Actuarial Advice in a Transaction Paul Geeson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Actuarial Advice in a Transaction Paul Geeson

Description:

Cost of servicing pension debt is Interest type item ... Different deals different solutions. Debt on employer on ceasing to participate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Did24
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Actuarial Advice in a Transaction Paul Geeson


1
Actuarial Advice in a TransactionPaul Geeson
  • Staple Inn Hall
  • Tuesday 5 July 2005

2
Agenda
  • What does financial economic tell us to do?
  • Can the transaction dynamics bend the rules?
  • Cash flow planning paying off the deficit?
  • Dealing with mortality uncertainty.
  • International issues.

3
Options for pricing pensions
  • Wide range of options from
  • MFR
  • Ongoing funding basis many choices
  • FRS17
  • Gilts matching
  • Insurance buy-out
  • Q What are you using currently?

4
Insurance buy-out ?
  • Only current market in pension liabilities
  • Insurers statutory regime differs to pension
    schemes
  • Requirement for solvency margins
  • Capital intensive return on capital
    needed/profits
  • Guaranteed nature of benefits conservative
    pricing?
  • Is the scheme really going to wind up?
  • But post June 2003 this is the debt on the
    employer

5
Gilts matching
  • Matching asset class (nominal ILG)
  • Removes investment mismatching risk
  • Avoids transfer of risk at zero price
  • No allowance for uncertain future investment
    return
  • Assumes scheme run on and avoids wind-up
  • Assumes benefits are secure for members
  • Ignores reinvestment risk on longer terms
  • Cannot be a perfect match - some risks must remain

6
FRS17
  • Random result no theoretical basis for use
  • Just similar to gilts matching but weaker
  • Retains certain level of investment risk
  • Reasonable level of risk?
  • Risk of accounting drift AA to gilts?
  • Accounting use/Regulator use/availability
  • Seen as ongoing measure of pensions debt
  • Commercial advice? acceptable risk?
  • Emerging as accepted pricing basis

7
Ongoing funding basis
  • Allowance for asset out-performance
  • Capitalises future uncertain returns
  • Converts this into immediate cash for vendor
  • Would you pay more for the assets in any other
    situation than their market value?
  • No allowance for risk of lower returns
  • Punt on equity markets outside pension schemes

8
Commercial advice
  • Educate your client
  • Ensure they understand risks
  • Significance of different bases
  • Can wind up be avoided ?
  • Minimum FRS17....but gilts is proper rationale.
  • Clients view on risk and overall commercial
    situation
  • Eye on the exit how will it be valued?

9
Including pensions in business price
  • General business valuations based on a multiple
    of EBIT(DA)
  • Earning before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and
    Amortisation
  • Cost of servicing pension debt is Interest type
    item
  • Hence treat past service liability as a debt item
  • Consider deferred tax treatment
  • Factor future service cost only in EBIT model
  • Assess on consistent bases!
  • Avoid double counting

10
Typical example
  • Projections current cash costs 2m p.a.
  • Service cost under FRS17 3m p.a.
  • EBITDA business multiple 8 - value difference 8m
  • Past service FRS17 deficit 6m
  • Total valuation impact 14m
  • But buyout debt/gilts matching will be higher
  • Process of negotiation/education on both sides
  • Fully prices without addressing actual cash

11
Bending the rules a case study
  • Difficulty in selling a UK manufacturing business
  • Original buyers DD recommended a gilts basis
  • Value impact was too great deal killed
  • Brought in to advise seller on pension
    education
  • A new buyer was found new outlook on pensions
  • Structured finance buyer profit from debt not
    equity
  • Key concern was immediate/short term cashflow
  • Commercial situation allowed different
    consideration

12
Bending the rules a case study
  • Issues
  • Forthcoming Scheme Specific funding
  • Closed scheme rapidly reducing headcount
  • Realistic future short term salary increases
  • Produced report projecting cash costs on various
    basis illustrating upsides and downsides.
  • Purchaser and adviser were able to review,
    challenge and then reach a commercial position.
  • Therefore different outcome to suit situation.

13
Different deals different solutions
  • Business carve-out
  • Leave DB liabilities behind new DC set-up
  • Bulk transfer? To DB or DC...
  • Will the trustees pay a transfer? case study
  • Debt on employer issues
  • Clearance and the pensions regulator
  • New process in doing deals
  • Trustee involvement
  • More work for vendor advance planning
  • New practice to emerge

14
Different deals different solutions
  • Debt on employer on ceasing to participate
  • Be sure it is multiple employer!
  • Currently MFR due to become buyout
  • Potential for using SFO alternative
  • Subject to sufficient support
  • May hinder deals in future
  • Regulator suggests FRS17 now for clearance?
  • Impact of orphan debt apportionment
  • Debt reduced if transfers way forward?
  • Split of schemes in advance solution?

15
Different deals different solutions
  • Whole business and scheme
  • Taking on the liabilities
  • Eye on the exit how will pensions be priced
  • Management of scheme between now and exit
  • Short term or long term view
  • Ability to change benefits factor in pricing?
  • Protected employees
  • Other situations always consider each case
  • Participation in public sector schemes
  • Outsourcing contracts end game
  • Executive arrangements/liability concentrations

16
Clearance - application
  • What are you being cleared for?
  • Test for clearance
  • Ability to issue FSD and CN
  • Accepted process
  • Not ongoing protection for purchaser
  • Trustees need to be involved
  • Culture of giving something to the trustee
  • Timescales
  • Involve regulator early

17
Other assumptions
  • Mortality
  • Salary increases
  • Withdrawal
  • Early retirement
  • Normal retirement
  • Cash commutation
  • Cap/collar pension increases

18
Cashflow planning
  • Theoretical pricing on matching basis
  • Cashflow incidence will vary
  • Vital need for cashflow planning
  • Difficult to predict
  • Statutory Funding Objective Sept 05
  • Prudent assumptions
  • Allowance for covenant/affordability

19
Cashflow planning new funding
  • Real issue
  • Current uncertainty
  • Pre-empting SFO prudent funding basis
  • Need to speak to trustee in advance
  • Regulator clearance
  • Expect FRS17 to be typical?
  • Deficit spreading 10yrs? 5yrs? Immediate?
  • Affordability and covenant
  • New standards and practices to emerge

20
Cashflow planning deficit spreading
  • Current deficit cash funding usually insufficient
  • Actuarial spreading techniques?
  • Often insufficient to cover interest
  • Valuation assumes no ER or withdrawals
  • Not a realistic assessment
  • Need to reassess
  • What is going to happen to assets?
  • Give more get asked for more?
  • Assume a safe position

21
Cashflow planning future service
  • No withdrawals/no early retirement
  • What is really happening to closed schemes
  • But gives potential for future service saving
  • Can require detailed projections
  • But new process may give more time...
  • Greater understanding for client
  • Accurate assessment of changing costs
  • Sensitivity testing

22
Mortality uncertainty
  • Area of significant difficulty
  • Lack of real knowledge
  • Lack of real experience
  • Lack of information given to Seller
  • Education process on both sides
  • Big move in table from PA90 to PMA92mc
  • Scheme actuaries slow to move bases

23
Mortality uncertainty
  • Feeding in technique...
  • Simply not justified in transaction
  • But to address can cause conflict
  • Require firm evidence from Seller
  • Seek Scheme Actuary to hold to table?
  • Seek trustees views (and educate them)
  • Level of uncertainty
  • Potential to destroy value in a deal
  • New products to hedge risk?

24
Mortality uncertainty
  • Socio-economic effects are significant
  • Assessing the population
  • What allowance to make
  • Size of pensions
  • Executive liabilities
  • Impact of term of cohort
  • Continuing future improvements
  • Implication for future accrual

25
International issues
  • Same basic analysis
  • Care to cover all benefits
  • Unfunded arrangements
  • Retirement/leaving service indemnities
  • Post retirement medical benefits
  • Part time old age plans
  • Need to question local advisers closely
  • Keeping a sense of proportion
  • Measurement of liabilities

26
International issues
  • Utilise local resources
  • Mortality issues remain
  • Increasing cash costs for reserve building
  • Are plans really DC?
  • Investment and conversion guarantees
  • Complex carve-out issues
  • Co-ordination with other HR areas

27
Summary
  • Consider pricing carefully
  • Ensure pricing is consistent
  • Educate your client
  • Address the cashflow
  • Each situation is different
  • Look for new solutions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com