- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

The present paper presents the method for determining the elemental ... The TRIGA Annular-Core Pulsing Reactor (ACPR) is a pool type pulsed reactor. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: dumitr7
Category:
Tags: annular

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCHPITESTI ROMANIA 
  • Neutron activation analysis on slurry resulted
    from waste water conditioning

Authors Dumitru Barbos, barbos_at_scn.ro
Constantin Paunoiu Affiliation Institute for
Nuclear Research (INR) Pitesti, Romania
2
Abstract
  • The present paper presents the method for
    determining the elemental concentration in the
    slurry resulted from waste water conditioning at
    the INR site. In achieving of this goal, we used
    the ACPR TRIGA reactor as neutron source,
    operated in stationary mode. The TRIGA
    Annular-Core Pulsing Reactor (ACPR) is a pool
    type pulsed reactor. The samples were irradiated
    in the pneumatic rabbit of this reactor. There
    are presented the results of the measurements for
    neutron flux-spectrum characterization in the
    pneumatic rabbit irradiation location, and the
    results obtained for multi-elemental analysis
    using the Zr method.

3
NEUTRON FLUX-SPECTRUM MEASUREMENTS
  • Neutron flux spectrum measurements in the ACPR
    pneumatic rabbit dry channel were performed using
    multi-foil activation techniques. Activation
    reaction rates were obtained by absolute
    measurement of the induced activity using
    gamma-ray spectroscopy techniques.
  • The foil detectors were placed into an
    polyethylene cartridge and introduced in the dry
    hole using pneumatic rabbit. During the foil
    detectors irradiation the reactor was operated in
    steady-state mode at a power level of about 100
    kW.

4
  • For flux spectrum measurements, the multifoil
    activation method was applied. The neutron
    spectra and flux are obtained by unfolding from
    measured reaction rates. Nine thermal, epithermal
    and threshold foil reaction rates were measured.
    For gamma spectrum counting a 20 efficiency and
    128cm3 high purity Germanium detector connected
    to a spectrometer with multichannel analyzer
    installed on PC with ADC interface were used. The
    spectrometer is absolute-efficiency calibrated
    for the usual counting distances. Self-shielding
    corrections for the activation foils are also
    applied. The self-shielding corrections are
    computed using Monte-Carlo simulation
    methods.The solution spectrum obtained by the
    SAND-II code runs, and the response functions are
    presented in Figure 1. The solution is obtained
    after 2 iterations with a standard deviation of
    measured activities equal to 2.51 . The guess
    spectrum used for unfolding was generated using
    SAND II energy mesh according to the formula

and matched to fission spectrum at 0.5 MeV
5
  • The thermal to epithermal ratio is estimated
    from measured cadmium ratio of 197Au (n,?)
    reaction.
  • The integral flux measured value is 3.01 1012
    n/cm2s.. The sub cadmium neutron flux value is
    1.41012 n/cm2s and cadmium ratio Rcd1,94.

6
(No Transcript)
7
Elemental concentration determination in the
analyzed samples using the Zr standardization
method.
  • To determine the elemental concentration in the
    analyzed samples, the multi-isotope foil
    standardization method ( Zr method) was used.
  • Zr monitor has a double utilization From the
    specific reaction rates of 95Zr and 97Nb, the
    thermal to epithermal neutron flux ratio is
    determined, using the relation

8
  • In the following, the isotope 94Zr is used as a
    comparator also.
  • The elemental concentration is computed with the
    relation

9
  • Samples were collected from calming basins no 1
    ad 2 at the waste water conditioning plant at the
    INR site. Together with each sample, a Zr monitor
    was irradiated in order to measure the thermal (
    E lt 0.5 eV) to epi-thermal flux ratio. During
    irradiation, the reactor was operated in
    stationary mode at a constant power level of 100
    kW. Irradiation time was of two hours.
  • The induced reaction rates in the samples and the
    monitors were measured by the means of the
    gamma-ray spectrometry chain already described
    here. The thermal to epi-thermal flux ratio is
    f10.56.
  • The gamma-ray spectrometry measurements showed
    the presence of important Uranium quantities. It
    is important to emphasize that its concentration
    is so large ( percent levels) so that for this
    (rather small) irradiation time, fission
    reaction were already observed.
  • The analyzed samples showed the presence of Na,
    K, Sc Cr, Fe, Zn, Br, W, As, Co, as well as
    traces of Au and La. Concentration values are
    given in Table 2.

10
  • Table 2

Loc de prelevare Tir (h) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm)
Loc de prelevare Tir (h) La La Na Na K K As As Br Br Sc Sc Cr Cr Fe Fe W W Zn Zn Co Co U U Au
Bazin 1 SCN 2,01 60,79 60,79 2823 2823 6571 6571 4,03 4,03 17,87 17,87 6,44 6,44 610 610 4,58 4,58 13,56 13,56 1719 1719 17,05 17,05 0,18 0,18 0,11
Bazin 2 SCN 2,01 25,22 25,22 2398 2398 5021 5021 1,013 1,013 4,73 4,73 4,5 4,5 267 267 3,08 3,08 5,53 5,53 1581 1581 23,08 23,08 0,09 0,09 0,084
/- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty
Sample1 2.74 127 127 262.8 262.8 0.20 0.20 0.89 0.89 0.19 0.19 18.3 18.3 0.09 0.09 0.68 0.68 68.76 68.76 0.68 0.68 0.008 0.008 0.006 0.006
Sample2 1.13 107 107 201 201 0.05 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.14 8 8 0.06 0.06 0.28 0.28 63.24 63.24 0.92 0.92 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com