Title: Identifying and following good practice in e-learning
1Identifying and following good practice in
e-learning
- Jonathan Darby
- Visiting Fellow, e-Learning Research Centre,
University of Southampton
2Overview
- The rationale for e-learning
- A generational analysis
- Where it mostly goes wrong
- Theories of e-learning
- Logic of control versus logic of affordances
- The UKeU experience
- Lessons learnt and conclusions
3My background
- First used computers in teaching 1975
- Joined Oxford University 1980
- Computers in Teaching Initiative 1988 to 1996
- Director of Technology-Assisted Lifelong Learning
(TALL) 1996 to 2002 - Chief Architect, UK eUniversities 2002 to 2004
- Visiting Fellow, e-Learning Research Centre,
University of Southampton from May 2004
4Neil Postman, media ecologist
- What is the problem to which headlamp
washer-wipers are the solution? - Educom Conference 1992
5Neil Postman, media ecologist
- What is the problem to which headlamp
washer-wipers are the solution? - Educom Conference 1992
- What is the problem to which e-learning is the
solution?
6What is e-learning for?
- What problems are you seeking to address?
- What opportunities are you seeking to realise?
7What is e-learning for?
- For me
- To meet unmet educational needs
8First Generation e-learning
- Online courses as direct analogues of
conventionally-delivered courses - replicating course structure, elements and
delivery mode - incorporate existing support materials (though
may be modified or augmented) - delivery dependent on course originator
- not scalable
- always inferior to original course
- horseless carriages
9(No Transcript)
10Second Generation e-learning
- Online courses equivalent to conventionally-delive
red courses but purpose designed for medium - same top-level learning outcomes
- educationally derived, precept-driven design
methodology - team developed not faculty led
- course requires mentoring not teaching when
delivered - fully scalable
11(No Transcript)
12Third Generation e-learning
- Online education that does not adhere to course
conventions - the course is an artificial construct born of
practicality old constraints no longer apply - Examples
- learning pathways through knowledge management
systems - personalised curricula
- just-in-time education
13(No Transcript)
14What is education?
Knowledge transfer?
eLearning demands new models. The classroom does
not translate.
With thanks to Derek Morrison
15Top 3 e-learning mistakes
- Blindly implementing old models
- the classroom
- the textbook
- Seeking to control the student
- adaptive sequencing
- use of next
- Undue focus on content
16Learning theories
- Programmed learning (Skinner)
- Epistemological relativism (Piaget)
- Constructivism (Vygotsky)
- Students "construct" their own knowledge by
testing ideas and approaches based on their prior
knowledge and experience, applying these to a new
situation, and integrating the new knowledge
gained with pre-existing intellectual constructs.
17Aspects of learning Gilly
Salmons five stage model
- Access and Motivation
- Online Socialization
- Information Exchange
- Knowledge Construction
- Development
18Aspects of learning Noel
Entwhistle
- Orientation
- Motivation
- Information acquisition
- Elaboration
- Clarification
- Consolidation
- Confirmation
19Aspects of learning Noel
Entwhistle
- Orientation ? face to face
- Motivation ? face to face
- Information acquisition ? online
- Elaboration ? online
- Clarification ? online
- Consolidation ? online
- Confirmation ? online
- face to face online 1 9
20Student e-learning strategies
- Linear (following default sequence) 30
- Text-led (printed all texts and used as course
framework) 30 - Aural (played all audiographics before referring
to texts) 20 - Assignment-orientated (prioritised all course
elements based on relevance to assignment) 20 - (Oxford University online course students 1998)
21The seduction of control
- Feeds the belief If we can only control the
environment for learning we will enable students
to learn all that is required of them - Many technology-based environments permit greater
control of students behaviour than conventional
teaching - With acknowledgement to David Boud, University of
Technology, Sydney
22Logic of control versus logic of affordances
Logic of affordances
Logic of control
V
23What are affordances?
- Characteristics
- Not just attributes of an environment
- Link objects and events with behaviour of
individuals - Not causes but opportunities
- Need to be perceived
24Comparisons
- Logic of control
- Activities determined
- Behaviour is all
- Outcomes always determinable
- Emphasis on achievement
- What is permitted is required
- Learner values may be tolerated
- Logic of affordances
- Activities facilitated
- Behaviour is important
- Outcomes may not be determinable
- Emphasis on development
- What is permitted is not required
- Learner values and priorities respected
25Logic of control not sustainable
- Learners experience, inherently, cannot be
controlled - We can set up the environment fully, but how
learners respond depends on what they bring and
what they desire
26Logic of affordances links
Design for learning
Experience of learning
27Importance of social e-learning
- Students are a hidden free resource
- always up to date case studies
- Course surveys show interaction with other
students number one on list of most valued
learning experiences
28Why content is not king
- Online award-bearing course 1000
- Textbook 25
- ---------
- 975
-
- Market research by McKinsey shows students
prepared to pay twice as much for courses with
certification
29UK eUniversities Worldwide
- A case study in e-learning as change agent
30Why was UKeU set up?
- To stake our claim in online borderless HE
- To develop best practice models for online
distance learning - To develop and deliver courses through a learning
environment optimised for large scale courses for
remote adult learners - To enhance elearning know-how and capacity in UK
HE - To be a profitable business making money for its
shareholders
31Ingredients for success
HEIs keen to work with UKeU
High quality courses optimised for remote
delivery to international students
Individuals wishing to take courses (paying full
cost)
32The elearning challenge
- Just how do you deliver high quality HE courses
worldwide? - support all aspects of learning
- recognise diversity of experience and expectation
- What design and production methodology works
best? - What sort of learning environment is required?
- enhance affordances
- support collaborative learning
- support collaborative development
33What's been achieved?
- 17 courses running 18 in production
- Activity-based learning object course model
- Almost complete Learning Environment
- Worldwide marketing network
- Various public good projects
- eChina
- eLearning Research Centre
- eLearning boost to HEIs
- beyond the 1st Generation VLE mindset
34eLearning methodology
- Construction kit approach with elements defined
by educational purpose - Courses built from components defining activities
not content - Collaborative course building with integral peer
review - Access to course elements determined by student
alone - multiple uses according to stage in learning
journey - Design for adaptation and reuse
35UKeU Learning Environment
- Supports development teams
- Learning navigator integrates all elements of a
course in a single view - Sophisticated assignment handling
- marking groups
- group assignments
- Website assessments
- Linking of content and discussion
- Cohort size scalable
- Views support multiple user types
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39So whats the problem?
- Undershot recruitment targets
- Target 5000 Actual 1000
40Ingredients for success
?
?
HEIs keen to work with UKeU
High quality courses optimised for remote
delivery to international students
?
Individuals wishing to take courses (paying full
cost)
41So whats the problem?
- Undershot recruitment targets
- Target 5000 Actual 1000
- market damaged by poor quality online courses
- Learning Environment very late
- Programmes not closely matched to market demand
- Tension between academic (public good) and
commercial objectives - Failed commercial model
42Lessons learnt
- Timescales for systemic change enabled by
elearning must be realistic - High quality largely online courses are
achievable blended is not the only future - HEIs still need strong inducement to move away
from classroom-based content-driven course models - International marketing of UK online degree
programmes still problematic - international HEI
collaboration models need to be developed further
43Conclusions
- Make sure that you have a good reason for using
e-learning and select your learning technologies
accordingly - Use activities as building blocks not content
- Follow the logic of affordances and not the logic
of control - Be prepared to take risks this will maximise
your learning even when not successful!
44Further information
- References
- e-Learning Research Centre www.elrc.ac.uk
- Joint Information Systems Committee www.jisc.ac.uk
- Higher Education Academy www.heacademy.ac.uk
- CETIS www.cetis.ac.uk
- Email
- Jonathan Darby jdarby_at_soton.ac.uk