Title: Trade Policy
1Trade Policy
- Patrik Karpaty
- Spring 2005
2Content
- Introduction
- Chapter 2 Helpman-Krugman (H-K), Tariff Analysis
und perfect competition - Chapter 3 imperfect competition
- Chapter 4 Trade taxes
- As an alternative for chapter 2 K-O (2000)
3Introduction
- Trade policy, instruments
- Specific tariffs (a tariff on each unit of
imports) - Ad valorem tariffs (percentage of the import
price) - Import quotas
- Subsidize domestic production
- Subsidize the export of domestic production
- Export restraints
4Trade policy
- International flows can be demonstrated to be
beneficial for all countries involved - Ricardian models, technology differences
- H-O, differences in factor abundance
- Critics against trade, unemployment, low wages
etc - Tariffs, import quotas (cars from Japan etc etc.)
- Trade restrictions have been falling since 1945
- GATT
5- World trade in manufacturing goods is important
- Theoretical models up to the 80s assumed
perfect competition - But, firms are seldom price takers in reality
- Oligopolistic markets (concentrated production)
- Theory has eventually changed New Trade
Theory - More of Industrial Organization (IO)
- IRS (allow for large firms)
- Imperfect competition
- Differentiated goods
- Still, Trade Policy using new trade theory is
not - generally accepted
- Diversity of models, as in IO. I.e. no model
consensus
6Chapter 2 (abbreviated)
- Aim of this lecture
- Trade policy under perfect competition
- Analyze different policy tools and effects
- Winners and losers of different tools
- Tariff
- Import quotas
- Export subsidies
- Small and large countries (focus on large)
- Optimal tariff
7Tools
- Partial equilibrium analysis
- Supply and demand depend only on the policies
undertaken in that market - World market, single competitive market
- General equilibrium
- When we consider the combined effects on both
import and export in e.g. Home (e.g. allow exort
tax affect imports)
8Assumptions
- Two large countries, Home and Foreign
- A single competitive market, e.g. wheat
- Note that the figures in chapter 2 often is the
World Market, while in other textbooks Home and
Foreign is common figures (we will use both) - Assume that there is a difference in price
between Foreign and Home (higher in Home) Home
import wheat - When Foreign starts export wheat to Home, prices
increase in Foreign and lowers the price in Home
9- The reason for imports is that prices are lower
in Foreign - In Foreign prices will increase because of import
demand from Home
10Figure 1 Deriving Homes Import Demand Curve
Import demand curve MD Is the difference in
domestic production and consumption MD D(p)-S(p)
PA
P2
P1
11Figure 2 Deriving Foreigns Export Supply Curve
P2
Foreigns export supply curve excess domestic
supply over domestic demand XSS(p)-D(p)
P1
PA
12World market
- We now have a diagram for the world market
- This diagram will help us in finding pros and
cons of different Trade Policies, Tariffs, Quota,
Export subsidies, Export taxes
13Tools in measuring welfare
- Consumer surplus (CS)
- CS measures the difference between the consumers
reservation prices and the price the actually
have to pay - CS is the area above the price level and under
the demand curve - Producer surplus (PS)
- PS measures the difference between the producers
reservation price and the price he actually
receives - PS is the area below the price and above the
supply curve - Government revenue
14Terms of Trade (ToT)
- The relation between export prices and import
prices - A large country can use trade policy in order to
change the Terms of Trade - A small country cannot affect the world prices,
and thus the Terms of Trade cannot change by trade
15Figure 3 Effects of a Tariff
World market
Foreign market
Home market
S
PT
PW
PT
3
MD
D
16Figure 4 Home country, PS and CS
pt
pF
pt pt-t
17Figure 5 Determination of trade volume and
prices
Price p
World market
- Assume Home is large
- Equilibrium, without tariffs, pF
- Introduce a tariff t, price is now pt
- Price in Foreign falls
- CS decreases by 12345
- Government revenues 2367
- Distortion 125
- The gain 4567. ToT effect ()
- If Home is small, the gain vanish
XS
3
2
pt
1
4
5
pF
pt pt-t
6
7
MD
m
0
mF
mt
18Effects on prices
- In the absence of a Tariff the equilibrium price
is pF. Equalized in both countries - Impose a Tariff t, (a wedge)
- pt is the new Home price on imports
- The price in Foreign falls to pt, i.e. pt-t
- At pt less imports is demanded in Home, and less
export is supplied from Foreign, see figure 1 - Lower price in Foreign raises Foreign demand
- The volume of goods traded declines due to the
Tariff - The tariff rate difference in pt - pt
19Effects on welfare in Home
- Consumers loose CS (-) (a tax on consumers)
- government win ()
- domestic producers win PS () (a subsidy)
- Terms of Trade () since pimp(-)
- A small tariff raises welfare
- If we lower the tariff a little, the gain (area
4567) will not shrink as much - Thus the gain is first order and loss second
order - For a small country the effects are always
negative for welfare - Large Tariffs, trade-off distortion and gain
20Import quotas
- The import quota restricts the quantity that Home
importers may import - In figure 2.1 in H-K the imports decreases to mt
- The welfare analysis is the same as for the
Tariffs, but the government in Home receives no
revenue. - The owner of licenses gain
- e.g. the licence owner buy at p, sell at pt
- If the licenses are assigned to foreigners, the
foreigners get the rent
21Welfare of licenses
- Example 1 auction
- the auction prices fully absorb the rent
- Example 2 assignment of import rights to Home
residents - residents receive the rents
- Example 3 Foreigners receive the licenses
- the foreigners receive the gain
22Quotas examples
- U.S sugar quotas, the foreigners get the rents
(unambiguous loss to the Home country) - U.S has a quota on imports of foreign cheese
(certain trading companies) - Self-punishing policy
23Export Subsidies
- The exporting firms in Home country receives
payment, e.g. per unit export good - The export subsidies raises the price in Home
(take it or leave it), but lowers the price in
Foreign - Welfare effects differs as compared to a tariff
- The domestic producer win, while consumers lose
- In contrast to a tariff, subsidies worsens the ToT
24Figure 6a Effects of an Export Subsidy
Home country
pS
pF
pS ps - s
25Figure 6b Effects of an Export Subsidy
p
World market
S
Homes export supply
Distortion loss 127
- Subsidy raises the prices in Home (ps)
- Abroad ps
- difference subsidy
- Home producers gain, consumers lose
- Net change 1234 in PS and Cs
- Export rise from XF to XS
- ToT decreases for Home
3
ps
2
1
4
7
pF
6
pspS-S
5
D
Foreign import demand
X
XS
XF
26Export Taxes
- So, a subsidy worsens ToT, tariff improves ToT
- The government in Home imposes an export tax
instead - Example
- This means that the Home producers export prices
falls (they dont get the whole export price).
I.e. the internal price of exports falls. - Same effects as if Foreign imposes a import quota
27Figure 7 Effects of an Export Tax
Price p
World market
- Assume Home is large
- Equilibrium, without tax, pF
- Introduce a tax t
- Price in Home falls to pt
- CSPS decreases by 12345
- Government tax revenues 4567
- Distortion 125
- The gain 4567. ToT effect ()
- If Home is small, the gain vanish
- Same effect when Foreign impose
- a import quota
XS
7
pt ptt
6
1
3
2
pF
pt
4
5
MD
m
0
mF
mt
28Optimal trade taxes
- A small export tax increases wealth
- At some point taxes become harmful
- the gain in ToT, becomes off set by the
distortion of the tax - One limit is the social cost in exports
- Home cut its consumption, or
- increase its production
- Marginal social costs defined by the export
supply curve - Social return (marginal revenue of export)
29Figure 8 Optimal Trade tax
p
SMC
5
6
pt
MR is below D since exporting more contributes
less to the gain from exporting The optimal tax
reduces XF to Xt
1
4
7
pF
ptpt-t
2
3
MR
D
X
XF
Xt
30Optimal tax again
- The optimal tax rate is simply determined by the
condition that the marginal revenue (MR) from
exports be equal to the marginal cost of these
exports - The optimal tax can be shown to be a function of
the elasticity of Foreign demand of Home exports
(see page 18)
31Table 1 A summary
32Chapter 3
- Imperfectly competitive domestic industries faces
competitively supplied imports - Idea is that protection creates domestic monopoly
- Quota are worse than tariffs (Bhagwati 1965)
- Not so realistic
- a industry in Home that is Oligopolistic is often
Oligopolistic in Foreign as well - But we may isolate domestic market power
33Import competing monopolist
- The only competition comes from abroad
- The Monopolist can not choose a profit max price
due to foreign competition - Protection would give market power
- Can be shown that import quotas creates more
market power than tariffs
34The monopolist
- Domestic demand (D)
- Marginal Revenue (MR)
- Imports assumed supplied perfectly elastic
- World price Pw
- No possibility of export
- If no trade the monopolist choses Pm, Xm
- But Pw is the upper bound
- If free trade the monopolist have no market power
(PMC)
35Figure 9 Import competing monopolist
p
MC
pm
pw world price of the good, the upper bound pm
is the optimal monopoly price If free trade, the
monopolist cant choose price and quantity
optimally XF is produced and no market power for
the monopolist
pw
D
MR
X
XF
Xm
36Tariff is imposed
- Example, a specific unit tariff, t
- Import price is then pw t
- Effect of tariff depends on how large the tariff
is. - prohibitive, assume pp (i.e. no imports)
37The tariff effect
- If pw t ltpp, small tariff
- no change in price and output
- Same effects as if the industry were perfectly
competitive - If pp lt pw t ltpm, medium tariff
- no imports, but only a threat
- perverse effect on output (see small lines)
- If pw t gtpp, large tariff
- closed economy monopoly levels
38Figure 9b Import competing monopolist
p
MC
pm
pp
pw
MR
D
X
Xp
XF
Xm
39Effects of a tariff
- The effects of the medium tariff is thus to
increase prices but lower output (i.e. a
pervasive effect on output) - The price will still be lower than the monopoly
price, because of the threat of imports. - This pattern of different tariffs is illustrated
in figure 10
40Figure 10 Effects of a tariff
pw t
pm
pp
pw
X
Xp
XF
Xm
41Import quota
- Impose a quota m
- First the quota is small, i.e. less than the free
trade level of imports - The quota will give the domestic firm a new
demand function (three segments) - if pgtpw import m
- if ppw horizontal segment
- if pltpw no imports, total domestic demand
42Small import quota
- Domestic firm max profits where MR (new) is equal
to MC (Xq, Pq) - The quota gives the monopolist market power
43Figure 11a Effects of a small quota
p
D
D
mc
MR
Assume a quota m less than free trade level of
imports
pq
1
- if pgtpw import m
- if ppw
- if pltpw no imports, total
- domestic demand
2
pw
3
X
XF
Xq
m
44Large quota
- The import quota may give the domestic monopolist
market power even if its large - In figure 11.b two different profit max levels of
output is depicted - Point 1 is the free trade output
- Point 2 is where the monopolist can react to the
quota (lower output, higher price)
45Figure 11b Effects of a large quota
Import quota m set larger than free trade import
level
D
p
D
mc
pq2
First, MRgtMC, to xq2 where the quota becomes
binding
MR
Loss, due to less output
pw
1
2
Reduce profits
Gain due to less Output,and higher prices
x
xq2
46- The size of the quota is important
- If the quota is large, it restricts the monopoly
market power - But at the same time the monopolist will chose a
small output and high prices - A quota that limits imports to precisely free
trade level will definitely reduce output and
higher prices
47Tariff v.s. quotas
- Tariff and quota that lead to the same level of
import have different effects - A quota implies higher domestic price and lower
domestic output - Tariff may restrict imports, but prices are still
below Pm and output larger than Xm - The reason is that there is a threat from abroad
- The import quota eliminates this threat
- The tariff constrained demand curve is more
elastic then the quota constrained demand
48- Import quota creates more market power, as
compared to a tariff that restricts imports by
the same amount - Lower domestic output and and a higher domestic
price - The quota reduces welfare more
- How robust are theses conclusions?
49Declining marginal costs
- Increasing returns to scale
- Downward sloping marginal costs
- Discontinuity in the response of output to the
tariff rate - If free trade the monopolist is unable to operate
profitably in the domestic market
50- Impose a tariff ts
- Firm starts to produce a large positive output Xs
(displaces all imports) - If tariff is further increased, the monopolist
can move against monopoly prices and output - Nonequivalence of tariffs v.s. quotas remains (as
in the case of upward sloping MC) - Thus th result seem to be intact
51p
pM
Pwts
AC
Pw
MC
MR
D
X
XM
XS
52Imperfect subsitutes
- The single monopolist have some market power even
under free trade - Protection can no longer have the effect of
creating brand new monopoly power, because there
is always perfect substitutes - Protection may of course increase monopoly power
53Imperfect substitutes
- The firm will face a downward sloping demand
curve - The tariff will raise the price of competing
imports - The domestic demand for the good will increase
- If the domestic firm keep there prices and
increase demand no increase in monopoly power
(p-mc)/p
54Imperfect substitutes
- The effect of a quota is again stronger than that
of a tariff - The reason is that when a quota restricts
imports, a price increase in the monopoly firm
will be accompanied by a price increase in
imported goods as well. - I.e. the demand curve with a quota is steeper
than that of a tariff
55Noncooperative domestic oligopoly
- Strategic variable?
- Price and then adjust demand?
- Levels of output
- Bertrand and Cournot
- Results are much the same
- Each firm will produce xX/n
- Same good (imperfect substituite for import)
56Perceived demand curves