task Force Website
  • http//www.ode.state.or.us/teachlearn/real
  • Nuts and bolts information regarding task
  • force implementation work

13
Communications
  • Get Ready Oregon! Website
  • http//www.getreadyoregon.org/
  • Public awareness campaign for parents and
  • students

14
Core Standards A New Structure
  • Overview of the core standards concept

15
Oregon Content Standards
  • Oregon Educational Act (ORS 329.045)
  • State Board of Education (SBE)
  • shall regularly and periodically review and
    revise its Common Curriculum Goalsand rigorous
    academic content standards in mathematics,
    science, English, history, geography, economics,
    civics, physical education, health, the arts and
    second languages.
  • School districts
  • shall maintain control over course content,
    format, materials, and teaching methods.
  • shall offer students instruction in mathematics,
    science, English, history, geography, economics,
    civics, physical education, health, the arts and
    second languages that meets the academic content
    standards and requirements adopted by the SBE
  • http//landru.leg.state.or.us/ors/

16
Oregon Content Standards
  • Define What Students are Expected to Know and Be
    Able to Do

17
WestEd Recommendations
  • WestEd was contracted to
  • Review the content standards
  • Evaluate the structure of the content standards
  • Evaluate alignment between the state assessments
    and the content standards
  • Make recommendations for improvement of
    structures and systems
  • Address ODEs Critical Questions

18
WestEd Recommendations
  • General Considerations
  • Comparable Content Standard Structure
  • Core Standards
  • Reduce Redundancy
  • Consistency in Level of Detail
  • Levels of Cognitive Demand are Appropriate and
    Intentional

19
WestEd Recommendations
  • Core Standards
  • knowledge and skills central to a content area
  • significant/critical content targets
  • state-specific priorities in a content area
  • learning expectations and performance goals for
    all students

20
WestEd Recommendations
  • Advantages of Core Standards
  • incorporate other standards and/or provide the
    structure for a coherent standards system
  • these standards are addressed in each grade and
    developed across grades
  • local curricula are expected to align
  • common structure across content areas

21
Core Standards Definition
  • Oregon's Core Standards will
  • Focus instruction
  • key ideas
  • fewer key learning objectives
  • greater depth of teaching and learning
  • Incorporate other content standards
  • in-depth understanding will imply, and be
    supported by, understanding of the underlying
    content standards
  • Articulate clear grade level progression in both
    knowledge and skills

22
Core Standards Criteria
  • Endurance Will the standard provide students
    with knowledge and skills that will be of value
    beyond a single test date?
  • Leverage Will the standard provide knowledge and
    skills that will be of value in multiple
    disciplines?
  • Readiness Will the standard provide students
    with essential knowledge and skills that are
    necessary for success in the next level of
    instruction? Beyond school?

23
Guiding Philosophy
  • Core Standards are not intended to require the
    entire year.
  • Core Standards will form the basis of statewide
    assessments.
  • Core Standards clearly communicate to teachers,
    parents and students the expectations at each
    grade.
  • Connections provide additional topics, allowing
    individualized instruction to deepen
    understanding of core standards.

24
(No Transcript)
25
Oregon Core Standards
  • Mathematics Standards Revision
  • K-8 standards State Board adoption in December
    2007
  • High School standards State Board adoption in
    March 2008
  • Feedback and more information at
    http//www.ode.state.or.us/search/results/?id20

26
Oregon Core Standards
  • Science Standards Revision
  • Research and review now
  • Draft standards available Fall 2008
  • State Board adoption in Spring 2009
  • More information coming soon athttp//www.ode.s
    tate.or.us/serch/results/?id22

27
Essential Skills Task Force
  • Defining the Essential Skills

28
Essential Skills
  • Identified by the State Board
  • Read and interpret a variety of texts
  • Write for a variety of purposes
  • Speak and present publicly
  • Apply mathematics in a variety of settings
  • Use technology
  • Think critically and analytically
  • Demonstrate civic and community engagement
  • Demonstrate global literacy
  • Demonstrate career-related learning
    communications, problem solving, personal
    management, teamwork, employment foundations, and
    career development

29
Content Performance Standards ? State Local Assessments Content Performance Standards ? State Local Assessments Content Performance Standards ? State Local Assessments Content Performance Standards ? State Local Assessments Content Performance Standards ? State Local Assessments Content Performance Standards ? State Local Assessments Content Performance Standards ? State Local Assessments Content Performance Standards ? State Local Assessments Content Performance Standards ? State Local Assessments
ELA MATH SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCES THE ARTS HEALTH PE SECOND LANGUAGE CTE

ESSENTIAL SKILLS Process skills that cut across
all content areas Read Write Speak Apply
math Use technology Think Global
literacy Civic community engagement Career
Related Learning
30
Essential Skills Task Force
  • Phase I tasks Define essential skills,
    indicators, proficiency levels, and assessment
    options
  • Phase II tasks Address policy and operational
    implications for PK-20 alignment and
    accountability

31
Essential Skills Task Force
  • Timeline
  • Phase I August December 2007
  • Phase II December 2007 Feb 2008
  • Recommendations to the Board in Feb 2008
  • Targeted adoption of essential skills June 2008
  • Phase I Participants K-12, OUS, and community
    college teachers special education specialists
    business/community representatives students
  • Phase II Participants K-12 principals and
    superintendents, OUS provosts, community college
    deans, admissions representatives

32
Defining the Essential Skills
  • Identify skills that are necessary for success in
    entry-level college courses not advanced
    levels
  • How similar are these across postsecondary
    institutions?
  • Identify skills that are necessary for success in
    the workforce across all sectors not
    job-specific
  • How similar are these across work force levels
    and community?
  • Consider what should be expected of all students

33
Essential Skills
  • National models that support essential or 21st
    Century skills
  • Commission of the Skills of the America Workforce
  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills
  • 21st Century Skills, North Central Regional Ed
    Lab
  • Essential Skills, Government of Canada
  • Career One Stop
  • National Work Readiness Credential, US Chamber of
    Commerce
  • Standards for Success, College-Readiness
  • Skills and Abilities That Employers Want,
    Education Testing Service (ETS)
  • Achieve, Inc.

34
Resources
  • College Work Ready Knowledge Skills
  • PASS Proficiencies
  • Achieve Benchmarks
  • Standards for Success
  • General Education Outcomes
  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills
  • National Educational Technology Standards for
    Students
  • Workforce Readiness Certificate

35
WestEds Analysis of Essential Skills,
content standards assessments
  • Three key steps
  • Analysis of the degree to which Oregons existing
    content standards support the draft Essential
    Skills
  • Analysis of the degree to which Oregons current
    test item pool (TESA/OAKS), work samples, and
    writing assessments assess proficiency in the
    Essential Skills
  • Identification of Core Standards and
    recommendations for addressing gaps in coverage
    of core concepts

36
Preliminary Findings
  • Of those CIM standards that support the Essential
    Skills, what percentage was rated as providing
    strong support?

Number of CIM Standards Supporting ES Number of Standards Providing Strong Support Percentage of Standards Providing Strong Support
ELA 105 99 94
Math 84 78 93
Science 18 16 89
Social Sciences 34 23 68
total 241 216 90
Based on primary relationships.
37
Summary of WestEds Preliminary Findings
  • Overall, 98 of existing standards across the
    four content areas (ELA, math, science, and
    social sciences) primarily supported one of the
    draft Essential Skills.
  • Across content areas, the majority of
    relationships among supporting standards and the
    Essential Skills was strong.
  • ELA and math gt92 support was strong
  • Science 89 support was strong
  • Social sciences 68 support was strong

38
Summary of WestEdsPreliminary Findings
  • The distribution of standards primary support
    across Essential Skills varied by content area.
  • Primary support in the ELA standards was balanced
    across three ES (read, write, speak).
  • 100 of math standards provided primary support
    for ES apply math.
  • 100 of science standards provided primary
    support for ES think critically.
  • Primary support in the social sciences standards
    was balanced across three ES (think, civic, and
    global).
  • Across content areas, evidence of coherent
    progression across grades ranged from 83-91 (85
    overall).

39
Essential Skills Task Force Work to Date
Next Steps
  • Meetings Aug, Sept, Oct Produced Draft 3.0
    preliminary review of K-12 standards-ES alignment
    and current work sample scoring guides
  • Nov 6th - Reviewed West Eds preliminary
    findings- refined ES - Draft 4.0
  • Dec 11th Recommendations on assessment options
    and proficiency levels (TBD)
  • Dec 12th ?Begin policy discussion with K-12, OUS,
    and community college decision-makers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com