WHO ELSE WAS TO BLAME - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

WHO ELSE WAS TO BLAME

Description:

Jewish leaders co-operated with the Nazis in rounding up Jews from the ... Was this silence complicity? Few Protestants in occupied countries spoke out either. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: allber
Category:
Tags: blame | else | was | who | complicity

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WHO ELSE WAS TO BLAME


1
WHO ELSE WAS TO BLAME?
2
AIMS
  • To look at other groups and understand how some
    historians have assigned some blame to them.
  • To assess the validity of these claims.

3
JEWISH RESPONSIBILITY
  • Should Jews have resisted more?
  • Jewish leaders co-operated with the Nazis in
    rounding up Jews from the ghettosThe role of
    these leaders in the destruction of their own
    people is undoubtedly the darkest chapter of the
    whole dark story.Hannah Arendt.
  • Without Jewish assistance would Nazi manpower
    have been overstretched?

4
IS THIS FAIR?
  • Most Jews did not know their fate until mid-1942.
  • Appeasement made sense it bought time and may
    have led to some Jews surviving.
  • If this was the wrong tactic, what was the right
    tactic?

5
RESISTANCE
  • Most Jews killed before they had the chance to
    form resistance groups.
  • Most resistance groups had little equipment.
  • Resistance could lead to reprisals.
  • This made it harder for Jews to melt away.
  • Anti-Semitism of some Polish resistance groups.

6
IN SPITE OF THESE DIFFICULTIES
  • Warsaw uprising, April/May 1943.
  • Escapes.
  • Attacks on guards.
  • Fleeing from ghettos.
  • Subverting Nazi law in the ghettos.
  • Staying alive.

7
NON-GERMAN RESPONSIBILITY
  • How far did people under Nazi rule have to
    co-operate with the Final Solution?
  • Post-war claims that coercion and force were used
    to guarantee co-operation.

8
CENTRAL EASTERN EUROPE
  • Not a uniform response.
  • Slovakia co-operated to win German favour.
  • Croatia ethnically cleansed Jews, Serbs
    Bosnians.
  • Romania enthusiastically joined in, until Germany
    looked like being defeated.
  • Bulgaria refused to hand over Bulgarian Jews.
  • Hungary ignored Nazi requests until Nazis took
    over government.

9
WESTERN EUROPE
  • Vichy France happy to co-operate but no French
    born Jews were transported.
  • Denmark escape to Sweden.
  • Did refusal to collaborate work? Was Vichy policy
    of co-operating slowly a successful delaying
    tactic?
  • Italy did not co-operate until the Nazis took
    over Northern Italy.
  • No Finnish Jews killed.

10
POLAND THE USSR
  • No collaborationist governments Nazis took
    over.
  • Long history of Polish anti-Semitism. Few Poles
    helped Jews but could they?
  • USSR civilians saw Nazis as liberators and Jews
    as Bolshevik agents.

11
FARMERS VIEW
  • The degree of Nazi control, rather than the
    strength of local anti-Semitism, was the decisive
    factor in determining the number of Jews who were
    killed. Holland, for example, which was far less
    anti-Semitic than Romania, had a much higher rate
    of Jewish losses.

12
ALLIED RESPONSIBILITY
  • Reports of atrocities reached the West.
  • Indifferent or anti-Semitic?
  • Is either description fair?

13
PAPAL RESPONSIBILITY
  • Pius XII did not speak out even though many
    Nazi occupied countries were Catholic.
  • Was this silence complicity?
  • Few Protestants in occupied countries spoke out
    either.

14
NEUTRAL RESPONSIBILITY
  • Most neutral countries did not aid Jews because
    they were scared of upsetting Hitler.
  • Only from 1944, when Nazi defeat seemed more
    likely, did this view begin to shift.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com