PRODUCT STUDY 2519

1
PRODUCT STUDY 2519
Churcher's College

• AN EXCITING OPPORTUNITY TO IDENTIFY AND DEVELOP A
  DESIGN FEATURE OF AN EXISTING SELECTED PRODUCT

2
(No Transcript)
3
WHAT YOU MUST DO

• CANDIDATE REQUIREMENTS
• FRONT TITLE SHEET -
• CANDIDATE NAME /NUMBER
• CENTRE NAME /NUMBER
• CANDIDATE COPY OF CCS160 SIGNED
• IN FOLIO -PHOTOGRAPHS 2D /3D MODELS-
• PHOTOGRAPHS /TEST RIG
• 20 X A3 SHEETS IN ALL
• BIND ALL TOGETHER
• NO PLASTIC SLEEVES /FOLDERS

4

• TOTAL MARKS FOR UNIT 120
• THIS UNIT30 HOURS WORK

RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM 20 X A3
5
SECTION A MAY 2005

• GIVE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INTENDED PURPOSE OF
  THE PRODUCT
• NEEDS OF CONSUMER
• AND MANUFACTURER
• IDENTIFY THE KEY CRITERIA USED IN ITS DESIGN

• ONE PRODUCT!
• FOR MARKS IN TOP BAND ALL FOUR AREAS NEED TO BE
  CONSIDERED
• 2 X A3 SHEETS
• 9 MARKS

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
SECTION A MAY 2005

• ANALYSE THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE
  PRODUCT
• IN COMPARISON TO SIMILAR PRODUCTS

• IN TERMS OF
• FUNCTION
• MATERIALS
• MANUFACTURING
• ERGONOMICS
• AESTHETICS
• COST
• 2 X A3 SHEETS
• 9 MARKS

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
SECTION A MAY 2005

• IDENTIFY AND ANALYSE THE MORAL IMPLICATIONS
  ASSOCIATED WITH
• ENVIRONMENTAL,
• SOCIAL AND
• ECONOMIC ISSUES.
• 1 X A3 SHEET
• 6 MARKS

• ADVICE ON THESE DIMENSIONS OF SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
  CAN BE OBTAINED FROM
• ITDG (sda) WEBSITE
• www.sda-uk.org

12
(No Transcript)
13
SECTION A MAY 2005

• WRITE A DETAILED BRIEF FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCT
  IN SOME WAY
• 1/3 X A3 SHEET 3 MARKS
• DEVELOP AND JUSTIFY AN OBJECTIVE DESIGN
  SPECIFICATION
• 2/3 X A3 SHEET 6 MARKS

• Candidate should be advised against -
• I am going to design and make a..
• An improvement of the existing selected product
  should be identified.
• For marks in the top band a justification of each
  specification point is needed.
• A different size, style or coloured font helps.

14
(No Transcript)
15
SECTION A MAY 2005

• USE ANNOTATED SKETCHING TO GENERATE A WIDE RANGE
  OF INITIAL IDEAS WHICH EXPLORE POSSIBLE
  IMPROVEMENTS
• PRESENT A WIDE RANGE OF INNOVATIVE/CREATIVE
  IDEAS
• 5 X A3 SHEETS (maximum)
• 15 MARKS

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
SECTION A MAY 2005

• EVALUATE THE IDEAS AGAINST THE SPECIFICATION AND
  JUSTIFY THE CHOICE OF ONE IDEA WORTHY OF BEING
  TAKEN FORWARD
• 1 X A3 SHEET (a) (vii)
• 6 MARKS

• To meet this assessment criterion the
  specification should be re-stated and/or cross
  referenced.
• Award low marks in the lower band where this is
  not the case.

22
Tabulated comments could also be shown as
cross-referenced annotations on ideas sheets
23
SECTION A MAY 2005

• USE COMBINATION OF TEXT,GRAPHICAL TECHNIQUES
• AND ICT AS APPROPRIATE TO PRESENT INFORMATION
• Marks in this assessment criteria apply to all
  sheets presented in section A
• 6 MARKS

24
SECTION B MAY 2005

• ANALYSE THE INFLUENCE OF RELEVANT DESIGN
  CONSTRAINTS ON THE PROPOSED IDEA
• eg. ISSUES
• MATERIAL CHOICE
• MANUFACTURING
• ERGONOMIC
• AESTHETICS
• ENVIRONMENT
• etc.
• 1 x A3 6 MARKS

• An annotation of the selected idea with issues
  relevant to the proposed idea would be
  appropriate.
• etc- cost or economic issues could be considered.
• Six points-six marks.
• Not six marks for one!

25
(No Transcript)
26
SECTION B MAY 2005

• MAKE SUFFICIENT FIRST GENERATION EXPERIMENTAL 2D
  3D PROTOTYPE MODELS TO ESTABLISH THE VALIDITY
  OF THE PROPOSED IDEA IN TERMS OF PHYSICAL
  REQUIREMENTS
• CONSTRUCTION MOVEMENT, STABILITY, STRENGTH etc.
• AESTHETIC QUALITIES
• MANUFACTURE
• SUITABILITY OF MATERIALS /COMPONENTS.

• 3 X A3 SHEETS eg
• 2D IMAGES -DRAWINGS PRO/D
• PHOTOGRAPHS OF A RANGE OF 2D MODELS. (annotate)
• PHOTOGRAPHS OF A RANGE OF 3D MODELS (annotate)
• 36 MARKS

27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
SECTION B MAY 2005

• MAKE USING WORKSHOP TOOLS A SELF CONTAINED TEST
  RIG
• TO FORMALLY TEST EITHER
• ONE OF THE PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS or
• SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED MATERIALS/COMPONENTS

• INCLUDE DETAILED IN FOCUS PHOTOGRAPHS.
• (no photographs no marks)
• The quality of the rig .(in particular
  calibration/or facility for providing
  quantifiable results) 1xA3
• The rig in use 1/2 x A3
• 1 1/2 X A3 SHEETS
• 12 MARKS

31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
SECTION B MAY 2005

• PRODUCE A SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS OF THIS
  MODELLING INCLUDING
• ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION GAINED FROM MODELS
• DETAILS OF THE RESULTS GAINED FROM TESTING
• SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE
  PROPOSED IDEA

• There are three distinct requirements for this
  assessment criterion. For marks in the top band
  all must be considered.
• In general there are two marks for each
  requirement.
• Suggest 1 x A3 info/models
• Suggest 1/2 x A3 on test rig results (on
  previous page)
• Suggest 1x A3 improvements
• 2 1/2 X A3 SHEET 6 MARKS

34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
APPENDIX EXAMPLES 2D/3D

• A GOOD RANGE OF 2D MODELS
• A GOOD RANGE OF 3D MODELS
• PRODUCT DESIGN TOP BAND
• TEXTILES TOP BAND
• SYSTEMS AND CONTROL TOP BAND

37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)