Title: Contracting for Public Services
1Contracting for Public Services
- Objectives, Issues and Options
City Council Workshop October 13, 2007
2Contracting for Public Services Objectives,
Issues and Options
3Option A2 (Criteria)
- Restrict use of contracting to certain
circumstances or criteria (below). Staff would
return with an evaluation of which currently
outsourced services do not meet the criteria, and
what the service and financial impacts would be
of transitioning those services in-house. - Pooling of contracted employees would provide
significant benefits that City staffing could not
provide. - Service requires technical or special expertise
that City staff could not or do not provide, and
is outside of core service mission of the
department. - Service by contractor staff does not have
significant interaction, communication or
engagement with the community, and service is not
expected to significantly affect customer service
provided. - Service is needed on an interim or emergency
basis, or for a pilot period of time. - The service requires substantial space to house
the staff and/or equipment to provide the
service, which is not available within City
facilities or cannot be leased. - The service requires significant equipment or
other capital investment and maintenance, which
a private contractor could better amortize the
costs or maximize use of the equipment compared
to the City. - Service is new or uncertain, and the City would
rather transfer that uncertainty to another
entity until more information or experience is
gained. Or the service is assessed to entail a
certain level of risk that the City would rather
transfer to an outside party. Specific risk
issues would always be evaluated by staff and
incorporated as part of budget development for
workers compensation and liability exposures. - Service would supplement City jobs by having
contractors perform more labor-intensive,
rudimentary tasks, freeing up City employees to
perform more skilled functions. An accompanying
reduction in work-related injury, public
liability claims and employee lost time would be
expected.
4Introduction
- Clarity
- Staff workplan and performance
- Employee certainty
- Budget preparation (Priority?)
- Purpose today
- Understand current practice
- Review Policy Paper
- Goals, issues and options
- Develop policy (return for formal approval)
1
5Policy Development
Policy
Examples History Data
Pros or Cons Others to consider? Impacts
Agreement? Others to consider?
2
6Current Practice
- Contractual vs. Professional
- Small percentage (4-5)
- No involuntary employee job loss
- Current Major Contracts
- Over 1 M annually
- Lifeguards
- Landscaping
- Tree Trimming
- Parking Citation Processing
- Parking Operations
3
7What other cities do
Custodial (10) Landscape/Tree Trimming
(7) Print Shop/Water Billing (4) Vehicle
Maint/Street Maint/Parking Lot Ops (3) Facility
Maint (2)
(Services provided partially by contract in
Santa Monica)
4
8Policy Objectives
- Responsive Service/Performance
- Employee Fairness
- Socially Responsible
- Financially Feasible
5
9Issues Responsive Service
- Poor service
- Quality control
- Uncontrollable cost
- Over reliance
- Not invested -gt poor customer service
- Administrative problems
- Pooling
- Specialized
- Allocation of routine
- Emergency/interim
- Space and capital
- Transfer of risk or uncertainty
Key Adequate supervision, monitoring, measuring
and reporting
6
10Example Pier Custodial Service
- January 2007
- Concern - level of service, flexibility of
workforce, Pier Maintenance succession planning - March 2007 core concern key and policy issue of
the PRC was the delivery of the highest possible
level of service. - 30-day cancellation,
- accountability and oversight
- Ongoing financial and operational analysis
11- October 2007 high quality of service
- For the first time in recent memory, the
condition of the restrooms was not a source of
complaints during peak summer months. In fact,
several comments were relayed that people
actually didnt mind using the restrooms on the
Pier, truly a first. - Checklist, grading, oversight
12Issues Responsive Service
- Staff angst of bringing services in-house
- Time and complexity of Civil Service
- Lengthen processing time
- Example - Progressive discipline steps
- Space!
7
13Issues Employee Fairness
- History last 20 years
- No involuntary terminations due to contracting
- Placements
- Employee Group Concerns
- Probation waiver
- Seniority
- Other
8
14Issues Social Responsibility
- Mixed benefit levels
- Living Wage
- Health Care
9
15Issues Financial Feasibility
- Five Year Forecast little capacity for ongoing
costs - Long term cost effectiveness mixed
- In source example
- Why less expensive?
- Benefit levels 40
- Structural - pooling, cost spreading
10
16Options Responsive Service
11
17Options Employee Fairness
12
18Options Social Responsibility
13
19Options Financial Feasibility
(1) Continue with existing contracts within
planned resources. No significant tradeoffs
manage with budget process
(2) Change practice and evaluate tradeoffs in
services or identify new revenues
14
20Summary
- Existing Practice ? Policy
- Improve Monitoring, Measuring and Reporting
- No involuntary terminations probation waiver
- Advocate for and/or monitor health care
legislation - Stay within planned resources no significant
tradeoffs - () Recommendation CMO presented to MEA
15
21Summary
- Develop a formal policy
- Right Goals?
- Issue Clarification
- Discussion of Options
Direction for draft policy
16
22Contracting for Public Services Objectives,
Issues and Options
17