WTO Doha Negotiations on Rules - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

WTO Doha Negotiations on Rules

Description:

No interim timeframes = to be completed at the end of the round (originally 2005) ... duty rules, cost of responding to AD, excessive information requirements ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: Mar5713
Category:
Tags: wto | ad | doha | interim | negotiations | rules

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WTO Doha Negotiations on Rules


1
WTO Doha Negotiations on Rules
  • Workshop on the main issues and challenges in the
    multilateral trading system
  • Dhaka, 9-12 July 2007

2
Outline
  • Overview
  • Anti-dumping (AD) (and CVD)
  • Subsidies (fishery subsidies)
  • Regional trade agreements (RTAs)
  • Way forward conclusion

3
I Overview
  • Mandated by the Doha Ministerial Declaration
    (paras 28-29)
  • Form an integral part of single undertaking
  • No interim timeframes to be completed at the
    end of the round (originally 2005)
  • Negotiating Group on Rules (NGR)
  • July Package (2004) - Reaffirm Members
    commitment to progress

4
II AD/CVD
  • Doha Ministerial Declaration (para 28)
  • In the light of experience of the increasing
    application of these instruments
  • Aimed at clarifying and improving disciplines
  • While preserving the basic concepts, principles
    and effectiveness of these Agreements and their
    instruments and objectives
  • Taking into account the needs of DCs LDCs

5
II AD use peaked in 2001 (364), 213 initiations
in 2004
6
II Major Users India, US, EC
7
II Major Affected Countries China but also
other DCs
8
II Affected Sectors - Steel, chemical plastics
9
II Three Phases of Negotiations
  • 2002-09/2003
  • Identification of issues (141 submissions by
    Cancun)
  • Some 50 issues identified
  • 10/2003-2004
  • Elaborated proposals (55 submissions) - 45 on
    AD/CVD
  • 2005
  • Third generation text-based proposals
  • Friends ( Brazil, HK (China), JPN, Korea,
    Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan PC, Thailand), US,
    EU, CAN, Aus, India, China, Egypt

10
II State of Play (1)
  • Friends ? Stronger disciplines to reduce the
    discretion of national investigation authorities
  • Mitigate the excessive effects of AD
  • Prevent AD from becoming permanent
  • Strengthen due process transparency
  • Reduce the costs for authorities respondents
  • End unwarranted investigation at an early stage
  • Improve substantive rules for dumping injury

11
II State of Play (2)
  • US ? Preserve the basic concepts, principles
    effectiveness transparency procedural related
    improvements
  • EU ? Disclosure, lesser duty rules, cost of
    responding to AD, excessive information
    requirements
  • China ? Similar to Friends, emphasis on SDT
    (lesser duty)

12
II Issues (1)
  • Dumping margins - exchange rates (Egypt),
    prohibition of zeroing, determination of normal
    value, price comparison, like product, product
    under consideration)
  • Injury definition of domestic industry, injury
    determination, material retardation (Egypt),
    cumulation

13
II Issues (2)
  • Duties mandatory lesser duty rule, de minimis
    margins, negligible imports, public interest
  • Procedures case initiation, duty assessment,
    reviews, non-confidential info, verifications,
    conduct of investigation, comment procedures,
  • Others - Circumvention and DS

14
III Fishery Subsidies
  • Doha Min Declaration (para 28)
  • Clarify and improve WTO disciplines on fisheries
    subsidies
  • Taking into account the importance of the sector
    to developing countries.
  • 75 of fish stocks overexploited, fully exploited
    or significantly depleted
  • Overcapacity 250
  • 20-25 of the industry's revenue from subsidies
  • Global fishery subsidies estimated at 20 billion
    (400 billion in agriculture)
  • Harmful subsidies as a factor for stock depletion

15
III State of Play (1)
  • Friends of Fish (Aus, Chile, Iceland, NZ,
    Norway Peru)
  • win-win-win for environment, development
    trade
  • Subsidies contribute to the depletion of fish
    stocks
  • Japan/Korea
  • Poor management fishery resources, rather than
    subsidies, is the source of stock depletion
  • No need for fishery-specific disciplines

16
III State of Play (2)
  • Friends ? Negative list approach
  • Broad prohibition of subsidies having revenue or
    cost impacts for the fisheries industry
    over-capacity and over-fishing
  • Management frameworks, general infrastructures,
    social insurance programme, access,
    decommissioning
  • JPN/Korea ? Positive list approach
  • Red - Fisheries subsidies related to IUU
    fisheries fishing vessel construction engaging
    in poorly managed fishery
  • Green - conservation sustainable utilization of
    fishery resources, research on fisheries resource

17
III State of Play (3)
  • Discussion moved to specific subsidies (to be
    permitted/prohibited) beyond the structure of
    disciplines
  • Management framework
  • Decommissioning
  • Artisanal fisheries
  • Access fees for distant water fleets
  • Aquaculture

18
IV Regional Trade Agreements
  • Doha Ministerial Declaration (para 29)
  • Clarifying and improving disciplines procedures
    under the existing WTO provisions applying to
    RTAs.
  • Takes into account the developmental aspects of
    RTAs
  • 12/2002 - Issue identification
  • 10/2002 Mid 2003 Transparency issues
  • 03/2004 - Parallel discussion on transparency
    systemic issues
  • 03/2005 - Specific proposals (ACP, Aus, EU)

19
IV Notified RTAs in Force 1948-2004
Source WTO
20
IV World Trade under RTAS
21
IV RTAs Background
  • WTO rules conceived ineffective in disciplining
    RTAs
  • GATT XXIV, Enabling Clause
  • GATS V
  • Deep integration behind-the-border measures
  • WTO-plus (WTO-minus)
  • Emergence of N-S RTAs (Euro-Med, ACP-EU EPAs,
    GCC-EU, US FTAs Jordan, Morocco, Bahrain)
    (Oman, UAE under negotiations)
  • Reinvigoration of S-S RTAs (UMA, GCC, COMESA)

22
IV GATT Article XXIV5-8
  • Duties and ORRCs must be eliminated on
    substantially all the trade (SAT) among parties
  • Duties and ORCs must not on the whole be higher
    or more restrictive than prior to the RTA
    formation
  • Reasonable length of time for the formation of
    CU/FTA should exceed 10 years only in
    exceptional cases
  • Substantially the same duties ORCs (CU)
  • Notification, examination reporting by CRTA

23
IV Systemic Issues
  • How much is substantially all the trade? 90?
    How to measure?
  • How long is reasonable period of time? What are
    the exceptional cases? How long is reasonable
    in such cases? 12 years?
  • Flexibilities for DCs - Coherence of rules
    involving DCs
  • What are ORRCs? ROO?
  • Retroactive application of future rules
  • How should WTO monitor, examine and decide on WTO
    compatibility of an RTA?

24
IV SAT Requirement
  • Australia
  • 95 tariff line coverage (HS 6 digit)
  • 70 tariff line coverage at the entry into force
  • No exclusion of highly traded produces (0.2 or
    top 50 traded products) significant exports
    (2 of total trade)
  • EU
  • Trade volume based measurement of SAT (possibly
    combined with tariff line approach)
  • Threshold level subject to negotiations
  • ACP
  • Lesser product/trade coverage through the
    application of favourable methodology and/or
    lower threshold

25
IV Transitional periods
  • Australia
  • Transition period strictly limited to 10 years
  • Longer than 10 years limited to Interim
    agreements
  • ACP
  • SAT other disciplines to be applied at the end
    of transition period
  • Clarify exceptional cases
  • Longer transition periods by DCs

26
IV Flexibility for Developing Countries
  • ACP
  • SDT in the application of Art XXIV conditions
  • Due consideration of developmental dimension in
    the examination process
  • EU
  • Clarification of existing flexibilities for DCs
    (differentiated thresholds, longer transition
    period)
  • Disciplines on SS RTAs under Enabling Clause by
    larger developing countries
  • China
  • SDT to be applied to all DCs

27
V Way forward (1) AD/SCM
  • NGR Chairs July 2005 Report
  • AD/CVD specific characteristics of rules
    negotiations Mandate general (clarify
    improve) while the existing rules are highly
    detailed, painfully negotiated and complex text
  • Involve a very large number of highly specific
    questions.
  • Internal trade-offs is limited (heavily in one
    direction), particularly AD
  • Outcome closely linked to other areas
    (agriculture or NAMA) ? comparable level of
    details is required for external trade-offs

28
V Way forward (2) AD/SCM
  • Outcome on AD is essential component of overall
    balance of DWP
  • Need to define the scope of negotiations ? time
    is limited before MC6 conclusion by 2006
  • Text based negotiations needed in 2006
  • Specific action for MC6? No Chairs text in sight

29
V Way forward (3) - RTAs
  • Further refinement on transparency issues
  • More work on systemic issues to define by MC6 the
    scope and broad parameters of systemic issues
    negotiations

30
V Conclusion
  • WTO rules affect predictability and security of
    the market access opportunities for Arab States
    (AD/CVD as NTBs)
  • Affect countrys trade policy practice to ensure
    fair trade leveling the playing field (dumping
    subsidies distort international trade)
  • RTAs rules affect terms conditions of Arab
    regional integration efforts
  • Need to ascertain their interests both as the
    user of trade policy instruments as exporters
    in the light of the overall trade development
    policy objectives

31
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com