Title: Regulatory Controls on Trade Part II
1Regulatory Controls on Trade Part II
- Donald J. Lewis
- Faculty of Law
- The University of Hong Kong
2Rationale for Chinas Anti-dumping Legislation
- Substantial unilateral reduction in Chinas
tariff rates and elimination of NTBs (e.g.,
import quotas) as a result of WTO Accession - Trade protection is necessary to protect Chinas
inefficient SOEs against international
competition - Trade retaliation mechanism available to China to
combat WTO Members (e.g., US and EU)
anti-dumping actions against China
3Relevant Legal Texts
- PRC Foreign Trade Law
- PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations (2002)
- Article VI, GATT 94
- WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement
- WPAC, paras 148 and 152
4PRC Anti-Dumping Authorities
- MOFTEC (Fair Trade Bureau)
- Receives anti-dumping petitions
- Conducts investigations on foreign dumping and
dumping margins - Makes preliminary and final determinations of
dumping - Makes provisional and final recommendations re
anti-dumping duties -
5- State Economic and Trade Commission (SETC)
(Bureau of Industry Injury Investigation) - Conducts investigations of injury to the relevant
PRC domestic industry - Makes preliminary and final determinations of
injury - Customs General Administration (CGA)
- Enforces anti-dumping measures, including
anti-dumping duties - Customs Tariff Commission (CTC)
- Determines provisional and final anti-dumping
duties on recommendation of MOFTEC
6Anti-Dumping Basic Features
- Definition of Dumping
- PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations provide
- Importation of a product at an export price lower
than its normal value in the ordinary course of
trade - Normal value is usually determined on the basis
of the comparable price for the like product in
the country of export
7Anti-Dumping Basic Features
- Export Price Determination
- PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations provide
- Export price is the purchase price OR
- If no identifiable or reliable export price, the
re-sale price OR - If no resale price, MOFTEC will infer export
price on a reasonable basis
8Anti-Dumping Basic Features
- Dumping Margin
- PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations provide
- The dumping margin is the differential between
the export price of the imported product and its
normal value - Methods of determining the dumping margin
- Weighted average normal value vs weighted average
export price OR - Average value vs export price per transaction
OR - Weighted average normal value vs. export price
per transaction
9Anti-Dumping Basic Features
- Definition of Injury
- PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations provide
- Injury means
- substantial injury or threat of substantial
injury to a related established domestic industry
caused by dumping OR - substantial impediment to the establishment of a
related domestic industry caused by dumping
10Anti-Dumping Basic Features
- Injury determination relevant factors
- PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations provide
- volume of dumped products
- price of the dumped product
- impact of the dumped product on the related
industry - production and export capacity and stockpiles of
the dumped product in country of export
11Anti-Dumping Basic Features
- Definition of Domestic Industry
- PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations provide
- All producers of the like product in China OR
- Producers whose total output of the like product
accounts for a majority of output in China OR - In special cases, producers for a regional market
may be regarded as a separate domestic industry
12Anti-Dumping Basic Features
- Definition of Like Product
- PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations provide
- Like product means
- The same product as the dumped product OR
- A product very closely resembling the dumped
product
13Anti-Dumping Basic Features
- Standing to Petition
- PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations provide
- 50 Rule if output of petitioners accounts for
more than 50 of total output of petitioners and
respondents, petition is deemed to be that of the
domestic industry and will be accepted by MOFTEC - In special cases, MOFTEC may sua sponte initiate
its own dumping investigations
14Illustrative Cases
- As of January 2002, 12 anti-dumping
investigations under the prior 1997 Anti-Dumping
and Anti-Subsidy Regulations - Six (6) cases have led to final determinations
- In five (5) of those cases, anti-dumping duties
were assessed against foreign importers the
sixth case was dismissed as Chinese producers
failed to prove causation (i.e. Polystyrene case) - At least six (6) additional cases currently
pending
15Illustrative Cases
- Pre-WTO Accession Cases Issues
- Russian Silicon Steel
- Like products
- Russian exporters submitted evidence of
major differences between two types of silicon
steel to establish that the two types of steel
were different products. The Chinese petitioner
appeared to concede that the types of steel were
not like products by requesting different dumping
margins for each type of steel. MOFTEC and SETC
ignored this evidence and found that imported
silicon sheet was one like product.
16Illustrative Cases
- Russian Silicon Steel
- Injury Determination
- Russian exporters submitted evidence that
Russian silicon steel imports accounted for only
2 of the PRC market and that this percentage was
in fact decreasing. Further, the Russian exports
were sold primarily in one region, Northeast
China, whereas the products of the Chinese
petitioner were sold in a different region,
Central and South China. SETC disregarded such
evidence on the issues of substantial injury
and causation.
17Illustrative Cases
- Japanese and Korean Cold-Rolled Steel
- Injury Determination
- Japanese exporters submitted evidence that
the Chinese petitioners business was in fact
prosperous and there was no apparent injury.
Further, that PRC government authorities in
charge of the Chinese steel industry had
published reports that Chinese production
problems were caused by technology and management
issues, not competition from foreign imports.
SETC disregarded such evidence in its preliminary
determination that injury had occurred.
18Current Situation An Assessment
- 2002 PRC Anti-Dumping Regulations are a
substantial improvement over prior 1997
regulations - 2002 Regulations closely track the WTO
Anti-Dumping Agreement in many respects - Judicial Review now available (Article 53) in
line with WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement
19Current Situation An Assessment
- Continuing Problem Areas
- Transparency and Procedural Fairness
- Opportunity to be heard remains compromised
- Limited access to evidence and arguments of the
Chinese petitioner - Problems of confidential information
- Ex parte contacts and conflicts of interest
- Insufficiency and lack of transparency of
MOFTEC/SETC preliminary and final determinations