Title:
1INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCHPITESTI ROMANIAÂ
- Neutron activation analysis on slurry resulted
from waste water conditioning
Authors Dumitru Barbos, barbos_at_scn.ro
Constantin Paunoiu Affiliation Institute for
Nuclear Research (INR) Pitesti, Romania
2Abstract
-
- The present paper presents the method for
determining the elemental concentration in the
slurry resulted from waste water conditioning at
the INR site. In achieving of this goal, we used
the ACPR TRIGA reactor as neutron source,
operated in stationary mode. The TRIGA
Annular-Core Pulsing Reactor (ACPR) is a pool
type pulsed reactor. The samples were irradiated
in the pneumatic rabbit of this reactor. There
are presented the results of the measurements for
neutron flux-spectrum characterization in the
pneumatic rabbit irradiation location, and the
results obtained for multi-elemental analysis
using the Zr method.
3NEUTRON FLUX-SPECTRUM MEASUREMENTS
- Neutron flux spectrum measurements in the ACPR
pneumatic rabbit dry channel were performed using
multi-foil activation techniques. Activation
reaction rates were obtained by absolute
measurement of the induced activity using
gamma-ray spectroscopy techniques. - The foil detectors were placed into an
polyethylene cartridge and introduced in the dry
hole using pneumatic rabbit. During the foil
detectors irradiation the reactor was operated in
steady-state mode at a power level of about 100
kW.
4- For flux spectrum measurements, the multifoil
activation method was applied. The neutron
spectra and flux are obtained by unfolding from
measured reaction rates. Nine thermal, epithermal
and threshold foil reaction rates were measured.
For gamma spectrum counting a 20 efficiency and
128cm3 high purity Germanium detector connected
to a spectrometer with multichannel analyzer
installed on PC with ADC interface were used. The
spectrometer is absolute-efficiency calibrated
for the usual counting distances. Self-shielding
corrections for the activation foils are also
applied. The self-shielding corrections are
computed using Monte-Carlo simulation
methods.The solution spectrum obtained by the
SAND-II code runs, and the response functions are
presented in Figure 1. The solution is obtained
after 2 iterations with a standard deviation of
measured activities equal to 2.51 . The guess
spectrum used for unfolding was generated using
SAND II energy mesh according to the formula
and matched to fission spectrum at 0.5 MeV
5- The thermal to epithermal ratio is estimated
from measured cadmium ratio of 197Au (n,?)
reaction. - The integral flux measured value is 3.01 1012
n/cm2s.. The sub cadmium neutron flux value is
1.41012 n/cm2s and cadmium ratio Rcd1,94.
6(No Transcript)
7Elemental concentration determination in the
analyzed samples using the Zr standardization
method.
- To determine the elemental concentration in the
analyzed samples, the multi-isotope foil
standardization method ( Zr method) was used. - Zr monitor has a double utilization From the
specific reaction rates of 95Zr and 97Nb, the
thermal to epithermal neutron flux ratio is
determined, using the relation
8- In the following, the isotope 94Zr is used as a
comparator also.
- The elemental concentration is computed with the
relation
9- Samples were collected from calming basins no 1
ad 2 at the waste water conditioning plant at the
INR site. Together with each sample, a Zr monitor
was irradiated in order to measure the thermal (
E lt 0.5 eV) to epi-thermal flux ratio. During
irradiation, the reactor was operated in
stationary mode at a constant power level of 100
kW. Irradiation time was of two hours. - The induced reaction rates in the samples and the
monitors were measured by the means of the
gamma-ray spectrometry chain already described
here. The thermal to epi-thermal flux ratio is
f10.56. - The gamma-ray spectrometry measurements showed
the presence of important Uranium quantities. It
is important to emphasize that its concentration
is so large ( percent levels) so that for this
(rather small) irradiation time, fission
reaction were already observed. - The analyzed samples showed the presence of Na,
K, Sc Cr, Fe, Zn, Br, W, As, Co, as well as
traces of Au and La. Concentration values are
given in Table 2.
10Loc de prelevare Tir (h) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm) Concentration(ppm)
Loc de prelevare Tir (h) La La Na Na K K As As Br Br Sc Sc Cr Cr Fe Fe W W Zn Zn Co Co U U Au
Bazin 1 SCN 2,01 60,79 60,79 2823 2823 6571 6571 4,03 4,03 17,87 17,87 6,44 6,44 610 610 4,58 4,58 13,56 13,56 1719 1719 17,05 17,05 0,18 0,18 0,11
Bazin 2 SCN 2,01 25,22 25,22 2398 2398 5021 5021 1,013 1,013 4,73 4,73 4,5 4,5 267 267 3,08 3,08 5,53 5,53 1581 1581 23,08 23,08 0,09 0,09 0,084
/- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty /- Overall uncertainty
Sample1 2.74 127 127 262.8 262.8 0.20 0.20 0.89 0.89 0.19 0.19 18.3 18.3 0.09 0.09 0.68 0.68 68.76 68.76 0.68 0.68 0.008 0.008 0.006 0.006
Sample2 1.13 107 107 201 201 0.05 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.14 0.14 8 8 0.06 0.06 0.28 0.28 63.24 63.24 0.92 0.92 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004