Application of Ice Microphysics to CAM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Application of Ice Microphysics to CAM

Description:

Aura MLS. Zonal Mean Shortwave Cloud Forcing. Zonal Mean Longwave Cloud Forcing ... Ice water content improved comparing with Aura MLS data; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: xhl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Application of Ice Microphysics to CAM


1
Application of Ice Microphysics to CAM
  • Xiaohong Liu, S. J. Ghan
  • (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)
  • M. Wang, J. E. Penner
  • (University of Michigan)

National Science Foundation
2
Motivation
  • Anthropogenic aerosol effects on cirrus cloud?
  • Homogeneous ice nucleation of SO4
  • Heterogeneous ice nucleation of IN (soot dust)
  • Contact freezing of cloud droplets by IN
  • Processes in cirrus and mixed-phase clouds depend
    on ice number
  • Vapor deposition, Bergeron-Findeison process
  • Gravitational settling of crystals depends on
    sizes
  • Radiation depends on effective radius

3
Prognostic ice crystal number in CAM
  • R(Ni) advection, turbulence, and convective
    transport (detainment at the top of convective
    cloud)
  • Jnuc nucleation of ice crystals
  • Jsec secondary production of ice crystals
  • Qagg aggregation of ice crystals to form snow
  • Qsaci accretion of ice crystals by snow
  • Qmlt melting of ice crystals

4
  • Detrainment from convective clouds (Tlt-35 C)
  • Homogeneous nucleation of sulfate and
    heterogeneous immersion nucleation on soot in
    cirrus clouds with Tlt-35C (Liu Penner, 2005)
  • ice number depends on temperature, updraft
    velocity, sulfate and soot number, considering
    the competition between the two mechanisms.

5
  • Contact freezing of cloud droplets in mixed-phase
    clouds (-35 to 0 C) based on Young (1974), and
    assume contact IN to be mineral dust (Brownian
    coagulation)
  • Deposition/condensation ice nucleation in
    mixed-phase clouds (-35 to 0 C) based on Meyers
    et al. (1992)
  • Secondary ice production between -3 and -8 C
    (Jsecb) based on Cotton et al. (1986) for
    Hallet-Mossop mutiplication
  • Ice crystal sublimation based on homogeneous
    mixing ice crystals sublimate completely only
    when the cloud dissipates

6
Ice supersaturation
  • Hybrid RH in standard CAM RHw (T gt 0 C) RHi (T
    lt -20 C) RHw RHi (-20 lt T lt 0 C)
  • Condensation and evaporation (C-E) scheme removes
    ice supersaturation (assume RHi100 in ice cloud)

Compare with MOZAIC data (year 1997) statistics
at every three hours in cloud-free CAM grid cells
(2.5x2) with flight tracks
7
CAM Modified
CAM Standard
  • C-E used only for liquid water, diagnosed from
    RHw and liquid cloud fraction (based on RHw) get
    rid of fice(T)
  • Dv2i vapor deposition on ice crystals in grid
    cells (Rotstayn et al., 2000), in proportion to
    (Si-1)
  • Cloud fraction based on RHi is used in radiation
  • reff of ice crystals diagnosed from mass
    number number effects on radiation and ice
    gravitational settling

8
January
Ice number
Ice mass
RHw
T
9
Ice number balance (January)
Nucleation (hf/immersion/deposition)
Detrainment
Contact freezing
Secondary production
10
Precipitation
Evaporation
11
Effective radius of ice crystals (January)
Modified CAM
Standard CAM
12
RHi from Modified CAM Compared with MOZAIC Data
Compare with MOZAIC data (year 1997) statistics
at every three hours in cloud-free CAM grid cells
(2.5x2) with flight tracks
13
Annual Mean Ice Water Content
Modified CAM
Standard CAM
Pressure (hPa)
Aura MLS
Pressure (hPa)
14
Ice Water Content at 316 hPa (January)
Modified CAM
Standard CAM
Aura MLS
15
Zonal Mean Shortwave Cloud Forcing
16
Zonal Mean Longwave Cloud Forcing
17
Global Annual Means
18
Summary
  • CAM modified to allow supersaturation add water
    vapor deposition on ice to replace C-E for ice
    clouds get rid of f(T)
  • Water vapor increased significantly in the upper
    troposphere. However, still not too much at
    200-500 hPa compared to MOZAIC data
  • Ice water content improved comparing with Aura
    MLS data
  • Ice number concentration is predicted with the
    dominant sources being detainment from convection
    and in situ ice nucleation balanced by
    precipitation and evaporation losses
  • Work needed reduce LWP and IWP to improve SWCF.

19
Zonal Mean Water Vapor (January)
Relative difference () between modified and
standard CAM
Standard CAM
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com