Title: Political Anthropology
1Political Anthropology
- The Organization of Power
2Political Organization
- The organizations and cultural processes that
direct a societys collective actions - All populations express political institutions,
although they are more formally organized and
obvious in some societies than they are in
others. - The main operations of political organizations
are
- determining public policy
- preventing and resolving conflict
- maintaining order
- managing the distribution of social resources
among the several sectors of society (i.e.,
determining who gets what, particularly with
respect to wealth and power).
3Power, Authority and Influence
- Power
- the ability to exercise ones will over others.
- Authority
- the socially approved use of power.
- Influence
- the ability to affect the behavior of others
without coercion or holding an explicit
leadership status or office
4Political Anthropology
Culture and the Political Process
- How are power and social control
- organized?
- distributed?
- manifested?
- Created?
- How are group decisions made?
- How is social order enforced?
- How are conflicts dealt with?
Because of the embeddedness it is better to talk
of sociopolitical
5Mechanisms of Control
- Internal (ideological)
- culturally instilled values
- expectation of supernatural harm or reward
- External (behavioral)
- informal
- ridicule and ostracism, gossip
- praise
- formal
- laws and rules
- institutionalized threat of force
6Law and Conflict Resolution
- Formal and informal sanctions
- Conflict mediators
- Often older men
- Nuer leopard skin chief
- Ordeals
- Oaths supernatural source
- Oracles people or things that have
- prophetic abilities
Delphic Oracle, Greece
7Compliance
the process by which leaders mobilize followers
and make their policies binding on their
followers actions
what motivates followers to follow them, even
under conditions that expose followers to great
risk
- Any leaders effectiveness at mobilizing support
partly is the result of the political
organization in which he/she acts. - attitudes that followers have may be more
important to getting things done than is the form
of organization with which the leader is
associated.
8Compliance
according to comparative sociologist Amitai
Etzione there are three main mechanisms that
leaders use to gain compliance
1. Coercion
- the use, or threatened use, of physical force to
gain compliance e.g., confinement, torture, and
execution - Systematic use of force ultimately requires
construction of police stations, military
installations, prisons, and so on, plus
maintaining the personnel to staff them. Its
expensive
2. Remuneration
- leaders provide a payoff in tangible benefits
(e.g. income or property, personal security,
social welfare support etc. ) to those who comply
with their orders and policies. - Remuneration implies punishing the disloyal
- by withholding or removing benefits.
93. Intellectual Commitment
- followers more or less spontaneously support a
leaders because they are devoted to certain
values and principles that the leader advocates. - followers sometimes support leaders on principle
- The absence of force and payoff obviously puts
attention on the power of shared culture to
generate support.
10Legitimacy
Max Weber believed that there were three
principal ways in which rule could be rendered
legitimate, or rightful, in the eyes of the
governed
1. Traditional Authority
- Rule is accepted by followers because it is
believed to be the correct moral order, usually a
moral order that has a deep historythe way
things always have been. - members are selected for office on the basis of
loyalty, not job ability, they often have no
expertise in their areas of bureaucratic
responsibility
112. Rational-legal Authority
- Authority established through rational legal
means features has two key features - the system of rule is created by laws that have
popular support and - leaders are selected and advanced on the basis of
their ability to get the job doneby rational
criteria.
- leaders are legitimate because they are elevated
in accordance with law, and because they are
experts
12- 3. Charismatic Authority
- some leaders manage to obtain authority over a
set of followers by opposing tradition and while
operating outside the prevailing system of
rulewithout a lawful office. - Such persons are reformers who gain followings
because followers believe that they are endowed
with exceptional qualities or powers. - Often, they are believed to have a special
relationship with God, or some other powerful
deity.
- However, some modern charismatic leaders appeal
to secular values and acquire followers because
of the followers belief that the leader is
revealing errors in popular practices. - charismatic authority is most important as a
source of change and reform in authority systems
that are legitimized in other ways,
13Political organizations vary cross culturally
with respect to three main dimensions
- the level of integration, or numbers of
communities over which the political system has
jurisdiction - the degree to which decisions that govern the
groups actions are centralized and - the source of a leaders ability to direct the
activities of others (i.e., whether that ability
results from influence, authority, raw power, or
some combination of those elements)
14Degrees of Organizational Complexity
- Uncentralized
- Band
- Tribe
- Centralized
- Chiefdom
- State
In general, as the economy becomes more
productive, population size increases leading to
greater regulatory problems, which give rise to
more complex social relations and linkages
(greater social and political complexity).
1962, Elman Service
15Bands the political organization of foraging
groups
- Rarely more than 30-40 people
- kin-based
- Flexible extended family units
- No formal political organization
- No socioeconomic stratification
- the political order (polity) is not a distinct
institution, but is embedded in the overall
social order.
16Bands
- How are group decisions made?
- adult consensus
- informal leaders
- egalitarian
- How is social order enforced?
- ridicule and ostracism
- How are conflicts dealt with?
- negotiation/mediation
- mobility
17Tribes
- Multiple autonomous small communities that share
common identity - Usually pastoralists or Horticulturalists
- Several hundred to thousands of people
- No formal political organization
- Little socioeconomic stratification
18Tribes
- How are group decisions made?
- Consensus among descent groups
- How are social norms enforced?
- ridicule and ostracism
- How are conflicts dealt with?
- negotiation/mediation
- semi-official mediation
19Tribes The Village Head
- achieved position comes with very limited
authority. - He cannot force or coerce people to do things.
- He can only persuade, harangue, and try to
influence people to do things. - acts as a mediator in disputes, but has no
authority to back his decision or impose
punishments. - The village head must lead in generosity.
- He must be more generous, which means he must
cultivate more land. - He hosts feasts for other villages.
modern-day Iroquois, New York
20Tribes Big Man
- Big Man -like a village head, except that his
authority is regional in that he may have
influence over more than one village - wisdom
- wealth
- generosity
- charisma.
- unofficial prestige status
- The benefit is greater influence and community
standing.
Nuer, Sudan
21Pantribal Sodalities and Age Grades
- Sodalities are non-kin-based organizations that
may generate cross-societal linkages. - often based on common age or gender.
- Some sodalities are confined to a single village.
- Some sodalities span several villages these are
called pantribal sodalities. they can mobilize a
large number of men for raids.
22Age Sets
- sodalities that include all of the men or women
born during a certain time - Similar to a cohort of class of students
- Members of an age set progress through a series
of age grades together (e.g., initiated youth,
warrior, adult, elder, (freshmen, sophomore,
junior, senior, graduate). - Sodalities create nonkin linkages between people
based on age, gender, and ritual and create a
sense of ethnic identity and belonging to the
same cultural tradition
23Chiefdoms
- Agriculturalists or pastoralists
- Multiple communities that share common identity
and tribute system - Thousands to many thousands of people
- Centralized political organization based on
hierarchical lineage system - a political unit of permanently allied tribes and
villages under one recognized leader with
authority - Significant socioeconomic stratification based on
lineage
Old Chief of the Arawa Tribe, Rotorua, New
Zealand.
24Chiefdoms
- How are group decisions made?
- Chief and advisors
- How is social order enforced?
- ridicule and ostracism
- official order
- use of force
- How are conflicts dealt with?
- negotiation/mediation
- centralized arbitration
25Chiefdoms
- Small hierarchical bureaucracy
- Tribute - tax paid to chief to be redistributed
according to community needs - Chiefs Leaders own, manage, and control basic
factors of the economy and have special access to
- crops
- labor
- cash
- goods.
Grand chief Matthew Coon Come
26Chiefdoms
- Formalized leadership functions
- Unrelated to personal qualities
- Rules of succession (primogeniture)
- Office is permanent - it outlasts the individuals
who occupy them - Loyalty, status, coercion but not too much
Zulu Chief
27States
- Agriculturalists
- Multiple cities that share tax and administrative
infrastructure system - Tens of thousands to billions of people
- Centralized political organization possessing
coercive power - Social stratification is a key distinguishing
feature. - the rule of states is divorced from kinship
there is no pretense that the rulers constituents
are kin
Calcutta
28States
- How are group decisions made?
- rulers decide on behalf of populous
- How is social order enforced?
- official enforcement
- threat or use of sanctions
- How are conflicts dealt with?
- negotiation/mediation
- centralized arbitration
Angkor
29States
- Status
- not necessarily kin-based
- class-based
- Codification of laws
- More formalized in industrial societies
- Courts adjudicate and mediate Officials
- Monopoly on use of force
- Police force
- Hammurabis Code (1750 BC)
30States
- Nearly all populations nowadays are governed by
states to one degree of control or another
degree. - However, where states have a poor tax base, or
are weakened by internal disunity, their
authority is not likely to be binding at local
levels or in remote regions. - Thus, many traditional, non-state kinds of
political organizations have not been drawn
firmly under state control, and the lives of
citizens in these areas are often affected more
by historical political organizations than they
are by the state itself.
31The Tausug
Tausug, which means "people of the current", is a
Philippine ethnic group which lives in the
northern part of Sulu province. Farming, fishing
and trading are their major economic activities
32The Tausug
- The Tausug have a tenuous relationship with the
central government of the Republic of the
Philippines. - Legally the Tausug are integrated into the state
bureaucracy. They elect local leaders, send
representatives to congress etc. - But in practice the national Philippine state is
too powerless in its southern provinces to govern
them effectively - group actions continue to be mainly organized by
informal, traditional organizations and leaders.
33The Tausug
- Most of their political operations carried
through the ordinary, multi-use institutions of
social life e.g., kinship groups, age sets,
religious associations, and so on