Title: A Balanced Approach to Sustainability
1 A Balanced Approach to Sustainability NewPage
Corporation June 4, 2007
2NewPage Corporation beliefs
- We incorporate the concept of sustainability into
our business model to manage and protect our
available human, natural, and financial resources - NewPage daily needs are balanced by our long-term
interests - Maintain a safe and healthy workplace for all
employees, contractors, and visitors - Continuity of fiber supply for our mills through
sustainable-managed sources - Compliance with government agencies and laws
- Good stewards of the communities in which we
operate - An environmentally-responsible paper encompasses
more than just recycled fiber content - Recycled fiber content
- Fiber certification
- Carbon footprint
- As a company, we maintain a balanced approach to
these three elements
3 Recycled Fiber
4Recycled fiber in North America
- Two types of recycled fiber
- Pre-consumer
- Paper waste generated in a paper mill prior to
completion of the papermaking process - Most paper mills utilize pre-consumer fiber as
standard practice - Post-consumer
- Paper, paperboard, and fibrous wastes
- Collected from a variety of sources, including
offices, stores, municipal solid waste - Recovered after it has passed through its
end-usage as a consumer item - Does not include printer overrun, converter
scrap, or over-issue publications - Generally viewed as the more environmentally-frien
dly option
Source US Environmental Protection Agency
5Recycled fiber in North America(continued)
- The original, environmental intent of
post-consumer recycled fiber - Save trees
- Reforestation not an issue in North America
- On US commercial forests, net annual growth
exceeds harvests and losses to insects and
disease by 50 percent each year - Reduce landfill space
- North American recovery rates have increased from
approx 32 in 1990 to 50 in 2006 - Supply of recovered paper in North America has
outpaced North American consumption since 1990 by
an average of 20 balance of fiber is exported - All fiber that CAN be used is consumed or
exported - Therefore, landfill space has not been
significantly affected by paper products - Current demand driven largely by eco-marketing,
not environmentalism
Source AFPA, RISI Industry Statistics Database
6Recycled fiber in North America(continued)
- Recycled fiber in value-added coated paper adds
cost to the supply chain - Cost disadvantage for integrated paper mills
- On average, market pulp more expensive vs.
internally-manufactured pulp - De-inked pulp procured on open market, cost
fluctuates with demand/supply balance - Continued increases in Asian demand could lead to
de-inked pulp price increases - Additional cost to process in value-added grades
vs. newsprint or packaging - Sorting
- Screening
- Bleaching
- De-inking
- Reduction in yield (quality issues)
- Difficult to use in freesheet papers due to
potential groundwood content
Source Reel Time Report March 2007
7Recycled fiber in North America(continued)
Recycle Economics
Economics for Coated Paper Mill
Cost/Ton NBHK Dried 580 NBSK Dried
670 Recycled Pulp- De-inked 605 Average
Integrated Pulp Cost 400
Cost/Ton De-inked Pulp 605 Newsprint
Use 260 Packaging Use 122
Post Consumer Fiber
De-inking Process Adds 2 to 4x the Costs of
Other Uses Results in 50 hazardous sludge that
needs to be landfilled or burned
A Dry Mill is Approx. Equivalent Using Recycled
vs. a 50 Disadvantage for an Integrated Mill
Source RISI World Pulp Monthly (Mar 07),
internal research, NBHK/SK numbers adjusted down
15 to adjust off list prices
8Practical levels for post-consumer
- The EPA recommends a maximum of 10 post-consumer
fiber content for coated papers - High-end coated free papers 10 post
- Groundwood coated papers 10 post
- The EPA also states that higher levels of
post-consumer content are better-suited for
products with lower cost and required level of
quality - Forms bond 30 post
- Packaging (folding cartons) 40 to 80 post
- Newsprint 20 to 85 post
- Industrial paperboard 45 to 100 post
- NewPage concurs with the US EPA and offers 10
post-consumer on all grades - Standard component of Signature True web/sheets
and Sterling Ultra sheets - Optional upon request for all other grades
Source United States Environmental Protection
Agency Recovered Materials Advisory Notice,
Comprehensive Procurement Guideline www.epa.gov/ep
aoswer/non-hw/procure/index.htm
9 Fiber Certification and Forest Conservation
10Our pledge to forest conservation
- NewPage fully intends to contribute to the
protection of the worlds forests today and in
the future - We must ensure sustainability of wood supply for
our own operations - We encourage our employees to find new ways to
conserve resources and reduce waste - We respect the opinions of individuals
organizations that share our dedication to
protecting the worlds forests - We place top priority on compliance with
government with local, state, and federal laws in
developing and applying our forestry standards - We are dedicated to balancing the needs of paper
production with the preservation and beauty of
our forests
11NewPage certifications
American Tree Farm (ATF) Group Certification All
mills in the NewPage system will source fiber
from ATF lands in 2007. Master Logger
Certification (MLC) In 2007, NewPage will source
MLC fiber at its Rumford, Escanaba, and Wickliffe
facilities. Sustainable Forestry Initiative
(SFI) All NewPage mills procurement systems
carry independent third-party certification from
SFI. Forest Stewardship Council
(FSC) NewPages Escanaba facility has achieved
independent third-party chain of custody
certification from FSC.
12Similarities between FSC and SFI
- Established standards for forest management
- Independently governed
- Subject to third-party certification
- Supported by conservation groups
- Fight illegal logging while recognizing the
rights of indigenous peoples - Protects water, soil, and wildlife
- Protects endangered forests
- Improves forest productivity by allowing prudent
use of EPA-approved pesticides - Improves forest productivity by allowing
plantation forestry
13Differences between FSC and SFI
- Non-native tree species
- FSC discourages use of non-native tree species
whereas SFI does not - SFI does require that non-native species do not
cause problems (i.e. out-compete) for native
species - Genetically-modified organisms (GMO)
- FSC does not allow, with no exception
- SFI does allow because
- GMOs are currently available in medicine and
agriculture - May be a future need in forestry
- High conservation value forests (HCVF) or old
growth - FSC initially maintained strict preservation
standards - SFI has subsequently adjusted
- The standards are now very similar
14NewPage forest practices
- NewPage Corporation owns no forestland
- None of our supply from areas with high
conservation value - Rain forests
- Old growth forests
- Intact forests (Canadian Boreal region,
Cumberland Plateau) - Only obtain wood fiber from areas designated for
harvesting - Nearly 70 from private lands
- Approximately 23 from scrap generated by
facilities making solid wood products - Public lands supply 5 balance is purchased pulp
- We do NOT source wood from illegal harvesting,
including those in Indonesia, China, and Russia - NewPage promotes 3rd party certification
- Actively pursuing increased amounts of certified
fiber for our mills - Assisting landowners with achievement of
certification - Provide on the-ground forest management
assistance to families and individuals through
our Forest Management Assistance (FMA) program - Founding member of the FSC Family Forest Alliance
15 Energy Conservation and Carbon Footprint
16Our beliefs about energy use
- The continued use of fossil fuels as an energy
source has increased the amount of carbon
dioxide, a greenhouse gas, emitted into the
atmosphere - Greenhouse gases may be accumulating in the
atmosphere, enhancing the natural greenhouse
effect, resulting in a gradual increase in global
temperatures - Regardless of the cause, global climate change is
an important emerging issue - We require a substantial amount of energy to
manufacture paper, from chipping to pulping to
drying - NewPage will take constant action to reduce our
energy consumption as a way to - Lower our costs
- Conserve limited fossil fuels
- Minimize environmental impact
17NewPage actively reducing our footprint
- We use biomass in lieu of fossil fuels
- Organic byproducts of papermaking, including
bark, wood waste, etc. - Sourced from
- Our internal manufacturing process
- Purchased from local markets
- Considered carbon neutral does not release
additional CO2 into the atmosphere - Effective means to manage costs with recent hikes
in fossil fuel cost - Spent 1mm in 2006 on screw press at Escanaba
facility - Effectively removes water from residual pulp mill
sludge, a form of biomass - This biomass now used for energy vs. sent to
landfill - Approximately 60 of NewPage energy produced by
burning biomass will continue efforts to
increase this percentage. - From 1990 to 2006, GHG emissions per unit of
production have been reduced substantially - GHG reduction of 24 per ton of paper produced
- Measured from NewPage core mills (Escanaba,
Rumford, Luke, Wickliffe) - Represents total GHG emissions from NP
consumption of fossil fuel purchased electricity
18NewPage Corporation beliefs
- We incorporate the concept of sustainability into
our business model to manage and protect our
available human, natural, and financial resources - NewPage daily needs are balanced by our long-term
interests - Maintain a safe and healthy workplace for all
employees, contractors, and visitors - Continuity of fiber supply for our mills through
sustainably-managed sources - Compliance with government agencies and laws
- Good stewards of the communities in which we
operate - An environmentally-responsible paper encompasses
more than just recycled fiber content - Recycled fiber content
- Fiber certification
- Carbon footprint
- As a company, we maintain a balanced approach to
these three elements
19 NewPage Corporation