Point Estimation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Point Estimation

Description:

Point estimation is an estimation of a value based on the distance from the unknown. ... For bivariate estimated and true values ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: set45
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Point Estimation


1
Point Estimation
i n 2 0 s l i d e s
286.50
774.52
25
?
20
30
Seth C. Triggs GEO597 Spring 04
425.34
2
What is point estimation?
  • Point estimation is an estimation of a value
    based on the distance from the unknown. This is
    in a sense an application of Toblers First Law
    of Geography
  • Close things are more related than far things!

3
Polygon usage
  • Many triangulation methods involve polygons.

4
After figure 11.1
To create polygons of influence, draw
perpendicular bisectors! (also see figure 10.2 in
text)
EXAMPLE
5
Look at these sharp differences between the
polygons of influence! (after Figure 11.2)
6
Triangulation
  • Politicians do it - many of us do it - it
    involves making a plane through three samples
    around the point of interest.
  • This plane is a triangle and its slope represents
    the gradient between points.
  • Equations

(11.2)
ax1 by1 c z1 ax2 by2 c z2 ax3 by3
c z3
(11.1)
z ax by c
7
(11.4)
(11.5)
(11.3)
Triangulation estimator v -11.25x 41.614y -
4421.159
63a 140b c 696 64a 129b c 227 71a
140b c 606
When solving, a -11.250, b 41.614, c
-4421.159
(65E, 137N) 548.7
Think of this like the slope of a mountain the
highest point is 696, then 606, then 227. You
could even map it and put contour lines on.
(after Figure 11.3)
8
Delaunay Triangulation
  • This requires polygons of influence
  • Three polygons must share a vertex.

(after figure 11.4)
9
Weighted Linear Combination
  • Another type of triangulation estimate that
    produces a similar result.
  • This one uses a single equation instead of three
    in regular triangulation.

(After Fig. 11.5)
J
(11.6)
AOIJ
AOJK
O
AOJK vI AOIK vJ AOIJ vK AIJK
vO
AOIK
K
I
10
Local Sample Mean
  • By taking a local sample mean, we can get a
    quick and dirty method for estimation.

11
Inverse Distance Methods
  • For each sample, the weight is inversely
    proportional to its distance from the point of
    interest.
  • Thus, as distance decreases, weight increases.

(11.8)
n i1
1 di
vi
v
n i1
1 di
12
ID SAMP X Y V Dist 1/di (1/di)/(
1/di) 1 225 61 139 477 4.5 0.2222 0.2088 2 437 63
140 696 3.6 0.2778 0.2610 3 367 64 129 227 8.1 0.1
235 0.1160 4 52 68 128 646 9.5 0.1053 0.0989 5 259
71 140 606 6.7 0.1493 0.1402 6 436 73 141 791 8.9
0.1124 0.1056 7 366 75 128 783 13.5 0.0741 0.0696
1/di 1.0644
Mean is 603.7
After Table 11.2
13
Search Neighborhoods
  • Sometimes we need to specify how far away we want
    to look to find a neighbor.
  • You wouldnt want to hunt 500 miles for the
    nearest neighbor, because that could be expensive
    in terms of time.

14
Estimation Criteria
  • These criteria differ by the distribution of your
    data. Youll get different results by changing p,
    the exponent.

(11.9)
1
n i1
vi
p i
d
v1
1
n i1
p i
d
15
For univariate estimate distributions
  • You can compare the mean and standard deviation
    between the estimated and true values!

n
Mean Absolute Error (11.11)
1 n
r
i 1
MSE variance bias2
Mean Squared Error (11.12)
n
1 n
r2
i1
16
For univariate error distributions
  • Youll want to have a small variance in
    residuals, not a small bias.
  • There is a true value v and an estimated value v.
  • Thus, the error is v - v r. Its also called a
    residual.

Based on figure 11.9
Less variance with bias
Large variance without bias
f
17
For bivariate estimated and true values
  • If you plot your true versus predicted values,
    you can also get an indication of how well the
    model holds.
  • The best values form a line of 45 degrees from
    the origin.

18
Some case studies
  • Smoothing - sometimes estimated values have a
    smaller variance than sample values because
    estimations use weighted linear averages of
    several samples.
  • Figure 11.13 gives an indication of the
    performance of the different estimation methods.
    Table 11.16 gives statistics.
  • It appears that polygonal performs better.

(See figure 11.13)
19
Additionally
  • We can look at how clustering affects samples and
    the estimates.
  • Triangulation seems better because of its low
    standard deviation.
  • Largest errors can be minimized by inverse
    distance weighing. See tables 11.7 and 11.8.

20
The End!
  • An excellent antidote to PowerPoint poisoning is
    black coffee. Get it at your favorite coffee shop
    or convenience store.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com